reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the relationship between profits and cancer treatment in the United States. They mention a study that found chemotherapy to be ineffective 97% of the time, but it is still used because doctors profit from it. The speaker explains how doctors receive financial incentives for prescribing chemotherapy drugs. They argue that the pharmaceutical industry has control over cancer treatment and that the medical system prioritizes drugs and surgery over alternative approaches. The speaker suggests that funding for cancer research should also go towards nutritional, homeopathic, acupuncture, and naturopathic research. They criticize the for-profit nature of the medical industry and its impact on patient outcomes.

A man shares his experience battling cancer and how he found an alternative treatment that worked for him. After undergoing surgery and years of chemotherapy, he was told there was no hope left. However, he discovered a combination of fenbendazole, annatto, tagamet (somatodine), curcumin, and AHCC (active hexose correlated compound) that he started taking. Within six weeks, he noticed improvements and subsequent scans showed a reduction in the disease. After 14 weeks, he was declared cancer-free. He emphasizes that these ingredients can be easily obtained on Amazon and believes that alternative treatments are often overlooked by big pharmaceutical companies.

Partner and mom cried as doctors revealed stage 4 cancer. Given 8 weeks to live, decided to go off chemo and try alternative methods. Biopsies showed no cancer, PET scan clear. Doctors amazed at recovery. Credits daily supplements and mushrooms for immune system support and anti-cancer properties.

The speaker shared their journey of battling cancer and how they turned to fenbendazole after traditional treatments failed. They combined the medication with intermittent fasting and other supplements. After following this regimen, they received news that there was no evidence of disease in their body, surprising both them and their medical team.

The speaker shares their personal experience with stage 4 metastatic breast cancer and discusses alternative treatments they used. They mention soursop tea and apricot kernels as cancer-fighting agents. They also emphasize the importance of changing their diet, consuming alkaline foods, and advocating for their own health. The speaker mentions taking black seed oil and highlights the significance of positive thinking and speaking life into existence. They acknowledge that they are not a medical professional but express their belief in the effectiveness of these treatments. The speaker concludes by encouraging others to speak life, eat well, and take control of their health.

The speaker shares their personal experience with stage 4 metastatic breast cancer and discusses their approach to treatment. They mention using soursop tea and apricot kernels, which are believed to have cancer-fighting properties. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of changing their diet, consuming alkaline foods, and advocating for their own health. They mention taking black seed oil and highlight the significance of a positive mindset. The speaker concludes by stating that they are now cancer-free and encourages others to speak life and focus on their well-being. They acknowledge that they are not a medical professional and that their doctor did not support their chosen treatments.

The speaker shares their experience of being diagnosed with cancer and undergoing traditional treatments that were not effective. They then mention how they came across Fenbendazole, a medication typically used for parasites, and decided to try it. Along with intermittent fasting and other lifestyle changes, the speaker's condition improved. They recall visiting their doctor and being surprised to learn that they had no evidence of disease in their body. The speaker had been prepared for further treatments but was relieved by the positive outcome.

Partner and mother cried as doctors delivered a stage 4 cancer diagnosis. Given 8 weeks to live, the speaker chose alternative treatments after seeing improvement off chemotherapy. Despite medical skepticism, biopsies showed no cancer cells, surprising doctors. Two years later, scans revealed no active disease. Doctors praised the speaker's miraculous recovery, attributing it to alternative treatments like mesima mushrooms and IP 6 Gold supplements.

The speaker shares their personal experience with cancer and their journey to finding an alternative treatment. They discuss undergoing surgeries and years of chemotherapy before reaching their lifetime maximum. Feeling hopeless, they receive a suggestion to try a dewormer called fenbendazole. Skeptical at first, they decide to give it a try and start taking a combination of fenbendazole, curcumin, somatodine, annatto, and AHCC. To their surprise, subsequent scans show a reduction in the disease, and eventually, they become cancer-free. The speaker emphasizes the importance of faith and encourages others to explore alternative treatments. They also mention the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry.

Oncologist Dr. Tullio Simancini wrote the book "Cancer is a Fungus" and discovered that all his tested patients had Candida in their bodies. He achieved a 90% success rate by injecting sodium bicarbonate, an alkaline mix, directly into the cancerous area. Cancer cannot survive in an alkaline environment. A friend of mine, Dr. Emma Fields, took a patient to him in Italy, but he was under investigation and later jailed for manslaughter. My husband believes that if he had used chemotherapy instead, he wouldn't be in jail. Is it possible that some patients came to him in advanced stages and would have passed away regardless?

The speaker shares a personal story about their mother's experience with cancer and Fenbendazole. Initially skeptical, the mother eventually started taking Fenbendazole and saw positive results. The tumors in her body disappeared, impressing her doctors. However, when a new doctor learned about the Fenbendazole, he refused to treat her if she continued taking it. The mother stopped taking Fenbendazole and three months later, she passed away with a tumor in her brain. The speaker believes that Fenbendazole is effective and recommends it for cancer patients.

The discussion covers apricots and the “counter” to claims about the seeds. It notes that people are told not to eat the inside of the seed, referencing a “cyanide scare” in which “there’s cyanide in the seeds,” attributing the warning to the FDA. The speaker contrasts this with the claim that the same source is promoting vaccination, saying this juxtaposition is “delusional.” They also assert that the Hunza tribe has been eating “thousands of apricot seeds” with “there has never been a case” of harm, including “look at that in the Hunza.” The speaker then gives practical instructions: obtain apricots, use a mallet to crack the seed, and remove the inner part, which they describe as “a little seed” that is “bitter.” The bitterness is said to be “really good for this right here.” The speaker claims that “professionals aren’t gonna tell you about that” because they “get a 6% commission from doing chemo on you.” They add that apricots can be found for “$10,” and conclude by stating they would “rather trust the apricot seed than the government.”

A man claims his father beat stage four lung cancer in eight months without doctors, chemo, or radiation using Panacur, vitamin D, and CBD oil. Panacur is described as similar to ivermectin and a deworming medicine. The speaker says they bought it on Amazon for about $100 a month. A year prior, they had traveled to Japan as a farewell trip because his father was expected to die. The speaker references Joe Tippins, who in 2017, allegedly found that Panacur cured rats of cancer. Tippins then took Panacur, vitamin D, and CBD oil and cured his own cancer after doctors gave him a month to live. The speaker says they avoided chemo because it killed his mother, who also had stage four lung cancer, in 2014.

In the early years, not many people were aware that Norm had stomach cancer. We were best buddies during that time, sharing many moments together.

The speaker discusses mistletoe as a “superfood” and highlights its berries, noting that they are very bitter—“just like apricot seeds.” The speaker then asserts that mistletoe is “the solution to cancer.” They claim that mistletoe therapy has been used “all throughout the world” but has been banned in many places. The speaker asks the audience to wonder why this is the case and answers that it is because “the Rockefeller's control the system, natural remedies are not allowed to be told.” They further suggest that the widespread use of mistletoe therapy was restricted due to influential control over medical information. The speaker connects these ideas to a broader critique of information about natural remedies, asserting that “natural remedies are not allowed to be told.” They then refer to the cultural practice of kissing under a mistletoe, proposing that “the whole kissing under a mistletoe, they kind of subconsciously telling you all along to eat this.” The message implies that a cultural ritual around mistletoe serves as a subconscious cue to consume the plant. In closing, the speaker reiterates that mistletoe is “pretty delicious,” reinforcing the claim that it is enjoyable to eat despite the earlier discussion of its bitterness and therapeutic potential.

The speaker discusses the book The MD Emperor Has No Clothes by Peter Glidden, describing it as a phenomenal resource. They assert that when patients receive a cancer diagnosis and undergo a PCR test, they are then told they must undergo chemotherapy or radiation. According to the speaker, in the book Peter Glidden explains that the professional receives a 6% commission for recommending chemotherapy. They claim this leads to about $100,000 being charged to the patient’s insurance, which the speaker views as a significant incentive for doctors to push chemo and radiation. The speaker contends that professionals tell patients to pursue chemo and radiation largely because of the commission from Big Pharma, rather than offering alternatives or focusing on overall health. They allege that doctors do not inform patients about natural or alternative options, listing items such as soursop, sun exposure, reishi, apricot seeds, and dietary corrections as potential aids that could address the body’s signals for help. The implication is that the medical system prioritizes medication and procedures over nutritional or lifestyle approaches. A central claim echoed in the talk is that the medical system in the United States is financially driven: 20% of the country’s GDP is spent on healthcare. The speaker emphasizes “20% of the GDP of America” to illustrate how the system operates financially, suggesting that this economic framework contributes to the continued use of vaccines, chemotherapy, radiation, “poisonous pills,” and misdiagnoses. They argue that these financial incentives are why certain treatments persist, and why systemic changes are unlikely within the current framework. Overall, the speaker asserts that the U.S. medical system is a money-driven enterprise, with substantial financial incentives tied to specific treatments like chemotherapy, which are presented as standard responses to cancer diagnoses. The discussion centers on challenging the mainstream approach by highlighting alleged commissions, insurance costs, and the availability of alternative health information and practices that they claim are typically overlooked.

The speaker describes a medical situation in which cancer had spread extensively: “In my neck, my liver, my bladder, my pancreas, and in my bones from head to toe.” He notes that when small cell lung cancer metastasizes this far, the prognosis is extremely poor, stating that “Life expectancy goes below one percent.” Shortly after, he received a call from a large animal veterinarian who shared a remarkable anecdote involving cancer research at Merck Animal Health on the veterinary medicine side. The veterinarian explained that a scientist working there had been implanting cancer in mice for research, and as a result her entire mouse population developed intestinal parasites. According to the story, the scientist administered fenbendazole, the drug commonly used to treat parasites in animals. Remarkably, not only did the drug save the mice from dying of intestinal parasites, but weeks later it appeared to cure the mice of cancer as well. The speaker recounts this as a concise answer to the question at hand about possible treatments. Motivated by this anecdote, the speaker began taking fenbendazole himself, starting the day after receiving the veterinarian’s account. He reports that “three and a half months later” he was all clear of cancer. In summary, the speaker connects a dire prognosis for widespread metastasized cancer with an anecdotal account from a large animal veterinary context: fenbendazole, used for parasitic infections in animals, purportedly cured cancer in mice in that story, and the speaker credits starting fenbendazole with achieving an all-clear status several months later.

Steve Jobs had a rare, relatively curable type of pancreatic cancer called a neuroendocrine or islet cell tumor. Unlike the more common adenocarcinoma, this type can often be cured with surgery if detected early. Jobs chose juice diets and herbal supplements instead of immediate surgery, delaying other therapies like chemotherapy. By the time he sought conventional treatment, his cancer had progressed and metastasized to his liver. At that point, surgery was no longer an option, leading to his death.

A parent shares their experience with their daughter's cancer treatment. The doctors offered two options: let her die or undergo intense chemo and radiation. They chose the latter, but it caused severe burns and other complications. After six months, the standard treatment didn't cure her cancer, and they were told she had only a few months to live. Desperate, they discovered Dr. Brzezinski's treatment, which the FDA deemed nontoxic. They took their daughter off the standard treatment and tried Brzezinski's, and within nine weeks, the tumor disappeared. Sadly, she later died from radiation damage, but the autopsy showed she was cancer-free. The speaker questions why the bureaucratic process for accessing this treatment is so difficult, preventing many patients from receiving a potential cure.

Speaker 0: In hindsight, is there anything you would have done differently? Speaker 1: I wish I'd spent more time with my wife and with my children when they were little. I was kind of obsessed with work. Speaker 1: The first one died of ovarian cancer, the second one died of pancreatic cancer. Speaker 0: And you wish you'd spent more time with the second wife? Speaker 1: yeah, who was a wonderful person. Speaker 1: Oh, just because she's gone, I can't spend more time with her now. Speaker 0: Mhmm. But you didn't know that at the time? Speaker 1: At the time, you think I mean, it was likely I would die before her just because she was a woman and I was a man. I didn't I just didn't spend enough time when I could.

Walt's current condition is uncertain until he completes his chemo and undergoes a new PET scan. The idea of exploring alternative medicine, such as Eastern healing and holistic approaches, is brought up. While the effectiveness of these methods is unknown, as long as they don't interfere with the ongoing treatment, the speaker is open to anything that improves the patient's outlook and comfort. The question arises whether these approaches are purely psychological and lack tangible benefits.

The speaker shares their experience of being diagnosed with cancer and undergoing traditional treatments that were not effective. They then stumbled upon Fenbendazole, a medication typically used for parasites, and decided to try it. Along with intermittent fasting and other lifestyle changes, the speaker took Fenbendazole and experienced positive results. They recount visiting their doctor's office and being told that they had no evidence of disease in their body. The speaker expresses their surprise and relief at the news, as they were prepared for further treatments.

The speaker shares their personal experience with stage 4 metastatic breast cancer and their search for alternative treatments. They mention using soursop tea and apricot kernels, which are believed to have cancer-fighting properties. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of changing their diet, consuming alkaline foods, and advocating for their own health. They mention taking black seed oil and highlight the significance of positive thinking and speaking life into existence. The speaker acknowledges that their approach may not be supported by medical professionals but believes they have nothing to lose. They conclude by encouraging others to speak life and take care of their bodies.

The radiologist presents a personal stance on cancer treatment and fasting. He states that if he personally developed cancer, he would not enter the hospital and would “unplug the motor of the cancer” by fasting. He notes that 50% of patients who die of cancer die from the effects of aggressive treatment, a fact he believes the public does not know. He emphasizes that fasting is difficult in medical professionals’ demanding roles, but claims he could fast for 30 days without problem. For an exceptional patient, he suggests advising fasting, and mentions there are weeks-long fasting programs developing in France and elsewhere, with existing centers in Switzerland. He acknowledges that significant financial resources are required to establish such centers and to support patients. If a patient is exceptional, he would recommend fasting, provide books for reading, and ensure the patient reads about it. The protocol he describes involves not eating for 30 days, while continuing to drink, with supplementation and close medical monitoring—at least weekly visits to check weight and blood pressure, noting potential hypotension and migraines as minor risks. He argues that there are two fuels in the body: sugar (the fuel used in typical alimentation) and ketone bodies. During fasting, the body uses ketone bodies as fuel, which he says provides a spiritual or intellectual stimulation. He claims cancer cells only know sugar, describing them as “conne” (stupid) in this context, and asserts there is no miracle cancer treatment. He believes that cancer is a test of humility placed by God, and reiterates that no single treatment is effective on its own; cancer treatment must be personalized for each patient, and prevention is central to preventing cancer or its progression. The radiologist concludes by reiterating that to a patient with cancer, one should first “débrancher le moteur du cancer,” proposing a 100% ketogenic diet as the approach. He frames prevention and personalized, comprehensive care as essential, while maintaining that the ketogenic strategy is a central component of his view on addressing cancer.

The transcript presents a provocative framing of cancer treatment decisions and the influence of alternative medicine advocates. It opens with a claim that chemotherapy is widely recommended for cancer patients because oncologists receive a four to six percent commission for each treatment, implying a financial incentive behind standard cancer care. The speaker then contrasts this with the stance of a prominent monarch, referred to as the king of the United Kingdom, who is not going to undergo chemotherapy. This contrast is used to question why others would pursue chemotherapy when a high-profile leader would refuse it. Following this, the dialogue introduces a figure described as a “great fan” and loyal promoter of alternative medicine, who is depicted as consistently opposed to chemotherapy. This individual is characterized as someone who believes strongly in natural remedies, herbs, potions, and related approaches rather than conventional medical treatments. The speaker suggests that this person’s position aligns with a broader skepticism toward chemotherapy as a conventional option. The conversation then pivots to encourage readers or listeners to explore a specific book: A World Without Cancer, The Story of B 17 by G. Edward Griffin. The transcript explicitly mentions the book as a recommended source of information, signaling that it presents an alternative view on cancer and treatment. Within the discussion of alternatives, seeds containing “B 17” are highlighted as potential natural solutions. The seeds named include apricot seeds, cherry seeds, and plum seeds, with the claim that all contain B17, which is framed as a natural remedy in place of radiation and in opposition to what the speaker characterizes as an industry’s commission-based approach. Throughout, the speakers emphasize a preference for natural or non-traditional remedies over the conventional chemotherapy route. The language conveys skepticism about chemotherapy, suggesting a conflict of interest in the standard medical system, and promotes B17-containing seeds as a viable alternative, linking them to both the non-use of chemotherapy by the king and the endorsement of a book that supports these views. The overall message presented is that chemotherapy is driven by financial incentives, while there are natural, seed-based alternatives advocated by proponents of natural medicine, with a notable emphasis on the book by G. Edward Griffin as a source of justification.