reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A CNN correspondent reported from the Pentagon, near where a plane went down. The fire was still burning in some parts of the building. Upon close inspection, the correspondent saw a huge gaping hole in the side of the building, but no evidence of a plane crash anywhere near the Pentagon. The only pieces left were small enough to pick up by hand. There were no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage visible.

The speaker observed the Pentagon after the 9/11 attack while firefighters were still working. According to the speaker, the fire was still burning in some parts of the Pentagon. The speaker saw a large hole in the side of the building. However, the speaker claims that, upon close inspection, there was no evidence of a plane crash anywhere near the Pentagon, only the damaged side of the building. The speaker states that the only remaining pieces were small enough to pick up by hand, with no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage visible.

A CNN correspondent reported from the Pentagon, near where a plane went down. The fire was still burning in some parts of the Pentagon. From a close-up inspection, there was no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon, except for the actual side of the building that was crashed into. The only pieces left were small enough to pick up by hand. There were no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage anywhere around.

I observed the ongoing fire at the Pentagon and noticed a significant hole in the building. However, upon closer inspection, I found no signs of a plane crash nearby. The only damaged area was the side of the building. There were only small debris pieces that could be easily held in one's hand, with no large sections of the plane such as tail or wings present. The fire is still burning in certain parts of the Pentagon.

I turned on my computer and suddenly there was an explosion. I thought it was a bomb. Debris covered me and my son was thrown out of his stroller. Some floors collapsed and people were trapped. When I left the Pentagon, I didn't see any airplane parts or evidence of a plane crash. There was no jet fuel on me, my son, or the people I helped. Others in the area also didn't see any plane parts or luggage. I believe there is something more sinister going on. Fabricating an official story when the evidence proves it false is unjust.

A speaker questions how a plane, even a large one like a 767 or 747, could have caused the destruction seen in the 9/11 attacks. They suggest that bombs may have been involved due to the difficulty of a plane penetrating the building. The speaker also notes that most buildings have steel on the inside, but this one was built differently, with the steel on the outside. Another speaker mentions seeing the plane approach and explode on the other side of the building. The first speaker believes that the planes used in the attacks were not only large but also going at high speeds, possibly aided by the downward slope of the building. They express astonishment at the level of destruction and predict that the country will be forever changed.

I'm a "no planer," meaning I don't believe planes were used in the 9/11 attacks. People believe what they saw on TV, but there was no plane wreckage at the World Trade Center or the Pentagon. Remotely controlling a plane that size to hit the towers dead center is nearly impossible. Flight 93 allegedly crashed in Shanksville, but there was minimal wreckage, unlike a typical plane crash. The plane supposedly went underground at 580 mph, yet a hijacker's bandana and a passport were found at the site. Also, cell phone calls from the planes at high altitudes wouldn't have been possible with the technology at the time. Experienced pilots couldn't replicate the attacks in a simulator at high speeds, and exceeding a plane's maximum operating speed like that would be extremely difficult and dangerous.

I turned on my computer and immediately heard a loud explosion. I thought it was a bomb. Debris covered me and my son, who was thrown out of his stroller. Some floors collapsed, trapping people. When I left the Pentagon, I didn't see any airplane parts or evidence of a plane crash. There was no jet fuel on me, my son, or the people I helped. Others in the area also didn't see any plane debris. I believe there is a more sinister explanation than the official story. Those responsible should be held accountable.

I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on a building. I mean, these buildings were rock solid.

I was near the Pentagon where a plane crashed. The fire is still burning, but there's no evidence of a plane crash nearby. Only small pieces remain, no large sections like wings or fuselage.

I walked up to the Pentagon after the plane crash. The fire was still burning, and I saw a big hole in the building. There were only small pieces left, no big parts like wings or fuselage. No plane crashed near the Pentagon, just the side of the building.

They claimed it was a plane, but the building exploded randomly. It's not a plane; that side just blew up after the first explosion. They don't know what they're saying. How could a plane have caused that? It happened too quickly. The building was fine before, then suddenly it exploded. How did that happen?

Outside the Pentagon, firefighters are still battling the blaze caused by the crash. I observed the significant hole in the building, but there is no evidence of a plane crash nearby. The only remnants visible are small pieces that could fit in your hand; there are no large sections like tail or wing parts anywhere around.

A CNN correspondent reported from the Pentagon, near where a plane went down. The fire was still burning in some parts of the building. Upon close inspection, the correspondent saw a huge gaping hole in the side of the building, but no evidence of a plane crash. The only pieces left were small enough to pick up by hand. There were no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage anywhere around.

Here's a summary of the provided transcript: The speaker questions how a 757 could fit into a 14-16 foot hole in the Pentagon without leaving wreckage. Photos taken before the Pentagon's outer wall collapsed show a hole, wire spools on the lawn, and broken concrete facing. The roof shows fatigue but hasn't collapsed. The speaker points out the absence of wreckage like a tail, fuselage, wings, or engines. Engine 331 from the Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority is visible in photos. The fire chief from this engine company initially agreed to an interview but canceled an hour before airtime, and two firefighters were reportedly placed on indefinite leave. Fire retardant foam is being sprayed on the front of the Pentagon, and the speaker reiterates the question of whether the hole is large enough for a 757 and where the wreckage is.

A CNN correspondent reported from the Pentagon, near where a plane went down. Firefighters were still working to extinguish the blaze, which was still burning in some parts of the building. Upon close inspection, the correspondent saw a huge gaping hole in the side of the building, but no evidence of a plane crash. The only pieces left were small enough to pick up by hand. There were no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage anywhere around the site.

Deborah Potta visited the crash site in Ethiopia this morning. The plane nose-dived into the ground, creating a massive crater. Mangled wreckage and charred personal belongings are scattered everywhere, serving as a reminder of the lives lost in the crash. Many of the passengers were young individuals with aspirations to make a difference in the world.

The crash site of Flight 93 left first responders and reporters in disbelief. When we arrived, we were expecting to see a plane, but instead, we found only small pieces of debris scattered around. It was hard to believe a Boeing 757 had crashed there; the area looked like a gouged-out trough covered in dirt. There was nothing recognizable as airplane parts. Even experienced photographers and officials were stunned by the lack of identifiable wreckage. All that remained was a large crater and tiny bits of debris, leaving us wondering where the plane had gone.

"No seats, no luggage, no bodies, nothing but bricks and limestone." "The official explanation is that the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane." "Flight 77 had two Rolls Royce engines made of steel and titanium alloy and weighs six tons each." "it is scientifically impossible that 12 tons of steel and titanium was vaporized by jet fuel." "From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon." "The videos from security cameras, which would show what really hit the Pentagon, were immediately confiscated by agents of the FBI, and the Department of Justice has to this day refused to release them." "If these videos would prove that the Pentagon was really hit by a seven fifty seven, most of us would assume the government would release them."

A 125-foot wide, 44-foot tall plane reportedly executed a 270-degree downridge spiral before striking the Pentagon, despite the pilot being known as terrible. The crash site contained no seats, luggage, or bodies, only bricks and limestone. The official explanation claims the intense heat from jet fuel vaporized the entire plane, but Flight 77 had two six-ton Rolls Royce engines made of steel and titanium alloy, and it is scientifically impossible for jet fuel to vaporize 12 tons of steel and titanium. Bodies were reportedly identified by fingerprints or DNA, which raises the question of how a fire could vaporize aluminum and tempered steel but leave human bodies intact. There was allegedly no evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon, with only small, hand-sized pieces remaining. Government agents allegedly removed debris and covered the lawn with dirt and gravel. Videos from security cameras were confiscated by the FBI and the Department of Justice has refused to release them.

About ten minutes later, the second building went off. "Did you see it? Yes. I saw it. It just blew up." "No second flight. It was a bomb. Bombing another building, not second plane. That was a bomb." "That's what we're told. The second plane. We saw it." "From my perspective, I didn't know that it was an airplane that hit the building. I I still thought it was a bomb and everything I saw told me it was bombs in the building." "I saw this plane come out of nowhere and just ream right into the side of the twin tower, exploding through the other side. And then I witnessed both towers collapse, one first and then the second, mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense."

A person questions how a plane, even a large one like a 767 or 747, could have caused the destruction seen on 9/11. They suggest that bombs may have been involved due to the difficulty of a plane penetrating the building. The speaker also mentions that most buildings have steel on the inside, but this one was built differently. Another person agrees, mentioning the explosion on the other side of the building. The first person believes that the planes were not only carrying fuel but also something else, as they seemed to be going very fast and descending into the building. They emphasize the immense destruction caused by taking out the heavy steel used in the buildings. The speaker concludes by stating that the events of 9/11 have forever changed the country.

A CNN correspondent reported from the Pentagon, near where a plane went down. The fire was still burning in some parts of the building. Upon close inspection, the correspondent saw a huge gaping hole in the side of the building, but no evidence of a plane crash anywhere near the Pentagon. The only pieces left were small enough to pick up by hand. There were no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage anywhere around.

How could anyone fly a 60 ton, 125 foot wide, 44 foot tall plane through this obstacle course? The aircraft before striking the Pentagon reportedly executed a 270 degree downward spiral, and yet Hani Hanure was known as a terrible pilot who could not safely fly even a small plane. The official explanation is that the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane. From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The videos from security cameras, which would show what really hit the Pentagon, were immediately confiscated by agents of the FBI.

The speaker describes moving away from the Northeast of the Pentagon and filming the scene as the fire and firefighting efforts unfolded. He notes a battalion chief from Fort Myer put an air bottle on his back five minutes after impact, which helped with his timeline. He says he had free rein and avoided interfering with firefighting or lifesaving, while photographing and videotaping some medic units treating the injured. He moved behind ambulances to capture a severely burned man on a stretcher being placed into an ambulance, the man asking others to tell his family he was okay. As he progressed, he focused on the impact site and firefighting across from the fire engine and the heliport control tower, while scanning for aircraft wreckage. He could not identify any discernible wreckage: no tail, wheels, engines, chairs, luggage, or logos—unlike an identifiable Air Florida aircraft when they shot that. He observed stretcher bearers with backboards forming an organized line, apparently preparing to return into the building for rescue before the collapse, mustering at burned-out fire equipment on the heliport pad. Debris in the foreground consisted of small pieces, described as roughly dinner-plate-sized or smaller, with the largest piece perhaps two by three feet and crumpled, which he believes is the “beast” with a blue stripe or red paint/logo. He noticed clergy arriving and began videotaping representatives from churches and various religions to document their actions. Foam trucks from National Airport began firefighting after the dispatch indicated a plane; he recalls that they poured water into the firefighting effort, which he believes probably spread the fire deeper into the building, though he cannot be certain. He notes there was no foam and no actual fuel fighting occurring at that time. He saw the first helicopter land to his right, the Park Police Eagle, and turned to his right to observe a severely burned patient being moved past him, possibly one of the first medevac survivors, with a name he believes to be Carlos. He recalls hearing a crunch and turning to his left to see the Pentagon floors collapsing across from where he stood, with video showing debris and smoke as the building was pushed apart. Regarding the Pentagon hole, he states: “If it was 16 feet diameter, 20 feet tops.” He cannot see marks on the grass or ground, suggesting nothing hit the grass or heliport; he questions how it could have hit the side of the building so quickly and directly without bouncing, and wonders how it could be more than a garage door. He describes firefighters in front, looking up at the hole and wondering what lay behind it.