TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

CMS is currently offering a 20% bonus payout to hospitals that choose to use Remdesivir for Medicare aged patients. This drug is supposedly approved by the FDA and recommended by the NIH for COVID-19 treatment. However, it is known to cause kidney, heart, and liver failure. Hospitals are also being incentivized to PCR test every patient, regardless of the reason for their visit, in order to increase their numbers. The federal government pays a monthly bribe based on the percentage of PCR tests conducted. Hospitals receive a 20% bonus for every positive COVID-19 diagnosis, as well as for using Remdesivir and ventilating patients. Additionally, they receive further incentives for every COVID-19 death, amounting to $9,000 per case per month. The reasons behind these incentives remain unclear.

Transparency and outcome-based funding are key solutions. CMS data showed a 90% ventilator mortality rate in Texas, worse than Russian roulette. Hospitals are allegedly incentivized to use specific protocols. Hospitals get paid more for testing, COVID admission, remdesivir, ventilation, and death. This allegedly incentivizes patient murder over treatment. The public should decide if they want to incentivize good hospital outcomes or the alleged murder of loved ones.

Hospitals are receiving financial incentives for COVID-related cases, leading to concerns about patient care and transparency. The CARES Act offers bonus payments for COVID diagnoses, while the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services is waiving patient rights. Hospitals receive payments for offering free COVID tests, diagnosing COVID, admitting COVID patients, administering Remdesivir, using mechanical ventilators, and even listing COVID on death certificates. There are also bonus payments to coroners. This combination of incentives has raised concerns about hospitals prioritizing financial gain over patient well-being. The estimated payment per patient is around $100,000. The situation is alarming, and urgent action is needed to address these issues.

A doctor claims there were "perverse incentives" during the pandemic to administer COVID vaccines. As an outpatient physician, she states she could have made $1,500,000 if she had vaccinated the 6,000 COVID patients she treated. She suggests that both outpatient and inpatient settings had "financial incentives" to adhere to government protocols.

I'm going to ask you a question about the vaccine. If you pushed the vaccine for your patients, say you had 6,000 patients at that time, what would your income have been? Blue Cross Blue Shield had an incentive program for doctors to administer these shots. If I had vaccinated the 6,000 patients that I treated for COVID, I would have made $1,500,000. The "follow the money" aspect of this is staggering.

The CDC and NVSS changed death certificate reporting in violation of federal law. Two days later, the HHS increased reimbursement for hospitals and doctors who listed everything as COVID, making it the most lucrative diagnosis. There are reports of patients being starved and denied water, possibly to increase the use of Remdesivir. The range of fraudulent death certificates is estimated to be between 88.6% and 94.0%. Reimbursement for a diabetic patient labeled as COVID is 3 to 6 times higher. Hospitals had to go along with this to stay in business. Doctors who spoke up were threatened with license revocation and faced censorship. This is seen as collusion and murder for profit.

The video discusses the alleged financial incentives given to hospitals for COVID patients and treatments. It claims that hospitals receive money for each COVID patient admitted, for positive COVID test results, and for using the drug remdesivir. The video suggests that these incentives led to false positives and inappropriate treatments, such as putting patients on ventilators. It also shares personal stories of individuals who experienced mistreatment in hospitals. The video concludes by urging viewers to be cautious and avoid hospitals if possible.

The speaker claims that unvaccinated individuals entering hospitals were deliberately killed. According to the speaker, every unvaccinated person they interviewed who went to the hospital reported not receiving the same treatments as vaccinated patients. Instead, they were allegedly given remdesivir, ventilation, and fentanyl, leading to their deaths. Another speaker adds that hospitals had financial incentives to produce COVID-related deaths, allegedly receiving up to $500,000 per death in California. The first speaker agrees, stating that hospital coders and whistleblowers revealed that patients were repeatedly tested for COVID until a positive result was obtained, triggering payments. They claim hospitals received additional payments for each drug and piece of equipment used, totaling over $500,000 per person. One person allegedly said their daughter was worth more dead than alive.

Dr. Scott Jensen asserts that financial incentives in healthcare motivate providers to make patients sicker. He explains that Medicare and insurers profit when patients are categorized as more ill, and cites programs that reward clinics for reaching vaccine uptake thresholds. For example, an influenza vaccine incentive could pay per patient if a clinic hits 60% or 80% vaccination among eligible patients, potentially yielding tens of thousands annually. He also claims we can be labeled diabetic through a simple A1C reading even without treatment. Once labeled diabetic, a clinician is typically rewarded for keeping the A1C below targets (often 7.5 or even under 7–8). He ends by noting: But if you can call someone a diabetic with an A1C...

When someone dies with COVID-19, it's counted as a COVID-19 death, not just an infection. Doctors are being paid more for listing patients as COVID-19 cases, with $13,000 for a COVID-19 admission and $39,000 if the patient goes on a ventilator. Some believe this treatment approach is wrong and could harm many people.

Blue Cross Blue Shield had an incentive program for doctors to administer COVID shots. A doctor stated that if they had vaccinated the 6,000 patients they treated for COVID, they would have made $1,500,000.

Unvaccinated patients entering the hospital reported being treated differently based on their vaccination status. Those who had not received the COVID-19 shot were quickly given treatments like remdesivir and placed on ventilators, leading to a high mortality rate. There are claims that hospitals had financial incentives to classify deaths as COVID-related, with some receiving substantial payments for each case. Whistleblowers from within the healthcare system indicated that staff were pressured to ensure positive COVID tests to secure funding. The financial motives behind these practices raised serious ethical concerns, with one individual stating that their loved one was valued more dead than alive due to these incentives.

Actions were taken to promote the vaccine by inflating COVID numbers through protocols in 2020. Hospitals were incentivized to label patients as COVID, put them on ventilators, administer Remdesivir, and profit from deaths. The goal was to instill fear and push vaccinations. Hospital administrators, driven by financial incentives, unknowingly contributed to unnecessary deaths. This greed-driven system continues to harm people.

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

Our initial response to COVID incentivized hospitals to prioritize profit over patient care, leading to questionable treatment decisions. Medical boards, influenced by financial gain, hindered effective protocols like those of Doctor Bartlett. This highlights the need to hold medical boards accountable for prioritizing money over patient well-being.

Hospitals are receiving bonus payments for COVID cases, leading to high mortality rates and lack of transparency for families. The CARES Act incentivizes hospitals with payments for COVID tests, diagnoses, admissions, remdesivir use, ventilator use, and even COVID-related deaths on death certificates. This system is seen as the Biden administration paying hospitals to harm patients, with estimated payments of $100,000 per patient. The situation is dire and needs to be addressed urgently.

We ended our previous episode with our COVID pyramid, build layer upon layer of lies, deceit, fraud, scandals. Now, by now you’re wondering how so many hospitals, doctors, and health care workers went along with all of the above. We have reached the capstone of our nauseating COVID pyramid. Pyramid. We shall name the capstone M and M, money and murder in hospitals. Shocking as it may sound, we’ve seen it before. Remember the unjust administering the killer drug midazolam in The UK as shown in part 19? Well, The US and many other countries had their own version called remdesivir. Here’s what happened. Hospitals were given incentives, as in money, for each and every COVID casualty. According to whistleblowers, investigative journalists, lawyers, and specialists, Hospitals in The US have been receiving $13,000 for every admitted COVID patient. There have been financial extras for every COVID test, for every positive outcome. If patients were treated with the only prescribed drug, remdesivir, the hospital received yet another bonus: 20% of the entire hospital bill of the patient. Then for every patient put on a ventilator, the hospital received $39,000. And if that patient officially died of COVID nineteen, they got yet another $13,000. That’s a lot of money. According to attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers, the hospitals receive approximately $100,000 per COVID casualty if the above protocol was followed. Now the thing is, the American hospitals received this money in advance based on the COVID predictions, based on the flawed models of people like Brooks. If the hospitals didn’t actually meet those models, they had to pay that money back at a later stage. And we’re talking millions of dollars here. So what happened? Everybody who was admitted to a hospital, for instance because of a car accident or because of cancer or diabetes or kidney failure, everybody got a PCR test to start with. Due to the ridiculous amount of cycles, there was an abundance of false positives. False positives equals positives equals COVID patients equals money. Hence, the sunrise in COVID patients. Then remdesivir left its detrimental mark just like midazolam had done in The UK. You see, remdesivir is not a new drug. It was used in 2018 during the West African Ebola outbreak. It was known to have severe adverse effects such as kidney damage, liver damage, and even death. Yet in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals used to treat COVID nineteen, hence the incentives. So what happened next? Those poor patients only got worse, after which they were put on a ventilator. After all, that was yet another bonus of many thousands of dollars pouring straight into the pockets of the hospitals. Now the problem with ventilators is that the patient is put into an induced coma. His or her breathing is taken over by a machine that puts extra pressure on the lungs called barrow pressure. In the case of damaged lungs due to for instance pneumonia, those lungs will only get worse. The chances of that patient recovering, of being able to be taken off the ventilator and to start breathing by himself are very, very small. Combined with organ failure as a result of remdesivir, the chances of that patient ever leaving the hospital alive are next to nothing.

'the hospitalization and the death numbers were were almost a complete fiction because the government was paying hospitals to report that they had COVID hospitalizations and deaths.' 'The official number is one point two million, but secretary Kennedy's right.' 'If in order to be diagnosed with COVID, it was possible to have a prior test... and you entered the hospital for something else, and then you were still counted as a COVID case.' 'Most of the people who died from COVID had at least four comorbidities. That was according to CDC.' 'We paid hospitals tens of thousands of dollars per COVID patient.' 'COVID was obviously a deadly disease. It killed many people.'

Doctors receive year-end bonuses from insurance companies for fully vaccinated patients, sometimes $250-$400 per patient. For a pediatrician with a thousand patients, this could mean a bonus of $250,000 to $500,000. For an office with 10 pediatricians, bonuses could reach millions of dollars. It is wondered if insurance companies are incentivized by the pharmaceutical industry to promote vaccines and bonus doctors for administering them.

America is counting all deaths with COVID-19 as COVID-19 deaths, not just those caused by the virus. Doctors claim they are incentivized to label patients as COVID-19 cases for financial gain, with $13,000 paid by Medicare for each COVID-19 hospital admission and $39,000 if the patient goes on a ventilator. This has led to concerns about misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.

CMS is currently offering a 20% bonus payout to hospitals that choose to use remdesivir for all Medicare aged patients. This drug is supposedly approved by the FDA and recommended by the NIH for COVID-19 treatment. However, it is known to cause kidney, heart, and liver failure. Hospitals are also being incentivized to PCR test every patient, regardless of the reason for their visit, and are paid a bribe for the percentages of positive COVID-19 diagnoses. Additionally, hospitals receive a 20% bonus for using remdesivir, ventilating patients, and for every COVID-19 death, earning up to $9,000 per case per month. The reasons behind these incentives remain unclear.

If you're a patient, your doctor, insurance company, clinic, and hospital can all benefit financially if you are classified as sicker. For example, insurance companies offer incentives for clinics to increase vaccination rates, rewarding them with payments based on the percentage of patients vaccinated. Additionally, if a patient is labeled as diabetic based on an A1C test result, even without treatment, the clinic can receive benefits. Maintaining a patient's A1C below certain thresholds can also improve the clinic's ratings. This system creates financial incentives for healthcare providers to classify patients in ways that may not always align with their actual health status.

Hospitals were incentivized to put patients on ventilators for financial gain, receiving $39,000 per patient. Many patients were put on ventilators unnecessarily, leading to high death rates. Some physicians found that patients could be treated with oxygen therapy instead of ventilators. Despite spending billions on ventilators, many remain unused in warehouses or even discarded in city dumps.

Conflicts and controversies surrounding remdesivir are significant. In November 2020, the World Health Organization conducted a comprehensive study and advised against using remdesivir in hospitals due to its association with death and kidney and liver injuries. Despite this, the U.S. incentivizes its use by offering hospitals a 20% bonus on the total bill if remdesivir is administered. As a doctor, I find it troubling that while other medications do not provide such financial incentives, the use of remdesivir can lead to substantial additional costs for hospitals, contradicting the WHO's recommendations. This situation highlights a serious disconnect in medical decision-making.

Hi. I'm Robert F. Kennedy Jr, your HHS secretary. Should doctors make decisions based upon what's best for their patients or based upon what makes them the most money? It rewards certain treatments, not because they're better for the patient, but because someone profits. Take what happened during COVID. Hospitals were paid to report staff vaccination rates. We're scanning every corner of the health care system for hidden incentives at corrupt medical judgment. What we're finding is alarming. Doctors are being paid to vaccinate not to evaluate. We've recently uncovered that more than 36,000 doctors had their Medicare reimbursements altered based upon childhood vaccination rates. That's not medicine.