reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Elon Musk is being targeted by the ADL as an anti-Semite and traitor to the US because he refuses to censor on demand. If he buys Twitter and reduces censorship, it poses a threat to establishment centers of power. They fear free speech on the internet. They blamed the free internet for Brexit and Trump's election, leading to increased censorship. Elon Musk is one of the few in technology standing up against this censorship.

Elon Musk is seen as a defender of free speech, standing up against censorship from government, media, and tech companies. He understands that advertisers can be easily influenced by special interest groups and political allies. This is evident in the case of Tucker Carlson.

Old Twitter was heavily influenced by the government, which violated the First Amendment. The reason for this amendment is to protect freedom of speech, as many immigrants came from places where it was restricted. If we allow censorship, it won't be long before we ourselves are censored. That's why the First Amendment exists.

Social media sites must be held responsible and understand their power. They speak directly to millions of people without oversight or regulation, and this has to stop. The same rule has to apply across platforms; there can't be one rule for Facebook and another for Twitter.

I support Elon Musk because he stands up for freedom of speech. I will advertise on X with an unlimited budget because freedom is priceless. I don't have $100,000,000, but I will spend as much as I can to support this platform and freedom of speech. I am proud to be a new advertiser on X. The same people who were mad about a black woman being on a cereal box are the same people who don't like Elon and don't like free speech. I stand for freedom and support Elon. Visit cousin t's.com and use the discount code x for great American pancakes. Thank you, Elon, for standing up for freedom of speech.

TikTok embodies American values of freedom of expression, giving people a platform to be heard. We will continue to fight for your rights in court, confident in our cause. The facts and constitution support us, and we expect to win.

Elon Musk is seen as a defender of free speech against censorship from government, media, and tech companies. He understands that advertisers can be easily influenced by special interest groups and political allies. This is evident in the case of Tucker Carlson.

The speaker wrote to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, asking him to remove the president's Twitter account. The speaker believes this is not a free speech violation because Twitter, as a corporation, has terms of use policies that dictate who can speak on the platform. The speaker claims Donald Trump has violated these terms and should face consequences. They assert he has used his platform as president to incite fear and potentially incite harm against a witness to a possible crime against the country and democracy. The speaker is asking Twitter to revoke the president's privilege to use the platform, as they have done in the past when users violated the terms of use.

People want to use platforms that are appealing and comfortable, so freedom of speech should have limits. Shadow banning and algorithmic suppression are making people less visible on platforms like YouTube. This information war prevents real truth from being discovered. While freedom of speech allows people to say anything, controversial statements don't need to be broadcasted to the whole country. Twitter should let people express themselves within the law but limit who sees their content based on user preferences. Personalized algorithms are destroying content creators who aren't part of the mainstream system. This control over messages is social engineering and mind control. Despite this, people will fight against it.

Our message was clear: there are rules that must be followed, and failure to comply will result in sanctions. However, I believe that confidence has been weakened. I used to have a high level of confidence in Twitter, as we worked with knowledgeable people, lawyers, and sociologists who understood the importance of behaving responsibly and not causing harm to society. But now, I no longer feel that sense of responsibility.

Twitter must comply with local government laws to avoid being shut down. Each country has its own rules and forms of government, so it's important to adhere to them. The goal is to provide the freest speech possible within the confines of the law.

Twitter's new CEO, Linda Yakinaro, has a history of censorship and promoting mask-wearing. Elon Musk hired her for her advertising background to help Twitter become profitable through ads and subscriptions. Twitter is struggling financially and needs revenue sources like video content and ads. However, Twitter is also increasing censorship, labeling and reducing the reach of "violative" content by 81%. Many accounts are being banned or restricted, and Twitter is partnering with Sprinklr to measure and reduce hate speech. Elon Musk has expressed concern about the lack of absolute free speech on platforms like Rumble. Overall, Twitter's focus on ad-friendliness and censorship is not aligned with being a free speech platform.

Facebook and other platforms have the power to manipulate content without explanation or transparency. They can secretly ban candidates or limit their reach while boosting other content. Elon Musk believes this is done in the name of free speech and to benefit people.

in the last twenty four hours, you locked the accounts and shut down the accounts of two guys, Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones. it's better if you unlock those accounts and let the guys be heard. censorship isn't good for America. It's antithetical to our culture. If you tell people they can't speak, that's when they scream. And if you tell people they can't scream, that's when they tear things down. free speech is a precondition for peace. There's a different category of saying that you may demonetize certain people. What I'm talking about is not a legal point. It's just a cultural point. because of who you are, you deserve not to be heard. restore the accounts of those guys, believe me, it will be a down payment on beginning to reunite this country.

Mister Musk's recent Twitter activity sparked a discussion on freedom of speech. While we also value this freedom, we acknowledge the need to address illegal content online.

I'm a free speech absolutist, yet my account was suspended and my verification removed. Subscribers can no longer support my work because Elon Musk disagrees with my statements. I didn't dox anyone; I shared publicly available FEC records. My intention was to warn the Trump administration about a significant issue that could lead to impeachment if the Democrats regain control and frame it as big tech buying influence. This is a serious concern that needs attention, especially since the MAGA base is reacting strongly to it.

I support Elon Musk and his fight for freedom of speech. I will advertise on X with an unlimited budget because freedom is priceless. I don't have $100,000,000, but I have a successful small business and will spend as much as I can to support this platform and freedom of speech. I am proud to be a new advertiser on X. Those who were upset about a black woman being on a cereal box are the same people who dislike Elon and X. We shouldn't bow down to people who get offended easily. Visit cousin t's.com and use the discount code x for great American pancakes and fried chicken. Thank you, Elon, for standing up for freedom of speech.

The speaker acknowledges that brands have the power to make their own decisions. They clarify that they have never accused Elon Musk or Twitter of being anti-Semitic, but they express concern about the platform's handling of hate speech. The speaker admits that they are not publicly or privately talking to advertisers, but rather engaging with Twitter's management to help improve the platform. They address the critique of seeking a role at Twitter or donations, stating that it is unfair to suggest that expressing outrage over anti-Semitism is a shakedown. The speaker mentions their efforts to work with various platforms, including Twitter, to make improvements.

We must protect free speech, especially when it involves someone we disagree with. Censorship can backfire, as it may eventually be used against those who advocate for it.

Experiment to see what people want! I believe it's less about free speech and more about choosing how algorithms program us, because they definitely are. It's hard to predict what algorithms will do, and that's risky. But, imagine an algorithm store instead of an app store, where I choose algorithms to filter my content. This gives me more control and creates a healthier relationship with technology. This applies beyond Twitter, to YouTube and financial tech too. Algorithms know our preferences better than we do, and this will only increase. We need to increase individual agency by choosing different algorithms, turning them off, or even creating our own.

Social media sites must be held responsible and understand their power. The speaker claims these sites speak directly to millions of people without oversight or regulation, and that "has to stop." The speaker asserts that the same rules must apply across platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Someone "has lost his privileges" and content "should be taken down."

Elon Musk is seen as a defender of free speech, standing up against censorship from government, media, and tech companies. He understands that advertisers can be easily influenced by special interest groups and political allies. This is evident in the case of Tucker Carlson.

Sarah was criticized by MSNBC hosts for defending free speech and voting rights. In response, it’s inappropriate and undemocratic to suggest punishing individuals or businesses for their political views. Such ideas reflect a fascist mentality. Even if I disagree with someone like Mark Cuban, I would never advocate for penalizing his business due to his political stance. We need free and fair elections and to ensure that all voices are heard within the law. It’s essential to address any unfairness while maintaining a public discourse that respects free speech for everyone.