TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

This video provides a comprehensive overview of the history, prevalence, and concerns surrounding voter fraud in American politics. It covers various instances of voter fraud, including manipulation of voting machines, absentee ballot abuse, and tampering with election results. The role of money in fueling voter fraud is emphasized, with politicians and election officials being incentivized to engage in fraudulent activities to maintain power. The video also discusses the need for election reform to ensure fair and transparent voting processes. It highlights concerns about the integrity of the electoral system and emphasizes the importance of implementing measures to prevent and address voter fraud. The video further discusses specific instances of voter fraud and irregularities during the 2020 election, including questionable ballots, incorrect deliveries, and potential fraud in mail-in voting. Overall, it calls for a fair and secure election system.

The speaker claims that real-time Edison data reveals election data manipulation. According to the speaker, Seidl receives raw election data directly from election officials in at least nine states. The speaker alleges that an additive process should show more votes, not deletions, in each interval report. However, a video of Edison reports allegedly shows pauses, oscillation, and deletions in total, in-person, and mail-in votes. The speaker claims this is the algorithm trying to figure out the math problem. The speaker points to North Carolina and Georgia counties as examples, noting Seidl directly contracts with Georgia. The speaker then plays a clip of someone discussing estimated vote percentages dropping, suggesting the reported results are not actual results. The speaker questions the calling of races with razor-thin margins, particularly Arizona, based on projections and alleged impossible data anomalies. The speaker asserts that historically, those counting votes called races, but now machines and news outlets do, deterring challenges.

A computer programmer testified that programs exist to secretly fix elections. He claims that in February, he wrote a prototype for Congressman Tom Feeney that could rig an election. The program could flip the vote to 51-49 for a candidate in any race. He stated that election officials would never detect the program.

The speaker discusses the Obama administration's use of the ScoreCard program to change votes during elections. They claim that both Obama and Biden are familiar with this program, as it was used in the 2012 election in Florida. The speaker also mentions the Democratic Party's alleged desire to bring the country to a totalitarian state. They state that the program was used in the primaries, causing Bernie to lose to Biden. The speaker emphasizes the importance of informing the American people about this software program, which can allegedly switch 3% of the votes. They briefly mention General McInerney's career and expertise in the cloud business. The speaker explains that HAMR, originally a foreign surveillance system, was adopted for the voting business and used by the CIA to monitor US citizens illegally. They warn that this system is still active and can be used to manipulate the election results.

In this video, the speakers discuss how the voting system can be easily manipulated using a USB drive. They explain that election officials are unaware of the potential misuse of USB drives in voting machines. The speakers demonstrate how a USB drive can be used to run a backdoor utility and manipulate the election results. They show that the screen does not display any indication of this manipulation. By inserting a specific USB drive, they are able to fix the flipped election results. The speakers emphasize the simplicity and affordability of USB drives, highlighting the vulnerability of the voting system.

In this video, the speakers discuss an example of vote switching in Georgia during the election. They explain that there was a clear switch of vote totals between Donald Trump and Joe Biden in Bibb County. They mention that this type of switch can go undetected in state reporting if it falls between state updates. The speakers then analyze the underlying data and identify deductions in votes for Trump in Pennsylvania. They emphasize that these deductions should not occur in an election. By closely analyzing the data sources, they aim to understand what really happened in November 2020.

The video discusses the vulnerabilities in election systems and the potential for manipulation by hackers. It mentions that voting machines, campaign networks, and registration databases are all at risk. The speaker explains that attackers can cause mischief without physically accessing the machines, such as by messing up voter files. It is noted that Russia was able to influence the election by breaching DNC computers and targeting election-related systems in multiple states. The speaker emphasizes that manipulating vote counts on every machine in America would be difficult, but flipping a few senate seats could still impact the US Congress. The video concludes by suggesting that nation states and criminals likely have knowledge of these vulnerabilities.

The video highlights instances of vote manipulation in the election database, specifically focusing on Donald Trump's votes. It reveals that votes for Trump were switched and removed from his total, making it appear as if there were no changes. In three counties, over 30,000 votes for Trump disappeared. The video provides a clear example of this manipulation, where Trump's votes were switched with Biden's in a matter of minutes. This type of manipulation can go undetected in state reporting due to the time lag between each state update.

The speakers discuss how ballot boxes are stuffed with fake votes using computer programs. They explain that the programs follow an algorithm to add a certain number of ballots from each age group to make it look realistic. They mention that the census helps determine how many ballots to add. They also mention that if they run out of pre-stuffed ballots, they have to pause the election until more are printed. They highlight the importance of proving that the ballots are fraudulent, both through physical evidence and by identifying inconsistencies in voter information. The speakers express that initially, the claims may have seemed crazy, but now they believe everything is starting to make sense.

The video discusses concerns about the potential manipulation of votes in election software. It questions whether proper validation processes were followed, such as having observers from both parties present during the transmission of SD cards and the transportation of ballots. The speaker also mentions the use of election night reporting data and emphasizes that there is no human entry of totals, which eliminates the possibility of human error.

This video presents evidence of alleged widespread fraud in the November 2020 US election. It highlights statistical anomalies in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, where Joe Biden received major vote spikes in the early hours of November 4th. These spikes occurred during a 5-hour window when counting had reportedly stopped. The video also discusses eyewitness and video evidence, including a poll worker in Georgia who was seen handling absentee ballots after counting was supposed to have ended. It raises concerns about Dominion Voting Systems and their alleged vulnerabilities to hacking and manipulation. The video concludes by urging viewers to share the evidence and demand election reform.

In this video, the speaker discusses the issue of Dominion machines and their accuracy in counting ballots. They question why in heavily Democratic areas, the mail-in ballots are always on target and within 1 mic, while in Republican areas, the mail-in ballots are often out of calibration. The speaker suggests that the machines allow human intervention, where a person can interpret the ballot if the machine is unsure. This raises concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the voting process.

In this video, the speaker discusses a statistical anomaly in a race where ballots were sorted into groups of 200. Out of 61 groups, 58 favored Biden by 90% or more, while 3 favored Trump by the same margin. This suggests that someone or a group of people may have manipulated the ballots, resulting in a significant imbalance in favor of one candidate over the other in a race that was supposed to be evenly split.

This clip shows a live feed from Clarity Elections feeding the Associated Desk/Decision Desk HQ, with CNN-generated ribbons updating in real time. The current vote counts displayed are Andy Bashir with 673,948 votes and Matt Bevin with 662,235 votes, aligning with the CNN ribbon at that moment. The presenter then demonstrates the speed of the update by replaying the sequence: a flash update appears, the page fills with the new face, and the viewer sees what was missed in the brief instant between updates. He drags the footage frame by frame to illustrate the moment of change. In the next forward pass, the update from Clarity shows Bashir with 674,508 votes, while Bevin is at 661,675. This reflects a gain of 560 votes for Bashir and a corresponding loss of 560 votes for Bevin within the same split second. The presenter notes that the ribbon below has not yet updated to reflect the new totals, since the changes occur in split seconds. He emphasizes that this is a live demonstration of vote-switching in the computer: as more votes are tallied, Bashir climbs by 560 votes and Bevin drops by 560 votes almost simultaneously. The presenter points out that between the 560-vote gain and the 560-vote loss, 25% of the total loss amount in this race has occurred right before the viewers’ eyes. Key takeaways: - The feed is a live Clarity Elections data stream, with CNN ribbons updating in near real time. - An update shows Bashir gaining 560 votes (674,508 total) and Bevin losing 560 votes (661,675 total) in the same instant. - The ribbon update lags briefly behind the live tally, illustrating the speed and synchronization issues in live vote reporting. - The presenter highlights the phenomenon of vote-switching in the computer and quantifies the visible portion of the race’s loss happening during the demonstration (25%).

Speaker 0: Totals being awarded to Biden and Jorgensen's totals being awarded to Trump. After gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion election management system in Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch tens of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in seconds by simply changing the index number next to each candidate's name. Speaker 1: This is a a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio that is actually installed on the image of the voting system. So is it certified? It is not on the list of certified software. What I'm gonna do first, I'm just gonna pull up the presidential results in Mesa County for that election. And here they are. You can see Biden has 31,000. Trump has 56,000. K. So I'm gonna come up here now, and I'm going to make a quick change. Change that to a two? Yep. I'm changing Trump to a one. Okay. And then I'm going to come up here, and I'm gonna rerun the port. And there you go. Biden, 56,000. Trump, 31,000. So I just flipped the results of the election using a tool that's actually built in to the voting system. And what I did is not even logged. There's no trace of what I just did now. For some reason, the logging of activities by a user that has the password are not retained. Speaker 0: In Pennsylvania on live TV, Trump had 1,690,589 votes, while Biden had 1,252,537 votes. The time was approximately 11:08 Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report shows Trump's votes decreasing to 1,670,631 and Biden's votes increasing to 1,272,495. The time is approximately 11:09PM. Live on CNN, exactly 19,958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden. This means Trump lost 39,916 votes.

There was fraud in the election, including dead people voting. The machines played a role in this fraud. Instead of having hidden ballots, they stored them in a secret folder. After the polls closed, the machines matched unvoted ballots with unvoted voters. This was evident when the vote percentage reached 99% but the votes kept coming in. The denominator, which represents the remaining ballots, started increasing, indicating that they were unloading the hidden ballots and matching them to unvoted voters. This allowed them to barely cross the finish line with enough votes.

This video highlights statistical irregularities and vote manipulation within the election database. It focuses on the example of Dodge County, where there were strange occurrences in the vote counts. Specifically, votes for Donald Trump were being switched and removed from his total, often coinciding with other updates to make it appear neutral. Across three counties, Trump lost over 30,000 votes. The video provides a clear example of vote count switching at the county level, where Trump's votes were swapped with Biden's. This type of manipulation can go undetected in state reporting if it falls between state refreshes.

In Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch thousands of votes from Trump to Biden using a backdoor utility in the Dominion election management system. The tool allows them to change the results without leaving a trace. In Pennsylvania, live TV footage shows nearly 20,000 votes being switched from Trump to Biden, resulting in Trump losing almost 40,000 votes. The manipulation occurs within minutes, highlighting vulnerabilities in the voting system.

The video highlights instances of ballot irregularities in the 2020 election. It shows examples where ballots were not filled out correctly, yet still counted for Joe Biden. It also mentions a ballot that was thrown out, which had votes for Donald Trump and other Republican candidates. According to Just the News, many adjudicated ballots had marks removed next to Trump's name, allowing for additional marks next to Biden's name. In total, 1,341 marks were removed, which accounts for over 11% of the votes in a race decided by 11,779 votes. The video suggests that this is just one type of fraud.

The election supervisor wants to vote for Jason Shaw. During adjudication, the supervisor states they want to vote for Biden, overriding the original marks on a ballot. The supervisor decides someone "don't deserve no votes" and chooses not to count votes on that ballot. The supervisor then declares another ballot should be blank. The supervisor admits to scanning the same batches of ballots repeatedly.

In this video, the speakers demonstrate how a USB drive can be used to manipulate voting systems. They explain that election officials may not be aware of the potential misuse of USB drives. The speaker inserts the USB drive into the voting system, running a backdoor utility that is preinstalled. They show that the screen does not display any indication of the manipulation. By executing commands, they change the election results back to the original numbers. The speakers emphasize the simplicity and accessibility of this method, as USB drives are widely known and inexpensive.

Up to 13 states' Board of Elections voter registration roles are coded with secret algorithms that allow for hidden, unreal votes. This coding system is like a national security coding system. In Ohio, there is a mathematical formula embedded within the state board of election voter role that permits someone within the board of election to vote as many mail-in votes as they want to rig and steal an election without it being known. The speaker is in Ohio demanding a proof of concept.

The speaker discusses how the vote total may have been altered through the HAMMER program and ScoreCard software, affecting the election outcome. They mention a computer glitch in Michigan that favored President Trump, suggesting similar issues in other states. They question the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden, deeming it statistically improbable.

This video presents evidence of alleged widespread fraud in the November 2020 election. It highlights statistical anomalies in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, where Joe Biden received major vote spikes in the early hours of November 4th. These spikes occurred during a 5-hour window when counting had reportedly stopped. The video also discusses eyewitness and video evidence, including a poll worker in Georgia seen handling absentee ballots after counting was supposed to have ended. It raises concerns about Dominion Voting Systems and their alleged vulnerabilities to hacking and manipulation. The video concludes by urging viewers to share the evidence and demand election reform.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.