reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker opposes sending defense articles and services from the US to Ukraine, arguing that they should be used to defend the US border instead. They claim that veterans in their district prefer fighting against Mexican cartels at the southern border rather than supporting Ukraine. They criticize the Secretary of State for prioritizing Ukraine and accuse the Biden administration of depleting US military readiness. The speaker also expresses concern about China's growing strength and accuses the government of lying about the need to support Ukraine to prevent China from invading Taiwan.

We fund one third of Ukraine's government, which includes salaries for teachers, janitors, and everyone else, not just the military. Meanwhile, people in our country are struggling to afford basic necessities like food and medicine. We need to focus on our own problems instead of paying for their government. Our priority should be to stop the killing and provide American leadership, rather than giving more money without any conditions.

The speakers question why the Ukraine war, which the U.S. allegedly funded and whose military leaders purportedly ran, was not televised. They claim the U.S. funds the Ukrainian government, retirement, and small businesses, keeping Ukraine afloat. One speaker states they asked members of Congress, including the Speaker of the House, about the number of Ukrainians who have died in the war. They suggest that while the U.S. is funding the war, there is no tracking of how many Ukrainians have died, including those with Down syndrome. The speakers question why the public is shown Israel being bombed but not other wars, implying manipulation. They believe the public should be able to watch a war they are paying for.

Since Biden took office, the U.S. has spent $100 billion in an undeclared war against Russia, primarily funding Ukraine with $75 billion. Despite claims of Ukrainian victories, many believe Ukraine cannot win against Russia's superior resources. Most Americans oppose further funding, yet Congress continues to push for more aid. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson plans to prioritize a $60 billion aid package for Ukraine, despite a lack of support from Republican voters. Critics argue that this funding diverts attention from pressing domestic issues, like illegal immigration and national debt. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene emphasizes the disconnect between lawmakers and their constituents, urging Americans to hold their government accountable and prioritize domestic needs over foreign wars.

Speaker 0 expressed gratitude for the attendees and mentioned a meeting with President Zelensky, emphasizing support against Putin's invasion. They requested a clear strategy and detailed answers from the White House regarding Ukraine. Criticizing the Biden administration, they highlighted the need for oversight and a coherent plan before allocating additional funds. The speaker then shifted focus to national security, specifically the border crisis. They highlighted the high number of illegal crossings, the presence of terrorists, and the alarming amount of fentanyl entering the country. The speaker stressed the urgency of addressing these issues and reiterated the need for clarity and oversight in spending taxpayer dollars.

The speaker criticizes the US government's funding of the proxy war in Ukraine, arguing that it prioritizes military aid over domestic infrastructure. They highlight the lack of transparency and accountability in the allocation of tax dollars, revealing questionable payments and arms deals. The speaker questions the wisdom of escalating the conflict with Russia, pointing out the potential for nuclear annihilation. They also criticize the erosion of democracy in Ukraine and the profit-seeking motives of individuals involved in the war. The speaker calls on the UN Security Council to enforce the UN Charter and monitor NATO's actions.

We don't have any extra money to send to Ukraine, considering our massive deficit of over $1.5 trillion. Borrowing money from China to support Ukraine doesn't make sense. We don't have a rainy day fund with trillions of dollars just sitting around. Instead, we would have to borrow the money, which leads to inflation. Since Russia's war in Ukraine began, American taxpayers have already provided $113 billion to Ukraine. We have many issues in our own country that need attention before we borrow more money to fuel a war in another nation.

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine and claims that Russia tried to settle it on favorable terms. They argue that the US spends a significant amount of money on military contracts and expanding NATO. The speaker criticizes the allocation of funds, stating that the money could have been used to address homelessness. They also mention that the war will require further expenses for rebuilding. The speaker suggests that politicians and defense manufacturers benefit from this situation, referring to it as a money laundering scheme. They question the loan given to Ukraine and its repayment prospects. The speaker highlights the loan conditions imposed, including austerity measures and the sale of government-owned assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the ownership of these corporations, specifically mentioning BlackRock. The speaker concludes by stating that the strategy of keeping people divided allows those in power to continue their actions unchecked.

To pass my amendment, the Senate must remove Democrat leaders blocking it. I propose a vote on whether American taxpayer money should be used to fly illegal immigrants from Venezuela and Haiti into the US. President Biden has secretly flown 320,000 illegal aliens into Blue City airports in 2023. Vote against me to stop this practice. Time has expired.

Ukraine cannot win its war against Russia, even with extensive Western support. The situation is dire, with a significant loss of life among Ukrainians. Recently, the U.S. Senate proposed sending an additional $60 billion to Ukraine, despite its corrupt government and ongoing issues. There's a chance to stop this legislation in the Senate, but if it passes, the House could potentially improve or reject it. This funding not only supports Ukraine for 2024 but also ties future presidents' hands, limiting their diplomatic options. Many senators seem to believe prolonging the war serves Ukraine's interests, ignoring the reality that it leads to further destruction and suffering. Ultimately, the motivations appear to align more with military contractors than the well-being of Ukrainians.

The American people should be proud of their support for Ukraine. We will continue supplying Ukraine with critical weapons and equipment, including $200 million that I just approved. However, without additional funding, our ability to help Ukraine respond to urgent demands is coming to an end. We need Ukraine to fix its broken immigration system, and Congress needs to do the same at home. Holding Ukraine funding hostage to push a partisan agenda on the border is not the solution. We need real solutions.

The speaker questions the unconditional financial support given to Ukraine and emphasizes the need for a plan and payment for any future aid. They also mention diverting funds from Israel's arms budget. The speaker then asks if the government will be shut down and suggests that the Republican party should focus on shutting down the border as a message.

Max Blumenthal, a journalist and American taxpayer, criticizes the US government's funding of the proxy war in Ukraine. He highlights the lack of transparency and accountability in how US tax dollars are allocated to Ukraine, with funds being misused and embezzled. Blumenthal also questions the US's escalation of the conflict and the potential nuclear consequences. He criticizes the erosion of democracy in Ukraine and the profit-seeking motives of individuals and companies involved in the war. Blumenthal calls on the UN Security Council to enforce the UN Charter and monitor and restrain NATO's actions.

Speaker 1 describes four months of arduous negotiations to produce a bipartisan bill, noting there were many times negotiations derailed and that he stayed on the phone at midnight to keep them moving. He argues the bill is crucial and a turning point for America, outlining the stakes across several flashpoints. First, he asserts that if the U.S. does not aid Ukraine, Putin will walk over Ukraine, the war could be lost, and the U.S. could find itself fighting in Eastern Europe as a NATO ally in a few years, a scenario Americans would not like. Second, he says if the U.S. does not help Israel defend itself against Hamas, the perpetual war will continue. Third, he claims humanitarian aid to starving Palestinians in Gaza is essential to prevent hundreds of thousands from starving. Fourth, he mentions the border crisis, referencing statements from Speaker Johnson that it is chaos, and asserts legislative action is needed. Speaker 1 credits Mitch McConnell for his contributions, but contrasts him with others, including Speaker Johnson, who he says are "scared to death of Donald Trump." He contends Trump has called for chaos and suggested that if he becomes president, Ukraine could be gone, the border could worsen, and war in the Middle East could escalate. He argues Trump’s stance is political rather than policy-driven and asserts that the majority of Republican senators recognize the bill as the right thing to do. He emphasizes the bill as a compromise—describing it as something he does not like in full, nor does McConnell, but necessary to accomplish important outcomes in the Senate. He recalls bipartisan legislation from two years prior as proof such collaboration is possible. The core question he poses is whether senators will drown out the political noise from Trump and his allies and do the right thing for America. Speaker 1 frames the bill as a turning point in American policy and history, asking whether history will look back and see that they rose to the occasion. He asserts that the majority of Republican senators understand the bill’s necessity, despite political headwinds, and he casts passage as essential to addressing Ukraine, Israel, Gaza humanitarian needs, and border stability. Speaker 1 ends by reiterating that history is watching their decisions at this moment.

The speaker criticizes a bill that prioritizes Ukraine over America, arguing that it neglects pressing issues such as border security and rising costs for American families. They express frustration with the lack of debate and amendment opportunities in the Senate, emphasizing the need for individual members to have more influence. The speaker also highlights the Biden administration's actions that have contributed to the current border crisis, including reversing Trump-era policies and not enforcing immigration laws. They criticize the administration's energy policy and its impact on US relations with Russia. The speaker concludes by expressing concerns about the allocation of foreign aid and the neglect of American priorities.

The speaker points out that the budget for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the US is $12 billion, while Ukraine receives 12 times that amount in one year. The speaker mentions that even after the war in Ukraine ends, the US will spend half a trillion dollars on rebuilding the country, with contracts for rebuilding being even larger than war contracts. The speaker highlights a statement made by Mitch McConnell, who suggests that the money sent to Ukraine actually goes to US military contractors, benefiting the country. The speaker implies that this reveals a money laundering scheme involving companies like Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed.

Ukraine cannot win its war against Russia, even with extensive Western support. The ongoing conflict is leading to significant loss of life and economic degradation. Recently, the U.S. Senate proposed sending another $60 billion to Ukraine, despite its corrupt government and ongoing issues. There is a critical procedural vote that could potentially kill this legislation, and efforts are being made to sway Republican senators against it. This funding not only supports Ukraine in 2024 but also ties future presidential decisions, limiting diplomatic options. Many senators seem to believe prolonging the war serves Ukraine's interests, but this perspective overlooks the devastating impact on the Ukrainian population and distracts from pressing domestic issues.

I am working very hard to end the savage conflict in Ukraine. Millions of Ukrainians and Russians have been needlessly killed or wounded in this horrific and brutal conflict with no end in sight. The United States has sent hundreds of billions of dollars to support Ukraine's defense with no security. Do you want to keep it going for another five years? 2,000 people are being killed every single week, or more. They're Russian young people. They're Ukrainian young people. They're not Americans, but I want it to stop. Meanwhile, Europe has sadly spent more money buying Russian oil and gas than they have spent on defending Ukraine by far. They've spent more buying Russian oil and gas than they have defending Ukraine.

The speaker introduces an amendment to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, aiming to prevent American troops from being sent to fight on the ground in Ukraine. They argue that the United States should focus on encouraging peace talks between Russia and Ukraine instead of escalating the conflict. The speaker highlights the significant amount of money already sent to Ukraine and questions its effectiveness due to the country's lack of commitment to anti-corruption measures. They urge their colleagues to support the amendment to protect American lives. Another speaker emphasizes the need to prevent US troops from being involved in Ukraine to avoid the risk of escalation and accidental involvement in a larger conflict. They reference previous entanglements in the Syrian civil war and support the amendment.

The speaker criticizes the act of withholding Ukraine funding to push a partisan agenda on the border, stating that it is not the right approach. They emphasize the need for genuine solutions.

I would like to remind Congress that Ukraine is not part of the United States, and it is not our responsibility to defend their borders. The Department of Defense has consistently failed its audits and cannot account for over 61% of its assets. Instead of focusing on Ukraine, we should prioritize defending our own borders, as 300 Americans die every day from Fentanyl poisoning originating from China and Mexican cartels. It is crucial for Congress to understand that the American people work hard to protect our own nation, not other countries. Therefore, we should redirect our efforts towards securing our border.

Millions of dollars are being funneled into Ukraine, which the speaker believes is a fraudulent and criminal endeavor. They express frustration over the lack of attention given to domestic issues, such as a recent derailment and chemical spill in Ohio that has left 4,000 people without safe drinking water. The speaker criticizes the prioritization of foreign affairs over the well-being of American citizens, stating that this pattern must come to an end. They predict that change will only come when pushed to the brink, and fear that the country is heading towards a disastrous outcome.

The United States has been sending hundreds of billions of dollars to support Ukraine's defense, with no end in sight, and with no security. Do you want to keep this going for another five years? Two thousand people, or more, are being killed every single week.

In this video, Speaker 0 proposes reducing funding for USAID by $4.5 billion, arguing that the money should be spent on economic development in the US instead. They criticize USAID for promoting abortion and President Biden's national gender strategy. Speaker 2 opposes the amendment, stating that it would harm vulnerable populations and eliminate important assistance programs. They argue that the funds are not primarily targeted at Ukraine and emphasize the negative consequences of cutting global health and disaster assistance programs. Speaker 0 counters by highlighting the economic struggles in the US and suggests prioritizing domestic issues. The debate continues with both speakers reiterating their positions.

Since Joe Biden became president, the US government has spent billions of dollars on an undeclared war against Russia without explaining its purpose or benefits. The war has resulted in Ukraine receiving billions of dollars in aid, but it has not been successful in ending the conflict. Ukraine is unable to defeat Russia, and the rest of the world is aware of this. However, US media continues to falsely claim that Ukraine is winning. Republican leaders like Mitch McConnell are pushing for more funding to Ukraine, despite opposition from the majority of American voters. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene criticizes the funding, highlighting the country's own issues and the lack of support from the American people.