reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Elon endorsed the speaker and campaigned for them. The speaker believes they would have won Pennsylvania easily, even if the "real governor" or Shapiro had run. The speaker is disappointed because Elon, who initially knew the bill's inner workings and had no problem with it, suddenly developed a problem when he learned about the EV mandate cut. This cut would save billions of dollars but is considered unfair. The speaker wants cars of all types, including electric, gasoline, combustion, and hybrids, and wants to be able to sell everything. Elon became "different" when Congress wanted to cut the EV mandate, which the speaker understands. Elon knew every aspect of the bill better than almost anybody.

The speaker begins by expressing their initial lack of bias against electric cars but then reveals some shocking discoveries. They mention that the environmental benefit of electric cars is a lie, as the French environmental agency ADEME states that it takes five years for an electric car to have the same carbon footprint as a traditional car due to the production of batteries. The speaker also highlights the exorbitant cost of electric cars, stating that they are 45-50% more expensive than traditional cars, taking 10-20 years to recoup the savings from not buying fuel. Lastly, the speaker criticizes the European market for giving the Chinese automotive industry a significant advantage, with Chinese cars being 20% cheaper and equally reliable. They conclude by stating that 80% of batteries worldwide are sold by the Chinese.

Electric cars are expensive and will be used to control where people can and cannot go. Unlike traditional cars, autonomous electric cars will be computer-driven and will only take passengers where they are allowed to go. The goal is not to save the planet from climate change, but rather to impose control over people's movements. The idea is to replace petrol and diesel cars with electric ones in order to limit people's freedom and decide where they can travel. The claim of saving the planet is just an excuse.

The speaker expresses disappointment in Elon, claiming Elon knew the details of a bill "better than almost anybody" and initially had no problem with it. The speaker suggests Elon's problem arose when the EV mandate was cut, costing billions. The speaker wants various car types available, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. The speaker claims Elon made positive statements about them previously. The speaker states they helped Elon a lot. A second speaker asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public.

Thousands of auto dealers are urging President Biden to reconsider the government's electric vehicle (EV) mandate. These dealerships represent various brands and are speaking on behalf of consumers. The problem is that manufacturers are being forced to produce EVs, but consumers are not buying them. Dealerships are now facing a backlog of EV inventory, with up to 12 months' worth of supply. Consumers are hesitant due to concerns about infrastructure and range anxiety. The Biden administration's mandate has put pressure on manufacturers to invest in EV production, but without sufficient consumer demand. Dealerships want the market and infrastructure to evolve naturally, rather than being forced. They are not against EVs and actually make good profits from EV service. The goal is to find a balance between EVs, gas vehicles, and hybrids.

Joe Biden's energy policies are causing high inflation and hitting American families hard. He reversed actions that achieved energy independence and canceled the Keystone XL Pipeline. By reentering the Paris climate accord and blocking new oil, gas, and coal production, he is raising energy costs and hurting industries like food, shipping, and manufacturing. China benefits from these high energy prices, driving our heavy industry overseas. To become an advanced manufacturing nation, we need low-cost energy. Biden's energy agenda aligns with China's, as they sign global climate deals and break them. When I'm back in the White House, I'll bring back a pro-American energy policy, eliminating unnecessary regulations and approving energy projects quickly. This will create jobs, restore hope, and make America great again.

Speaker 0 argues that 100-year-old automotive technology is continually refined and that exhaust from modern cars is cleaner than the air entering the intake in many cities, due to catalytic converters, NOx converters (notably in diesels), computer-controlled fuel injection, and stop-start systems. He claims that there is no justification for restricting petrol cars and contrasts this with restrictions on electric vehicles (EVs). He contends that the EV push is not about encouraging people to switch to EVs for environmental reasons but about driving people out of internal combustion engine (ICE) cars. The EV zero-emission vehicle mandate, he says, forces automotive manufacturers to sell an ever-increasing proportion of EVs each year, and he asserts this will destroy, bankrupt, and reduce mass-manufacturing conglomerates such as Volkswagen, Audi Group, Ford, and others. He cites an example with Volkswagen and Audi: they are not allowed to sell the desired mix of petrol and diesel vehicles because they will be fined £15,000 per car if they fail to sell 28% as EVs. He claims they are already restricting petrol and diesel sales, and notes that this pressure is already in place for 2025. He argues that European carmakers cannot sell many EVs because European cars are more expensive than cheaper Chinese imports. He shifts to a broader geopolitical economic view, stating this is not a mere consumer issue but a plan arranged by global financiers, describing it as a one-two punch: you cannot sell petrol and diesel because of mandates, and your cars are uncompetitive with cheaper Chinese imports. He notes there are 180 Chinese EV makers, with only one or two currently profitable; trade press reports suggest that by the end of the decade, seven to nine of them will be profitable while the rest will have failed. From this, he infers that someone is willing to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to manufacture cars at a loss so they can be delivered to Europe at a loss in order to destroy Europe’s mass-manufacturing capability. He concludes that as a result, there will simply not be enough cars to go around, and ultimately, the mandates will be moot because there will be none available.

Joe Biden's mandates for electric cars are causing problems in the US auto industry. The Green New Deal is driving up car prices and hurting American auto production. Despite spending billions of taxpayer dollars on electric car subsidies, prices are still skyrocketing. Biden's policies are projected to cost automakers billions of dollars and result in the loss of thousands of auto manufacturing jobs. Trump claims that he saved the auto industry once and will do it again, urging voters in key states to defeat Biden and reelect him.

Speaker 1 says people repairing their own vehicles is fine in general, but not for warranty work because the cars are “very complicated” and the company does not think it is safe. They argue many repairs cannot be done at home; the speaker says they can work on a 1973 Bronco, but working on a brand new Bronco requires “all sorts of specialty tools,” and not having them could risk people’s lives. Speaker 0 then cites “what real Americans have to say,” stating that if they cannot work on their own vehicle, they expect a “bumper to bumper warranty” for at least 200,000 miles. They connect this to auto manufacturers designing vehicles so they can’t be worked on, claiming that manufacturers do this “that’s how they make their money.” The transcript then discusses data for Ford: about $101 billion in revenue comes from “Ford Blue,” described as parts and service; “Ford Pro” is described as another parts-and-service category with about $66.3 billion in revenue. Speaker 0 concludes that overall Ford makes about $50 billion every year from parts and repairs and says they have “found the real reason why they don’t want you repairing a vehicle.”

The speaker asks the senator his opinion on violence against Tesla products. The speaker asks if the senator denounces the violence against Tesla products, dealerships, and cars. The senator responds that he can't talk about Tesla, but that Elon Musk is a disaster for America, and America knows it.

Joe Biden's mandates for electric cars are causing car prices to rise and threatening the American auto industry. Despite the high prices, Biden is using tax dollars to subsidize electric cars for the wealthy. This is hurting American consumers and manufacturing, particularly in states like Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio. The electric vehicle mandate is projected to cost 117,000 auto manufacturing jobs. Mexico now has a larger share of the car industry than the US. To save the industry, President Donald Trump promises to end the Green New Deal and fight for auto workers. Voters in key states need to defeat Biden and reelect Trump to protect the auto industry.

Speaker: The message points out that Advance Auto Parts is closing 700 stores and that they are “forcing you into, you know, these new AI kill switch vehicles by 2027.” It then asserts who actually owns the chessboard: who owns AutoZone, O'Reilly Parts, and Advance Auto Parts. Claim: The number one and number two shareholders of AutoZone are Vanguard and BlackRock. The same is stated for O'Reilly Parts. For Advance Auto Parts, the companies that are shutting down hundreds of stores are said to be owned by Vanguard and BlackRock. Speaker: The argument continues that Vanguard and BlackRock “own the aftermarket parts industry” and that this industry is currently being systematically dismantled. The speaker then asks to consider auto manufacturers, taking Ford as an example, and asserts Vanguard and BlackRock own Ford as well, implying they own the auto building automakers’ buildings that surveil the vehicles they are forcing consumers into. Speaker: The claim is that Vanguard and BlackRock profit from the destruction of the old market and from the construction of the new one. They are described as managing over $20,000,000,000,000 combined, and as the top shareholders in, out of 505 companies and the SDMP, owning all of them. The speaker states that the number one shareholder of BlackRock is Vanguard, describing this as a closed loop. Speaker: The speaker says this isn’t a conspiracy but literally a business model: you buy the cage, and they own the patent, so stop calling this progress. The implication is that Vanguard and BlackRock control both the supply chain for parts and the vehicle technologies and systems being deployed, enabling a cycle of destruction of the old market and creation of the new one.

Gas is incredibly volatile, and we don't even produce it locally. The Jones Act and other regulations make it difficult to obtain gas here. It's worth remembering that I blocked two gas pipelines from entering the state.

The Biden administration's research on solar radiation modification (SRM) as a climate policy component is seen by Mark Marano, publisher of climatedepot.com, as a government attempt to control weather. He points out that this approach, funded by Bill Gates through Harvard University, echoes ideas from the 1970s when scientists believed fossil fuels were causing global cooling. Marano criticizes the risky and unproven nature of SRM, suggesting it is being used as leverage to push for electric cars and Green New Deal policies. He argues that the American people have already shown their opposition to phasing out gas cars, with less than 7% of car sales being electric vehicles. Marano also raises concerns about the increased dependence on China and the intentional creation of car shortages to promote mass transit.

The speaker claims electric cars are a "con," citing John Kerry's private jet usage. A Jay Leno clip with Joe Biden was filmed at the Secret Service Training Center, where the speaker used to work, suggesting the whole thing is a "schtick." According to an op-ed, there's only enough battery power to power the world for 75 seconds. The speaker analogizes this to a hospital patient on life support. By 2030, the plan is to have enough battery power for only eleven minutes. The speaker believes "liberals" are asking for a solution that doesn't exist. The other speaker agrees, stating that the plan is not well thought out.

The speaker introduces an amendment to defund a federal mandate requiring all new vehicles after 2026 to be equipped with a kill switch that can disable a vehicle if the driver is deemed to be performing poorly. The speaker argues that this mandate infringes on the fundamental right to travel freely. The opposition claims that the amendment is misleading, as the mandate does not require kill switches but rather passive technology to prevent drunk driving. They argue that this technology saves lives and reduces the burden on police officers. The speaker counters by expressing concerns about privacy, potential dangers, and the violation of constitutional rights.

In 2009, the government destroyed the used car market through the program known as cash for clunkers, which offered drivers up to $4,500 to trade in older vehicles for new, more fuel-efficient ones. It was sold as good for the economy and good for the environment. The program led to a dramatic increase in showroom traffic at local car dealers. What it actually did was carry out a government-mandated destruction of some of the most reliable, easy-to-repair vehicles Americans still had on the road. If a car qualified, the dealership couldn't resell it. The engine had to be intentionally destroyed, so mechanics were made to fill their engines with sodium silicate, liquid glass, and run them until they seized for good. Nearly 700,000 vehicles were wiped out, and a lot of them weren't junk. They were older cars and trucks that could last for decades, be fixed in a driveway, and kept running without software, screens, sensors, or thousand-dollar repair bills. Then they were replaced by newer vehicles that cost more, brake more easily, and push ordinary people back to the dealer for repair bills. Cash for Clunkers was sold as progress, but to a lot of Americans, it looked more like the deliberate destruction of cheap, dependable transportation. The cars they killed were simple, durable, and paid off, which may be exactly why they had to go.

There is a scandal involving electric vehicles (EVs) and their claimed efficiency. Two Washington attorneys argue that the government is misleading the public by inflating the fuel efficiency of EVs. They claim that carmakers multiply the efficiency of EVs by a factor of 6.67, resulting in exaggerated numbers. Additionally, compliance credits are given based on these inflated scores, which can be traded for cash. Tesla alone has received billions of dollars in credits. The report highlights that this information is buried deep in the federal register and not widely known. The speaker praises the report as excellent.

Gas is incredibly volatile, and the fact that we don't produce it domestically creates challenges. Regulations like the Jones Act further complicate getting gas here. It's worth remembering that I made the decision to halt the construction of two gas pipelines that were intended to enter our state.

Auto workers are being taken advantage of by Joe Biden and their leadership for pushing electric vehicles. Electric cars are not popular. A new economic plan will create jobs and benefit the nation. Inflation is due to energy prices rising significantly.

The transcript claims that people protesting against ICE do not realize their rights were “completely violated” the previous day by the California State Legislature. It states that, in the Assembly, Democrats advanced a potential per-mile tax by a simple majority vote, asking the California Transportation Commission for recommendations by 2027 to implement a per-mile tax charging “two to nine cents for every single mile” driven. The speaker says this would cost families about $1,200 to $4,200 extra each year, depending on how estimates turn out, and describes it as punishing people for needing to fulfill work and family obligations. The transcript also claims the US House decided that cars made past 2026 should continue to have kill switches, describing this as a decision made by the Biden administration. It argues that if California sends monthly or quarterly per-mile-tax bills and someone refuses to pay, the government could “kill switch” the car, meaning that refusing payment would prevent driving. Finally, the speaker says the public is “supposed to trust them with our money,” citing a report about a homelessness program run by Newsom. The transcript claims that $11 to $12 million was spent, but the program helped only 22 people, and characterizes that outcome as “absolutely ludicrous.”

According to the speaker, Canada has an electric vehicle mandate, implemented without parliamentary debate, requiring all vehicles sold in Canada to be electric by 2035. This was enacted by the environmental minister through changes to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA). The speaker believes this mandate is an example of government overreach, citing challenges posed by Canada's cold climate, the needs of rural Canadians, and power outages that would render electric vehicles unusable. The speaker contrasts this approach with the conservative viewpoint, which emphasizes individual choice and ensuring the infrastructure is in place to support those who choose electric vehicles. The speaker states conservatives prioritize equal opportunity in areas like education, employment, healthcare, and family raising.

Biden's push for electric vehicles has resulted in auto workers losing their jobs and car dealerships struggling to sell unwanted EVs. Despite the lack of demand, those who do buy electric vehicles to save on gas are now being targeted by the government for more revenue. This includes placing tracking devices on their cars to monitor their usage. It's frustrating how liberals can support such policies.

By 2035, Canada will mandate that citizens can only purchase electric vehicles due to a change in the Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) quietly put in place by the environmental minister. The mandate stipulates that all vehicles made in Canada must have zero emissions. A speaker argues that the government is overreaching, citing issues such as cold climates, the needs of rural Canadians, and power outages, such as one that occurred in Peterborough three weeks prior, as examples of why the mandate won't work. During the five day outage, electric vehicles were rendered useless. The speaker suggests that families should be able to choose to buy electric vehicles if they want, and the government's role should be to ensure the infrastructure is in place to support them.

California plants ban plants due to wildfires. 'the government shut off the water when the fire was happening,' and 'they wanna ban plants.' They claim 'smart meters were catching on fire every time there's a fire,' and that 'the insurance companies even know,' adding that 'if your house catches on fire from a smart meter, the insurance companies actually will not cover you.' The speaker cites lawsuits claiming 'faulty PG and E smart meters started their house fire,' and says the meter 'pulses 14,000 to 190,000 times per day,' a claim PG and E admitted in court. They reference a 2019 document 'how insurance companies know this' and contend 'smart meters actually jack up your electric bill by two to three times the price.' They advocate 'analog meter instead of a smart meter' and note California considers per mile road charge as gas tax revenue is expected to decline.