reSee.it - Related Video Feed

According to the speaker, there was no COVID pandemic or novel virus. They believe it was a behavior modification exercise driven by financial interests. They quote Peter Daschick to support their claim and accuse the Biden administration of domestic terrorism. They argue that the administration used lockdowns and media manipulation to win the election. The speaker also mentions the adverse effects of vaccines. They conclude by stating that the government's actions are treasonous and call for the replacement of the current administration.

The speaker claims Derek Chauvin was unjustly prosecuted and imprisoned. Mike Benz discusses the "strange unanswered questions" surrounding the 2020 race riots, including prosecutors protecting rioters, BLM receiving $50 billion from corporations, and the suspension of COVID-19 restrictions for rioting. Benz asserts that Internet censorship stems from the foreign policy establishment's global tactics, including orchestrating politically motivated racial unrest. He cites a 2021 Pentagon special forces manual detailing how to incite a race riot in West Africa to coerce a government, drawing parallels to the Minneapolis riots. Benz highlights Tim Walz's role as governor and former chairman of the special forces caucus, the same unit that published the riot orchestration guide, and his alleged refusal to deploy the National Guard. He also questions the role of Somali immigrants in Minneapolis, suggesting they may have ties to US special forces. Benz discusses the Transition Integrity Project, a group that simulated scenarios to prevent Trump from remaining in office, even if he won the election, by using BLM to destabilize the country. He claims that blue chip companies gave BLM $50 billion between the riots and the election. He concludes that there was an agreement between the AFL CIO and the US Chamber of Commerce to have the rioters stand down when Biden was announced the president.

The speaker says their role is to present context that, in their view, the past four years involved “orchestration to assault the liberties of people” by “pretending” the situation was a public health emergency while enabling “inconceivable threat to liberties” and “violation of human rights.” They frame this as “lip service to tyrants” and as “domestic and international terrorism.” They argue that evidence begins in the UK in 1966, saying the UK’s wealth and trust decided to fund “the coronavirus as the preferred form of human manipulation” in 1966. They then claim that one year later, the United States and the UK agreed to “modify and manipulate coronavirus” to see what could be done to infect a healthy population (described as 1967). They characterize “Operation Warp Speed” as arriving after 56 years. They cite an imaged 2011 document, described as stating “antitrust collusion” involving the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The speaker claims this group established a mandate that “by 2020, the world would accept… a universal vaccine” by the end of 2020, and they say the group identified coronavirus as the thing nature would need for the plan to happen. The speaker then quotes a 2015 public statement: “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we needed to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” They say that at the time, the World Health Organization had officially declared coronavirus an eradicated disease, and they ask what world would need a vaccine for an eradicated disease. They argue that media hype drives economics: “A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype,” and that “We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.” They add that investors respond if they see profit, and characterize this as treason or terrorism. They say that Peter Daszak will testify in Congress in “a few short days” that the emergence likely came from a random event in Wuhan, China, where a bat and pangolin “got together and voila” by December, calling it “conspiracy level language.” The speaker asserts this is an admission of conspiracy “to commit acts of terror.” They also cite 2016 language, claiming an announcement that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was “poised for human emergence,” and treat this as part of the same “conspiracy.” Next, the speaker claims evidence includes a 2002 patent filed on “synthetic primary coronavirus,” which they say was “patented to be infectious and replication protective,” calling it “weaponized.” They further claim that in 2005, a curriculum vitae indicates “synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biological warfare enabling technologies,” and they question the meaning of that phrase, linking it to biological weapons. They state they have U.S. credentials since 2002 as a “biological weapons inspector” and say they briefed the matter since then. Finally, they cite a WHO Global Preparedness Monitoring Board announcement in September 2019, saying that between 09/19/2019 and September 2020 there would be “our greatest… accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen,” emphasizing the word “release” as “not a leak” and suggesting no mention of accident likelihood.

An individual claims they were offered $200 a day by an organization called No Kings to protest ICE in New York on June 14. The instructions allegedly involved causing chaotic disruptions in specific streets, with pallets of bricks available for protesters to use. The speaker believes this is unpatriotic and suggests the organization wants to wreak havoc. They speculate that wealthy individuals are funding these protests, possibly to remove Trump from power. The speaker asserts that while they need money, they will not participate, but others will be tempted to destroy the city for the payment. They believe the situation reveals corruption at the highest levels.

Speaker 0 asserts that the design of the molecular structures in vaccines and injections has no purpose other than to injure and kill. Drawing on 30 years of experience in rational drug design, they say every component in a vial is chosen by someone with specific objectives (e.g., how quickly absorbed, how long it lasts, where it distributes in the body) and that these components are not random or natural products. They declare the ingredients to be toxic by design and intentionally harmful. This, they claim, fits with what they call “the lie” about the pandemic, arguing there wasn’t a real pandemic. According to Speaker 0, the pandemic’s purpose was to damage the economy, train people to comply under a mock emergency, and compel people to get vaccinated. They warn that if people do nothing, speak up less, and simply follow directives, they will lose their freedom and then their lives. They allege that a self-appointed group of very rich people desires a much smaller global population than 8,000,000,000 people, and they claim to be able to deduce the script behind these events. The speaker urges listeners to start talking to anyone and everyone relentlessly, insisting that this situation is not going away. They warn that without protest and refusal, people will first lose their freedom and then their lives.

They claim our society has been taken over, and they point to one person in the White House who supposedly stands in the way. They warn that every American will have to stand up, saying we read about it in history like Normandy, but now we are in it and must spread it. They insist we cannot surrender, and reference that the president wouldn’t surrender. They state it was an attack on the capital carried out by Antifa, but was enabled by McConnell, Schumer, Pelosi, and the mayor, saying they knew it was coming and that security was lacking as Antifa acted, with the media later picking it up. They accuse Fox of disgraceful coverage, claim Rupert Murdoch is driving that with his sons, and say they merged with the rest of the mainstream media. They describe the situation as serious and expanding, claiming we do not have four years and that time is against us, drawing a comparison to Hong Kong to emphasize urgency. They discuss information released about cyber warfare used in battleground states. They claim to have learned that James Comey, the former FBI director, sold the HAMR and SCORECARD, a top-secret program, to the Chinese. They describe HAMR as a top-secret program similar to an iPhone that gains access to voting networks, with an application like on an iPhone that can be installed to modulate voting results so they win by smaller margins. They say they received a call on Tuesday night at 11:30 about the ISI from Pakistan being in the voting machines in Georgia, and that they informed someone about it. They assert that the two candidates Loeffler and Purdue were ahead, but an hour later they were behind.

Discussion centers on the agent provocateur angle of January 6. They claim there were federal agents involved in instigating the violence and entering the Capitol, and that "this one guy" has faced no legal consequences while others face "massive federal charges and four years plus in jail." They compare to the World Trade Organization riots in Seattle '99, saying "literal government agents went in wearing antifa outfits" to provoke violence and were released conveniently. They focus on "Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the first January 6 attack on the US Capitol," referencing a Revolver article and a video. They debate whether he was initiated by government, radicalized and acting on his own, or a rogue agent; they note it shows intelligence agency problems. They worry about autocratic solutions and how social media exposes such cases; they end with "Red or black" and Ray Epps.

The speakers discuss how COVID lockdowns and the George Floyd protests created a perfect storm, alleging certain groups encouraged, organized, and funded the unrest, even providing pallets of bricks. They claim these groups profited by pushing new laws, tightening censorship, and controlling social media, funded by tax money filtered through NGOs. They believe the events of the last four years revealed how many people are easily coerced and how unscrupulous groups in power will exploit people for profit and control. They assert that these groups use progressive or other guises to rationalize behavior that undermines the principles the Founding Fathers fought against. The speakers also discuss the concept of the "deep state," citing examples like the Kennedy files and a specific incident involving a rangefinder, suggesting organized cover-ups and hidden agendas. They question why certain information remains unreleased after many years, implying the public may not be ready for the truth.

Discussion centers on alleged agent provocateur involvement in January 6. Speakers describe a theory that "federal agents ... instigating the violence, instigating the entering into the capital," and point to "this one guy" who is isolated on video yet faced no legal consequences. They discuss "Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the very first one six attack January 6 attack on The US capital," and contrast him with others prosecuted. They debate whether the provocateur acted under government direction, was radicalized, or acted independently as a psycho, noting "this guy's doing this, like, over and over again." They reference the World Trade Organization in Seattle as a precedent for provocateurs, and note "100,000 different cameras" enabled scrutiny. A concern is raised about "an autocratic government that controls all aspects of society so none of this ever happens."

The speaker describes how on-the-spot protests unfold, arguing that protests that appear to erupt immediately after events, and often seem spontaneous, are in fact not organic or unplanned. According to the speaker, such demonstrations can be initiated without the traditional apparatus of organizers, music, bullhorns, or large gatherings that are typically associated with coordinated protests. Instead, the speaker notes that trucks are being loaded to depart after the protest, suggesting a premeditated or at least organized behind-the-scenes workflow that enables these protests to occur with apparent immediacy. The speaker then identifies the groups involved in the protest activity behind them. The groups named are the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Democratic Socialists of America, and a few looser organizations described as Revolutionary Communists for America. The speaker asserts that these groups, together, are responsible for the protests and the organizing of the demonstrations. A central claim of the speaker is that none of the protests seen are organic contributions arising spontaneously from local populations. Instead, the protests are characterized as well organized, implying a level of planning and coordination beyond what the public perceives. The assertion extends to the source of this organization, suggesting that the readiness and capability to mobilize protests come from structured planning and networks rather than spontaneous public sentiment alone. Building on the claim of organization, the speaker posits that the effective mobilization of these protests is supported by funding. The funding is described as coming through various campaigns, with two described pathways: foreign influence campaigns and domestic political campaigns, specifically mentioning Democrat campaigns as potential sources of financial support. The speaker implies that such funding enables the rapid deployment and execution of protest activities. In summary, the speaker contends that the protests observed after events are not spontaneously generated but are the result of deliberate organization by specific political groups, with notable involvement from the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Democratic Socialists of America, and Revolutionary Communists for America. The speaker emphasizes that these protests are well funded through campaigns, including foreign influence efforts or Democratic campaigns, which facilitates their ability to mobilize quickly and appear as if they are happening organically.

Speaker 0: Describes being “free as a bird,” moving “in the air,” and feeling “heavy,” with lyrics about diamonds and tattoos covering his scars. Mentions “Cut that bitch off,” not picking up when he calls, and hitting “another city” without needing to look around for others, saying he brought “the vibes” and “fresh off the press of cool.” References drinking, tinted eyes, and “Sprite” and “post some lines in it.” Claims the “shit here gonna sell itself,” with “weighted” motion and “one of my hoes shop in Chanel,” plus others “can’t stay off chain.” Repeats themes of “motion involved,” being “heavy,” “Diamonds and tattoos cover my scars,” “bulletproof” and “300 love,” and says “Make a killing,” “Got too many.” Speaker 1: Says “All over the place, guys,” and names Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer. Says Gabe Hoffman is “running humps on people” and calls him “a bad guy.” Says “I look like I’ve seen a ghost,” and claims someone very close to them was there “to infiltrate me.” Says “These are really fucking bad people,” “I’m beyond pissed,” and “It’s bad.” Claims “They tried to set someone up that you know and love.” Repeats “They’re fucking evil. These people are evil.” Says they are “unregistered foreign agents,” and claims “We’ll be watching,” saying “I will be watching,” including “everything they … everything you do.” Speaker 3: Responds “Hell yeah,” saying they are on their way back to the site to get a “burner phone” to use “ghost accounts” to “fuck Breva.” Speaker 5: States “We conduct riots and color revolutions,” “steal elections,” and “overthrow governments we don’t like,” and says “I was part of that.” Speaker 4: Says “IIA, which is social media psychological warfare,” and claims “We began that really in 2007.” Speaker 6: Says “They’re all being punished because they thought that what those important people told them was gonna happen.” Claims “I was there,” says people were “pumped that they were gonna fucking trash the capital,” and says, “And I was like, no. This is not good.” Speaker 7: Says the people “weren’t very prepared.” Speaker 0 replies that they’re not “come in to rush the building,” but asks whether “just having a little bit of security knowledge” meant they weren’t prepared. Speaker 1 says what “pisses me off” is that people say “I’m being handled.” Speaker 3 says “I’ve heard that before.” Speaker 7 warns it’s “very dangerous that people are out there giving people hope.” Speaker 4 concludes: “There is a storm coming like nothing you have ever seen, and not a one of you is prepared for it.”

The speaker says they “followed the money” to what they call the “protest industrial complex,” “Riot Inc.,” and identified a network of NGOs funding the ecosystem. They state the funding extends beyond the Soros/Open Society network to other funding networks, including the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, and “Foreign Cash,” along with “big, left wing” funders, including non-citizens. The speaker names Mr. Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland as an example of such funders. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, they describe Riot Inc. as having divisions similar to a corporation: not only an “Antifa boots on the ground” division, but also PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a “very well funded legal division” to “get these boots on the ground back on the streets as quickly as possible,” alongside the investors previously mentioned. Second, they claim they identified “dozens of radical organizations” that received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors, including “lawyer groups” that advocate for calling “good honest Americans fascists.” Third, they claim that more than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to “these very groups themselves.” They cite an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying more than 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism and that these groups received money from both “the billionaire class” and “taxpayer money” for that. The speaker also claims that this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms used by groups such as “Antifa,” the “John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (linked by the speaker to an attack on an ice facility), and the “Socialist Rifle Association.” They add that groups without LLCs or EIN numbers can still be paid through these crowdfunding platforms. The speaker closes by saying they will keep “following the money” and thanks the audience for leadership.

The speaker discusses how the COVID-19 pandemic has created a new category of forbidden speech, where questioning masks, vaccines, or the origins of the virus is seen as putting people at risk. They argue that it is important to hear both sides of the story and question the effectiveness of masks. They also discuss the George Floyd incident and the rise of movements like Black Lives Matter and Antifa, which they believe further divide the population. The speaker suggests that the pandemic and protests have been used to demolish independently owned businesses and introduce a woke militancy. They criticize the hypocrisy of wealthy individuals and corporations supporting these movements. The speaker also discusses the Trump presidency, conspiracy theories, and the Capitol riot, suggesting that the media's portrayal of these events is misleading.

Remember during COVID and the George Floyd protests? It seemed like money was being poured in to create outrage and destabilize the country in 2020, even though it felt artificial. It started after President Trump's inauguration with the pink hats, then transitioned into BLM and Antifa. The funding behind all of this seemed suspicious. Recently, we discovered USAID is one source. And just wait until we get to the Department of Defense and other departments! We've only scratched the surface of where this money is coming from.

This wasn't spontaneous; it was planned in plain sight, a war footing. A Marshall Plan-like approach could rapidly stimulate change. The science was bought, controlled via philanthrocapitalism to mandate vaccines globally. A worldwide lockstep approach amplified the alleged danger of a new virus through mainstream media, using horrific images. USAID manipulates news economics to enforce censorship. They own the science and expect platforms to comply. These actors can be prosecuted for fraud and racketeering. Withholding scientific data is fraud, but the mouthpieces spewed talking points like "nobody will be safe until everybody is safe". Departments rewrote rules, governors washed away rights, and politicians passed laws restricting freedoms. The vaccines aren't working, and should not be forced.

The speaker delivers a passionate tirade accusing established power structures of pervasive corruption and enacting or allowing harm without accountability. The core points are laid out as a sequence of high-profile allegations and perceived injustices, presented as ongoing and unresolved. Key claims and topics include: - Widespread frustration with exposing corruption: “I am tired of exposing corruption, doing our homework, [and] presenting the evidence. We know what's happening except then once we expose it, nothing happens. Nobody goes to jail.” - Hillary Clinton and related scandals: “Clinton got away with it. Even the left knew that the Clinton Foundation was dirty. They sold uranium to our biggest enemy, Russia.” The speaker asserts that “She can take confidential top secret emails and put them on her server at her home, something you and I would go to prison for.” - Benghazi and related actions: Benghazi referenced as gun running to a group in Syria that became ISIS, and the killing of a U.S. ambassador; a claim that troops were abandoned on Veterans Day with no consequences. - Spying on a presidential candidate: A charge that spying occurred on a presidential candidate, followed by the assertion that “they were doing it” and that “nothing happens.” - Russia collusion and its handling: The speaker claims collusion with Russia should have been the biggest scandal if true, or else that evidence and paperwork showed they knew it up to the White House; mentions lying to FISA courts, creating an enemies list, and using intelligence agencies to support an operation, claiming millions were spent on a claim they knew wasn’t true. - Ukraine and related investigations: The speaker mentions “the scandal, the loss of billions of tax dollars in Ukraine” and “the lies and the collusion with the Obama administration in Ukraine,” asserting these were downplayed or ignored. - Hunter Biden and Burisma/China: The speaker references “Hunter Biden, forget about Burisma. What was that? $7,000,000,000?” and asserts “We have all the proof anyone who cares to be honest needs… on his own freaking laptop,” with claimed verification by Democrats who had access to the same emails. - Deep state and justice system: An assertion of a “deep state” and a corrupted justice department, alongside perceived media complicity, including the claim that the media tells people to deny their own eyes. - Social and cultural protests: Claims that the country is torn apart by radicals marching with “no Trump, no Biden, no America” signs, while dismissing these protests as peaceful; and criticism of teachers’ unions and Black Lives Matter, labeling BLM as a corporation and BLM’s manifesto as advocating the destruction of the nuclear family. - Antifa and political labels: Antifa is dismissed as “not wild in the streets… that’s only an idea,” contrasting with the speaker’s view of constitutional support as radical. - Final sentiment: A declaration of having reached the limit, with a sense of fatigue and a near decision to end the show due to the perceived state of affairs, concluding with “I almost didn’t make the show last week because this is what I wanted to say to you.”

The speaker discusses the alleged plans of the government to declare martial law and strip the president's power to call the military. They claim that the country is being burned down by Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and Soros-funded groups, using the Israeli conflict as a catalyst. The speaker also talks about the long-term beta testing of tactics to create chaos and collapse civilization. They mention the deployment of troops in Chicago and the establishment of permanent TSA-style checkpoints in subways. The speaker criticizes the actions of Liz Cheney and accuses the Democrats of gaslighting and manipulating elections. They conclude by urging viewers to support their cause and promote their products.

Our politicians in Ireland are no different than England and everywhere else. They report up to the network through the European Commission, which is like the Politburo in Soviet times, unelected. And then you've got the European Parliament, which is like the Soviet Parliament in Soviet times. It's a talk shop with no real power. So EU is modeled on purpose on the Soviet system of totalitarian collectivization with unelected bureaucrats. Then you've got the UN, which sprang from Rockefeller's loins. Rockefeller brothers formed the Rockefellers along with the Rothschilds and the Warburgs. All of these structures we've got have been funded and grown, Trilateral Commission, Council Foreign Relations, Bilderberg, W. F. They've all been grown to manage the ant farm of us humans. That's where all our problems come from, and it all goes up essentially to the big banking kind of globalist oligarchs, and they all work together. So we get all this crap that comes down like totally totalitarian dystopian madness. So the key thing for people is to understand your politicians, challenge them on who they're reporting to. That's a key thing, I think. Not don't challenge them about what they're bringing in because that's a waste of time. If everyone is saying we see you and we know you're reporting to a non sovereign, non Irish authority, bringing in things that are against the people's interests. So who are you reporting to? And everyone keeps asking, keeps telling them, we know where you're at. We see you. I think that's important because a lot of people now, even young people are beginning to realize when we were told it was a conspiracy theory that higher powers are basically running our lives in a totalitarian fashion, that was part of the scam. We were indoctrinated to believe that higher up ultra wealthy people running our lives and influencing our governments was a conspiracy theory. But increasingly, people are realizing now, actually, that was a trick to tell us that Uh-huh. Because they are running our lives, and our children's and grandchildren's futures are going to be destroyed by these ultra rich oligarchs if we don't start making a ruckus. Now, wef is a filthy household name. Whereas they worked in the shadows for, like, a century, and no one ever talked about them because they own the media. No. It's 20 social media, you got COVID backlash Yeah. Vaccine backlash, and now you got all these people talking about them. And that's why they're desperately trying to get in hate speech, digital millennium act, censorship, ID for people to get on the Internet. They're really worried about the young people talking. Really scared about that. And, I think it's all on the razor's edge, all to play for for the bad guys and the good guys. Uh-huh. I couldn't call it. I think it's all to play for. So let's double down, more awakening.

Mike Benz, a former State Department official and cybersecurity expert, discusses how the US government has weaponized its power to control media and censor citizens. He explains that the foreign policy establishment, including the State Department, CIA, and Pentagon, has historically used these tactics against foreign governments but has now turned them on the American people. Benz outlines the chronology of how the government established censorship centers within agencies like the Global Engagement Center and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to control social media and suppress populist political movements. He also raises questions about the government's role in COVID-19 censorship and the origins of the virus.

The speaker claims that the real faces of J6 are leftist Democrats who are against Donald Trump, regardless of the legitimacy of the election. According to an investigation by Milly Weaver, these individuals orchestrated the insurrection, fooling people into believing it was perpetrated by MAGA supporters. Evidence purportedly shows they are the real violent insurrectionists behind J6. One individual is quoted discussing putting pressure on the Democratic National Committee, suggesting taking over buildings, using disguises, and asserting that burning buildings are legitimate forms of resistance. They also discuss a campaign to get Democratic governors to refuse to deploy the National Guard. One speaker states they were in the front and orchestrated it, while also expressing support for Trump 2024.