reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker cites a rapid rise in autism: "one in ten thousand children had autism" in the distant past, then "one in twenty thousand," then "one in ten thousand," and now "one in thirty one" overall, with boys at "one in twelve" in some areas, notably California. "Since February, autism rates have surged by much more than four hundred percent." He questions why and argues researchers should be appreciated rather than attacked for seeking answers. On stage were doctors, and he said, "this is what we gotta we have to find out." He adds, "Because when you go from 20,000 to 10,000 and then you go to 12, you know there's something artificial. They're taking something."

The current ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is one in thirty-one, with an extreme risk for boys. The risk for boys of getting an autism diagnosis in this country is one in twenty, and one in 12.5 in California. Two years ago, the prevalence was one in thirty-six. Since the first ADDM report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8, or 480%. Twenty-two years ago, prevalence was one in 150 children. In all the core states, the trend is consistently upward, and most cases are now severe. About 25% of kids diagnosed with autism are nonverbal, non-toilet trained, and have stereotypical features like head banging, tactile and light sensitivities, stimming, and toe walking.

About 25% of kids with autism are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and exhibit stereotypical behaviors, and this population is growing. While many individuals with autism are doing well, the speaker focuses on this specific group with severe disabilities. The media promotes the idea that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria, but studies disprove this. In 2013, the California legislature asked the Mind Institute at UC Davis to investigate whether the rise in autism is real or due to increased awareness. The Mind Institute concluded it is a real epidemic. The speaker argues that this epidemic is unique to children, as full-blown autism (nonverbal, non-toilet trained) is rarely seen in older adults. While the speaker has encountered people with Asperger's or on the spectrum who are their age, they have never seen an older individual with full-blown autism, despite its prevalence in children, affecting one in twenty boys, and in California, one in 12.5 boys.

"autism is such a tremendous, horror show what's happening in our country and some other countries, but mostly our country." "We will have announcements as promised in September." "We're finding interventions certain interventions now that are clearly almost certainly causing autism." "In 1970, the biggest epidemiological study in history was done in Wisconsin." "They looked at 900,000 children and they were looking for autism." "incident rate of point seven." "Today, our most recent numbers are one in every thirty one kids." "California, which has the best collection system, is reporting one out of every nineteen children American children as autism, one in every twelve point five boys." "So it's gone from one less than one in ten thousand in 1970 to one in twelve point five boys." "We will."

In 1987, 330 out of every million children were diagnosed with autism. Today, that number is 27,777 per million. To deny an autism epidemic, one must believe that researchers in North Dakota missed 98.8% of autistic children, including thousands with profound disabilities who were somehow invisible to doctors, teachers, parents, and their own study. The same researchers followed the original group for 12 years and, upon double-checking, found they had missed only one child. Doctors and therapists in the past were not missing all these cases, therefore the epidemic is real.

Autism rates have significantly increased over the past 25 years, from 1 in 100,000 to 1 in 100. Some attribute this rise to improved identification methods, but concerns about childhood vaccines persist. There are various theories about potential causes, including environmental factors like chlorine in the water. Many people are exploring different possibilities to understand this trend.

The speaker states that autism is a preventable disease caused by environmental exposure, not genes, though genes can provide vulnerability. A study by Blacksell et al. estimates the cost of treating autism in the US will be a trillion dollars a year by 2035, adding to already astronomical healthcare costs. According to Irva Herzbachoda, research into genetic causes of autism receives 10 to 20 times more funding than research into environmental factors, which is where the answer lies. Autism destroys families and children, many of whom were fully functional before regressing around age two due to environmental exposure. These children may never hold a job, pay taxes, or live independently. The speaker believes "we are doing this to our children" and it needs to end.

Speaker 0 argues that a critical missing piece in autism research is vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies, and notes there are six good studies to rely on. They claim these studies have been systematically suppressed and ignored by the mainstream media and the medical establishment. The summary of specific study claims is as follows: - Two studies by Gallier and Goodman show that the birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine significantly increases autism risk. - Three studies by Anthony Mawson confirmed that vaccination increases the odds of developing autism by at least 4.2-fold. - Preterm birth coupled with vaccination increases the odds of neurodevelopmental disability by more than 12-fold compared to preterm birth without vaccination. - A study by Hooker and Miller published in 2021 found that vaccination increases autism risk five-fold. - Vaccination in the absence of breastfeeding increases autism risk 12.5-fold. - Vaccination in addition to cesarean birth increases autism risk 18.7-fold. The speaker states that after conducting a systematic review of a thousand studies, their belief is that the autism and chronic disease epidemics are primarily caused by toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants.

The CDC released new data showing an increase in autism spectrum disorder cases in the US. The prevalence of autism is growing, and research suggests it may start during pregnancy. A study found that severe infection during pregnancy raises the risk of having a child with autism. Dr. John Poling, a neurologist and father of Hannah Poling, whose autism diagnosis was linked to vaccines, joins the discussion. He emphasizes the government's acknowledgment that his daughter's medical issues were caused by vaccination. The speakers stress the importance of finding the truth about vaccines and ensuring their safety.

Autism rates are rising, currently estimated at one in thirty-one and one in twelve, a significant increase from one in ten thousand in the speaker's childhood. A large-scale testing and research initiative involving hundreds of scientists worldwide has been launched. By September, the speaker claims they will know the cause of the autism epidemic and be able to eliminate the exposures responsible.

More than 40% of American children have at least one chronic health condition. Since the 1970s, rates of childhood cancer have soared, in some cases by nearly 50%. In the 1960s, less than 5% of children were obese; now, over 20% are obese. A few decades ago, one in 10,000 children had autism; today, it's one in 31. The speaker states they will not stop until they defeat the chronic disease epidemic in America.

Cynthia Navison found that from birth year 2000 to 2013, the autism rate in Marin County, California, among children born to wealthy white and Asian parents, plateaued and then declined. This is unprecedented. Vaccination rates also declined in that population during that time because parents were worried about safety and the number of shots. While other factors could be involved, the CDC has not investigated this matter. The speaker suggests this inaction indicates the CDC knows what is happening and doesn't want to investigate it. The speaker believes autism stems from regulatory capture.

Autism is caused by vaccines, according to the speaker. The CDC's VirTrak study from 1989 showed a 1350% elevated risk for autism among children who received the hepatitis B vaccine in their first 30 days. A series of 13 studies were allegedly done by people paid by the CDC to create the illusion that vaccines don't cause autism. The chief scientist, Paul Thornsen, is a fugitive wanted by Interpol for stealing millions from the CDC that he claimed to use for the study. His study is considered fraudulent but has not been retracted. The speaker claims there are hundreds of studies linking autism and neurological injuries to vaccines, citing a book with 1,400 references and over 400 studies. The speaker believes the CDC is a dishonest organization owned by the pharmaceutical industry and promotes propaganda that vaccines don't cause autism.

Speaker 0 notes anecdotal data and studies suggesting improvement of Parkinson’s disease with fecal microbiota transplant, mentioning China studies and that Johns Hopkins will start a study on it. They say we’re at the beginning of all this and, in the future, people may look back and see how archaic some early practices were, such as operating on a kidney instead of changing the microbiome. They reference data showing a signature microbiome in anxiety, noting that during COVID people were very anxious, and that this could be related to the media, the disease itself, or treatments. Speaker 1 observes there is open-minded thinking around health, especially preventative medicine, and a strong focus on autism at the moment. They ask for recommendations on approaching autism through the biome or more broadly. Speaker 0 responds that they would love to work with this government and governments worldwide to address autism, which affects every country and its children. They propose that COVID eroded trust in agencies, government, and pharmaceutical companies, and position themselves as someone who could rebuild that trust by driving proper research, focusing on the microbiome, and understanding diseases thoroughly. They advocate for international collaboration among clinicians and researchers, recounting experiences with colleagues in Italy and Germany who were conducting clinical trials. They express a willingness to coordinate with international colleagues to apply successful approaches to patients in the United States. Speaker 0 emphasizes the importance of global collaboration among clinicians to understand and fix autism in children, arguing that with one in twelve and a half boys in California affected, the issue demands attention. They ask, when is the right time to act—if not now, when? They conclude that the only way to fix this is for humanity to come together for the sake of children and future generations.

There is nothing more profitable than a sick child because insurance companies, hospitals, the medical cartel, and pharmaceutical companies profit from them. The earlier a child is sick, the more profitable they are. When the speaker's uncle was president, 6% of Americans had chronic disease; today, it's 60%. The annual cost of treating chronic disease was zero then, but now it's about $4.3 trillion, and none of it is necessary. In 1960, the autism rate was between one in 1,500 and one in 10,000. Today, according to the CDC, it's one in every 34 kids, and in some states, like California, Utah, and New Jersey, it's one in 22. These children should be healthy and high-performing, but instead, they have an extraordinary disability. Full-blown autism can result in nonverbal, non-toilet-trained children who will never graduate high school or live independently.

Autism rates have skyrocketed, with 1 in 10,070 men over 70 affected compared to 1 in 34 kids today. The speaker questions why allergies and autism were rare in their generation but prevalent now, costing the country $1 trillion annually. They emphasize the need to address this issue that is impacting so many children.

The ADDM report indicates an alarming increase in autism prevalence. The ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is now 1 in 31, with a higher risk for boys, 1 in 20 overall, and 1 in 12.5 in California. Since the first report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8. About 25% of diagnosed children are nonverbal and have severe symptoms. The speaker disputes the idea that increased prevalence is solely due to better diagnoses. Referencing table three of the ADDM report, they claim the rates are genuinely increasing year by year. They cite a Wisconsin study of 900,000 children that found autism in less than 1 in 10,000, compared to today's 1 in 31. A 1987 North Dakota study found a rate of 3.3 per 10,000. A national collaborative perinatal project between 1959 and 1965 found 4.7 cases per 10,000. A UC Davis MIND Institute study concluded that the autism epidemic is real.

If the autism epidemic is due to better diagnostics, it should be seen in older people, but it is not. Where are the 71-year-olds with full-blown autism? They are not seen in malls, homes, or institutions. The speaker claims this absence indicates a falsehood, likely perpetuated by industries profiting from an environmental toxin in air, water, medicines, or food. These industries benefit from normalizing autism and claiming it has always existed. The speaker asserts it is not good for the country or the press to not be skeptical. New studies will soon be announced to identify the specific environmental toxins causing autism, which the speaker claims has not been done before. The speaker anticipates providing answers to the American people quickly.

In 2016, the autism rate was 1 in 54, and in 2000, it was 1 in 150. One speaker asks what the rate was in the past and what is causing the change. Another speaker cites a peer-reviewed study in Wisconsin that looked at 900,000 children and found the rate to be 0.7 out of 10,000, which is less than 1 in 10,000.

The speaker states that previous CDC studies on autism were epidemiological and designed to avoid finding a link. They claim the Institute of Medicine criticized the CDC's vaccine schedule decision-making, alleging the ASIP panel was captured by industry due to financial entanglements. The speaker says the Institute of Medicine recommended various studies, including animal models, which the CDC allegedly ignored, opting instead for manipulated epidemiological studies. They claim these studies didn't compare fully vaccinated to unvaccinated groups. According to the speaker, a 1999 CDC study led by Thomas Verstraten found an 1135% elevated autism risk in vaccinated children. They allege the CDC concealed and manipulated this study to bury the link by removing older children from the data and using other statistical tricks. The speaker asserts that over 100 external studies indicate a link between vaccines and autism.

The speaker believes there hasn't been an open-minded investigation into the etiology of autism because it's dangerous for scientists to ask the question. They risk being incorrectly labeled as "anti-vaxxers," which could end their careers. This suppression of scientific curiosity prevents finding answers. The speaker has organized an initiative within the NIH to address the question of autism's etiology in a wide-ranging manner, not limited to vaccines.

The speaker claims the media propagates a false narrative that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria. They cite studies and a 2013 California legislature request to the UC Davis Mind Institute, which allegedly concluded that a real autism epidemic exists. The speaker argues that the epidemic is specific to children, not older generations. They state that while they've encountered people their age with Asperger's or autism spectrum traits, they've never seen older individuals with "full blown autism" (nonverbal, non-toilet trained), implying such cases are absent in older populations.

Speaker 0 suggests the increase in autism diagnoses is due to over-diagnosis, with children now receiving multiple diagnoses for what was once considered normal behavior, and that autism diagnoses are currently fashionable. Speaker 1 refutes this, calling it nonsense and an industry-driven myth. They claim numerous studies in reputable journals confirm a real autism epidemic. If it were simply better diagnosis, older people would also be diagnosed, but the epidemic is specific to those born after 1989. Speaker 1, age 71, states they have never seen someone their age with profound autism, characterized by nonverbal communication, lack of toilet training, head banging, and stimming. The speaker questions why, if it weren't an epidemic, it would only affect a single generation.

At one time, not too long ago, one out of a hundred thousand children were diagnosed with autism. Now it's one in thirty one. The speaker calls that "ridiculous" and describes it as a "'massive spike in autism'." The opposition claims the rise is due to better ways of diagnosing it. The speaker counters that if that were true, then you would look into every single nursing home and they would be filled with autistic people, and you don't see that. If you personally had a child with autism, wouldn't you want someone to look deeply and widely at every possibility? I mean, that's just common sense.