reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The World Health Organization has become a corrupt entity, heavily influenced by China. When the pandemic began, it covered for the Chinese Communist Party, leading to the termination of the U.S. relationship with the organization. The U.S. was paying nearly $500 million annually, while China contributed only $40 million. Joe Biden foolishly rejoined without negotiations and is now pushing a pandemic treaty that would undermine U.S. sovereignty. This treaty would require the U.S. to supply medical resources to other countries and promote censorship on public health matters. Under a future Trump administration, this treaty would be terminated, and the U.S. would withdraw from the WHO, which failed during COVID. A new coalition of nations focused on health and sovereignty would be established. Biden missed the chance to renegotiate a lower fee for WHO membership, opting instead for the higher cost.

The United Nations approved a declaration on pandemic prevention. The WHO will vote on international agreements in May 2020. The process is secretive and not widely discussed. The WHO seeks leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight how the US paid a significant amount to the WHO while China paid much less. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and criticizes President Biden for rejoining without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies to other countries and censor free speech. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO, abolish and replace it, and form a new coalition of nations committed to health protection, sovereignty, and freedom. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the WHO deal for a lower cost.

The select subcommittee is examining the future of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States' relationship with it. The WHO, known for its role in eradicating smallpox and reducing polio cases, failed to serve all members equally during the COVID-19 pandemic. It prioritized politics over global public health, ignoring facts and echoing Chinese government statements. The WHO's lack of independent investigation allowed the pandemic to worsen. Reforms are needed to ensure transparency, verifiability, and accountability. The WHO should not be influenced by politics and must hold its members accountable. The United States should set the standard for best practices and ensure American interests are protected in any new international health regulations. The goal is to strengthen the WHO for the future.

The United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA due to perceived anti-American bias. An executive order will also review U.S. involvement in UNESCO and overall funding in the UN, highlighting unfair disparities among countries. While the UN has great potential, it is currently not meeting expectations and is poorly managed. Many conflicts remain unresolved, and the UN should be more effective in helping to settle these issues. The organization needs to improve its operations to fulfill its primary purpose.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made a difficult decision to protect public health.

Speaker 0 argues against the WHO International Health Regulations (IHR), calling it "a legally binding treaty that would basically put the entire world or any country that signs onto it under the emergency preparations that we saw the WHO direct the really disastrous pandemic emergency response." The rhetoric suggests emergencies would be run "just disastrously as the WHO ran it" with "them calling the shots, not individual sovereignty of our nation and our states." The speaker says, "Kennedy just said, we're done. We're not signing on to this. US rejects amendments to WHO international health regulations. So we're out of there." They add that "just last week, Kennedy stepped away from GAVI. That's Bill and Melinda Gates funded vaccine repository." The message: the US is pulling out of a lot of things, including the WHO "as soon as president Trump took office," though the segment ends with "But I want."

"there wasn't a pandemic, there wasn't a public health emergency, there was nothing unusual happening." "In order for an emergency to be declared, which I think he did in 2020, March, whatever it was, He has to have some evidence of that." "There is nowhere in the world you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic." "They called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic." "They were lying to you." "Then they created the we, all our governments, created the impression of a pandemic by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR." "It's not a mistake. They they knew it was rubbish." "It's as simple as that." "If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence."

Despite COVID, which was very unfortunate situation for the whole world, we did a great job with it. Operation Warp Speed, people say is one of the greatest achievements ever in politics or in the military because it was almost a military procedure. But, everybody, including Putin, said that operation warp speed, what you did with that, nobody can believe it. And we did a great job, but it was still it was a horrible horrible pull over our country. We had a a very dark cloud over the world. That was a very, very bad thing that came out of Wuhan, which I said it came out of Wuhan. That's where it came from. China suffered greatly, but everybody did. But we, we did a good job with that, as good as you can possibly do, and we came back. And now we're stronger than ever before.

The World Health Organization has become a corrupt entity, influenced by China, especially during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. The United States was paying nearly $500 million annually, significantly more than China's contribution. I ended this relationship, but Biden rejoined without negotiations, pushing for a pandemic treaty that could compromise U.S. sovereignty and promote censorship on public health issues. Under my next administration, that treaty will be terminated, and the U.S. will withdraw from the WHO, which failed during the pandemic. I aim to create a new coalition focused on health while preserving national sovereignty. I had the opportunity to renegotiate a lower fee to rejoin the WHO, but Biden chose the higher amount. This is just one example of the many issues facing our country. Thank you.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made a difficult decision to protect public health.

We cannot defeat the epidemic alone, but the UN's approach is misdirected. It attempts both too little and too much. It exceeds the UN's proper role while ignoring the most pressing health issues, and that's why The United States will reject it. The WHO cannot claim credibility or leadership until it undergoes radical reform. The United States objects to the political declaration of noncommunicable diseases. Member states decided earlier this year that this meeting should approve a declaration in advance by consensus to ensure this gathering would not be marred by controversy, but the declaration is filled with controversy with provisions about everything from taxes to oppressive management entered by international bodies of communicable diseases. The draft declaration before us today should not have been included in today's agenda. The United States will walk away from the declaration.

The speaker states that the U.S. had the greatest economy in history before COVID-19, and that the speaker did a great job handling the pandemic but received no credit. The speaker claims COVID-19 caused $50 trillion in damage and devastated every country, including China.

The HHS Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is addressing controversial WHO amendments to international health regulations (IHR) that establish a framework for managing global public health events. The US is rejecting these amendments due to concerns about national sovereignty, as the regulations could grant an unelected international organization power over health emergencies, potentially leading to lockdowns and travel restrictions. The agreement bypasses the US Senate and employs broad language, enabling the WHO to implement unified public messaging, raising fears of censorship. Provisions regarding health IDs, vaccine passports, and a centralized medical database could lead to global medical surveillance. The WHO's failures during COVID, including its handling of China's actions, further fuel concerns. Rejecting the amendments aims to strengthen national autonomy and prevent a technocratic control system that uses health risks to curtail freedoms. While the regulations may have been written with good intentions, they represent a step in the wrong direction. This rejection is not a rejection of international cooperation, but a commitment to protecting civil liberties, the Constitution, and American sovereignty.

COVID-19 originated in a lab, and it took too long to reach this conclusion due to the suppression of debate, often framed as a fight against racism. Big tech censored discussions about the virus's origins, which only fueled misinformation. We must learn from this history to avoid repeating mistakes. As president, I commit to holding accountable those responsible for the pandemic's origin, including using financial measures against the CCP, imposing sanctions on officials, and investigating U.S. officials involved in gain-of-function research. It's time to move beyond complaints and focus on delivering real solutions. You have my commitment to do so.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight how the US paid a significant amount to the WHO while China paid much less. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and criticizes Joe Biden for reentering without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies and promote censorship. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO and replace it with a new coalition of nations committed to health and sovereignty. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the WHO deal for a lower cost.

The World Health Organization is allegedly attempting a global power grab to become a global ministry of health with divisions like the FDA and CDC. The WHO's definition of health encompasses every area of life, including climate, animals, and the environment via "One Health." According to the speaker, the head of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, considers climate change, racism, and gun violence to be public health emergencies. If these are public health emergencies, every area of life would fall under the WHO's control. The WHO adopted amendments to the international health regulations and intends to push through an international pandemic treaty by the end of the year or May 2025. They will allegedly continue until humanity says no.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight that the US paid almost $500 million to the WHO while China paid only $40 million. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and accuses Joe Biden of reentering without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies to other countries and censor free speech. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO, abolish and replace it, and form a new coalition of nations committed to health and sovereignty. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the deal with the WHO for a lower cost.

I advised the president to shut down the country despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made the difficult decision to shut the country down.

The United Nations approved a declaration on pandemic prevention. The WHO will vote on international agreements in May 2020. The process is secretive and not widely discussed. The WHO seeks leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

There's an increase in unusual infections in several countries. Is this connected to American biologists? Considering the damage from COVID-19 compared to something like World War II, the pandemic's impact has been far greater. Big Pharma, mainly based in the United States, has greatly benefited. We're raising questions and providing documents, but the US hasn't refuted any of the documents we've presented, which amounts to over 2000 pages to the United Nations. The US response is typically standard, claiming everything is done in the interest of their national security and that we should trust them. They're pursuing global biological control, realizing that artificially created biological crises can be used to manage the world, and even seemingly free aid comes with strings attached.

There are leaks almost every week in BSL 3 and BSL 4 labs, and no lab is immune. The executive order aims to prevent inadvertent leaks and protect humanity. The COVID outbreak cost twenty million lives and at least $25 trillion. The COVID nightmare was likely preventable, and the leading theory is that it came from the Wuhan Lab, which was five miles from the initial outbreak. The speaker believes the outbreak was the result of scientists manipulating nature in a lab using technology exported from the United States, specifically inserting a furin cleavage site. The speaker hopes the executive order will do some good.

We're in the middle of a crisis caused by a public health pandemic. Over 220,000,000 Americans have died in just the last several months. This public health epidemic has taken the lives of over 220,000,000 Americans in the last several months.

COVID-19 originated in a lab, and it took too long to acknowledge this due to the suppression of debate through accusations of racism. Big tech censored discussions about the virus's origins in the name of preventing misinformation, which ironically led to more confusion. We must learn from this history to avoid repeating mistakes. As president, I commit to holding accountable those responsible for the pandemic's origin, including using financial measures against the CCP and investigating U.S. officials who may have contributed to the crisis through gain-of-function research. It's time to move beyond complaints and focus on solutions. You have my commitment to do just that.

I expressed skepticism towards the World Health Organization's ability to handle a global pandemic due to past errors and conflicts of interest. While we can assist other countries, we must not give up our sovereignty or agree to a lockdown charter. In emergencies, governments may feel pressured to make harmful decisions. Therefore, I believe that no pandemic treaty is preferable to a flawed one.