reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes Vladimir Putin wants peace. Despite raining missiles, Putin's dream was to take over the whole country, but the speaker believes that because of them, Putin won't achieve this. The speaker states they don't trust many people, including the interviewer, accusing them of dishonesty and asking "fake questions." The speaker believes Putin respects them, and that is why Putin won't take over all of Ukraine, even though that was his original intention. The speaker concludes that the war should never have happened.

The speaker responds to critics by urging government officials and mayors to prioritize the war effort and the defense of their people instead of focusing on other matters. They emphasize the need to allocate resources to weapons, drones, society, and pensions. The speaker asserts that they are leaders who stand against Putin and that he is the only enemy. When asked about democracy, the speaker affirms their commitment to defending it. They thank the interviewer for their time and express gratitude for the opportunity to discuss the ongoing war.

Мы встретились в Курской области, где спецназ Ахмат активно работает. Ситуация сложная, особенно из-за страданий мирного населения. Я с уважением отношусь к украинцам и понимаю, что они оказались в трудной ситуации. Мы ведем борьбу за правду и защиту своей земли. В нашем подразделении высокопрофессиональные бойцы, которые стремятся к победе. Мы используем артиллерию и беспилотники для эффективной работы. Важно, что мы сплочены и поддерживаем друг друга, как братья. Наша цель — дать отпор тем, кто пытается сломить наш народ, и привлечь на свою сторону тех, кто разделяет наши ценности. --- We met in the Kursk region, where the Akhmat special forces are actively operating. The situation is difficult, especially due to the suffering of the civilian population. I have great respect for Ukrainians and understand their challenging circumstances. We are fighting for truth and the defense of our land. Our unit consists of highly professional fighters committed to victory. We utilize artillery and drones for effective operations. It’s essential that we are united and support each other as brothers. Our goal is to resist those trying to break our people and to attract those who share our values.

The speaker discusses the counter offensive in Ukraine and the challenges they are facing. The lack of close air support is hindering their progress against the Russian fortifications. The speaker believes that without this support, a stalemate is likely. They also mention that the West has contributed to the problem by not providing the necessary equipment to Ukraine. The speaker suggests that negotiations or an armistice may be necessary to find a way out of the destructive war.

The speaker discusses the collapse of the Soviet Union and the expectations of Russian leadership regarding cooperation with the West. They highlight the broken promises of NATO expansion and the negative response from the West towards Russia. The speaker also mentions the events leading up to the conflict in Ukraine, including the coup and the failure to implement the Minsk agreements. They express their willingness to resolve the conflict peacefully but emphasize the need to protect Russian interests and the people of Donbas.

The speaker describes the Ukrainian Armed Forces' training and motivation as layered. They have analyzed about a thousand enemy units over three years, including brigades like the 47th Mechanized Brigade, which has been reorganized multiple times after suffering losses. The speaker claims that 15-20% of Ukrainian forces are ideologically committed, while about half are fresh conscripts. They state that those mobilized are sent into combat, and prisoners report no way to avoid conscription, with refusal leading to imprisonment and assignment to assault units. One prisoner claimed he was working in a factory two weeks prior, received two weeks of training in Germany, and was then sent to the front. The speaker asserts that 10-15% of ideologically driven nationalists control armed groups and have no option to surrender, while the other 75% of Ukrainian citizens are hostages.

The speaker expresses disagreement with the portrayal of the President of Ukraine by Western media, arguing that he is not the hero he is made out to be. They highlight the mistreatment of ethnic Russian people in Ukraine and the ongoing civil war. The speaker criticizes President Zelensky for endorsing a group with a leader who made a controversial statement about Russian children. They also mention the Azov battalion, a militia with alleged Nazi affiliations, and the US's support for Ukraine's bid to join NATO. The speaker questions Zelensky's image and accuses him of propagating lies and escalating the conflict. They suggest allowing a vote on independence for predominantly Russian areas as a solution. The speaker concludes by cautioning against blindly accepting information about the conflict.

The speaker describes being kidnapped and taken to a strange place in a minibus. They witnessed people being mistreated and forced to walk in their own waste. They blame Ukraine for the situation and deny any involvement from Russia. Another speaker recounts how Ukrainian tanks fired at a theater where children and civilians were present. The speaker also mentions seeing Ukrainian troops with neo-Nazi tattoos. The video shows the aftermath of attacks on hospitals and the speaker's personal experience of being injured and paralyzed. They express their determination to continue fighting against the lies spread by Ukraine and the West. The speaker now collaborates with a French journalist to gather evidence of Ukraine's crimes. They express their love for Russia and consider it their homeland.

The speaker criticizes the current leadership as incompetent and corrupt, leading to a worsening situation without positive motivation or hope for the future. They suggest that the people are to blame for choosing such leaders. The Second Ukrainian Republic is deemed a failed project, with previous attempts also failing. The speaker questions the sacrifices made by hundreds of thousands of people and expresses uncertainty about Ukraine's future.

In this video, the speaker discusses the issues in Donbass and suggests that the region has a large number of unnecessary people in the economy. They believe that Donbass should be utilized as a resource for the overall Ukrainian national interest. However, they admit to not having a quick solution for understanding and addressing the problems in Donbass. They also controversially suggest that there is a certain category of people who need to be eliminated, although they acknowledge the cruelty of this statement.

**Original Language Summary:** Продолжается работа по выполнению боевых задач. Опрашивают пленных. Один представился как Задачников Владимир Вячеславович из 24 МБР, третьей роты, первого взвода, служит полтора месяца, мобилизованный. Другой представился как боец 5 штурмовой бригады 130 батальона теробороны, задача которого была глушить пушки и дроны в лесу. Он служил два месяца, это был его третий выход. У него в телефоне нашли ролики с призывами убивать русских, хотя он утверждает, что никого не убивал и не хочет. Обсуждают переписки в телефоне, где ему присылали контент с призывами к насилию. Также спрашивают про корочку с символикой, которую якобы хотел приобрести кто-то из его батальона. **English Translation:** Work continues on the implementation of combat missions. Prisoners are being questioned. One introduced himself as Zadachnikov Vladimir Vyacheslavovich from the 24th Motorized Brigade, third company, first platoon, serving for a month and a half, mobilized. The other introduced himself as a fighter from the 5th Assault Brigade, 130th Territorial Defense Battalion, whose task was to jam cannons and drones in the forest. He served for two months, this was his third deployment. They found videos on his phone calling for the killing of Russians, although he claims he has not killed anyone and does not want to. They discuss correspondence on his phone where he was sent content calling for violence. They also ask about a badge with symbols that someone from his battalion allegedly wanted to acquire.

The video is a compilation of conversations and scenes from a war zone, depicting soldiers discussing their mission, the dangers they face, and their longing to return home. It showcases the chaos and uncertainty of war, with scenes of violence and conflict resulting in injuries and fatalities. The individuals in the video, representing various ethnicities, engage in tense conversations about their backgrounds, current situations, and experiences. They mention being in a hospital and discuss the capture of an airport. The overall tone is filled with conflict. The speakers also reminisce about the past, emphasizing the division of groups and the need to protect their comrades. They express determination, loyalty, and pride in being Russian. The video concludes with a discussion about the war's impact on their lives and the importance of honoring the fallen soldiers.

Russia is holding on due to its size and army. Putin is waging the war in Ukraine as a special military operation to avoid overheating Russian society, keeping it at a minimal background level. They are not fighting at full capacity; a real war with 2,000,000 drafted and 40% of the budget would have ended Ukraine in three months. Russia is satisfied with the war as a process because international isolation has ended. They have many friends, the ruble is strong, stores are full, and travel is open. Despite setbacks like Kharkov, Kyiv, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kherson, and the Prigashin revolt, they continue to fight with fewer troops. The speaker questions why Russia is fighting with 650,000 against a million Ukrainian troops, contrary to textbook ratios. They ask what system they live in and what they are fighting for, given that people are hiding from mobilization instead of fighting for the motherland.

We consider the Ukrainian prisoners of war as part of our people, aiming to convince them to join the Russian army. The Ukrainian oath pledges allegiance to the people of Ukraine, not to any specific leader or foreign power. We see that pro-American forces have tried to bend Ukraine to their will since 1991, dividing one nation into two. These are our people, and we want them on our side, so they can share in our victory and not feel ashamed. This idea has been around since 2014, with individuals joining our regular units. In 2022, we captured many people and conducted explanatory work, leading to the creation of a separate combat-ready unit. We aim for them to become the new elite of what remains of Ukraine. Starting with 30, we refined our methods and are ready to expand. Weeding out war criminals, we welcome those who honestly served and realized the truth. If given the go-ahead, we can enlist over 2,000 people who have expressed interest.

We're dying out here, and you don't give a damn. You've slashed our salaries and cut military bonuses. I swear to God, I'm ready to take you all down. I'm not alone. Юра lost his friend because of you bastards! He barely made it back alive himself. What are you doing to us? You're already feasting on pensioners; haven't you fought enough for your own lands? You put on a show, but it's never enough, is it? How long must we endure this? You're constantly screwing us over. You want to strip away benefits, and now you're rushing young men back to war before they've even had a chance to come home, all to die for your children and your greedy asses. You can't divide up your millions? We need a coup in this damn country, kicking out every last one of you, starting with Зеленский! You're robbing the people blind! Go work in the mines, you thieving murderers! Keep it up, and see what happens, you bloodsuckers!

I went to Ukraine after the revolution, joining the battalion and later the M Division. It was different from the US, as various military organizations were active. Our battalion had people from Norway, Finland, and the US. Before being organized into different units, there were many Americans. I believe Zelensky fears us more than the Russians. He constantly talks about new weapons, but we haven't seen any. He allowed the arrest of defenders and sent us to die for an aluminum plant. While he treated us well and gave us citizenship and medals, when it came to social security cards, he wanted us to die for his own goals.

I went to Ukraine after the revolution, joining the battalion and later the M Division. It was different from the US, as various military organizations were active. Our battalion had people from different countries, including Americans. I believe Zelensky fears us more than the Russians. He constantly talks about new weapons, but we haven't seen any. He allowed the arrest of defenders and sent us to die for an aluminum plant. While he treated us well and gave us citizenship and medals, when it came to social security cards, he showed he wants us to die. I shared this thought with some members of our squad. He sent us to die for his own purposes.

The brigade was left with only 20% of its members, not allowed to take them. People are being grabbed off the streets, farmers are taken and thrown to the front lines. There's no gear, no ammunition, no weapons. My will was broken. My comrades and I believe that if we had gone from Rusnea to Kyiv, all of this would have ended long ago.

The speaker discusses the danger of stopping military aid to Ukraine and the potential consequences of Russia advancing towards the capital. They mention that if Ukraine falls, it would be the end of the Europe we know, and EU membership for Ukraine would be delayed. The speaker acknowledges that their proposed solution is not ideal, but emphasizes the need to stop the war and prevent Putin from winning. They draw parallels to historical examples like Germany after World War II and express a desire for Ukraine to join NATO. The speaker acknowledges that their views may not be popular but believes it is important to speak out. They also express concern about the upcoming US presidential elections and the potential impact on global democracy and NATO.

The speakers discuss various topics including LGBTQ+ issues in the military, finding LGBTQ+ friendly units, the Russian threat, corruption in the government, and the challenges faced by the Ukrainian army. They express disappointment in the current president and discuss the possibility of the speaker becoming a deputy in the future. The conversation also touches on the murder of an English soldier by his partner and the presence of foreign fighters in the Ukrainian army. The speakers express concerns about security risks and morale issues. The conversation ends with the offer for the speaker to become a deputy.

The transcript alleges that there are preparations to fly Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and much of his inner circle to Israel, where they would have immunity against extradition for criminal proceedings, and that this is what they would need after completing duties in Ukraine. The speaker asserts that Zelensky and his circle are “on … one foot right now in Ukraine and the other foot really in the door of the aircraft to fly them out.” The claim is made that people do not realize how weak and fragile the Ukrainian government is. Additionally, the speaker reports receiving information from Eastern Europe about people coming out of basements and homes in Prokhorst (Prokhorovka? Prokhorst is presented as a location), telling the Russians, “thank god. Let’s get this over with,” and expressing a wish for the war to end. The transcript notes that, according to the speaker, those in Eastern Ukraine and much of the population in the West desperately want an end to the war, and they realize it will only end with one outcome: “the elimination of Zelenskyy and his regime.” The statements imply a belief that increasing numbers of people are regretting the continuation of the conflict and favor a conclusion that involves removing Zelenskyy and his government.

Speaker 1 was fired and reinstated due to political reasons, affecting his testimony against a Russian agent. The decision came from high levels, possibly New York. Both speakers discussed corruption, equipment issues, and the need for change in the army. Speaker 1 expressed interest in transferring to Speaker 0's artillery unit. They also discussed foreign fighters, security risks, and the murder of an English soldier. Speaker 0 proposed Speaker 1 become a deputy in upcoming elections. They ended on a positive note, expressing gratitude and respect.

The speaker discusses LGBTQ+ individuals in the military, recommends LGBTQ+ friendly units, praises a commander, criticizes Russian culture, emphasizes the importance of winning the information war, and condemns Russian propaganda and war crimes. They also mention a personal encounter with Maria Zakharova.

The speaker states they are not happy with Putin, who is killing many people. The speaker says they have known Putin a long time and always gotten along with him, but now Putin is shooting rockets into cities and killing people. The speaker expresses surprise at Putin's actions. When asked what they are going to do about it, the speaker doesn't say, and then accuses the questioner of being fake news. The speaker reiterates they do not like what Putin is doing, that he is killing people, and that something has happened to him.

Speaker 0: Slavic force, too. Speaker 1: Officers, tonight will be the toughest night for me. Speaker 0: They took some today, no one took them, not even you, you were not in the Ukrainian army this morning, you are a local resident, I understand, Don is very professional, you are from Russia, can I ask you about the British? Where did they get it, comrade? They just sell British stuff in the store. Speaker 1: In the store. Speaker 0: The city now. Speaker 1: But they also have to switch to our side. They came here, and we offer them bread and everything so that our people are happy. Speaker 0: So, you think they will switch sides too? Speaker 1: They don't give weapons, they just come here. They can take their weapons and go back to their units. Those who want to stay can stay because what's the point of fighting? They won't be here anymore. Are you from Crimea? Speaker 0: Yes, and all your guys? Speaker 1: No, not all the guys from Crimea are here. There are only a few people here. The rest are in Petrovsky. 100 people, maybe. Speaker 0: Where did you come from in Crimea? You participated, of course, in the people's column surrendering. Speaker 2: There was no surrender. She will die there herself. Speaker 0: Military vehicles. Speaker 2: Initially, they said that we were going to the border to protect the integrity of the comparison. Speaker 3: We came against the troops, against the conduct of troops, to protect the territory. There are people here, no old ladies. If we hadn't gone to the exercises, they wouldn't have loaded the guns. Now they sit with loaded guns. What does it mean? Speaker 2: Probably, we are for it. Speaker 0: Of course. Speaker 2: Specifically, what is it for? No, we don't have it. Speaker 0: And you also came to stop, to...