reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that the flu vaccine's purpose has shifted from preventing the flu to only lessening symptoms. A Cleveland Clinic study allegedly found the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. According to the speaker, this means that individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The speaker notes the study doesn't detail the pharmaceutical industry's profits from the vaccine or list its side effects. They state the side effects would be less than an mRNA vaccine, as it is a dead virus vaccine. The speaker reiterates that taking the flu shot allegedly makes one almost 27% more likely to get sick than not taking it.

Flu vaccines are administered annually starting at six months old, with nine branded options available in the U.S. A CDC document lists all vaccine ingredients, revealing that three flu vaccines contain hydrocortisone, a corticosteroid known to suppress the immune system. This raises questions about the effectiveness of flu vaccines, which are marketed to boost immunity. Additionally, one vaccine contains Madine Darby canine kidney cells, which are highly susceptible to the flu virus. Other concerning ingredients include formaldehyde and polysorbate 80, which can affect the blood-brain barrier. The hepatitis B vaccine also contains MRC-5 cells derived from a fetus, prompting further scrutiny about the ingredients in vaccines and their implications for health.

We're taking a closer look at how to best protect seniors from the flu, especially since studies question the effectiveness of flu shots in older people. Despite mass vaccinations of the elderly and a sharp increase in seniors getting flu shots over the past 20 years, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. Research from the NIH and other countries reveals that flu shots haven't reduced deaths among the elderly. While the CDC confirms they're exploring new strategies and still recommends seniors get flu shots to lessen the flu's severity, the focus may shift towards vaccinating those around seniors to protect them indirectly.

Division scientists acknowledged the danger of a vaccine, but it was still used for three years while they examined the evidence against it. The vaccines didn't work as intended and contained a cancer-causing agent. However, removing the agent wasn't possible, so there was no alternative. Millions of people were subjected to deadly viruses due to this decision. American troops received a vaccine that prevented colds but caused cancer in lab animals. The pressure to test influenza vaccines caused internal stress, but it was deemed more important to use the vaccines than to remove them from the market. George's simple words are left as a parting thought.

Doctors admit flu vaccine can be ineffective and harmful in larger doses, but still recommend it for elderly and chronically ill. Government criticized for not informing public about ineffective vaccines. Division of biologic standards tests vaccine safety, not effectiveness. Scientists found flu vaccine ineffective in the 1960s but were silenced. Adenovirus vaccine with cancer-causing contaminant given to soldiers despite scientists' warnings. Division director defends vaccine use, saying it took 3 years to assess risks. Troops injected with cancer-causing vaccine for 3 years. Some scientists prevented from publishing ineffective vaccine findings. Control officer raised concerns about flu vaccine potency in 1960.

Over 20 years, flu shot rates among seniors rose from 15% to 65%, yet flu deaths continued to climb. An NIH study adjusting for various factors confirmed that flu shots haven't reduced deaths in the elderly. We were astonished by these findings, which hold true in other countries like Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. Despite billions spent, current research suggests flu shots in seniors haven't had the desired impact. The CDC is exploring new strategies but maintains that seniors should still get vaccinated, as it may lessen flu severity or prevent other complications. The CDC may shift towards vaccinating more children and others around seniors to protect them indirectly.

The CDC recommended increasing flu shot coverage for babies and pregnant women, despite evidence suggesting it could be harmful to fetuses. The flu shots contained thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative. The CDC's decision was criticized because mercury exposure during pregnancy can have catastrophic effects. Some doctors and patients questioned the safety of the flu shot, especially for pregnant women. Studies showed that thimerosal increased the abortion rate in animals, and it was found to be more toxic to males than females. A woman shared her personal experience of suffering a miscarriage and having her daughter diagnosed with severe autism after receiving a flu shot while pregnant. The government agencies involved defended their recommendations, but some people doubted their credibility.

We're taking a closer look at protecting seniors from the flu, following studies questioning the effectiveness of flu shots for older people. Despite millions of seniors getting vaccinated annually, and 90% of flu deaths occurring in those 65 or older, mass vaccinations haven't reduced deaths. Over twenty years, flu shot rates in seniors rose from 15% to 65%, but flu deaths continued to climb. NIH research confirmed flu shots haven't reduced deaths in the elderly. A study, soon to be published, finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. The CDC is exploring new strategies, but still recommends flu shots, as they may lessen flu severity. A likely shift may involve indirectly protecting seniors by vaccinating more children and others around them.

I would not take the flu shot in a million years. Cochrane and BMJ found that people who take the flu shot are protected against the flu, but are 4.4 times more likely to get a non-flu infection. Many people get sick after the flu shot, and that's usually because they are getting something indistinguishable from the flu because the flu shot gives you something called pathogenic priming. The Pentagon published a study by Wolfe in January of this year, that said that the flu shot primes you for coronavirus. The people who got the flu shot were 36% more likely to get coronavirus, and there were six other major studies that say the same thing.

CBS did a report 20 years ago that may shock you. The percentage of seniors getting flu shots sharply increased from 15% to 65%. You'd think flu deaths among the elderly would decrease, but they continued to climb. The NIH did a study, but then suppressed it. CBS got their hands on it, and the study revealed flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly. The lead author was not available for comment but a co-author, Dr. Reichert, said they were astonished by the results. They also found the same poor results in other countries like Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. The CDC is now looking at new strategies, but still recommends flu shots. They may shift toward vaccinating more children to protect the elderly.

Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge the flu vaccine and recommended dosage is ineffective, and in larger doses, harmful, but still recommend it for the old and chronically ill. A senate subcommittee charged the federal government with not informing the public about ineffective vaccines. The division of biologic standards tests vaccines for potency and safety but not effectiveness, which is left to manufacturers. Four scientists found the flu vaccine ineffective and refused to give it to their families; two were transferred, one left, and their findings were not published. The adenovirus vaccine, given to soldiers, contained a contaminant causing cancer in animals, but was taken off the market three years after scientists pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justified using the vaccine, stating it took three years to examine the evidence. For three years, troops were injected with a cold-preventing vaccine causing cancer in animals. Some division scientists were allegedly prevented from publishing results showing some vaccines to be ineffective. A control officer in 1960 had doubts about the potency of the influenza vaccine, which were made known to the director.

"Over twenty years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from fifteen percent to sixty five percent." "But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly." "We realized that we had incendiary materials." "Doctor Reichert says they thought their study would prove vaccinations had helped." "Were you surprised?" "Astonished." "That study soon to be published finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and The UK." "Decades of promoting flu shots in seniors and the billions spent haven't had the desired result." "The CDC says they should still get their flu shots, that it could make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected in the totals." "But watch for the CDC to shift toward protecting the elderly by vaccinating more children and others around them who could pass the flu."

I would never take the flu shot due to findings from Cochrane and BMJ. Those vaccinated are 4.4 times more likely to get non-flu infections and often experience illnesses similar to the flu. The flu shot can cause pathogenic priming, weakening the immune system and increasing susceptibility to other viral infections, including coronavirus. A Pentagon study indicated that flu shot recipients were 36% more likely to contract coronavirus. Observational data suggests that life expectancy in the elderly has declined since flu shot mandates, and many COVID-19 fatalities were among those who received flu shots. While I oppose mandates, I believe individuals should have the choice to take the flu shot if they wish, similar to other medications.

A Cleveland Clinic study found the influenza vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. This means individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The report does not specify the pharmaceutical industry's profits from selling this vaccine.

For over 20 years, flu shot rates in seniors sharply increased, but flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. NIH researchers conducted a study adjusting for factors masking the shots' benefits, but found flu shots haven't reduced deaths among the elderly. We sought out Dr. Reichert, who confirmed the study's surprising results, which were also found in Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. Despite billions spent, promoting flu shots in seniors hasn't had the desired result. The CDC is considering new strategies but still recommends seniors get vaccinated to lessen flu severity and prevent other issues. The CDC will likely shift towards protecting the elderly by vaccinating more children and those around them.

The division of biologic standards tests vaccines for safety and potency, but not for effectiveness. In the 1960s, four scientists found the influenza vaccine to be ineffective and refused to give it to their families. Two were transferred and one left the division. Their unfavorable findings were not allowed to be published. Another case involved the adenovirus vaccine given to American soldiers, which was found to contain a cancer-causing contaminant and was taken off the market three years later.

The aluminum safety study that allowed aluminum into US vaccines was based on a study of four New Zealand white rabbits, but the results from one rabbit were lost, leaving only three. The rabbits were killed after 28 days with no cognition tests. Upon sacrificing the rabbits, the aluminum adjuvants were still present in their bodies. 94% of one type of aluminum adjuvant and approximately 70% of another remained. The aluminum was found in the kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and brain. Despite the study's flaws and horrifying results, the FDA and CDC declared aluminum adjuvants in vaccines safe and effective. The speaker asserts that anyone who reads the study would not want to inject their children with aluminum adjuvanted vaccines.

Vaccines are neither safe, effective, necessary, nor harmless, and this has been a two-hundred-year indoctrination. No vaccine has ever been proven safe because true placebos aren't used, and subjects aren't followed long enough. Safety is determined by whether the vaccine causes immediate death. Long-term effects like asthma, allergies, eczema, ADD, ADHD, neurological problems, and autoimmune diseases are not monitored. The FDA arbitrarily decided in the early 1990s that side effects appearing more than 72 hours after vaccination are unrelated.

Fluzone package insert: Indicated for six months of age and older. Adverse reactions for kids, normal crying, malaise, drowsiness, appetite loss, vomiting, fever, and headache. Section 5.1 under warnings and precautions. evidence for a causal relationship, not correlation, but causation of Guillain Barre syndrome. Guillain Barre is described as a type of partial paralysis that looks a lot like polio with influenza vaccine. The decision to give Fluzone quadrivalent should be based on careful consideration of potential benefits and risk. Fluzone has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or for impairment of fertility. There are no placebo controlled randomized trials for this product. They base efficacy simply on the ability of the product to elicit antibody response that's measured in the blood. Translation. We don't know if this product causes cancer or can interfere with reproductive health, but let's give it to a six month old. Informed consent.

We're taking a closer look at protecting seniors from the flu, following studies questioning the effectiveness of flu shots for older people. While most flu deaths occur in those 65 and older, mass vaccinations haven't done the job. Despite a sharp increase in seniors getting vaccinated over twenty years, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. Studies adjusting for various factors still show that flu shots haven't reduced deaths in this group. This same conclusion has been observed in other countries, including Australia, France, Canada, and The UK. The CDC is exploring new strategies, but still advises seniors to get flu shots, as they might lessen flu severity or prevent other complications. The focus may shift towards vaccinating children and others who could transmit the flu to the elderly.

In a million years, I wouldn't take the flu shot. Research from Cochrane and BMJ shows that flu shot recipients are 4.4 times more likely to contract non-flu infections. Many people who get the flu shot often feel sick afterward, usually from something similar to the flu, due to a phenomenon called pathogenic priming, which weakens the immune system. A Pentagon study revealed that flu shot recipients were 36% more likely to contract coronavirus compared to a placebo group. This finding is supported by six other major studies indicating that receiving the flu shot increases the likelihood of getting coronavirus.

Welcome to this talk. Now let me give you the bottom line on this video so you can decide if you want to watch. A large study at the Cleveland Clinic found out that the flu vaccine, the influenza vaccine over last winter, wasn't that effective. In fact, it had a negative efficacy of twenty six point nine percent. In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were twenty six point nine percent more likely more likely to get influenza. Now unfortunately the paper doesn't give us details on how much money the pharmaceutical industry made from selling this vaccine with negative efficacy.

In 1976, the US government urged everyone to get a swine flu shot to prevent a potential nationwide outbreak. 46 million people complied, but now 4,000 Americans are seeking $3.5 billion in damages from the government due to negative effects from the shot. Two-thirds of the claims are related to neurological damage or death. In 1918 and 1919, the same virus caused a pandemic that resulted in over half a million deaths in the US and 20 million deaths worldwide.

The speaker, recently retired from a local hospital, claims widespread disbelief in flu shots among colleagues due to data issues, stating "the efficacy and I won't give you data. You created the data. Ten percent one year, eighteen percent the next, forty percent at best." They describe the flu vaccine given to children aged two to eight for nearly four years as ineffective, with a claimed three percent efficacy at times. The speaker contrasts this with their hospital experience, where doctors, nurses, medical assistants, patient care, and lab staff did not believe in the flu shot, until mandates and recommendations arrived. They express relief at retirement, saying their soul was sick about what they witnessed, and that conflicts of interest prevented them from speaking out while employed. They recount working on high-volume ER days with about 300 flu cases daily and claim they never contracted the flu, attributing this to personal practices: washing hands, taking vitamin D, and using a berry syrup. The speaker criticizes the shift from physicians and nurses to pharmacists administering the vaccine, accuses the system of bribing people with Target gift cards and marketing the vaccine as free, and denounces scare tactics. They observe an increase in vaccination across generations, noting "some of you are my age," with their generation having seven shots, their daughter ten, her son around sixty, and their new grandson expected to receive seventy-two vaccines, expressing shock at this escalation. The speaker references Robert F. Kennedy Jr., saying he fights for them and goes to court for kids who suffered, noting that Kennedy's family started Special Olympics. They claim that in Kennedy’s view, autism linked to vaccines is evident since there were no autistic kids in the past four decades, and allege that vaccines have caused autism. They describe watching a perfectly healthy two-year-old become a "severe autistic child" after vaccination, expressing certainty that autism exists because of vaccines. They forecast their 10-year-old grandson becoming an adult who, at age 40, would be walking in the mall with a diaper and a helmet. The speaker ends by thanking studies they claim are not done and reiterates their stance against vaccines, including autism implications, as presented in the narrative.

Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge that the flu vaccine and its recommended dosage are ineffective; in a larger dose, it can be harmful. Nevertheless, the flu vaccine is still recommended for older people and the chronically ill. A senate subcommittee headed by Abraham Rebikoff charged that the federal government wasn’t doing a good enough job of informing the public about ineffective vaccines. Scientists at the Division of Biologic Standards test vaccines for potency and safety before licensing them for public use. However, the division does not determine the effectiveness of the vaccine. That is left to the manufacturers. A case in point is the influenza vaccine. Four scientists in charge of work on the flu vaccine during the 1960s found it to be ineffective, and they refused to give it to their own families. Two were transferred to other work, a third left the division, and over the entire ten-year period, not one word of their unfavorable findings was allowed to be published. But a more serious case involving the relationship between the leaders of the division and their scientists involves the adenovirus vaccine, a vaccine given to thousands of American soldiers to prevent certain cold-like symptoms. When it was shown that the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market. But that was three years after the division’s own scientists had pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justifies the use of the vaccine by saying it took three years to examine the evidence against it. "It is more important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent." "It is more important to use the vaccines" "than to take them off the market" "and to remove the agent." Thus, for three years, American troops were injected with a cold-preventing vaccine, which was causing cancer in laboratory animals. And some of the division’s scientists who charged they were prevented from publishing results of experiments which show some of the vaccines to be ineffective. "It's the control officer in 1960 who has grave doubts about the potency of influenza vaccine. These doubts were made known to the director of the division and through the proper channels."