TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

What has happened to Tina Peters in Colorado is outrageous, and a criminal violation of our civil rights laws. As Mesa County Clerk, Tina Peters tried to look at election irregularities in Colorado, which is her job under Colorado statute, and accessed tabulation codes in the voting machines. Instead of a warning, the Colorado Secretary of State went to the Mesa County Prosecutor, and put Tina Peters in prison for nine years with the help of a partisan hack judge. The judge admitted he imposed the severe penalty because she advanced false claims about Trump's defeat and became a celebrity among those who denied he lost the race. The acting US attorney in Colorado just filed a statement of interest in Tina Peters' habeas petition, pointing out that this is a 69 year old woman whose health is failing in state prison, and she's being punished for protected First Amendment thoughts.

Trump's court cases on election fraud were mentioned, but the focus shifted to the treatment of January 6th hostages. The speaker expressed concerns about the weaponization of the federal government against Trump, conservatives, and Catholics. They emphasized the need for transparency and equal rules for all Americans. The speaker condemned violence from both sides, supported election integrity, and criticized investigations and lawsuits against Trump. They claimed that these actions are undemocratic and harming the constitution. The speaker highlighted Trump's popularity in polls as evidence of the American people's agreement.

The speaker believes many January 6th defendants were wrongly charged with 1512, an obstruction charge, and that a bipartisan Supreme Court threw it out. As a US Attorney, the speaker wanted to investigate the use of 1512, which they attribute to Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco, but ultimately to Andrew Weissman. Weissman, connected to the Mueller investigation, allegedly advocated using 1512 to target Trump, even if it meant "making it up." The speaker claims Weissman wanted to charge Trump after first jailing hundreds of people to validate the charge. 1512 was initially created after Enron to prevent the destruction of documents related to an official proceeding. Weissman allegedly planned to expand the definition of "official proceeding" to include the electoral college count. The speaker asserts that this plan involved jailing people, securing guilty pleas, and influencing judges to support the charge before targeting Trump.

Speaker introduces Tina Peters, a gold star mother whose son died in Iraq. He says she went and got involved in our government and, upon seeing Davinian voting machines, declared it's my job to back up hard drive. She allegedly made a backup copy of the hard drive, giving President Trump and his administration every shred of evidence they needed to put all these people away. Peters spent the year on lunch duty in Colorado prisons, wearing yellow boots. The speaker blames Trump for inaction, suggesting he could move White House to Colorado and appoint a special counsel to investigate Colorado election fraud, but it's a state charge. He claims Jewish allies staged it and accuses a foreign government of buying a US social media platform to indoctrinate Americans, cites Israel's free healthcare and education, says settlers are paid to steal land, and says Tina Peters will rot in jail.

Trennis Evans, COO of American Rights Alliance, leads the fight against lawfare, representing James O'Keefe, Tina Peters, parental-rights cases; he previously founded Condemned USA. Peters' Colorado case centers on First Amendment rights and data preservation; Evans notes she is a Gold Star mother. He argues federal supremacy: “one single fourteenth amendment... reigns supreme over all state laws.” They cover O’Keefe’s lawsuits against Mark Zaid and Booz Allen contractor Jamie Menina, and broader attempts to silence critics. They recount January 6 narratives—“The raid on my home is what created who I am now”—and claim the Select Committee “altered the timestamp” and “dumped the part where I was in it.” They cite parental rights and religious liberties in Shana Gaviola’s California case, and say Don Jr. funded ARA: “Donald Trump Jr took the net proceeds... and donated it.” They challenge a two-tier judiciary and note “22 deaths” linked to January 6.

Coy Griffin, founder of Cowboys for Trump and an elected county commissioner, was charged with misdemeanors for being at the Capitol on January 6th. Although acquitted of disorderly conduct, he was convicted of trespassing. A nonpartisan watchdog group called CREW sued to remove Griffin from office, claiming he violated the 14th amendment. Despite being acquitted of any participation in the riot, a New Mexico judge ordered Griffin's removal, stating the Capitol attack was an insurrection. This marked the first court disqualification of a public official for this reason since 1869. The goal was to establish precedent to target Donald Trump. Trump claims to be a target of the January 6th grand jury investigation, fearing multiple indictments and the use of the 14th amendment to prevent him from running for office. Conservative media has largely avoided covering January 6th. The story of Coy Griffin highlights the danger of left-wing ideological zealots weaponizing courts to control election outcomes. The American people must wake up to the left's efforts to destroy institutions and prevent Trump's election. (150 words)

People like me are experiencing what Trump faces. I'm being sued for displaying Trump flags. The left is using lawfare to suppress free speech, target opponents, and disrupt elections. Regular people, like the January 6ers and peaceful protesters, are facing unfair tactics and legal battles. Free speech is in danger.

The speaker makes several points about the treatment of January 6th protester defendants. They criticize the formation of the January 6th committee, claiming it was one-sided and lacked due process. The committee's hearings were described as scripted and cherry-picked. The speaker also accuses the committee of working with media outlets to spread a fake insurrection narrative. They argue that this poisoned the jury pool in Washington, DC. The speaker believes that many defendants were unfairly targeted through geofencing technology and cell phone data warrants. They also mention that some protesters were unaware that certain areas were closed, leading to trespassing charges.

Tina Peters, a gold star Navy Seal mom and former Mesa County, Colorado recorder, is imprisoned with a nine-and-a-half-year sentence after a conviction. She became suspicious of election systems after unusual April 2021 county elections. When Dominion was sent to work on her county's machines, Peters preserved records, leading to the Mesa County number three report. The DOJ filed a statement of interest regarding her case, citing concerns about the lengthy sentence, First Amendment implications, and denial of bail. The DOJ is reviewing cases nationwide for abuse of the criminal justice process, including whether Peters' prosecution was politically motivated rather than pursuing justice. The speaker claims Peters had a duty to preserve the records, and her actions revealed significant fraud. The speaker alleges the judge ran a kangaroo court, preventing the admission of evidence of fraud uncovered by Peters' actions. A key witness allegedly lied on the stand, with the judge and prosecutor reinforcing the false testimony. The speaker urges financial support for Peters through TinaPeters.US and vouches for the integrity of the Lindell Offense Fund, stating that no money was taken for personal use.

- "Do you know who Ray Epps is, and where is he? And, is he sitting behind bars like some of these other, protesters who've been sitting there without bail for so long?" - "And what we need to know is whether or not that cooperation existed on January 5 and January 6 to get people to do things that they might otherwise not do, like enter the capital." - "We already know as a consequence of reporting in revolver.news and in re really, that was confirmed by the New York Times that there were people texting their handlers from the crowd in January 5 and January 6." - "Now we just need to know whether the folks being controlled by the federal government were, in fact, the very people that were doing the worst things on January 6."

Two years ago today on 10/17/2023, I was sentenced to sixty days in prison for trespassing outside the capital on J sixth. The judge during my sentencing said that I misused my platform as a candidate for elected office. If you don't know, my name is Ryan Kelly. I was the leading gubernatorial candidate in the state of Michigan in 2022 when the FBI raided my house on 06/09/2022, and they arrested me on misdemeanor charges, nonviolent, never even went inside the Capitol Building, was the leading gubernatorial candidate, election interference. I was the best poised to beat Whitmer. But, anyway, that's the point of all of this right now. The judge said that I had a lot of folks that followed me. I had a lot of folks that supported me. And with that comes the responsibility of not peddling lies and falsehoods. And he was talking about the twenty twenty election because I said it was a fraudulent stolen election. He was talking about January 6 because I said that the January 6 that there was FBI agents there that were setting the whole thing up and involved in the crowd. And what did we find out here recently? Oh, I was right, but I was sentenced to sixty days in prison for that. One of the biggest things the judge brought up that he had a huge problem with the Facebook posts that I had. Right? Freedom of speech. Poof. Gone. Kings do that kind of stuff. They don't let their people talk freely. Is that right? And then on top of that, you know, lying and misleading all of my supporters when we come to now find out there was 274 agents that were in the crowd that day on January 6. You know, it's obvious that the Democrats are the tyrants, the kings, if you will. Right? I mean, look at what they did with Kamala in the primary. Right? I don't need to explain it to y'all. But, you know, here we are. The Trump administration is removing illegal immigrants from our country and doing good things for America. It was the Biden administration, the Democrats that targeted American citizens. Red, white, and blue. Let's go USA.

The video features an interview with Kara Castronova, a journalist who was assaulted by a federal official while asking questions about the January 6th incident at the US Capitol. Castronova explains how she was pushed by the official and expresses concern about potential retaliation. The discussion also focuses on the trial of Luke Coffey, who is accused of assaulting a police officer named Lila Morris. Castronova highlights inconsistencies in Morris' testimony and argues that Coffey is being wrongly charged. The video concludes with an advertisement for MyPillow 2.0.

The speaker discusses the selective evidence and rigged cases surrounding the January 6th incident at the Capitol. They argue that the prosecutors, DOJ, and FBI have created a two-tier system of justice by hiding certain evidence and distributing others to maintain a false narrative of an insurrection. They also mention the attempt to remove Donald Trump from the ballot and highlight the connections between the law firm representing the group pushing for his removal and individuals like Sally Yates, Rod Rosenstein, and Gina Haspel. The speaker questions the logic behind accusing Trump of insurrection when he did not order the deployment of the National Guard.

177 veterans were arrested for protesting the January 6th election results, some unable to use their First Amendment rights in court. Ashley Babbitt, a protester, was killed that day, contrary to claims about Capitol Police fatalities. Vigils are held outside the DC prison for those affected, and Matt Gaetz is one of the few representatives who has shown support. This situation highlights the lengths to which some will go to prevent Trump from regaining power. The truth about January 6th must be preserved in American history, and it's crucial to share this narrative to help those whose lives have been impacted. Support and engagement with this content are appreciated to spread awareness. Thank you.

Nancy Pelosi's daughter and her friends admit that there was no real insurrection on January 6th. The media's biased narrative and the January 6th Committee's unfair actions poisoned the jury pool in Washington DC. The defendants' rights were violated through the use of invasive surveillance techniques and the trapping of protesters. The Justice Department also failed to respect the protesters' First Amendment rights.

The White House confirmed Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams. Translation: The White House confirmed that Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams.

Speaker 1 describes being blacklisted by various platforms and services following the events of January 6th. They mention being permanently banned by PayPal, Venmo, Stripe, Patreon, and donor portals. Their organization, the WalkAway Foundation and Walkaway campaign pack, were also permanently banned. Speaker 1 expresses concern over Bank of America turning over records of individuals who bought coffee in DC on January 6th, violating privacy. They mention a fellow defendant who had their bank mortgage canceled. Speaker 1 believes that legal reforms are needed to prevent people from being barred from the financial world based on their nonviolent politics. They discuss being put on a terrorism watch list and facing extensive screening at airports. Speaker 2 emphasizes the importance of venue reform to ensure fair trials. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 2 believes they were framed by the January 6th select committee, to which Speaker 2 responds affirmatively and criticizes the suppression of evidence of election fraud.

Speaker 1 describes being blacklisted by various platforms and services following the events of January 6th. They mention being permanently banned by PayPal, Venmo, Stripe, and Patreon, as well as being banned by multiple email services. Speaker 1 also discusses how Bank of America allegedly turned over records of individuals who bought coffee in Washington, DC on January 6th, expressing concern about privacy violations. They emphasize the need for legal reforms to prevent people from being barred from the financial world based on their nonviolent politics. The conversation then shifts to the topic of venue reform, allowing defendants to face charges in their own jurisdiction. Finally, Speaker 2 believes they were framed by the January 6th select committee and accuses Bill Barr of suppressing evidence of election fraud.

The January 6 committee was unlawfully formed by Speaker Pelosi and acted without due process, using cherry-picked and doctored video. The committee worked with regime media to blast the fake narrative of an insurrection. Secretly recorded video reveals Nancy Pelosi's documentary admitting no insurrection occurred. The shameful proceedings and media blitz poisoned the jury pool in DC. Many defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet violating the Fourth Amendment via geofencing and cellphone data warrants. The Justice Department didn't respect the protesters' First Amendment rights, unlike the kid gloves treatment of Antifa and BLM agitators in Portland. January 6 defendants haven't been dealt with in the same fashion as Antifa and BLM protesters, violating equal protection. Widespread Brady violations exist, including concealed footage around the Capitol and 800+ unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts potentially containing exculpatory evidence. Judges in DC seem to have come under the spell of the January 6 committee's original sin, allowing the mainstream media narrative to influence their decisions. A statute designed to close an obstruction of justice loophole is being misapplied. Antifa and BLM revolutionaries largely got off scot-free, while January 6 defendants' sentences are wildly disproportionate.

The speaker presents seven core points about the January 6 investigations and related prosecutions. 1) Original sins of government and due process concerns - The lawless formation of the House Select Committee on January 6 led to a one-sided, due process-free process. - The committee was gerrymandered by Speaker Pelosi, operated without a ranking member or counsel for the ranking member, and Liz Cheney was granted vice chair status to cover that up. - The committee conducted scripted hearings with prewritten Q&A paths and cherry-picked, highly edited audio and video. 2) Collaboration with mainstream media and narrative shaping - The committee worked with major outlets (The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC) to blast a narrative of an insurrection. - The speaker claims secretly recorded video shows Nancy Pelosi, her daughter, and friends admitting no real insurrection occurred. - The combined effect of the committee’s conduct and the media blitz allegedly poisoned the jury pool in Washington, DC, and suggested that venue transfers should have been permitted. 3) Fourth Amendment concerns and the dragnet - Many defendants were swept up in a broad dragnet that the speaker believes resembled a general warrant violating the Fourth Amendment. - This involved geofencing technology and cell phone data warrants to telecom providers. - People arriving after the speech and the ellipse allegedly did not see that areas normally open to the public were closed, creating a trespass trap for the unwary. 4) First Amendment rights and unequal treatment - The Department of Justice did not treat First Amendment rights of the protesters with appropriate respect. - The speaker contrasts the January 6 cases with the 2020 Portland protests, where nightly attacks on federal courthouses and antifa/BLM activity were characterized differently. - The speaker asserts that insurrection labeling in Portland was more applicable to those actions than to the largely spontaneous January 6 crowd, implying selective enforcement. 5) Selective prosecution and unequal treatment - The January 6 defendants have not been treated the same as Antifa and BLM protesters in 2020 who damaged property and threatened the White House. - The speaker calls this a flat violation of equal protection of the laws and suggests broad public belief in selective prosecution. 6) Brady violations and exculpatory evidence - Widespread Brady violations are alleged, focusing on two areas: concealed or underreported footage of the Capitol, and the large number of unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts (over 800), with the possibility that exculpatory evidence remains unseen by defendants and their lawyers. - The committee allegedly acted like a star chamber, and there is concern that not all exculpatory material has been made available. 7) Judicial influence and misapplication of obstruction statutes - DC federal judges are said to have been influenced by the January 6 committee’s narrative and the mainstream media. - A statute designed to close an obstruction-of-justice loophole from Arthur Andersen/Enron is claimed to be applied to activity that in many instances is protected by the First Amendment, with unequal sentencing: Antifa and BLM defendants allegedly receiving lighter outcomes or settlements, while January 6 defendants face disproportionate sentences. - The speaker concludes by expressing disagreement with the overall approach and intention to speak on these concerns.

The speaker outlines seven points regarding the treatment of January 6 defendants. First, the House Select Committee was lawlessly formed and acted in a one-sided way. Second, the committee worked with regime media to blast the narrative that an insurrection occurred. Nancy Pelosi's documentary allegedly admits no real insurrection occurred. Third, many defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet violating the fourth amendment via geofencing and cell phone data warrants. Fourth, the Justice Department didn't respect the protesters' first amendment rights, unlike how they treated Antifa. Fifth, January 6 defendants haven't been dealt with in the same fashion as Antifa and BLM protesters, violating equal protection. Sixth, there are widespread Brady violations, including concealed footage and unreleased deposition transcripts. Seventh, DC judges are under the spell of the January 6 committee and are misapplying a statute, leading to disproportionate sentences compared to Antifa and BLM, who largely got off scot-free.

Ivan Raikland, a former intelligence officer and constitutional attorney, discusses his investigation into the events of January 6th at the United States Capitol. He identifies individuals, including Nancy Pelosi and her daughter, who he believes played a role in facilitating the unlawful entry. Raikland suggests that the Capitol Police Chief, Yogananda Pittman, may have manipulated evidence to ensure a high conviction rate. He calls for political solutions to address the situation, including reversing criminal referrals and pressuring the new Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, to release video footage. Raikland proposes defunding the Capitol Police Chief and others who do not cooperate.

I was scheduled to speak at a permitted event on Capitol grounds on January 6th. As I arrived, I learned that people were entering the Capitol. There were no police officers on the east side, and I walked through open barricades into a crowd. This led to my first felony charge for being on restricted grounds. After filming a video outside, the FBI raided my home, and I faced multiple felony charges. The government is overcharging individuals, forcing them into a difficult position of either going to trial or accepting a plea deal that they dictate. This has been a targeted effort against Trump supporters. I'm also part of the Walk Away Campaign, a movement of former Democrats encouraging people to think independently and move away from identity politics. For more information, visit walkawaycampaign.com.