reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We are partnering with Twitter to provide accurate vaccine information when users search hashtags like vaccination or anti-vaccine. Public health agencies' websites will appear in the search results. Similar collaborations have been done with other organizations. We have also discussed with Facebook about removing scientifically disproven or debunked information. Facebook is currently working with the US CDC and seeking input from experts to identify misinformation. If information is proven to be false, they have the opportunity to remove it. Additionally, we are collaborating with Google and other platforms.

Mark Zuckerberg stated he was ordered by the White House to suppress mentions of vaccine injuries on Facebook and Instagram. He expressed being stunned by this order from the federal government to deny facts. According to the speaker, they sued the Biden administration and obtained documents showing that 37 hours after taking office, a White House group was formed to suppress dissent regarding government policy. The speaker claims they were the first target, with Facebook being told to remove them from Instagram, which Facebook did. The speaker asserts they had almost a million followers and posted no vaccine misinformation, challenging Facebook to identify any factual errors in their posts, which were cited and sourced to government databases or peer-reviewed publications.

A network president revealed that allowing certain voices on air could lead to the host's firing due to advertiser pressures, particularly from pharmaceutical companies. During non-election years, up to 70% of news revenue can come from pharma ads, which serve as a public relations tactic rather than simply promoting drugs. This funding influences the media, making it reluctant to investigate pharmaceutical practices, even when there are serious concerns about vaccine safety and corporate misconduct. The media often dismisses legitimate questions as anti-science, silencing discussions about vaccine injuries. There's a growing need to reconsider trust in the pharmaceutical industry, especially with the increasing government funding for drugs like Ozempic.

The Gates Foundation was established after an undisclosed settlement for antitrust violations by Microsoft. It started funding the World Health Organization, along with other major foundations. These foundations formed the global preparedness monitoring board, including members from Gates Foundation, NIAID, and Wellcome Trust. This collaboration raises questions about who the FDA and CDC were truly taking orders from, hinting at a criminal conspiracy involving antitrust violations and racketeering.

The Pentagon funded a psychological operations research group that began mapping COVID-19 skepticism and conspiracy theories in April 2020. Their analysis indicated that right-wing accounts were diminishing the mainstream conversation about the virus. This effort aimed to counter misinformation regarding COVID origins and involved targeting individuals questioning vaccine efficacy and lockdown policies. The project, known as the Virality Project, received funding from U.S. government sources, including a $3 million grant to Stanford and the University of Washington. Additionally, the Atlantic Council, which has ties to various U.S. intelligence agencies, received significant funding from the Pentagon and State Department. This initiative effectively aimed to protect the reputations of figures like Bill Gates and George Soros by mapping and censoring online discourse surrounding them.

Gates suggests AI should censor disfavored views on vaccines. Media literacy is described as an Orwellian code word for government propaganda. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz have called for government censorship of social media, including banning political rivals. Many governments, journalists, and societal elites view censorship of social media as a must-have. They are unhappy that X allows so much speech and desire more censorship over Meta/Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg confessed to bowing to unethical and illegal government censorship demands on COVID. Gates's foundation is the largest private donor to the World Health Organization, and he and his partners allegedly use their clout to control the global COVID response with little oversight. TikTok banned ads by XXXY Athletics, a company recognizing biological sex, while allowing promotion of transgenderism and ads for minors to perform irreversible surgeries. TikTok is accused of censoring the truth regarding trans-identified males participating in women's sports.

Judiciary committee chairman Jim Jordan revealed that Facebook censored Americans over COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Internal emails exposed the White House pressuring Facebook to remove content, and Facebook complied after meeting with Biden's surgeon general. The Biden administration demanded the censorship of true stories about vaccine side effects and discussions on the lab leak theory. Twitter files journalist Michael Shellenberger expressed surprise at the extreme censorship and the Biden administration's blatant demands. He called for Congress and the Supreme Court to take action against the violation of the First Amendment and the abuse of power by big tech companies. He also highlighted YouTube's censorship of a video about censorship. The ongoing censorship raises concerns about future election interference.

Speaker 0: Zuckerberg claims to be an old-fashioned liberal who dislikes censorship, but why doesn't Facebook take a similar stand on free speech? It seems rooted in American political tradition. Speaker 1: Zuckerberg reportedly spent $400 million in the last election, primarily supporting Democrats. This raises questions about his impartiality.

Big Pharma spends heavily on media propaganda, influencing public perception and political campaigns. A recent vote in Idaho ended funding for COVID-19 vaccines, reflecting growing skepticism. Studies show vaccines may harm natural immunity, with significant increases in severe health issues among vaccinated individuals. The pharmaceutical industry is a major advertiser on networks like CBS and MSNBC, with top drugs linked to companies like Pfizer. In the 2020 election, a large portion of Congress received funding from pharmaceutical companies. Since 2011, digital ad spending in healthcare has surged, with billions spent on advertising and censorship efforts. The COVID-19 response is viewed as a significant wrongdoing, and there’s a call for accountability and a return to health. It's never too late to seek justice for those affected.

A case filed by Missouri against Biden reveals that federal courts found Facebook coordinated with the administration to censor First Amendment protected speech. Courts documented that Facebook allocated significant resources to monitor posts about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. For instance, a parent in Missouri had a post about a school board meeting removed by Facebook's human moderators. In contrast, Facebook reportedly lacks the resources to address serious issues like child exploitation on its platform. This disparity highlights a troubling prioritization: ample resources for censoring speech but insufficient efforts to protect children from harm.

Twitter released the long-awaited Fauci files, revealing that Dr. Anthony Fauci lied under oath about his use of Twitter. Despite denying any association with the platform, the files show that Fauci took control of the White House COVID response account twice in March and April 2021. Elon Musk had previously mentioned a dedicated Fauci fan club on Twitter, and the report confirms that a former lead company attorney at Twitter worked with Fauci on disinformation. Additionally, Twitter collaborated with pharmaceutical companies to shape vaccine marketing campaigns, actively suppressing opposing views while promoting COVID-19 vaccines.

Mark Zuckerberg allegedly stated he was ordered by the White House to suppress discussion of vaccine injuries on Facebook and Instagram. The speaker claims to have sued the Biden administration and obtained documents showing that 37 hours after taking office, a White House group was formed to suppress dissent regarding government policy, and the speaker was their first target. Facebook was allegedly told to remove the speaker from Instagram, which they did, despite the speaker's claim that all vaccine-related posts were cited and sourced to government databases or peer-reviewed publications. According to the speaker, Facebook told the White House that the information was not misinformation, but the White House called it "malinformation"—factually true information inconvenient for the government. The speaker asserts that numerous individuals, including O.J. Botticello, Marty Makary, Dr. Oz, and Vinay Prasad, were also censored.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

We are partnering with Twitter to provide accurate vaccine information when users search certain hashtags like vaccination or anti-vaccine. Public health agency websites will appear in the search results. Similar collaborations have been done with other organizations. We have also discussed with Facebook how to remove scientifically disproven or debunked information. Facebook is currently working with the WHO and the US CDC to identify misinformation. If experts confirm it as misinformation, Facebook can remove it. Additionally, we are collaborating with Google and other platforms.

Laura Logan hosts a discussion with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on vaccines, public health policy, and what they see as failures and harms within the system. The conversation weaves together personal history, policy details, scientific debates, and broader social concerns, intercut with promotional content for GiveSendGo. Key points and claims raised by Dr. Tenpenny - Vaccine ingredients and aluminum exposure: Tenpenny asserts that if someone receives every vaccine on the schedule, they would be injected with a total of about twelve thousand micrograms of aluminum, which she says is inflammatory to every organ system and can be stored in bones (60% of aluminum exposure). She notes aluminum is present in vaccines in order to replace mercury, which she describes as also a poison. - Early vaccine industry liability and the 1986 Act: The discussion explains that prior to 1986 there were liability concerns for vaccine makers due to injury lawsuits. Tenpenny recounts that in 1986 Congress passed a law giving the pharmaceutical industry liability immunity for vaccines, creating what she describes as a ramp in the vaccine schedule. She cites that by 1991 additional vaccines were introduced (Hep B at birth, Hib, chickenpox, Prevnar, Gardasil, Hep A, and more) and alleges this resulted in a rising autism incidence aligned with new vaccines. - The vaccine injury system: Tenpenny explains the Injury Compensation Act and the existence of VAERS as a tracking system, along with a separate pathway created under the PREP Act (the Preparedness and Readiness Act). She states that during the COVID era a separate program, the Covered Countermeasure Program (CICP), existed under the PREP Act, but it had no funding and a one-year statute of limitations, leading to under-compensation and very few adjudicated cases; she contrasts this with the earlier 1986 act, which funded vaccine injury compensation through the Federal Court of Claims and VAERS. - Perceived safety and effectiveness concerns: The speakers discuss studies suggesting that the flu shot might not prevent flu and that some studies indicate vaccines including pneumonia vaccines may be associated with higher risk of the conditions they aim to prevent. Tenpenny frames this as evidence of cracks in the vaccine program and argues that vaccines are linked to a broad spectrum of health issues, including autoimmune diseases, infertility, and cancers, which she says have been increasing. - Pediatric vaccination schedule and “pediatric poisoning program”: Tenpenny asserts that infants receive multiple injections early in life, with claims that by age two they will have thousands of micrograms of aluminum and other compounds that remain in the body, including in the brain. She characterizes the pediatric schedule as a systematic poisoning program for children and a parallel “adult assault program” for adults receiving vaccines. - COVID-19 vaccine controversy and health impacts: The conversation covers the COVID vaccines, including assertions about adverse effects such as myocarditis, strokes, kidney injury, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, and cancers. Tenpenny describes long-term concerns (long COVID, autoimmune diseases) and claims of widespread injury and death, contending that the pandemic revealed how the health-care and pharmaceutical systems operate, including alleged corruption and profit motives. She discusses the difficult experiences of families during the pandemic, including restrictions on care and the use of alternate treatments like ivermectin in some cases. - The claim that COVID vaccines were not properly evaluated and that mandated vaccination reflected coercion: The speakers discuss mandates and the experiences of individuals in workplaces and educational institutions who faced pressure to receive vaccines, including religious exemptions and disputes about mandates. Tenpenny suggests a broader pattern of overreach in public health policy and questions about the balance between individual rights and mandates. - History and philosophy of public health programs: They discuss the Healthy People initiatives, arguing that the program’s goals have expanded in scope (from 15 goals to 1,200 for Healthy People 2030) and that the expansion is associated with greater surveillance and control over personal lives. Tenpenny claims that this is part of a broader trend toward data collection and governance of individual health and behavior. - The economics and incentives around vaccines: The conversation notes how physicians are compensated in part through vaccine administration, implying financial incentives influence clinical decisions. Tenpenny emphasizes the profit motive behind vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry’s financial interests, citing extreme examples like the one boy in a photo who allegedly became heavily medicated due to vaccines. - The role of media and information control: They discuss the influence of advertising in media since the 1990s and the difficulty of reporting critically on vaccines when major advertisers are pharmaceutical companies. They also mention AI and misinformation concerns, including examples of AI fabricating sources and the need to verify information. - Personal stakes, accountability, and political possibilities: Tenpenny discusses personal cost for challenging the vaccine paradigm, including an earlier period of potential licensing scrutiny and professional pushback. She names figures such as Fauci and Birx, argues that accountability has not yet occurred, and expresses hope that public interest in accountability could shift through advocacy and political leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential ally though acknowledging political and institutional obstacles. - Treatment and detoxification approaches: For those who have already received vaccines, Tenpenny outlines two separate tracks: detoxification for childhood vaccines and detox for COVID vaccines. For detox, she mentions products such as PureBody Extra (PBX), a zeolite-based supplement she says helps remove metals like aluminum and mercury from the body. She notes it is usable across age groups and even for pets, and she personally uses it. She also discusses non-specific detox approaches such as vitamin D optimization, lymphatic stimulation, exercise, and a diet focusing on avoiding white foods and reducing inflammation. She cautions that there is no proven blood or urine test to quantify spike protein after a COVID vaccine, and that detox strategies aim to support overall health rather than remove embedded spike protein from tissues. - The role of faith and resilience: The interview includes discussions of faith as a guiding force for Tenpenny, including her personal journey toward Christian faith in 2020. They reflect on fear, hope, forgiveness, and the idea that one can act with integrity and do the right thing even when faced with controversy or personal cost. They discuss existential questions about meaning, purpose, and moral responsibility, including the belief that life has a spiritual dimension that informs how to respond to public-health challenges. - Community and parenting: The conversation emphasizes the importance of community networks for new parents, including seeking mentorship from experienced parents and trusted health advocates, and maintaining parental agency in decisions about vaccines, medical interventions, and child-rearing. They discuss the value of critical thinking, asking questions, and avoiding blind trust in professionals or institutions. - Closing notes and resources: Tenpenny provides her websites and a Substack for ongoing information, including dr10penny.com, dr10penny.substack.com, and 10pennywalkwithgod.substack.com, as well as her X profile busy doctor t. The episode closes with a call to viewers to stay informed and to seek second opinions, while thanking the audience for supporting independent journalism. Overall, the dialogue centers on a critical, conspiratorial framing of vaccines, public-health policy, and the medical establishment; it weaves together testimonies about personal experience, policy history (notably the 1986 Act and the PREP Act), alleged systemic failures in compensation for vaccine injuries, criticisms of COVID-19 responses and vaccine mandates, and practical detoxification and faith-based guidance. The promotional content for GiveSendGo lightly interrupts the core discussion, but the majority of the exchange remains an extended argument about vaccine safety, accountability, and the perceived influence of big pharma on health care and public policy.

Facebook provided $100,000 in ad credits per city to the Rockefeller Foundation, with estimates suggesting total credits could reach $500,000 to $700,000. Leaked audio reveals discussions about leveraging these credits to amplify narratives aligned with the Biden administration, the CDC, and the WHO. Participants also mentioned seeking additional ad credits from YouTube and Twitter. Despite Mark Zuckerberg's claims of limited involvement with the Biden team, the recordings suggest a proactive approach from Facebook in supporting public health initiatives. The conversation reflects a strategic effort to navigate political pressures while maintaining influence. More recordings are expected to be released soon.

We don't know the long-term effects of modifying people's DNA and RNA. Facebook announced they are expanding efforts to remove false claims about COVID-19 vaccines, including claims that the vaccine changes people's DNA. However, a leaked tape shows Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, violating his own policy by saying the vaccine modifies people's DNA. This statement would get him banned from Facebook.

The recent report reveals that the Biden administration spent nearly $1 billion on a campaign promoting COVID vaccines, masks, and social distancing, using exaggerated claims about COVID risks and the effectiveness of vaccines. The campaign, executed by a PR firm, aimed to boost vaccine uptake but ultimately eroded public trust in health authorities due to misleading messaging. It relied heavily on flawed CDC guidance, which overstated vaccine efficacy against transmission and misrepresented the risks of COVID to children. The report highlights the need for reforms to prevent similar failures in future public health emergencies. Additionally, it notes that the CDC's inconsistent messaging on masks contributed to a loss of credibility.

We don't know the long-term effects of modifying people's DNA and RNA. Facebook announced they are expanding their efforts to remove false claims about COVID-19 vaccines. They specifically mentioned removing content that claims the vaccine changes people's DNA. However, a leaked tape of Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, shows him saying that the vaccine basically modifies people's DNA. This contradicts Facebook's policy, and if Zuckerberg had said this on the platform, he would be censored.

We don't fully understand the long-term effects of modifying DNA and RNA. Recently, Facebook announced it would remove false claims about COVID-19 vaccines, specifically those suggesting the vaccine changes DNA. However, a leaked tape reveals Mark Zuckerberg stating that the vaccine modifies DNA, which contradicts Facebook's own policy. This statement would likely result in censorship on the platform today. The concern remains about the implications of such modifications and the unknown long-term side effects.

Government officials allegedly coerced Facebook and Twitter to censor posts via threatening emails, according to the transcript. A Biden White House official, Rob Flaherty, purportedly sent explicit threats to Facebook demanding content removal. High-ranking government officials had a special portal to flag content to senior executives at Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter, outsourcing censorship. Universities like Stanford and the University of Washington were allegedly used to flag "wrong think," which then led to government pressure on social media companies. The speaker asserts this network, like the "story of COVID," was about power and control, with entities exceeding their authority. The OSHA vaccine mandate is cited as an example of an agency overstepping its original purpose.

Newly released Facebook files reveal the White House's efforts to control the COVID narrative on social media. Internal communications show that White House officials demanded more data and targeting tools from Facebook to promote vaccinations. The exchanges became heated, with the White House berating Facebook employees for not providing enough information. Facebook eventually delivered a data dump to the White House. The specific information they were trying to combat on Facebook included conversations about vaccine side effects and vaccine hesitancy. There was a push and pull between Facebook and the White House regarding the level of cooperation and information sharing. Facebook emphasized the need to protect privacy and freedom of speech.

The speaker discusses Facebook's framework for content moderation, which includes removing, reducing, and informing users. They explain how this framework is applied to COVID-19 misinformation. The speaker highlights efforts to promote vaccines and authoritative information, remove harmful misinformation, and address borderline content that could lead to vaccine hesitancy. They mention various ways Facebook informs users, such as directing them to expert health resources, helping them find vaccine appointments, and partnering with organizations to reach low vaccination rate communities. The speaker also discusses the removal of debunked false claims and the reduction of certain content about vaccines. They emphasize the importance of providing authoritative information and addressing vaccine hesitancy.