TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

An individual manages suppliers and manufacturers for a medical device company within a network, acting as the main point of contact and managing 13 contracts. One company, Bodycoat, based in Europe, was doing titanium machining for knee joints, but the speaker's company took over the process in-house because it was cheaper. Bodycoat is unaware that the speaker's company is pulling out of the deal and still lying to them. The speaker admits that Johnson & Johnson's (J&J) name and prestige are leveraged to get priority and favorable terms from smaller companies. Some suppliers rely heavily on J&J for business, sometimes up to 80%, and face bankruptcy when J&J cuts ties. The speaker feels "gross and slimy" about the situation. New contracts allow for early exits, but sometimes there isn't even a contract. The speaker follows a template and meets with attorneys weekly to ensure they're following the bare minimum legal requirements.

In general, would you say that Smartmatic software was designed with two principles in mind? Number one, it's easy to rig elections. Number two, it's hard to audit. That is correct. And is the same true for Dominion software? It's easy to rig an election with it, and it's hard to audit. That is correct.

Pharmaceutical giants like GSK, Sanofi, Novartis, and Baxter have been given the green light by the WHO to sell millions of vaccines, resulting in billions of euros in revenue. However, concerns have been raised about the WHO's handling of the pandemic. The organization is accused of easily declaring a pandemic by changing the definition, removing the criteria of a high number of cases and deaths. This change has allowed the pharmaceutical companies to profit from the situation. It is revealed that contracts for vaccines were signed between wealthy countries and the companies in 2005, with the condition that the WHO declares a pandemic. Furthermore, conflicts of interest are highlighted, as many experts advising the WHO also work for these pharmaceutical companies. The race for vaccine production is now underway.

Pfizer imported its own batch of vaccines for the employee vaccination program, without testing by the TGA.

Pfizer imported its own batch of vaccine for the employee vaccination program, which was not tested by the TGA.

Gates allegedly has incestuous and financially corrupt entanglements with Anthony Fauci dating back twenty years. The transcript claims Gates pays Fauci, and they have “all kinds of really corrupt financial entanglements.” It describes Gates bringing Fauci to his $189,000,000 house in Seattle in 2000, sitting him down, and saying he wants to form a partnership. Fauci’s account is that Fauci would develop the drugs and pass them on to drug companies like Merck, Sanofi, Gilead, and Johnson and Johnson. Gates would then guarantee markets in Africa through his control of WHO. It is asserted that those companies don’t want to give vaccines to Africa because it’s uncertain, with Botswana reportedly wanting them this year and not next year, and Gates, by controlling WHO, allegedly controls those countries because WHO pays for health ministries and supplies all HIV medications, forcing these countries to do what WHO tells them to do. The claim is that Gates can require those companies and countries to buy the vaccines and that he is invested in the companies. The transcript also states Gates has investments in tobacco companies, processed foods, Coca Cola, Cargill, Monsanto, Philip Morris, Kraft, and cheese. It alleges he has stakes in virtually all oil companies, portraying him as not caring about climate or public health but about control. It asserts Gates appeared daily on TV as a public health expert. According to the speaker, Gates’s message was that people should shut down, lock down, wear a mask, and that it would never end until they took the vaccine he was making for them.

"Smartmatic is a labyrinth of international holding companies owned by Venezuelan businessmen." "When Smartmatic bought The US voting machine companies, the US government did not review the sale." "Many experts say those voting machines were manipulated in Venezuela to give president Hugo Chavez a victory." "Exit polls done by The US firm Penn shown in Berlin had Chavez losing 41% to 59%." "But the next day, Chavez declared victory, reversing the score, saying he won 59% of the vote." "All these machines talk to a central computer and report on their results." "And in that mechanism, as they communicate with the center, the central machine can report anything." "The Chavez government gave Bizta, Smartmatic, and another company a $91,000,000 contract to run voting machines for the February."

The European Commission is facing criticism and legal action over the lack of transparency surrounding a €35 billion deal for COVID-19 vaccines. Ursula von der Leyen, the Commission President, is accused of arranging the deal in secret, without public or parliamentary scrutiny. Belgian citizen Frederic Balgaar has filed a criminal complaint against von der Leyen, alleging the withholding of important documents related to the deal. Journalist Alexander Fanta also requested the release of text messages but was unsuccessful. The European Parliament and the European Court of Justice have been urged to demand transparency and disclose all contracts. Critics argue that the lack of transparency undermines democracy and raises questions about the necessity and cost of the vaccine orders.

Von der Leyen handelte per SMS einen Vertrag über 35 Milliarden Euro mit Pfizer aus. Sie weigert sich, Dokumente offenzulegen und einer Einladung in den Covid Ausschuss zu folgen. Das Parlament sollte sie wegen Korruption die rote Karte zeigen, da die Staatsanwaltschaft ermittelt. Es ist schlimm, dass die Kommissionspräsidentin korrupt ist, aber noch schlimmer, wenn das Parlament diese Korruption deckt. Translation: Von der Leyen negotiated a 35 billion euro contract with Pfizer via SMS. She refuses to disclose documents and attend the Covid committee. The parliament should show her the red card for corruption as the prosecutor investigates. It's bad that the Commission President is corrupt, but even worse if the parliament covers it up.

Tonight, we will be filing a complaint against Mrs. Von der Leyen, the European Union, and Pfizer. The complaint is significant because it exposes their complicity in the deception surrounding the Covid vaccine. We have evidence, including a contract signed on November 20th between the EU and Pfizer, where the EU blindly invested €200 million without any knowledge of the product's outcome or nature. This money came from our taxes and was meant to fund Pfizer's research.

Confidentiality agreements were required for government employees accessing these documents. The high number of redactions in these documents is due to the rush to produce vaccines during the pandemic. Companies faced increased liability as they had to expedite testing and bring products to market in less than a year. To secure vaccine contracts, companies requested different conditions since countries were competing for limited supplies. The government had less negotiating power at the time of signing these contracts. Despite these challenges, Canada successfully obtained vaccines and became one of the fastest countries to vaccinate its population.

Ursula von der Leyen must resign as president of the European Commission due to a criminal investigation by the European Public Prosecutor's Office regarding vaccine contract signings. The court of auditors revealed that the Commission signed contracts worth €71 billion for up to 4.6 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses by November 2021, equating to ten doses for every EU citizen. These contracts have not been made public, raising concerns about transparency in the use of public funds. Therefore, I reiterate the call for her immediate and unconditional resignation.

The vaccine contract awarded to a single supplier is under scrutiny for potential political influence. The Liberal party criticized the Harper government for jeopardizing the health and safety of Canadians by relying on one supplier. The original contract, awarded by the Liberal government, was for 10 years to Shire Biochem, which later became owned by GlaxoSmithKline. The contract, valued at over $323 million, was signed in 2001 before any vaccine was produced. Additionally, Shire Biochem donated $56,000 to the Liberal Party in the same year they secured the contract.

The speaker states the Clinton Foundation acted as an agent of a foreign government, giving the example of Mozambique in 2002. According to the speaker, a memorandum of agreement existed between the foundation and Mozambique to work on their behalf through their Ministry of Health program. Emails suggest this was not a Clinton Foundation program, but rather support for the Mozambique Ministry of Health. The speaker claims the foundation brokered money and pharmaceuticals, taking a vague fee. They negotiated relationships with pharmaceutical companies. The speaker concludes the Clinton Foundation functioned as a closely held family partnership, not a charity.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is accused of being a criminal cartel due to their self-exemption from criminal prosecution in their founding document. This exemption raises questions about their behavior and motives, suggesting they may be aware of illegal activities within the organization.

Project Veritas' inflammatory allegations are based on the words of the company's own employees. However, the individual cited is not a procurement leader. Project Veritas' claims regarding the company's interactions and relations with its suppliers are inaccurate. These relationships are built on trust, transparency, and a commitment to innovation, quality, and reliability. Project Veritas has refused to provide a copy of the recording made without the individual's awareness or consent.

Under Florida law, contracts that are inconsistent with public policy are considered unconscionable. In this case, there are procedural and substantive issues with the contracts. Procedurally, there is self-dealing and a lack of independent counsel for the district. Internal emails reveal that Disney drafted the development agreement and tried to cover it up by having the district's lawyer put his name on it. The same was true for the restrictive covenants. Disney's in-house lawyer also edited the development agreement agenda and provided talking points for the district's administrator. Substantively, the benefits heavily favor Disney, while the district receives nothing in return. The contracts also lack consideration and violate Florida law regarding restrictive covenants on governmental entities. These contracts are unlikely to hold up in court.

The EU General Court ruled against Ursula von der Leyen because, as president of the European Commission, she allegedly negotiated COVID vaccine contracts worth billions of euros with the CEO of Pfizer via text message during the pandemic. The New York Times requested the release of these messages, but the European Commission refused, claiming the messages were lost. The New York Times then took the case to court. The EU General Court ruled that the European Commission broke the law by refusing to release the text messages, stating that citizens have the right to know how such deals are made, even via SMS. The European Commission has two months to appeal the decision. The speaker highlights that this situation demonstrates that the EU is a place where a court can rule against the president of the European Commission.

The speaker questions the secrecy surrounding COVID-19 vaccine contracts and the rush to develop them under Operation Warp Speed. They mention that these contracts are confidential and cannot be obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. The speaker also raises concerns about Pfizer's CEO allegedly trying to blackmail Argentina and Brazil. They wonder why such extreme measures are being taken and what information is being hidden. The speaker mentions that Bill Gates stated in 2020 that the final solution to the pandemic will be a... (transcript ends)

Deutsch: Es geht um den Vorwurf, dass EU‑Kommissionspräsidentin Ursula von der Leyen 2021 persönlich für 35 Milliarden Euro den dritten Pfizer‑Impfstoffdeal eingefädelt hat, obwohl das gemeinsame Verhandlungsteam laut Bericht abseits des Beschlusses der Kommission nicht in die Verhandlungen einbezogen wurde. Der Deal soll 1,8 Milliarden Dosen umfassen; der Preis pro Dosis soll von 15,50 Euro auf 19,50 Euro gestiegen sein. Die New York Times berichtete von SMS und Telefonaten zwischen Von der Leyen und Pfizer‑CEO Albert Bourla; der Europäische Rechnungshof bestätigt Unregelmäßigkeiten. Frederic Baldan hat Strafanzeige gegen Von der Leyen gestellt; Klagen zur Offenlegung wichtiger Dokumente, da SMS angeblich nicht auffindbar oder gelöscht seien. Journalist Alexander Fanta und die Ombudsfrau Emily O’Riley sowie vier EU‑Abgeordnete fordern Transparenz; der EuGH soll Verträge offenlegen. Der Vertrag wurde unter Druck einiger Mitgliedstaaten nachverhandelt, aber Geheimhaltung bleibt bestehen; Kritik an zu vielen Dosen, erhöhtem Preis und mangelnder Transparenz. English: This concerns the allegation that EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen personally orchestrated in 2021 a third Pfizer vaccine deal for 35 billion euros, even though the joint negotiating team was not involved in the negotiations in accordance with the Commission's decision. The deal reportedly covers 1.8 billion doses; the price per dose reportedly rose from 15.50 to 19.50 euros. The New York Times reported SMS and phone calls between Von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla; the European Court of Auditors confirms irregularities. Frederic Baldan has filed a criminal complaint against Von der Leyen; lawsuits seek disclosure of important documents, as SMS are allegedly not discoverable or deleted. Journalist Alexander Fanta and Ombudsman Emily O'Reilly as well as four MEPs demand transparency; the ECJ should disclose contracts. The contract was renegotiated under pressure from some member states, but secrecy remains; criticism of too many doses, higher price, and lack of transparency.

Pfizer imported their own batch of vaccine specifically for the employee vaccination program, which was not tested by the TGA.

Antonio Mujica and his partner Alfredo Enzola received a small business loan from the Venezuelan government just months before the recall election. Venezuelan corporate registration documents show the government owned 28% of the stock of Bizta, a company they started that adapted voting software for the Smartmatic machines in the 2004 elections. The same document shows Chavez government minister Omar Montillo was on Bizta’s board of directors. The Chavez government gave Bizta, Smartmatic, and another company a $91,000,000 contract to run voting machines for the February election. The next year, the owners of Smartmatic, primarily Venezuelan businessmen, bought Sequoia, one of the top electronic voting system companies in the United States, for $16,000,000. Smartmatic is a labyrinth international holding company structure. Smartmatic Group NV of Curacao Netherlands Antilles owns Smartmatic International BV of Amsterdam, which owns Smartmatic Corporation of Florida, which bought Sequoia Voting Systems of California, USA. When Smartmatic bought the US voting machine companies, the US government did not review the sale. Many experts say those voting machines were manipulated in Venezuela to give president Hugo Chavez a victory. Polls done by The US firm Penn shown in Berlin had Chavez losing 41% to 59%. But the next day, Chavez declared victory, reversing the score, saying he won 59% of the vote. “Everything was computed in the favor of the government.” So the only explanation is that the smart mathematic machines had been programmed in that way. A mathematician crunched the numbers on the Venezuelan election. “All these machines talk to a central computer and report on their results. And in that mechanism, as they communicate with the center, the central machine can report anything.” Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida. But the president of the company, Jack Blaine, testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida. The majority of the workers are based in Venezuela.

Confidentiality agreements were required for Canadian government employees accessing these documents. The reason for extensive redactions is that these agreements were signed during the early stages of the pandemic when there was a rush to produce and test vaccines. Companies took on higher liability by fast-tracking the testing process, which normally takes years. Due to global competition for vaccines, countries had less negotiating power. The government prioritized signing as many vaccine contracts as possible to meet the urgent need for vaccinations. Ultimately, Canada successfully obtained vaccines and became one of the fastest countries to vaccinate its population.

The EU Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, is facing criticism and legal action over a secretive €35 billion deal for COVID-19 vaccines. The deal, allegedly arranged through personal phone calls and text messages, has raised concerns about transparency and the misuse of public funds. Journalists, EU parliament members, and the European Court of Auditors have all been denied access to the documents related to the contract. The lack of transparency has led to accusations of undemocratic practices and a disregard for European democracy. Additionally, questions have been raised about the necessity of ordering such a large quantity of vaccines and the increased price paid for subsequent purchases.