reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker says USAID funding amounts to terrorism. He notes $697,000,000 annually, plus shipments of cash funds Madrasas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS Khorazan, terrorist training camps. If you think that the program under operation enduring Sentinel entitled Women's Scholarship Endowment ($60,000,000 annually) or the Young Women Lead ($5,000,000 annually) is going to women— inspector general's report says the Taliban does not allow women to speak in public. He asserts Americans are told this funds women, but 'You are funding terrorism, and it's coming through USAID.' He adds USAID spent $8,840,000,000 in the last twenty years on Pakistan's education related program, including $136,000,000 to build 120 schools with zero evidence any were built; inspector general can't get in to see them. They spent $20,000,000 to create educational television programs for children unable to attend the school; 'You paid for it. Somebody else got the money. You are paying for terrorism.'

The Pentagon hides billions of dollars, with no accountability or audits. We've never received a satisfactory explanation. To uncover the truth, someone will likely have to leak information online before being silenced—a scenario I've often predicted.

Elon Musk invited a group to observe his weekly Doge meeting, where they discussed efforts to combat government waste and fraud. They found instances of misuse of funds, such as the Department of Education's $4 billion COVID fund being used for parties at Caesar's Palace and stadium rentals. Requiring receipts halted these withdrawals. The Small Business Administration gave loans to dead people and even unborn children. The Inter American Foundation (IAF) spends only 58% of its funds on grantees, like alpaca farmers in Peru, with much of the money remaining in DC. Only 10-15 cents of each dollar reaches the intended recipient due to layers of stealing. The United States Institute of Peace was found to have loaded guns in its headquarters and a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for unclear services. The chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of records, later recovered. Unspent funds were swept into a private bank account. The team referred the evidence to the FBI and DOJ. A generous government resignation program was initially met with suspicion, but is now gaining acceptance. The effort to combat waste and fraud is a long-term enterprise.

We've stopped the $8,000,000 in taxpayer subsidies for Politico subscriptions. The team is working to cancel the payments immediately. Large organizations inevitably miss things. Claims of widespread waste and abuse haven't been substantiated with evidence. We haven't seen proof of the alleged misuse of funds.

Pentagon's Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, declared war on the Pentagon bureaucracy, stating that wasted money poses a serious threat. However, after the events of 9/11, the focus shifted to funding the war on terrorism, and the issue of wasteful spending was forgotten. The military already struggles to account for 25% of its expenses, which amounts to $2.3 trillion. A whistleblower, Jim Minery, discovered $1 million missing from a defense agency's balance sheets but faced resistance when trying to investigate. The Pentagon's inspector general confirmed some of Minery's allegations but couldn't prove manipulation of financial statements. The problem of accounting games and cooked books persists, according to longtime Pentagon employee, c Spinney. Without proper oversight, billions of dollars could be saved.

The speaker claims the U.S. has given close to $5 billion to the Taliban via NGOs, and this continues. They allege this money cycles back to Washington, with a paper trail that Elon Musk has alluded to. The speaker believes USAID money goes "almost a %" right back to Democrat campaign coffers, with some Republicans also possibly benefiting. They state that Republican leadership is upset about these claims but acknowledges their truth. The speaker also questions how Joe Biden could have reviewed 8,000 pardon files, suggesting "payola" and shadiness in Washington D.C., particularly across various departments.

Official A states that in 2022, the office found that president Biden's DHS allowed some Afghans into the country before they were fully vetted, including one who had been liberated from prison by the Taliban. Official A notes that over 50 known or suspected terrorists had entered the United States as a result of Biden administration screening or lack thereof, and that last month the director of national intelligence said that 2,000 Afghans in America may have ties to terrorism. Official A asks whether a formal vetting process was in place, and asserts that the department did not have a formal process at the start of the OAW. Official A repeats the figure and corrects it to 36,000, calling it astounding. Official B replies that CARE, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, is the organization in question, stating that CARE was founded at a 1993 meeting and that they specifically state they are going to present themselves as a legitimate civil rights organization while furthering the mission of Hamas. Official A asks how much money CARE received from the federal government to shepherd Afghan parolees. Official B responds that CARE received $15,000,000 in California and more than $1,000,000 in Washington. Official A adds that when they check federal databases for CARE, they find nothing, and Official B explains that the money did not go directly from the federal government to CARE, but rather through an intermediary, and that this is how they’ve hidden the money. Official A states, “We need to find out where this money has gone. This is a scandal. This is corruption, and we've gotta figure out how taxpayer money has ended up in the hands of yet another organization terrorized.”

As senior advisor at the United States Agency for Global Media, the speaker is working on behalf of the American people and President Trump's administration. The speaker claims to be horrified by what they are learning about the agency. The Biden administration allegedly signed a 15-year lease for a new building costing taxpayers nearly a quarter of a billion dollars, despite already having a paid-off building that could have been renovated. The new building has fancy conference rooms, bridges to nowhere, waterfalls, Italian marble, and leather furnishings. The speaker also alleges that contracts were changed just before the new administration arrived to make it less transparent to track where money is going. The speaker says they are working to cancel contracts, save money, downsize, and prevent misuse of taxpayer dollars.

As EPA administrator, my top priority is to protect your tax dollars. A disturbing video showed a Biden appointee appearing to waste billions before inauguration day. My team discovered roughly $20 billion of your tax dollars parked at an outside financial institution by the previous administration. This unprecedented scheme awarded funds to eight entities responsible for distributing money with reduced transparency; almost $7 billion went to one entity, the Climate United Fund. We have serious questions about fund allocation and potential conflicts of interest. There is no reason to suspect wrongdoing by the bank, but the financial agreement must be terminated immediately, and the funds returned to EPA control. We will review all expenditures and refer the matter to the inspector general and the Justice Department. The days of irresponsible spending on activist groups are over. We are committed to transparency and accountability. We found the funds, and now we will regain control as we pursue next steps.

There's significant fraud in USAID, with radical groups receiving funds they don't deserve. A staggering amount, like a hundred million, is being misallocated. It's crucial to investigate the kickbacks associated with this spending. Who would invest such sums in questionable projects? It's likely that those who received the funds are not returning any to the government, indicating a high level of corruption. The key issue is understanding the extent of these kickbacks.

Democrats were invited to participate and bring witnesses, but they chose not to, likely because USAID's spending is indefensible, like $2 million for sex change surgeries in Guatemala and $3 million for girl-centric climate change initiatives. If USAID has unspent funds, can the President impound them? Auditing spending is essential oversight. We're uncovering waste, like $4.8 million for social media influencers in Ukraine. Forcing a social agenda, like LGBT issues, on conservative countries harms diplomacy. We're finding this waste because we have a president with the courage to oversee USAID. The CFO of FEMA was fired for spending $54 million on luxury hotels for illegal aliens. The Lincoln Riley's killer was put up in a luxury hotel in New York. Can the President impound funds, or should we rescind them through Congress? A pause in funding for an audit is just good government.

My team faced significant obstruction from USAID while trying to access records on taxpayer money. Partnering with Representative Mike McCall, we initiated a congressional investigation, but USAID only provided limited data. Our findings revealed excessive spending with minimal results. Notably, USAID funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology for dangerous coronaviruses, and also allocated money for pottery classes in Morocco and tourism in Lebanon, despite travel warnings from the State Department. There are numerous examples of questionable expenditures.

The speakers describe investigating the Institute of Peace, which they call the "least peaceful agency" they've worked with. They found the agency spent money on private jets and had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for generic services. Since the country's founding, the number of agencies has increased from four to over 400. After the team arrived at the Institute of Peace headquarters, the chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of accounting records, which the team recovered. The agency receives $55 million a year from Congress, and any unspent money was swept into a private bank account without congressional oversight, which funded events and private jets. The speakers allege the agency was hiding money and had weapons in its buildings, characterizing it as a cover-up. The evidence of deleted accounting records was referred to the FBI and DOJ.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war on the Pentagon bureaucracy, stating that wasted money poses a serious threat. However, after the events of 9/11, the focus shifted to funding the war on terrorism, and the war on waste was forgotten. The Pentagon cannot account for 25% of its spending, which amounts to $2.3 trillion. One whistleblower, Jim Minery, discovered $1 million missing from a defense agency's balance sheets but faced resistance when trying to investigate. The Pentagon's inspector general partially substantiated the allegations but couldn't prove manipulation of financial statements. Franklin C. Spinney, a Pentagon employee, exposed accounting games 20 years ago and believes the problem has worsened. Retired Vice Admiral Jack Shanahan confirms that the books are routinely cooked year after year.

The speakers investigated the Institute of Peace and found it to be the least peaceful agency they'd worked with. The agency spent money on private jets and had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for generic services with no clear description. Since the country's founding, the number of agencies has increased 100x. The team found weapons in the Institute's armory and evidence of payments to the Taliban. Shortly after the investigation began, the chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of accounting records, which the team recovered. The Institute received $55 million a year from Congress, and unspent money was swept into a private bank account without congressional oversight, which funded events and private jets. The speakers allege the agencies are hiding money and sending it to the Taliban, and that the Institute of Peace was attempting a cover-up by deleting financial information. The evidence in the accounting example was referred to the FBI and DOJ.

Elon Musk invited a group to observe his weekly Doge meeting, where they discussed government waste and fraud. A key issue was the lack of receipt requirements for a $4 billion COVID fund in the Department of Education, leading to funds being used for parties and stadium rentals. Even when receipts were required, they didn't need to be legitimate, yet requests stopped. The Small Business Administration gave loans to dead people and even fetuses. The Inter American Foundation (IAF) spends only 58% of its funds on grantees, like alpaca farmers in Peru, with much of the money remaining in DC. Only 10-15 cents of each dollar reaches the intended recipient due to layers of stealing. The United States Institute of Peace was cited as the agency with the most resistance, including loaded guns in their headquarters and a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for unclear services. The agency's chief accountant deleted a terabyte of records, later recovered, and unspent funds were diverted to a private bank account. Doge is a long-term enterprise to combat waste and fraud, with the goal of making it difficult to restart.

Government fraud often starts small but escalates over time, with examples including stadium rentals. Investigators become desensitized due to its prevalence. The Small Business Administration gave loans to dead people and those with impossible birthdates, totaling hundreds of millions of dollars. The Inter-American Foundation (IAF) spends a large portion of its funds on management and travel rather than grantees, with only a small percentage reaching the intended recipients. There are layers of stealing through contractors and subcontractors. One contractor was caught advising a colleague to falsify billable hours. Some agencies, like the United States Institute of Peace, have shown extreme resistance, including having loaded guns in their headquarters and a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. The Institute of Peace's chief accountant deleted a terabyte of accounting records, and unspent funds were swept into a private bank account. The evidence was referred to the FBI and DOJ. A deferred resignation program offered attractive separation terms, but some were talked out of it. The effort to combat waste and fraud is a long-term enterprise.

The speakers investigated the Institute of Peace and found it to be the "least peaceful agency" they'd worked with. The agency spent money on private jets and had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for vaguely defined "generic services." Since the country's founding, the number of agencies has increased from four to over 400. President Trump signed executive orders to reduce the number of agencies, including the Institute of Peace. Upon investigation, the team found weapons in their armory and evidence of payments to the Taliban. The chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of accounting records, which the team recovered. The Institute of Peace receives $55 million a year from Congress, and unspent money was swept into a private bank account without congressional oversight, used for events and private jets. The evidence of deleted accounting records was referred to the FBI and DOJ.

The United States Institute of Peace was described as the least peaceful agency encountered, with loaded guns found inside its headquarters. The agency was allegedly spending money on private jets and had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for generic services with no clear description. It is unclear what the money was for. Since the country's founding, the number of agencies has increased from four to over 400. President Trump signed two executive orders to reduce the number of agencies, including the Institute of Peace, prompting an investigation that uncovered weapons and payments to the Taliban.

As EPA Administrator, my top priority is to protect your tax dollars from waste and abuse. A disturbing video revealed a Biden EPA appointee discussing the wasteful spending of tax dollars. My team discovered that the Biden EPA parked approximately $20 billion of your tax dollars at an outside financial institution. This unprecedented scheme was designed to rush money out the door with reduced oversight, awarding the funds to just eight entities responsible for distributing the money to NGOs with less transparency. Nearly $7 billion went to one entity, raising questions about fund allocation and potential conflicts of interest. There's no suspicion of wrongdoing by the bank. I am calling for the immediate termination of the financial agent agreement with the bank, demanding the return of all funds to the EPA. We will review every expenditure, referring the matter to the Inspector General and working with the Justice Department. The days of irresponsible spending on activist groups are over. We are committed to transparency and accountability, reclaiming control of these funds and pursuing further action.

As EPA Administrator, I'm committed to fiscal responsibility and transparency. A disturbing video revealed a Biden appointee discussing the wasteful spending of tax dollars. My team discovered that the Biden EPA parked roughly $20 billion of your tax dollars at an outside financial institution, a scheme designed to rush the money out with reduced oversight, awarding it to just eight entities responsible for distribution to NGOs with less transparency. Nearly $7 billion went to one entity, raising questions about fund allocation and potential conflicts of interest. While there's no suspicion of wrongdoing by the bank, the financial agent agreement must be terminated, and the funds returned to EPA control. We will review all expenditures, referring the matter to the Inspector General and working with the Justice Department. The days of irresponsible spending are over; we're ushering in an era of accountability and transparency.

Here's why they didn't want us looking at the Department of Education. According to USED.gov, $4.6 million was contracted to coordinate Zoom and in-person meetings. Another $3 million went to writing a report to show that prior reports weren't used by schools. And $1.4 million was spent to physically observe mailing and clerical operations. We all want children educated, but these allocations don't seem right. It looks like theft from the American taxpayer.

The United States Institute of Peace was described as the least peaceful agency encountered. Loaded guns were found inside their headquarters. The agency was allegedly spending money on private jets. A $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban was discovered for generic services with no clear description. It is unclear what the contract was for. When the country was founded, there were only four agencies. Today, there are over 400. President Trump signed two executive orders to reduce the number of agencies in the government, including the Institute of Peace. This prompted an investigation that uncovered weapons and payments to the Taliban.

The speaker's team investigated the Institute of Peace and found questionable spending, including private jets and a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for vaguely defined services. The speaker notes a significant increase in the number of government agencies since the country's founding. Upon investigation, the team discovered weapons in the Institute's armory and that the chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of accounting records, which the team later recovered. The Institute received $55 million annually from Congress, and unspent funds were moved into a private bank account without congressional oversight, used for expenses like events and private jets. The speaker suggests this is an extreme example of wasteful spending in smaller agencies. Evidence of deleted accounting records was referred to the FBI and DOJ.

The speaker claims $5 trillion in untraceable payments exist with no record of where the money went. They allege Social Security sent out $72 billion in bad checks, and the head of Social Security resigned. The speaker finds the resignation suspicious. Speaker 1 asserts there is no waste in the Pentagon, Treasury, or HHS. Speaker 1 asks why Speaker 0 is not celebrating cuts and reforms if they agree there is waste, abuse, and corruption. Speaker 1 claims billions of dollars are being saved. Speaker 0 attempts to calm Speaker 1 down, stating they are not having a debate. Speaker 1 insists they are not trying to debate and will speak freely about saving Americans billions of dollars.