reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Globally, our population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. I anticipate a decline, but I hope it happens peacefully. Peace doesn't mean everyone will be happy, but conflicts should be resolved without violence. The planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. If we want more freedom and consumption, we need fewer people. Ideally, we should aim for a slow and equal decline to around 1 billion people. This way, everyone shares the experience and avoids a few wealthy individuals imposing their will on others. These hopes may seem pessimistic, but that's what lies ahead.

Ahmad Brabagir, the 4th prime minister of Malaysia and president of the Predana Global Peace Foundation, spoke about the intention to reduce the world's population. Originally, the goal was to decrease it from 3 billion to 1 billion people. However, the current population stands at 7 billion. To achieve this reduction, there may be measures such as killing or starving billions of people or preventing them from giving birth. Unfortunately, those who suffer and die will find peace in the grave.

In January 2019, my leadership team and I met in California to set goals for the next five years. One of our dreams was to reduce the global population by 50% by 2023.

Former Malaysian Prime Minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohammed, believes that the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a strategy led by the US and powerful individuals to establish a one-world government and dominate the global economy. He argues that this government would be controlled by a select group of wealthy and influential elites, with no emphasis on democracy or choice of leaders. Dr. Mahathir also suggests that this agenda aims to reduce the world's population significantly, either through mass killings, starvation, or birth control measures.

Running corporations and making billions can lead to boredom. Bill Gates aims to depopulate the planet by 2030 using vaccines and healthcare. He believes lowering the population by 10-15% is achievable. Gates' efforts focus on human depopulation, genetically modified foods, and vaccines. The Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health works to control population growth in developing countries. Gates predicts future pandemics and stresses the importance of global coordination and vaccination for returning to normalcy.

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad believes that the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a strategy by a powerful group, led by the US, to dominate the global economy and establish a one-world government. He argues that this government would be controlled by wealthy, intelligent, and powerful elites, with no emphasis on democracy or choosing leaders. Mahathir suggests that those who resist this new order would face punishment, and the ultimate goal is to reduce the world's population from 7 billion to 1 billion. He mentions methods such as starvation or preventing births to achieve this.

Speaker 0 notes the world population is 6.8 billion and is headed up to about 9 billion. He says if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. Speaker 1 responds with the question: common sense would tell you that if a man standing in front of you says he's gonna reduce the world's population by 10–15% using vaccines, what does that mean to you? He explains that means somebody's going to die because you put a vaccine in them, and it doesn't mean you're going to save people. He says that’s common sense, but he saw him say it, and now he’s here; he says, "I’m now an anti vaxxer I wasn't before."

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad believes that the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a strategy by a powerful group, led by the US, to dominate the global economy and establish a one-world government. He argues that this government would be controlled by wealthy, intelligent, and powerful elites, with no emphasis on democracy or choice of leaders. Mahathir suggests that those who resist this new world order would face punishment, and the ultimate goal is to reduce the world's population from 7 billion to 1 billion. He claims that this approach would bring a peace akin to a graveyard.

The world's population is currently 6.8 billion and is projected to reach 9 billion. The speaker suggests that by improving vaccines, healthcare, and reproductive health services, we could potentially reduce the population by 10-15%. However, another speaker questions this approach, stating that if vaccines are used to decrease the population, it implies that some people will die instead of being saved. This viewpoint has led the second speaker to become an anti-vaxxer.

The speaker mentions that the world's population is currently around 6.8 billion and is projected to reach 9 billion. They suggest that by improving vaccines, healthcare, and reproductive health services, it might be possible to reduce the population by 10-15%. Another speaker expresses concern, stating that if someone claims they can lower the population through vaccines, it implies that people will die as a result. This leads the second speaker to become an anti-vaxxer.

The speaker discusses depopulation and presents evidence to support the claim that it is a real agenda. They mention government policies such as the National Security Study Memorandum 200 and Global 2000, which outline strategies for reducing the global population. The speaker also quotes Zbigniew Brzezinski, a former adviser to President Jimmy Carter, who suggests that it is easier to kill people than to control them. They argue that various methods, including control of food, air, water, and reproductive services, are being used to target all races. The speaker acknowledges that people are waking up to this agenda, which has caused the government to consider eliminating all individuals who oppose them.

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad believes that the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a strategy by a powerful group, led by the US, to dominate the global economy and establish a one-world government. He argues that this government would be controlled by wealthy, intelligent, and powerful elites, with no emphasis on democracy or choosing leaders. Mahathir suggests that those who resist this new order would face punishment, and the ultimate goal is to reduce the world's population from 7 billion to 1 billion. He mentions methods such as starvation or preventing births to achieve this objective.

I'm looking at a world population of 6.8 billion, projected to hit 9 billion. If we focus on new vaccines, healthcare, and reproductive health services, we might be able to lower that by 10 to 15 percent. If someone says they're going to reduce the world's population by 10 to 15 percent using vaccines, it suggests that some people will die because of those vaccines. This doesn't sound like saving people. I never considered myself anti-vax, but here we are.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, an adviser to President Jimmy Carter, once said that it is easier to control a million people than to physically kill them. However, in today's world, it is easier to kill a million people than to control them. This idea is reflected in Global 2000, a government policy authorized by President Carter, which discusses using food and reproductive services as weapons. The goal of the government is to remove billions of people from the planet because they feel they have lost control over the masses. People are becoming more aware and questioning their government and the science presented to them. The government sees those who stand up against them as a threat and aims to eliminate them, regardless of their race.

Their plan is to reduce the global population to 500 million by killing 7 billion people. They believe most lives are not worth living and that the world would be better without the masses. They want America to be the first in this new world order, as Henry Kissinger said. They have foreign troops on the ground and anticipate some resistance, but believe that the people will eventually beg for help as chaos ensues. They see this as the birth pangs of a new world.

Speaker 0: The population today is 6,800,000,000 people, and it’s headed up to about 9,000,000,000. If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. Speaker 1: Well, common sense would tell you if you have a man standing in front of you saying he's gonna reduce the world's population by 10 or 15% using vaccines, what does that mean to you? That means somebody's going to die because you put a vaccine in them. It doesn't mean you're going to save people. That's pretty much common sense in my brain but yet I saw him say it, he said it and here we are I don't know I'm just here we are I'm now an anti vaxxer I wasn't before.

Globally, our population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. I anticipate a decline, but I hope it happens peacefully. Peace doesn't mean everyone is happy, but rather that conflicts are resolved without violence. The planet can support around 1-2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. If we want more freedom and consumption, we need fewer people. With a smart dictatorship and low living standards, we could have 8-9 billion people, but that's not what we desire. Currently, we have 7 billion people, so we need to decrease. I hope this decline is gradual and equitable, with shared experiences rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing their will. These hopes may seem pessimistic.

During the COVID crisis, there has been a theory that population control is an underlying agenda. Official US government documents dating back to 1973 reveal that population control to cap global growth at 8 billion is US policy. The logic behind this is to suppress population growth in least developed countries that the US wishes to exploit for resources. This theory is based on the idea that the Earth has limited resources and can only sustain a certain number of human beings. The goal is to use various means, including birth control and abortion, to limit population growth. These documents support the theory and raise questions about the intentions behind it.

Patrick Moore, a Greenpeace co-founder, recently claimed that achieving net zero emissions could lead to the death of half the world's population. Some believe this is part of a depopulation agenda aimed at reducing the global population by 7.5 billion people.

The speaker discusses the current global population of 6.8 billion, which is projected to reach 9 billion. They suggest that with advancements in vaccines and healthcare, it may be possible to reduce the population by 10-15%. Another speaker expresses concern about the idea of using vaccines to decrease the population, believing it could result in deaths rather than saving lives. This experience leads them to become an anti-vaxxer.

Jane Goodall expressed a desire to reduce the global population, citing concerns over overpopulation. Bill Gates, associated with the World Economic Forum, suggested that improved healthcare and vaccines could potentially lower the population by 10 to 15%. There are implications that these influential figures aim to control or eliminate those they deem unnecessary. The argument is made that if they believe in the need for depopulation, they should demonstrate their commitment by starting with themselves.

Former Malaysian Prime Minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, believes that the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPPA) is a strategy by powerful individuals, led by the US, to dominate the global economy and establish a one-world government. He argues that this government would be controlled by wealthy and powerful elites, who would impose their rules on everyone. Dr. Mahathir also suggests that the intention behind this new world order is to reduce the world's population, potentially through mass killings or starvation. He warns that the peace achieved through this system would be akin to the peace of the graveyard.

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

In January 2019, my leadership team and I gathered in California to set goals for the next five years. One of our dreams was to reduce the global population by 50% by 2023. Today, it seems like this dream is starting to come true.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, an adviser to President Jimmy Carter, once said that it is easier to kill a million people than to control them. This idea is reflected in the government policy called Global 2000, authorized by Carter, which discusses using food and reproductive services as weapons. In 1974, Henry Kissinger, the 32nd Secretary of State, stated that depopulation should be a top priority for US foreign policy towards the Third World. The government believes that the population is growing beyond their control and wants to remove billions of people from the planet. People are becoming more aware and questioning their government and the science they present. The government has decided to eliminate those who resist and refuse to conform, regardless of their race.