TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 questions Governor Walls about his past statements and actions. Speaker 1 asks if Walls knew the Nazis killed 6,000,000 Jews during the Holocaust, and if he agrees the Holocaust is the most horrific atrocity in human history. Speaker 1 asks if Walls knew the Nazi Gestapo imprisoned, tortured, and murdered Jews and committed suicide genocide against them, then asks if Walls knew ICE has done none of that. Speaker 1 asks if Walls will apologize for comparing ICE to the Gestapo. Speaker 1 asks if Walls believes the Nuremberg trials were a good exercise in holding the Nazis accountable, and if he is calling for ICE agents to be brought to a tribunal under the threat of death. Speaker 1 asks if Walls still wants to abolish ICE, and if he marched in a rally calling for ICE's abolishment. Speaker 1 asks Walls to rate Kamala Harris's job as border czar on a scale of one to ten, and if he ever personally spoke with Kamala about Joe Biden's cognitive collapse.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Parents seek guidance from health leaders regarding vaccine decisions. I want to address a serious matter about character. You were accused of sexual harassment and assault by Eliza Cooney, who was initially hired as a babysitter. When confronted, you mentioned you weren't a "church boy" and acknowledged having "skeletons in your closet." You later texted Ms. Cooney an apology but claimed no memory of her account. Can you respond to these accusations in front of this committee? Did you make unwanted sexual advances toward Ms. Cooney? No, I did not, and that story has been debunked. Why did you apologize then? I apologized for something else. That’s not my understanding. You can read the text she published; it was not for that.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about their testimony in court regarding a memo outlining potential investigations. Speaker 0 argues that it was misleading and wrong to testify about possibilities and maybes. Speaker 1 defends their answers, stating that they were discussing the memo and its purpose. Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1's claims, suggesting that the Democrat district attorney was excited about pursuing investigations against Ken Paxton. Speaker 1 disagrees with the characterization and explains that the feds waved them off. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1's credibility and suggests they would never engage in criminal activity. Speaker 1 denies this and clarifies their stance. The video ends with Speaker 0 highlighting that Speaker 1 applied for a job at the AG's office after writing the memo, with a letter of recommendation from Margaret Moore.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
We have full confidence and are forming a team to lead us to victory. The timing of people walking away doesn't matter; it's how we react. We are in talks with legal counsel to take CNN to task for what they have done to us. We have 5 weeks left and won't let CNN throw us off our mission to win. I am dismayed that you focus on this instead of people hooked on fentanyl, what's going on at the border, or the economy. I am coming after CNN full throttle. To put the people first, we've got to concentrate on this campaign. No more questions because when I made history as the first black lieutenant governor of North Carolina, you did not knock on my door. Don't knock on it now.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Hey, this is James O'Keefe outside the Phil Bredesen campaign. I'm here with Will Stewart, who we caught on video calling Bredesen a liar regarding Kavanaugh's vote. I asked why Bredesen would need to lie to get elected, but Stewart refused to comment, saying he couldn't talk about it. I pressed him for a response, but he insisted he had to leave. He mentioned that the messaging about a "blue wave" should stay behind closed doors. I noted his reluctance to speak and now I'm heading to the debate to see if Bredesen will comment. Stay tuned.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 if they still believe the NRA is a terror group. Speaker 0 clarifies that they support the 2nd amendment and do not consider the NRA a terror group. Speaker 1 questions if Speaker 0 regrets tweeting about it in 2018, to which Speaker 0 responds that they don't recall tweeting it but if they did, they don't consider the NRA a terror group. Speaker 1 then asks if Speaker 0 regrets endorsing various politicians, and Speaker 0 clarifies that they don't recall endorsing Bernie Sanders but they do like him, and they voted for Barack Obama without regrets.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 still wants to ban fracking. Speaker 1 says no, clarifying they stated in a 2020 debate they would not ban fracking as Vice President or President. Speaker 0 points out that in 2019, Speaker 1 said they were in favor of banning fracking. Speaker 1 responds that in 2020, they made their position clear, and they have not changed that position in 2024, nor will they going forward, and that they have kept their word.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 is asked about their previous tweets regarding Trump and Brian Kemp stealing elections. Speaker 1 dismisses the comparison as ridiculous and clarifies that they were referring to the threat to voting rights at that time.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 cautions that what you’re doing is extremely dangerous. Speaker 1 asks why it’s dangerous and replies that it’s not a conspiracy theory, and questions whether the person has $45. Speaker 1 emphasizes they are not saying people are voting there, but that people are currently registered to vote there. They state they went around Fulton County in the last few weeks and found that people are currently registered to vote in places like empty lots and homeless shelters that closed ten years ago. Speaker 1 asks what would you do if you become secretary of state to address that. Speaker 0 responds by saying they will reply to conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 reiterates that it’s not a conspiracy theory, and argues that there is a current act of voter rolls: “It’s a current you can currently go on the voter rolls, purchase them for $45, and go there with us.” They offer to take the other person to verify claims. Speaker 0 pushes back, saying they won’t respond to conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 asks how it’s a conspiracy theory, labeling it an act of voter rolls. Speaker 0 says, “If you're gonna be running for secretary of state, you're … in charge of maintaining the voter rolls. Don't you care about if people are registered to vote from empty lots?” Speaker 1 continues questioning, asking if it’s a conspiracy theory that people are registered to vote from empty lots and mentions they have the ability to go wherever they want. They reiterate that people are currently registered to vote in empty lots, MARTA bus stations, and elsewhere in Fulton County, and asks if the other person will not do anything about that, calling back the accusation of conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 asks for the exact addresses and notes: “205 Elm Street Northwest. That’s an empty lot. You can go there right now and see it for yourself.” They press: do you not care about that? You’re an elected official, and you don’t wanna address that? They argue that as a potential secretary of state, one should address maintaining clean voter rolls in one of the United States’ most important counties. Speaker 0 repeats that what you’re doing is extremely dangerous. Speaker 1 insists it’s not a conspiracy theory and repeats that people are currently registered to vote there, highlighting the $45 purchase of voter rolls and the need to clean the rolls, including registrations from empty lots and a MARTA station. The exchange ends with Speaker 1 noting that they are trying to have the rolls cleaned, and pointing to the claim of conspiracy theory, and suggesting to actually verify the situation.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A poll, sanctioned by the John Reed for lieutenant governor campaign, was released last night. It highlights “the one number that is gonna make you sick to your stomach.” Among Virginia Democrats, “the text that Jay Jones sent to a colleague calling for the assassination of, at at that time, Republican speaker Todd Gilbert, his wife, his kids, hoping his kids would die in her arms so she could suffer, calling for police to die so he could get policy on on qualified immunity.” When asked, “are these texts disqualifying for your candidate for attorney general?” 7% of Virginia Democrats said yes. 93 said no. “So, basically, if you're a Virginia Democrat, you have no problem with your candidate for attorney general threatening assassination of speaker of the house, his wife, his kids wanna see the kids in her arms. We have to see cops die in Virginia. Only seven percent reject that.”

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 thinks someone should be jailed for misrepresenting and lying to voters about Governor Nate Schatzlein asking cartel members to come into the country legally. Speaker 1 says people lie about him every day and he doesn't think that merits a year in jail, and he doesn't want to limit free speech. He'd rather people be able to lie than be jailed for it. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 sees how such a lie could significantly impact an election. Speaker 1 says the lie is refutable. Speaker 1 doesn't think someone should spend a year or even a day in jail for lying. He believes that when you run for office, people can lie about you, tell the truth, or hold you accountable. Speaker 0 argues it's about election integrity if voters decide based on fabricated information. Speaker 1's time then expires.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 pressed: 'Did you tell the attorney general that Donald Trump's name is in the Epstein files?' Speaker 1 responded: 'I have never spoken to president Trump about the Epstein files.' Speaker 1: 'The attorney general and I have had numerous discussions about the entirety of the Epstein files and the reviews conducted by our team.' Speaker 1: 'And we have released where president Trump's name is the files.' Speaker 1: 'During many conversations that the attorney general and I have had on the matter of Epstein, we have reviewed' Speaker 0: 'Question is simple.' Speaker 0: 'Who' Speaker 0: 'Did you tell the attorney general that Donald Trump's name is in the Epstein files? Yes or no?' Speaker 1: 'Why don't you try spelling it out' Speaker 0: 'Yes or no? Use' Speaker 0: 'the alphabet.' Speaker 0: 'Yes or no?' Speaker 1: 'No. A b c.' Speaker 0: 'Question has been asked and answered.' Speaker 0: 'You've not answered it, and we will take your evasiveness as a consciousness of guilt.'

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
If I were to continue running and be officially nominated, what if I have another episode like we saw during the debate? What if I have another performance at that level? I don't plan on having another performance like that.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is asked about their thoughts on running for reelection in 2026. The senator acknowledges the question but doesn't provide a direct answer. They apologize and ask if someone else has a different question.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Joe if he has ever been on the Senate floor and talked about cutting Social Security, Medicare, and veterans' programs. Joe denies ever saying that. Speaker 0 insists that Joe has made those statements multiple times, but Joe continues to deny it. Joe claims that he meant everything was on the table for discussion, but he did not support those specific cuts. Speaker 0 challenges Joe to watch videos on YouTube where he made those statements.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is asked if they will be running for reelection in 2026. They apologize for not hearing the question properly and ask for someone else to speak up with a different question.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is asked if they will be running for reelection in 2026. They apologize for the interruption and ask for another question.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Are you willing to condemn white supremacists and militia groups? I disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan. I’ve done this numerous times. I don’t want their support. Racism is evil, and those who commit violence in its name are criminals. I reject all hate groups, including neo-Nazis and white supremacists. I spoke out against hatred and bigotry. Despite claims, I have condemned these groups clearly. In one voice, our nation must condemn racism and white supremacy. I am concerned about all groups of hate, including Antifa. I will take action against hate in any form.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
You mentioned that the White House will not interfere, but the incoming president believes he can direct the Justice Department. If he suggests investigating a political enemy, would you comply? I wish we could have discussed this in a meeting. It's essential for the attorney general to remain independent. While I haven't heard the president make such a request, I recognize that many Americans have lost faith in the DOJ. If confirmed, my priority will be to restore integrity to the department and ensure justice is served fairly. Let's move on to your current responsibilities as attorney general.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I have many questions, but I won’t start with them to avoid trouble. What’s your message for the voters on Super Tuesday? Thank you. I want to encourage people to make informed decisions. Thank you all for being here.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I will switch parties after the election. Right now, it's a legal issue and I'm in the middle of a race. I'm proud of my voting record as a county legislator, which shows my support for cutting taxes, law enforcement, small businesses, and improving the economy. It's important to look at my voting record when someone wants to assess me.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I criticized Tim Walz for lying about his military service for political gain. We should focus on important issues like lowering inflation and securing the border. Kamala Harris changes her stance based on her audience, making her appear fake. I believe in debating and answering questions to make my case to the American people. Thank you for the interview.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
You were both in the secret society, Skull and Bones. What does that imply for America? Conspiracy theorists will likely speculate. I haven't seen the web surrounding 322. First, he's not the nominee, but I look forward to the future. Are you ready to lose? No, I won't lose. Skull and Bones is a secret society at Yale, but it doesn't reveal much since it's secretive. Is there a handshake or code? I wish there were something to share. While many secrets exist, one thing is clear: I disagree with the current president's direction for the country. We can do better, and I intend to. Stay safe on the campaign trail. Thanks for joining us. We'll be right back.

The Megyn Kelly Show

Left Falsely Blames Right For House Fire & Data Privacy Issues, w/ Lowry & Cooke, Erik Prince & Weil
Guests: Lowry, Cooke, Erik Prince, Weil
reSee.it Podcast Summary
An explosive thread of political blame unfurls after a South Carolina circuit judge’s home catches fire. Diane Goodstein had recently blocked the release of voter files to the DOJ amid a Trump-backed effort to curb non-citizen registration. The blaze on a water-framed property injured her husband, Arie, and possibly others; he was airlifted with multiple fractures. Authorities later said there was no evidence the fire was intentionally set. The episode becomes the centerpiece as Dan Goldman accuses Trump-era figures of doxxing judges and stoking violence, a claim debated by the panel. Media and political reactions unfold in real time. Goldman’s tweet linking the fire to 'mega' supporters is challenged by Rich Lowry and Charlie Cook, who warn against rushing to conclusions. Nerra Tanden retweets commentary tying previous criticism of officials to the blaze, while outlets such as People and Newsweek frame the incident as a Trump-opposition story. The hosts argue there’s a pattern of one-sided coverage and call for restraint, noting killings linked to political violence on both sides while criticizing how left-leaning voices frame events for political gain. Attention shifts to Virginia, where Jay Jones’s text exchanges reveal a willingness that opponents die for policy ends. The messages include references to shooting and 'two bullets in the brain,' followed by denials that minimize the episode, while a local investigation corroborates past controversial remarks about policing. The panel stresses such a worldview would be disqualifying for a top law officer, and notes that Democratic leaders have not uniformly called for his resignation, contrasting reaction to similar episodes in other races. The discussion highlights concerns about accountability and political violence language. On privacy and power, the interview with Eric Prince and Joe While centers on surveillance capitalism and the limits of data collection. They describe how apps continually transmit location and behavior to data harvesters, arguing the current phone ecosystem leaves citizens exposed to advertising networks and potential government access. Their privacy-focused Ups phone is presented as an alternative with encryption, a data-only SIM, and a hard-wipe function. The discussion emphasizes that while such devices reduce exposure, total privacy remains complicated by telecom infrastructure and legal frameworks.

The Megyn Kelly Show

Cuomo's Failed Zohran Strategy, Platner Oppo Dump & KJP's Only Line, w/ Halperin, Spicer, Turrentine
Guests: Halperin, Spicer, Turrentine
reSee.it Podcast Summary
The podcast delves into several high-stakes political races and broader issues within the Democratic Party. In New York City, the mayoral contest sees Democratic Socialist Zoran Mamani leading, despite significant controversy surrounding his association with Imam Siraj Wahaj, who is described as a terror apologist with anti-American, anti-LGBTQ, and anti-free speech views. The hosts criticize the mainstream media's perceived lack of scrutiny on Mamani and the intense pressure on Republican candidate Curtis Leewa to withdraw, arguing it's unfair given Andrew Cuomo's past scandals, including his handling of COVID-19 in nursing homes and sexual harassment allegations. The discussion moves to Virginia, where Democratic Attorney General candidate Jay Jones is losing ground after texts endorsing violence against Republicans and their children came to light. Democratic leaders, including gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger, are criticized for not denouncing Jones, highlighting a perceived hypocrisy and a focus on identity politics. Spanberger also faces backlash for dismissing concerns about transgender issues in schools, particularly regarding boys in girls' bathrooms, as mere "fear-mongering." In New Jersey, the gubernatorial race between Republican Jack Chidarelli and Democrat Mickey Sherrill is unexpectedly tight. Chidarelli's campaign, featuring Kelsey Grammar, focuses on issues like high taxes, rising crime, and parental rights, resonating with voters. Sherrill, meanwhile, faces scrutiny over a Naval Academy cheating scandal and perceived unpreparedness in debates. The hosts suggest this race indicates a potential shift in New Jersey's political landscape. Maine's Senate race also features controversy, with Democratic candidate Graham Platner, a self-described former communist, facing an imploding campaign. Revelations include controversial Reddit posts expressing anti-cop and anti-rural white American sentiments, and a Nazi-affiliated tattoo, which his former campaign manager claims he understood the meaning of. The hosts highlight a perceived double standard in media coverage and Democratic party responses to these controversies compared to similar situations involving Republicans. Broader themes include the Democratic Party's increasing reliance on identity politics, exemplified by Hunter Biden's comments on Kamala Harris's selection and Karine Jean-Pierre's frequent self-identification as a "black, queer, immigrant woman" while promoting her book, despite accusations of incompetence and internal White House conflicts. The podcast concludes with deep concern over escalating political polarization, vitriol, and an apparent acceptance of calls for violence against political opponents on the left, citing "No Kings" rallies and radicalized youth, while noting a recent surge in Bible sales as a potential counter-cultural trend.
View Full Interactive Feed