reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Josh LaHaz, interim litigation director for the Canadian Constitution Foundation, explains that the CCF is challenging Nova Scotia’s province-wide ban last summer on traveling into the woods as unreasonable and unconstitutional. He describes the case as very controversial. He notes the reaction to his warning that the ban violated Canadians’ rights and freedoms: hate mail accusing him of putting lives at risk, alongside a torrent of emails from Nova Scotians thanking him for standing up to vague, arbitrary, and overbroad measures. To many, the situation felt like the attacks on freedom experienced during COVID-19. People were willing to comply with reasonable measures to combat COVID-19 and protect the vulnerable, just as they complied with measures to prevent forest fires (burn bans and parking ATVs). But they questioned banning dog walking on urban trails, outlawing fishing from rocks on lake shores, and threatening $25,000 fines for attending a friend’s birthday party on rural property, noting none of these pose any fire risk. LaHaz argues that, in a time when taking a dog for a walk was illegal, the government was issuing permits for much riskier activities like forestry. He asserts that, like during COVID-19, the premier and the government did not think the travel ban through and did not even try to justify the decision despite its obvious impact on charter rights. He contends that every administrative decision affecting charter rights must be justified, transparent, and intelligible, justified in light of the facts and legal constraints. In this case, he says, the minister didn’t do any of that, nor did he turn his mind to the charter questions, which is why the CCF is defending rights and freedom to prevent a recurrence. LaHaz concludes by saying he’ll be live-tweeting all week on X at Josh DeHaas, with a summary later in the week after not reserving judgment.

The transcript discusses a plan attributed to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to airdrop oral rabies vaccines into six states over the course of a month, continuing a process that started in August in other states. The states named are Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, all of which are expected to receive these vaccines. The plan involves dropping edible satchels of food that are designed to attract wildlife. These satchels are described as containing an oral rabies vaccine, so that when wildlife consumes them, the animals are vaccinated against rabies. It is stated that this vaccination occurs without the animals’ consent, noting that animals cannot give consent. A key question raised is what would come next after this initial distribution. The speaker asks about the implications if these satchels are spread across the stated areas and whether there will be any impact on domestic pets. The transcript asserts that the satchels are intended for wildlife vaccination and that if cats and dogs end up consuming one of the satchels, it should be okay for them and they would simply be vaccinated against rabies. The speaker contends that many people have presumably already vaccinated their animals against rabies, so the program is framed as not causing harm to pets. The speaker then reflects on the broader pattern, asserting that this is how such programs begin. The argument is made that the authorities start with animals, referencing a history of starting with animals when a rabies problem is presented as an epidemic in wildlife. The speaker notes that people are concerned about wild animals biting dogs and other animals, and that the plan is presented as a measure to prevent rabies transmission in the animal population. Finally, the transcript asserts a claim about the progression of this approach, stating that this is how it begins and arguing that there is a suggestion of eventual vaccination or interventions targeting the human population, asserting that “they’ve already started to do this” with humans. The overall content centers on the described vaccination plan, its intended wildlife focus, its effects on pets, and concerns about potential expansion to humans.

The speaker frequently called the Secretary of Health and Human Services in Massachusetts, who worked for a Republican governor. The Secretary asked if they would allow professional football, and the speaker responded that they would not. The Secretary replied that neither would they. The speaker also had conversations about when Massachusetts would consider easing restrictions, with the state official suggesting "next Monday."

I frequently called the Secretary of Health and Human Services in Massachusetts to discuss COVID-19 restrictions. She mentioned they were not allowing professional football, and I agreed. We also talked about when they would ease restrictions, with the plan being to do so the following Monday.

Do you know if they got another dog earlier? The French dog, the pretty white one—was it abandoned or does it belong to someone? I filmed it, and some people might come to rescue it. Is it similar to the white bag like the Benjie dog? Yeah, I guess. I saw it tied up in the rain, which is concerning. I heard someone came to rescue it, or at least that’s what a woman told me. So, I’m just wondering if someone took it. Nobody seems to know.

Illegal blockades are harming Canadians and foreign money is funding this illegal activity. The border will not stay closed. Politicians don't control the police in a democratic society, but everything is being considered to stop this unlawful activity. If you joined the protests due to COVID frustrations, you must realize that you are breaking the law. We understand your frustration with COVID and the safety measures in place.

Breaking the rules could kill someone. The unvaccinated will not enjoy the freedoms of other New Zealanders. Failure to comply risks extending lockdowns and causing harm to thousands. The virus is finding unvaccinated people, and non-compliance puts lives at risk. Without intervention, tens of thousands of New Zealanders would die. Vaccinations will not be forced on all New Zealanders. Localized lockdowns may be used in areas with lower vaccination rates. People should call out family or colleagues not following the rules. There are potentially 300 women with cancer who don't know it due to 50,000 missed breast screens. Feedback suggests people are concerned about attending appointments. The Prime Minister does not condone illegal activity. People should go home and check on their neighbors, but not talk to them. The Prime Minister will not be seeking reelection. The country is turning on the Prime Minister and her government. Lockdowns and vaccine mandates have decimated human rights and destroyed businesses.

The speaker discusses rabies and vaccines in a conspiratorial frame, arguing that rabies is fake and that the treatment and vaccine are worse than the disease. They state that the vaccine is claimed to be mandatory, but argue that mandating is “voluntary to a service” and that the true situation is a game where “mandatory” only applies once you agree to it. They claim the test for rabies is the same as used during the pandemic, asserting that “the fruit came up positive for an illness,” and suggest that this demonstrates that “we’ve been lied to,” with implications that vets benefit from the situation. The speaker recounts an historical diagnostic method: in the early nineteen hundreds, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool to determine if an animal had rabies. They describe a procedure where, if a person was bitten by a suspected dog, “the brain tissue of the dog was injected into the two rabbits,” and “If the two rabbits died, rabies was proven.” They present this as the science behind rabies diagnosis. They then criticize the vaccine’s safety, claiming “that vaccine comes with a lot of side effects.” They cite an example case: “38 dogs and cats took the new vaccine that was made out by Merck,” and claim that these subjects “started having seizures, aggression, and death,” concluding with the statement that the vaccine is portrayed as “Safe and effective” by others. On a path to alternatives, the speaker says you could find a holistic vet who will give a medical exemption so you don’t have to receive the vaccine, or you could simply say no. They claim that if a vet “doesn’t wanna play ball,” you can make them sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to your animal after taking the injection, and predict that the vet “won’t sign it.” The segment ends with a provocative note encouraging skepticism about viruses, followed by the assertion that if you are unvaccinated and the virus enters your community, the virus will … (the clip ends here with an incomplete thought, implying a cautionary consequence).

The speakers discuss rabies and vaccinations in a provocative, conspiratorial frame. They claim rabies is nonexistent and that the treatment, the vaccine, is worse than the disease. They question the idea of compulsory vaccination, asserting that mandates are voluntary until you agree to them, and describe mandates as a game. They compare the rabies test to the pandemic-era testing method, suggesting the test for rabies relies on tests that produced positive results for illnesses, implying deception. They note that in the early 1900s, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool: brain tissue from a suspected dog injected into two rabbits; if the rabbits died, rabies was proven. They present the vaccine as having many side effects and cite an instance where 38 dogs and cats given a Merck vaccine experienced seizures, aggression, and death, labeling the vaccine “Safe and effective” as something they dispute. They propose solutions: finding a holistic veterinarian who can grant a medical exemption, or simply saying no to vaccination. They claim it’s possible to make a vet sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to an animal after the injection, and suggest vets won’t sign such a guarantee. The conversation closes with a clip asserting that if you are unvaccinated, the virus will hunt you out or find you, repeating the claim that the virus will locate unvaccinated individuals. Overall, the dialogue presents a skepticism toward rabies biology and vaccination, asserts that vaccines have harmful side effects, questions mandates, and promotes exemptions or refusals, culminating in the assertion that viruses target the unvaccinated.

As of today, Ontarians must provide proof of vaccination to enter certain high-risk indoor settings like restaurants, bars, casinos, theaters, and gyms. One person stated they feel safer in group settings because of the new rule and has no problem showing their ID and vaccine proof. Another person stated that it's a slight inconvenience, but one that is bearable in order to get things back to normal. It is important to remain patient with business owners and frontline workers implementing the vaccine certificate. One person expressed concern about policing the new rule, as it is a divisive issue, but hopes their clientele will remain amazing through this.

I frequently called the secretary of health and human services in Massachusetts, who worked for a republican governor. We discussed whether professional football should be allowed, and we both agreed it shouldn't. We also talked about when restrictions would be eased, and they mentioned it would happen next Monday.

Sending police to enforce vaccination can backfire in some communities. It's a difficult task that is not taken lightly. It can be done, but it's not an easy process.

At 777 Richard Street, police fined the doorman $2,500 under the provincial health order. The owner refused to open the door, posting this interaction with police on social media. "I'm right banging for? Stop banging on the door. That's a noise complaint. Don't you have anything more important to do right now than waste an owner's time who's just minding his own business on a Saturday night doing nothing?" Speaker 1: "If you're stupid enough to think that the, the rules don't apply to you, if you're dumb enough to, think that you can endanger people's health, and that you're gonna get away with it and you won't be punished, you're wrong."

Canadian health officials assure the public that the risk of coronavirus remains low and there is no need to panic. They address the spread of misinformation on social media and emphasize that Canada is prepared to detect and contain the virus. Border measures are deemed ineffective and potentially harmful in controlling the disease. Special screening at customs is not observed. The use of masks is not recommended for healthy individuals, although research suggests they could help reduce the pandemic. An interesting point is made that if everyone stayed still and isolated for two weeks, the virus would die.

In states with evidence of community transmission, it is recommended to close bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, and other venues where people gather. The speaker asks if the president is instructing governors in those states to close all their restaurants.

If there's a big party happening, it's important to call the police because large gatherings of 30 or more people can help spread the coronavirus. We all have a responsibility to be mindful of each other and follow the rules set by the government. If I were at home and saw something inappropriate, I would definitely call the police, even if it was a social gathering. The government's advice is clear: people should not be gathering.

Please follow the rules: no indoor social gatherings for unvaccinated individuals. Vaccinated individuals can have indoor social gatherings with 2 households and up to 10 people aged 12 or older. Outdoor social gatherings are now limited to 20 people, down from 200.

Hello? Is that your dog? No, it's not mine. Whose dog is it? Someone took him to a house. When did they come? About ten minutes ago. Did they take him that way? No, they’re over there talking to someone. I need help because the dog was tied up here. Do you know who’s writing those help messages? A guy named Jose. Does he need help? Yes, he’s homeless but has someone inside. So, he wrote that big help sign? Yes. Where is he? He’s around here. So, it’s just Jose doing all this? Yes. And the people who came about the dog are over there? Yes. Thank you. You're welcome.

Speaker 1 gives a warning about following lockdown rules, wearing masks, and not leaving balconies. Speaker 0 questions the logic of the rules. Speaker 1 explains the consequences of breaking the rules, including a $5,000 fine. Speaker 1 emphasizes the importance of compliance and avoiding conflict. Translation: Speaker 1 warns about lockdown rules, masks, and balcony restrictions. Speaker 0 questions the rules. Speaker 1 explains fines for rule-breaking and stresses compliance to avoid conflict.

Everyone needs to follow the simple rules so we can get through this pandemic together. Melbourne has experienced the world's longest lockdown. Police are gathering at the intersection of Victoria and Ligon Street. It's important for Victoria Police to enforce the health guidelines. Protesters are not helping the situation. Some people believe the protests are legal because of Daniel Andrews, but they are actually illegal.

The speaker discusses how compliance with government mandates regarding COVID-19 would be lower now due to decreased trust. At the start of the pandemic, people followed guidelines voluntarily, even though enforcement was limited. This lack of trust in government complicates future responses to new viruses.

I have a box of 4 COVID tests for my husband, but he had a sinus infection. I tested my pets instead. Using a test that gives results in 15 minutes, I swabbed their mouths. After waiting, it turns out my puppy and cat tested positive for COVID, while my other pets were negative. Oh no, not my Cheeto! Translation: I bought COVID tests for my husband, but he had a sinus infection. I tested my pets instead. Using a test that gives results in 15 minutes, I swabbed their mouths. After waiting, it turns out my puppy and cat tested positive for COVID, while my other pets were negative. Oh no, not my Cheeto!

The Toronto task force for COVID-19 volunteers reminds everyone to keep a distance of at least 6 feet from others.

In response to a question, the speaker mentions that there is an answer to the situation. They defer to someone named Howdy, who was their mentor, to speak. The speaker then mentions that in states with evidence of community transmission, certain places like bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, and other venues where people gather should be closed. However, they clarify that they haven't explicitly stated that governors in those states should close everything.