reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers assert that certain groups should be prevented from entering the country and proselytizing in mosques about overthrowing the government and replacing it with Sharia law. They argue this is sedition, not freedom of speech or religion, and that the battlefield is domestic. One speaker states that dismantling injustice involves replacing the system with people who represent the prophet and that Islam is jihad. Another speaker claims that spreading Islam involves jihad and fighting those who don't accept Islamic rule, which is a command of Allah. For Muslims in the West, jihad means establishing the deed of Allah through all means necessary, including using protests to overthrow non-Muslim governments.

The speakers in the video discuss the idea of a Muslim Europe and the need for unity among Muslims. They mention various countries and conflicts, suggesting that a solution lies in establishing an Islamic civilization and a caliphate. They believe that Muslims should unite and stand up against oppression worldwide. They express frustration with the lack of progress and call for action. The speakers emphasize the importance of a caliphate and believe it is the only way to solve the problems faced by Muslims in different parts of the world. They argue that Muslims should come together and end oppression.

Speaker 0, who identifies as a Muslim, expresses a desire for Islam to be worldwide, including in Germany. When asked if they would undermine the German constitution, they affirm that they would. Speaker 2 asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, to which Speaker 0 explains that according to their beliefs, if Muslims are in the majority, they are commanded to take over Germany, even by force if necessary. Speaker 1 asks about the treatment of homosexuals, and Speaker 0 suggests they would be thrown off a mountain, indicating support for the death penalty. Speaker 2 inquires about the possibility of reforming Islam, but Speaker 0 asserts that it remains unchanged. When asked about Germans resisting the acceptance of Sharia, Speaker 0 states that they would be attacked and violence would be used if they do not comply.

A person asks why Speaker 1 lives in a white country instead of a Muslim country. Speaker 1 says it's not a white country, and they live in the UK to tell people about Islam, engaging in interfaith dialogue with people of different faiths. Speaker 2 asks if a Christian could move to a Muslim country and freely convert people from Islam to Christianity. Speaker 1 responds that under Islamic law, this is not allowed because Christianity is false and Islam is the truth, and Islam doesn't allow harmful ideologies to infiltrate its people. Speaker 3 states that when tolerance is one-way, it leads to cultural suicide. They say that when they can fly to Saudi Arabia with a Bible and cross, go to Mecca, and attend a church, then "we're good to go," but until then, it's important to understand the objectives and goals that Islam has set forward.

The speakers discuss Jewish control of the world and the belief that Jews will dominate. They mention biblical references and the idea that non-Jews will cease to exist. They claim Jewish influence in politics and emphasize the importance of Jews as the chosen people. They assert that people should love and respect Jews.

The video features multiple speakers expressing their views on various topics. Speaker 0 discusses the concept of equality and its impact on nationality. Speaker 2 argues for the preservation of diversity and the importance of national identity. Speaker 3 emphasizes the need for separation to maintain true diversity. Speaker 4 expresses opposition to interracial relationships. Speaker 7 discusses the desire to maintain a majority in their respective countries. Speaker 8 uses a lion analogy to convey the idea of standing up against opposition. Speaker 9 controversially defends Adolf Hitler and claims he was trying to cleanse the world. The video ends with a poem criticizing a political figure.

Speaker 0 argues that Sharia law should be above the US constitution, stating, “US constitution which is made by people and the Sharia law is made by Allah. So that is the all the way above. That has to be definitely in the land, not for the America, for the whole world would be above.” In other words, Sharia law is superior to the US constitution and should be established not only in America but worldwide. Speaker 1 agrees with the idea, reiterating the claim by asking, “So that should be above the US constitution.”

The speakers discuss the possibility of offensive jihad if Muslims were to become a majority in Great Britain. They emphasize the importance of having enough authority and power to implement Sharia and take authority away from those who currently hold it. The concept of power is repeatedly emphasized throughout the conversation.

In this video, the speaker expresses concern about the rise of radical extremists and terrorists in Europe. They believe that this is due to a lack of decisive action and an overemphasis on political correctness. The speaker criticizes those who assume they have a better understanding of the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures than they actually do. They consider this ignorance and warn of the consequences it may bring.

In this video, the speaker expresses concern about the rise of radical extremists and terrorists in Europe due to a lack of decisive action and an emphasis on political correctness. They criticize the assumption that Europeans have a better understanding of the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures than others. The speaker believes this perspective is ignorant.

Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 supports Hamas, noting Speaker 0 is wearing a Hamas headband. Speaker 0 confirms support for Hamas and states they would join them, just as Speaker 1 would join the IDF. Speaker 0 says they would put a bullet in every soldier's head, clarifying they mean Zionists, not Jews, and that "real Jews" are elsewhere. Speaker 1 states that the IDF includes Jews and Muslims, but Speaker 0 claims there are no Muslims in the IDF, or if there are, they are hypocrites and traitors to the Muslim Ummah. Speaker 1 asks where the Muslim homeland is, and Speaker 0 replies it is all around the world and that Muslims will take over the world and implement Sharia law, which Speaker 0 supports.

In this video, the speaker expresses concern about the rise of radical extremists and terrorists in Europe. They attribute this to a lack of decisive action, political correctness, and a misguided belief that Europeans understand the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures better than they actually do. The speaker deems this perspective as pure ignorance.

The speaker claims that Europe is experiencing an invasion, not a refugee crisis, but a mass Islamization that has been ongoing for 50-60 years. They assert that a global political agenda by the world's powerful aims to destroy Europe culturally and religiously, specifically to destroy Christianity with the help of a massive Islamic population. The speaker references a sociologist's calculation that in 30-40 years, Muslims will be the majority in Europe because European people have few children while Muslims have many.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 2 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 responds affirmatively. Speaker 1 asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 suggests that when Muslims are the majority, they should use force if necessary. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the existence of a liberal Islam. Speaker 0 confirms that Islam encompasses all aspects of life, including politics. Speaker 1 asks about the means to establish Sharia and an Islamic state, excluding acts of terrorism. Speaker 0 suggests using force when Muslims are in the majority. Speaker 2 appreciates Speaker 0's honesty and shares similar thoughts, having advocated for Islamization in Germany. They emphasize the importance of Islamic practices in mosques.

Speaker 0 asks if at some point there will be sharia law everywhere. Speaker 1 replies, “Percent. This is my goal and every Muslim's goal.” Speaker 0 acknowledges the idea of establishing sharia law on earth and asks what would happen to someone like them who is a murtad and believes they should be killed under sharia if such law is universal. Speaker 1 states that the decision is “up to the army.” Speaker 0 questions whether it would be fair under Islamic law for someone to be killed simply because they arrived at the wrong conclusion, asserting they would be killed for being a murtad, and asks if that would be fair. Speaker 1 reiterates, “In the Sharia law, that's what I follow,” and that if sharia is universal, the speaker would follow that rule. Speaker 0 challenges the fairness of a system where their safety hinges on adherence to sharia, noting that if Islam dominates all of earth, there would be no safe haven for them. Speaker 1 confirms this by saying, “That's the plan. And you where.” Speaker 0 asks where their safe haven would be if all of earth is under Islam, and suggests that safety would have to come from Islam itself. Speaker 1 responds that safety would be found within Islam, implying it would be by force if necessary. Speaker 0 contends that safe haven would require conversion to Islam, and if they do not return to Islam, punishment would be death. Speaker 1 concludes that there are two choices, then says “Slam or death,” indicating the binary outcome under the stated framework.

Speaker 0: "What message do you want to give to the far right people? The message I wanna give to the far right people is we're here to take over your country. You can't stop us. You can try, but we're here to uphold Sharia law and yeah. That's it."

The speaker believes that if the American public is properly informed about Sharia law, they will support it and demand its implementation, overriding the agendas of politicians and senators. The speaker envisions a future where Sharia rules the world, and Islam is the only accepted religion.

"What you're really saying is Islamic doctrine is divisive and hateful towards non Muslims, and it is about domination." "And it's incompatible with Western freedom and democracy." "So if the purpose is jihad in America, then you must lie." "This is what Islam demands. You wanna be a true believer? This is what it takes." "Their money, their lives, they left their family behind in order to go fight to make the world the word of Allah supreme." "Offensive jihad that we know, as the prophet says, it is the highest beacon of Islam, you know, as the prophet says," "whoever fights so that the word of Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala is supreme in the land, then he is peaceabilah." "Inshallah, one day we will become martyrs." "We're coming to power. We're coming to power." "This is how we come to power."

Speaker 0: I’d implement Sharia in Germany, for sure. Speaker 1: Would you overturn the German constitution if you had the chance? Speaker 0: Definitely. If you are in the majority, as you’ve explained, we are commanded to take over Germany, for sure. Speaker 1: By what means do you want to install Sharia here and make an Islamic state? Speaker 0: If Muslims are in the majority, then if it must be done with violence. Speaker 1: That’s it. Speaker 0: That’s it. For sure. Speaker 1: You would then invite, so to speak, the German population to adopt Islam, to accept Sharia. What happens if the Germans resist? If they do not want it? Then they will be attacked. Then violence will be used. Speaker 0: For sure, yes. Speaker 1: And then violence will be employed. Speaker 0: If you don’t listen, then yes.

Die Diskussion dreht sich um die Einführung der Scharia in Deutschland. "Ich will die Scharia in Deutschland auf jeden Fall." "Jeder, der sich als Muslim bezeichnet, muss die Scharia wollen auf der ganzen Welt." "Würdest Du die deutsche Verfassung aushebeln, wenn Du die Gelegenheit hättest – Auf jeden Fall." Es wird gefragt, wie man aus Deutschland einen islamischen Staat machen könnte: "Laut den Werken ist das so, dass man, wenn man in der Mehrheit ist, ... wir dafür befohlen, Deutschland einzunehmen, auf jeden Fall." "Also es ist den Muslim, das ist eine islamische Pflicht, auch Deutschland einzunehmen." Es wird der Liberalismus diskutiert: "Es gibt diesen liberalen Islam." "Wie könnte man ... Mitteln wollt ihr die Scharia hier installieren und islamischen Staat machen? Mit welchen Mitteln? Ich rede nicht von Anschlägen ... Das ist falsch. Ich rede davon, wenn die Muslime in der Überzahl ist ... mit Gewalt." Speaker 2 erinnert daran: "Deutschland verdient eine satte Islamisierung." Die Scharia wird als "Regelung, wie Du betest, wie Du fastest, wie Du zu Hadsch gehst" beschrieben und als "in jeder Moschee lebendig." English translation: The discussion centers on introducing Sharia in Germany. "I want Sharia in Germany, in any case." "Every person who calls themselves a Muslim must want Sharia in the world." "Would you overturn the German constitution if you had the chance – In any case." It asks how to make Germany an Islamic state: "According to the works, if we are in the majority, we are commanded to take Germany, in any case." "So it is, for Muslims, an Islamic duty to take Germany as well." The liberalism debate is touched: "There is this liberal Islam." "With what means would you install Sharia here and make an Islamic state? With which means? I’m not talking about attacks ... That is wrong. I’m talking about when the Muslims are in the majority, then, if necessary, with violence." Speaker 2 adds: "Germany deserves a solid Islamization." Sharia is described as "the rules of how you pray, how you fast, how you perform Hajj" and as "alive in every mosque."

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 responds affirmatively. Speaker 1 then asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 explains that it is a Muslim's duty to take over when they are the majority. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the disagreement with liberals who advocate for peaceful coexistence. Speaker 0 mentions the punishment for homosexuality, suggesting they should be thrown off a mountain. Speaker 1 confirms that this is supported by a Hadith. Speaker 0 also mentions the destruction of buildings as a form of punishment, indicating support for the death penalty.

The speaker states that instead of force, laws are now being used, citing Canada's Islamophobia law M103. Another speaker says the only options are "ballot or bullet" and that participating in democracy is now their "jihad." Voting is now considered an obligatory action, a "jihad" to elect people who want Sharia law. It's claimed that in the last U.S. election, over 800 Muslim candidates ran for office. One speaker suggests that within six years, there could be 50 Muslims in Congress, replacing the current system with people who represent the prophet.

Ich will die Scharia in Deutschland. Jeder Muslim sollte die Scharia weltweit unterstützen. Wenn Muslime in der Mehrheit sind, ist es ihre Pflicht, Deutschland zu übernehmen. Es gibt keinen liberalen Islam, der von der politischen Dimension des Islam trennt. Die Scharia muss in allen Lebensbereichen gelten. Die Installation eines islamischen Staates könnte, wenn nötig, auch mit Gewalt erfolgen, wenn Muslime in der Überzahl sind. Ich habe immer gesagt, Deutschland verdient eine umfassende Islamisierung, die alle Aspekte des Lebens umfasst, wie Gebet und Fasten. --- I want Sharia in Germany. Every Muslim should support Sharia worldwide. When Muslims are in the majority, it is their duty to take over Germany. There is no liberal Islam that separates from the political dimension of Islam. Sharia must apply to all areas of life. The establishment of an Islamic state could, if necessary, also involve violence when Muslims are in the majority. I have always said that Germany deserves a comprehensive Islamization that encompasses all aspects of life, such as prayer and fasting.

In this video, the speaker discusses the connection between the actions of Daesh and Islamic law. They argue that every action carried out by Daesh is supported by Islamic law and that denying this is dishonest. The speaker also criticizes the idea that these actions should only be executed under a ruler or sultan, stating that the principle itself is not valid. They give examples of killing non-Muslim children and eating them during extreme famine, as mentioned in Islamic law. The speaker believes that unless society acknowledges and adapts Islamic teachings to fit current realities, similar actions will continue to occur.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 replies affirmatively. Speaker 1 then asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 explains that it is a Muslim's duty to take over when they are the majority. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the disagreement with liberals who advocate for peaceful coexistence. Speaker 0 mentions the punishment for homosexuality according to their beliefs. Speaker 1 confirms that it is part of Islam, citing past instances of punishment.