reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This speaker claims that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated or purified, and the PCR test is not reliable for detecting infectious virus. They argue that autopsies are not being conducted to hide the truth about COVID-19. The speaker questions the validity of the vaccine and criticizes the government's handling of the pandemic, including the use of the PCR test. They mention a document sent to the Chief Constable regarding these issues.

The speaker discusses the push for global COVID vaccination, linking the virus to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They suggest the pandemic was caused by bioengineering and funded by various organizations. The speaker questions the delay in developing vaccines for bioweapons, theorizing that the vaccination campaign aims to justify the bioweapons industry's existence. They claim the vaccines are meant to show the industry's dual-use research and cover up its true nature. The speaker concludes that the vaccines serve as a defense to prove the industry's supposed public benefit, regardless of any negative effects.

The speakers discuss the issue of not isolating the virus. They explain that without isolating the virus, it is impossible to determine its composition or its effects. They mention that there is no record of the virus being isolated anywhere in the world by anyone, despite institutions claiming to have searched for such records. They emphasize that this lack of isolation is a significant concern.

The speaker believes that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who are pretending that there is a serious respiratory viral health threat. They argue that the virus in Wuhan was not exaggerated and that there is no new health threat. They suggest that if there is a new virus, it is not more serious than influenza, which coincidentally disappeared at the same time. The speaker no longer believes in the existence of respiratory viruses and thinks that people still get ill with the same illnesses as before, but the cause is unknown.

A speaker states that a large segment of the public feels betrayed by scientists who won't admit fault regarding COVID-19. They want to know why they were lied to and no longer care about lab funding. The speaker asks what the scientific community needs to say about lockdowns, masks, and vaccines to restore trust. Another speaker responds that they were a vocal advocate against lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and the anti-scientific approach of public health during the pandemic. They also believe that scientific institutions should be transparent about their involvement in dangerous research that may have caused the pandemic, referring to the lab leak hypothesis.

Speaker 0 argues that the test cannot distinguish live from dead matter, only analyzes fragments and is set up to guarantee false positives, which the speaker claims was used to create case numbers for declaring a public health emergency of international concern and to enable untested drugs or vaccines to be used on people. Speaker 1 adds that the biggest lie may be that true viral isolates are unavailable, noting that the claimed genome of SARS-CoV-2 exists only in silico as a computer-programmed genome. The speaker says fear is created to control people, describing “fake mythical flying unicorns” that make us sick and asserting that disease is constructed rather than evidenced by visible agents. They claim that there is no evidence of transmission or isolations supporting the idea of a pathogen causing disease in the usual sense. The speaker references Andrew Kaufman, Doctor Cowan, Stephen Lunk, and others to support the claim that, after a year of pandemic conditions, there is no virus proven through traditional means, including in the 1918 influenza pandemic. They state that volunteers were exposed to sputum from infected individuals, or to the sputum directly, without becoming ill; some experiments involved injecting processed material, which also did not cause illness. They note that horses did not consistently transmit illness when exposed to similar materials, and conclude that influenza does not originate from a Latin term for a virus but means “influence,” suggesting historical transmission evidence is weak. The speakers discuss that we do not have approved evidence of transmission, a virus, a test, or autopsies; what exists is a syndrome of symptoms—flu-like symptoms without pathognomonic signs. They propose several alternative causes for COVID-19–like illness, including transmissibility that appears real but isn’t, radiation effects, and other non-disease explanations. Speaker 1 references Dr. Cowan’s book Contagion to illustrate how radiation exposure in mines could mimic disease transmission, where illness is not truly infectious. They argue that non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and exposure to graphene oxide toxicity (claimed to be present in vaccines and referred to as viral-based genetic therapies by the FDA) could produce COVID-like symptoms. They also acknowledge an artificially created spike protein in a lab as a known factor. However, they reiterate that there is no evidence for the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus as a causative agent. In summary, the dialogue challenges the existence of proven SARS-CoV-2 isolates, questions the validity of tests and transmission evidence, and proposes alternative explanations for the illness, including EMF toxicity, graphene oxide toxicity, and lab-made spike proteins, while highlighting a lack of definitive proof for traditional viral causation.

The transcript argues that deflating a “parasitic system” is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice to the people, including workers, creatives, and the maimed and dying under elite rule. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity to illustrate this destruction. On the mortality and harm claims related to Covid-19, the speaker estimates thirty-six million excess deaths from 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024, totaling forty-five million excess deaths for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. They add nine million deaths from Covid killing protocols in 2020, arguing these figures reflect the impact of what they term “SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons.” The speaker contends that terms like bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced, and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. They claim that elites and many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus, while “Truthful science” supposedly proves beyond any doubt that SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab, pointing to the genetic code of SARS CoV-two as containing several lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are described as too large and numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different, making natural mutation or recombination “quasi zero.” They assert a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. The speaker claims that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two in all organs and tissues, implying greater production than typical mucosal infection in unvaccinated people, which they say would cause only cold-like illness. They describe these vaccines as “GenTech covid vaccines” and label them as bio weapons, allegedly worse than the virus itself. Finally, they claim that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source is cited as Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

Speaker 0 asserts that the design of the molecular structures in vaccines and injections has no purpose other than to injure and kill. Drawing on 30 years of experience in rational drug design, they say every component in a vial is chosen by someone with specific objectives (e.g., how quickly absorbed, how long it lasts, where it distributes in the body) and that these components are not random or natural products. They declare the ingredients to be toxic by design and intentionally harmful. This, they claim, fits with what they call “the lie” about the pandemic, arguing there wasn’t a real pandemic. According to Speaker 0, the pandemic’s purpose was to damage the economy, train people to comply under a mock emergency, and compel people to get vaccinated. They warn that if people do nothing, speak up less, and simply follow directives, they will lose their freedom and then their lives. They allege that a self-appointed group of very rich people desires a much smaller global population than 8,000,000,000 people, and they claim to be able to deduce the script behind these events. The speaker urges listeners to start talking to anyone and everyone relentlessly, insisting that this situation is not going away. They warn that without protest and refusal, people will first lose their freedom and then their lives.

There is a claim that viruses do not exist and have never been found in nature. It is stated that no scientific publication can prove otherwise. The lack of evidence is attributed to the inability to isolate and purify viruses. This is seen as a problem in the field of biology, as the connection between viruses and diseases is not proven. The speaker emphasizes that this information is important for everyone to know.

The speaker states the virus was not isolated. Live animal samples are irrelevant. The speaker suspects the origin is different than originally thought. China's government is presenting the city where the virus emerged as the city that defeated it in a new patriotic film.

In this video, the speaker discusses evidence suggesting that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a natural occurrence but rather a deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen. They highlight a publication by the World Health Organization from September 2019 that mentions a world exposure to a respiratory pathogen. The speaker also mentions a report by Moderna, a pharmaceutical company, which reveals a payment of $400 million to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) for a royalty-bearing license agreement. They argue that this payment indicates a corrupt relationship between NIAID, led by Anthony Fauci, and the perpetrators of the outbreak. The speaker criticizes the lack of action from Congress and governors in addressing these issues. They also discuss a study conducted at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, which involved the engineering of a synthetic clone of the virus. The speaker accuses NIAID and other institutions of being part of a criminal conspiracy and calls for the public to share this information widely.

The speaker claims that the pandemic response was a propaganda war orchestrated by the US security state. They argue that the public health protocols for managing a respiratory virus pandemic were ignored, and individuals in positions of power were coerced into implementing policies contrary to scientific knowledge. The motivations behind this propaganda war are suggested to be covering up the US's role in creating the virus, diverting blame to China, and benefiting pharmaceutical companies. The speaker highlights irrational decisions, such as vaccinating everyone despite knowing that older individuals with chronic conditions were at higher risk. They argue that the public health establishment was manipulated, threatened, or propagandized into spreading lies. The speaker concludes that the pandemic response has been a scam imposed on the American public and possibly the world.

The speaker suggests that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who have exaggerated the threat of a new respiratory virus. They argue that there is no real health threat and that the only moving part in this situation is the PCR test. The speaker questions the existence of respiratory viruses and believes that people still get ill with similar symptoms as before, but the cause is unknown. They conclude that these illnesses are not caused by respiratory viruses.

In this video, the speaker addresses Congress and the Biden administration, emphasizing the serious implications of the SARS CoV 2 origin narrative. They highlight how the suppression of information regarding HIV 1 inserts and the furin cleavage site delayed the global response to the pandemic. The speaker accuses officials like Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins of prioritizing their own protection over the well-being of the public. They argue that justice for the millions of American victims should be prioritized over national security interests or censorship. The speaker concludes by expressing their determination to speak out on behalf of those who cannot, emphasizing their commitment to truth and justice.

In the event of another pandemic, the speaker asserts that the response should differ drastically from the previous one. They claim that established scientific and medical protocols were disregarded in favor of a politicized approach serving specific economic and power interests, leading to information chaos. The speaker emphasizes the need for gold standard information and complete transparency to enable public inquiry and informed responses. They advocate for challenging established orthodoxies and consensus, criticizing the notion of blindly trusting experts as antithetical to science and democracy, likening it instead to totalitarianism and religion.

Speaker 0 asks about the accuracy of claims that asymptomatic carriers exist and that children can be super-spreaders, questioning whether these ideas are true. Speaker 1 responds that these notions are complete nonsense and have never been shown; they are claims that have been spread as facts, and they consider that “criminal.” They state that the idea of asymptomatic carrier spreading the disease Covid-nineteen—which they describe as the pneumonia, not a cough but the pneumonia Covid-nineteen—is untrue and is backed by zero data. They emphasize that there is not a single case in the world documented, and conclude that the whole business is a fake. Speaker 0 follows up by asking whether these ideas are the basis for mask-wearing and many of the associated measures. Speaker 1 confirms, stating that this is “the inhuman part” of forcing people to wear masks “because of no reason,” describing it as taking away people’s rights as humans without reason.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the origins of COVID-19, focusing on claims that the virus originated in a Wuhan lab and the handling of scientific debate around the lab-leak hypothesis. - Speaker 0 states that for two years Republicans connected the dots and exposed evidence supporting the belief that COVID-19 was developed and leaked from the Wuhan lab, while Democrats hindered hearings and blocked truth-seeking. He asserts mounting evidence supports a lab-origin theory and frames the hearing as a pursuit of truth for Americans who suffered from the pandemic. He notes Doctor Redfield pointed to the lab-leak hypothesis early on and urged Fauci to investigate both the lab and natural hypotheses. - Speaker 0 recalls a February 1 meeting convened by Jeremy Farrar with 11 top scientists across five time zones, inviting Fauci to join, with a preference for a tight, confidential group. He says Redfield was excluded from the call, and asks why he was excluded. - Speaker 1 confirms that in January and February 2020 he spoke with Fauci, Farrar, and Tedros about pursuing both hypotheses, and as a clinical virologist argued it was not scientifically plausible that the virus jumped bat-to-human and became highly infectious; he notes that coronaviruses differ from Ebola and that intermediate hosts are involved for SARS and MERS, and that they never learned to go human-to-human in those contexts. - Speaker 0 asks why Redfield was excluded from the calls. Speaker 1 responds that he was told there was a desire for a single narrative and that his viewpoint differed. - Speaker 0 references emails after the conference call in which four of the 11 scientists said the genetic sequence was inconsistent with evolutionary expectations, but three days later those scientists drafted the paper Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 arguing the opposite. He asks how those scientists could conclude certainty about a natural origin after three days. - Speaker 1 describes the process as unfortunate and says the approach in January–February 2020 was antithetical to science, noting that science involves debate, which he claims was squashed. - Speaker 0 asks if Fauci used the Proximal Origin paper to hide gain-of-function research and to what extent the paper hides the truth. Speaker 1 declines to discuss Fauci’s motivations but calls the paper inaccurate and part of a narrative intended to negate the possibility that COVID-19 came from a laboratory. He emphasizes that the pandemic did not start in January at the seafood market and that infections date back to September. - Speaker 0 notes an email from 01/27/2020 stating NIH had a monetary relationship with the Wuhan Institute via EcoHealth Alliance, and asks if Fauci intentionally lied under oath about NIH funding of gain-of-function research. Speaker 1 asserts there is no doubt NIH funded gain-of-function research and says American tax dollars funded such research not only through NIH but also via the State Department, USAID, and the DOD. - The exchange ends with Speaker 0 signaling time and introducing Ms. Dink.

The speaker claims that the virus doesn't exist because it has never been proven or isolated. They mention that there have been 250 Freedom of Information Act requests worldwide asking for documentation on the virus's existence, but all have been answered with "we do not have it." Another speaker acknowledges that while the virus may not exist, particles claiming to be spike proteins do exist. However, the first speaker argues that spike proteins are synthetic and toxic, not found in nature or in the blood. They challenge supporters to find spike proteins in the blood and state that the only existing spike protein is the one made in the lab.

There is a claim that there is no COVID-19 virus, but rather a list of symptoms similar to the flu and pneumonia. The speaker explains that the spike protein in the virus makes people sick, and the vaccine contains this spike protein. They suggest that the virus was created through gain of function research in the US and that evidence of it being a bioweapon can be found. The speaker also mentions that the funding for this research came from Anthony Fauci's NIAID. They caution against blaming China and promoting a world war, as they believe there was collaboration between China and traders within the US.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated and an act of terrorism by a state. They argue that the United States and the UK, along with researchers worldwide, planned to use the virus to impose tyrannical reforms on society. They emphasize that there are many people who did not comply with these measures. Another speaker praises the evidence presented by the first speaker, stating that it is all based on published documents and facts. They encourage others to read the documents and draw their own conclusions.

- Speaker 0 describes a doctrine where an agent or pathogen works best as a binary weapon if followed by mass exposure with vaccines, noting the insistence on gene transfection technologies to create a peptide with a prion-catalyzing epitope and pointing out that lipid nanoparticles are highly labile and inflammatory, constituting a combination of chemical and biological warfare. - Speaker 0 adds that if this was a weapon release, it may be done and now data will reveal its effects, and expresses doubt about how much trust can be placed in normal scientific methods and institutions to relay data to the public, inviting Speaker 1’s thoughts. - Speaker 1 (Stephanie) says the discussion has been an incredible and difficult ride since things began unfolding, with questions about natural versus lab-based origins, vaccine development versus biowarfare, and concerns about funding by China for bioweapons, acknowledging the impossibility of definitively answering many questions. - Speaker 0 agrees that ambiguity is the point and calls it the strength of the weapon. - Speaker 1 asks why someone would inject something to inflict a bioweapon on the entire population, suggesting population control as a possible motivation. - Speaker 0 notes the need to consider literature from top transnational power structures and corporations, asserting that it is not hidden. - Speaker 1 recalls prior concerns about population-control vaccines, referencing reports about vaccines used in Argentina and Africa that allegedly caused infertility, describing an example where a vaccine given to teenage girls could lead to antibody development to a fetus, making infertility less detectable over time. She mentions a memory of a “benign disease” vaccination program in Argentina that led people to suspect infertility, and notes that it could be a stealth method. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that vaccines may have had effects on fertility and reference terms like human chorionic something, with Speaker 1 acknowledging possible occurrences in India as well as Africa and Argentina. - Speaker 0 refers to bioaccumulation seen in reproductive organs and cites pharmacokinetic studies beginning in Japan, noting the vaccine’s presence in the placenta and testes and recalling reports of harmful effects on male reproductive organs. - Speaker 0 mentions Anna Burkhart’s data as dark regarding spike protein expression in reproductive organs found in autopsies, while acknowledging uncertainty about how much weight to attribute to that data, but maintaining that biowarfare cannot be dismissed. - The discussion returns to the mechanism of biowarfare being distinct from a pathogen, describing a scenario where exposure leads to effects years later due to the disease mechanism being induced, rather than immediate pathogen-driven illness.

This is a transcript discussing the lack of isolation of SARS-CoV-2, the inefficacy of PCR tests, and the questionable actions surrounding COVID-19. The speaker questions the existence of the virus, criticizes the use of PCR tests, and highlights the lack of autopsies. They also mention the government's spending on tests that do not accurately detect the virus. The speaker references documents sent to authorities and statements made by officials regarding the PCR test's accuracy.

The speaker questions whether the government was guessing or lying when they said that vaccinated individuals couldn't get the virus. The other speaker, who was part of the previous administration, acknowledges that there was evidence of natural reinfection during the global pandemic and that the vaccine was based on natural immunity. They suggest that the vaccine may not necessarily outperform natural infection. The first speaker then asks if the government was lying when they said the vaccine couldn't transmit the virus, to which the second speaker responds that it was more of a hopeful belief. The first speaker concludes that the government's statements were not truthful, leaving the options of guessing, lying, or hoping as possible explanations.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated and an act of terrorism by a state. They state that the United States, the UK, and researchers planned to use the virus to enforce tyrannical reforms on society. The speaker emphasizes that their statements are supported by documented evidence, which they have provided in a speech to the EU parliament. They encourage others to read the documents and draw their own conclusions.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a result of incompetence or lack of knowledge, but rather a planned event. They accuse various groups, including philanthropaths, scientists, NGOs, and governments, of being involved in the deception. The speaker suggests that the pandemic was used as an opportunity for control and profit, with corporations, regulators, and media playing a role. They criticize the censorship of dissenting voices and the coercion of individuals to get vaccinated. The speaker urges people not to let those responsible for the pandemic escape accountability.