reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Laura Delano discusses her experience with psychiatric drugs, starting at age 13. She claims the "chemical imbalance" theory is a lie and that 66 million Americans are on these drugs. She describes Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD) and the outrage she faced after sharing her story of getting off medication. Delano recounts being diagnosed with bipolar disorder at 14 and put on a cocktail of drugs, including antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics. She says she was told it was a lifelong, incurable condition. She says there are no objective tests for mental illness, only subjective observations. She describes feeling numb and disconnected while on the drugs, and experiencing physical side effects like digestive issues and weight fluctuations. Delano says the drugs impaired her ability to think critically and connect with others. She says she eventually realized the treatment was making her sicker. She highlights the lack of long-term safety studies and the dangers of polypharmacy. She advocates for informed consent and questions the motives of the mental health industry. She emphasizes the importance of community, empathy, and finding purpose as alternatives to medication. She says she experienced withdrawal symptoms when she stopped taking the drugs. She says she found purpose in sharing her story and helping others make informed choices.

" 'The thing that would have really made a difference to me is that your hormones make you who you are, and when you change your hormones, you change who you are.' The birth control pill, she notes, 'is going to change you' and 'changes the version of yourself that your brain creates.' She adds there are at least five ways it changes who we are: 'It changes our sexual desire and who we're attracted to'; 'It changes our emotional states'; 'It can affect our moods'; 'It can affect our ability to regulate and to manage stress'; 'It influences sexual desire and sexual function'; and it 'influences our ability to be able to put on muscle mass and affects our, like, nutrition and fitness goals.' She concludes that not knowing all of that and the potential risks 'I wish I would have known that,' and that this 'probably would have' impacted decisions about staying on it when it wasn't needed, because 'there's no reason to change who you are if you don't need the contraceptive benefits.'"

At 35, the speaker claims she was paralyzed by the Moderna shot, which doctors confirmed in writing and audio recordings. She has filed a $45,000,000 lawsuit against Moderna, alleging mainstream media won't report such cases due to pharmaceutical company payments. Prior to the shot, she was healthy and working at a school. Now, she reports having no bowel or bladder function, no movement below the waist, and limited arm function, confining her to a wheelchair. She states she experiences pain and was offered medical assistance in dying three times in Canada, which she interprets as the government suggesting death due to lack of treatment. Her son now lives with his father because her house cannot accommodate her wheelchair. She urges viewers to help vaccine-injured people and warns that continued vaccinations without support could worsen the situation. She directs viewers to www.opkayla.ca for more information on her case.

Dr. Josef Duhring and Dr. Yosef (Doctor Yosef Duhring) discuss antidepressants and SSRIs, outlining perceived risks, data limitations, and long-term concerns, followed by practical guidance on tapering and contact information for a tapering clinic. Key side effects and risks cited - Common side effects: gastrointestinal issues (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), changes in sleep (insomnia or drowsiness), headaches, nervousness, restlessness, dry mouth, sweating, tremors, sexual dysfunction, decreased libido, difficulty reaching orgasm, erectile dysfunction, appetite and weight changes (gain or loss). - Other reported effects: emotional blunting, feeling less like yourself, dizziness, balance issues (especially early in treatment), increased sweating, abnormal dreams. - Serious but rarer risks: suicidal thoughts or behaviors, particularly under age 25; serotonin syndrome (described as rare); heart rhythm changes at high doses with some SSRIs. - Behavioral effects: mania, psychosis, irritability, aggression; rare but potentially misdiagnosed as bipolar disorder; in some cases leading to escalation to lithium or antipsychotics. - Sleep and long-term effects: SSRI use diminishing sleep quality (less REM and deep sleep), resulting in fatigue and brain fog in long-term users. - Long-term data gaps: “there has never been a randomized control study that looked at them for over a year,” and “seventy percent of antidepressant users are on these drugs for two years or more.” Claims that there is no long-term data on sustained efficacy or safety beyond eight to twelve weeks. Efficacy and data concerns - Most drugs reach market based on eight-week studies; there is a reported two-point difference on a 52-point depression scale between the drug and placebo, which is described as clinically very low. - Outcomes most meaningful to patients (employment, relationships, life meaning) are not directly measured in standard trials, which focus on scale-based movement. - The claim is made that long-term efficacy remains unproven and that the long-term data are unavailable. Observations about prescription patterns and systemic factors - Online “pill mill” platforms allegedly enable easy access to SSRIs (Lexapro), sometimes without video chats, via online questionnaires, with rapid mail delivery. - The dose of prescription and patient interactions are affected by time constraints and economic incentives in healthcare delivery, leading to faster checklists and medication-based treatments rather than in-depth discussions of life context, relationships, or non-drug approaches. - An “unholy alliance” between the pharmaceutical industry and academic medicine is described: investigators may pursue drug trials for career advancement and publications funded by drug companies, potentially biasing conclusions in favor of medications. - The FDA’s stance is portrayed as influenced by this environment, with concerns about regulatory capture and inadequate critical evaluation of risks, including suicide risk data and withdrawal issues. Key long-term and withdrawal considerations - Long-term withdrawal: physicians are described as telling patients that antidepressant withdrawal is mild and resolves in two weeks, but tapering often requires one to two years to avoid withdrawal symptoms; many are tapered too quickly, leading to relapse or withdrawal challenges. - Tapers and recovery: the clinician reports patients improving emotionally during tapering, sometimes even before complete discontinuation; success depends on broader life health improvements (physical health, relationships, purpose) and careful, gradual reduction. Three major concerns observed with antidepressants (as described by Dr. Yosef) - They don’t work for many patients in the long term; diminished efficacy over time due to emotional blunting and neurochemical adaptation. - Behavioral and cognitive changes: potential for mania, psychosis, irritability, and misdiagnosis as bipolar disorder; risk of “drug-induced” psychiatric symptoms. - Toxicity and sleep: long-term blunting reduces emotional responsiveness; chronic sleep disruption and brain fog; long-term toxicity may underlie persistent symptoms after prolonged use. Clinical implications and guidance offered - For those considering antidepressants, emotions matter and should be explored beyond a chemical-imbalance narrative; discuss physical health, relationships, purpose, substances, and non-drug approaches (therapy, lifestyle changes) before relying on medication. - For those already on SSRIs, a careful, patient-guided taper is advised: slowly reduce dosages, use approaches such as liquid tapering to control precise reductions, and listen to one’s body to avoid withdrawal; a two-year taper may be necessary for many patients. - Coming off antidepressants can reveal or restore aspects of life and personality; benefits may appear during tapering as engagement and motivation return, but life circumstances must be addressed in parallel to avoid relapse. Contact information - Tapering clinic website: taperclinic.com (for patients in the U.S.; clinic claims to operate in about 15–16 states, covering roughly 70% of the population). - YouTube channel for further resources: Doctor Yosef (German version) with a free drug tapering training (about five hours) and guidance for working with a doctor. Speaker names - Dr. Yosef Duhring (referred to as Doctor Josef Duhring in the discussion) and Dr. Yosef (the same speaker) are cited; their experiences include FDA and industry roles and a tapering clinic specializing in antidepressant withdrawal and discontinuation.

SSRIs are widely used: "About fourteen percent of the population" and "probably between fifteen to twenty percent" after COVID. Despite this, "There's more suicides" and "the outcomes are actually getting worse." Prozac "changed history" by "modulating the serotonin system" through "blocking serotonin reuptake" and making people "numb or emotionally constricted." The "chemical imbalance" story was a story "sold to doctors and patients" to justify drugs; "No brain scans, no blood tests" and used in diagnosis. The FDA is "funded by the pharmaceutical industry through PDUFA" with "70% funding," prioritizing drug development over safety signals. The "PSSD" stands for "post SSRI sexual dysfunction" and is experienced by "70 percent" with "permanent sexual dysfunction," "genital anesthesia," "cognitive damage," "emotional blunting" and "the suicide rate in this population is through the roof." There are withdrawal risks with benzodiazepines and "protracted withdrawal" can cause "brain injury."

The serotonin system was heavily targeted by the pharmaceutical industry, but experts suggest we're experimenting with it without full understanding. A 2022 systemic review of serotonin research found "no convincing evidence that depression is associated with or caused by lower serotonin concentration or activity." The FDA is considering a black box warning on related medications to ensure proper informed consent, especially for pregnant women, and to better inform doctors. Some doctors are unaware of the information presented in the FDA panel. The goal is radical transparency, ensuring everyone has informed consent with complete information.

A woman shares her devastating experience with the Covid-19 vaccine, stating that it has completely destroyed her life. She suffers from constant physical and cognitive issues, including speech and memory problems, tremors, and over 80 symptoms daily. Despite her case being reported, it was dismissed as psychiatric problems. She expresses suicidal thoughts and the need for multiple medications to cope. She urges caution regarding the government and doctors' actions, as she believed in the vaccine's safety until experiencing its severe side effects. She also mentions her father's negative reaction to her decision not to get vaccinated and vows to seek justice for his death.

Kelly Sue, a survivor of the vaccine, used to lead an active life but experienced cramping in her calf after her first shot. Concerned, she visited a vascular surgeon who performed an ultrasound on her legs. Weeks later, she had back-to-back strokes and continued to have more throughout the following months. Kelly Sue spent 31 days in the hospital, experiencing various complications such as blindness and difficulty speaking. Her neurologist initially attributed her condition to the vaccine, but discussions about it ceased when doctors started getting fired. Kelly Sue is frustrated that no one is investigating the cause of these adverse reactions. Recently, she experienced a sudden spike in blood pressure and is currently fighting for her life.

Kelly Sue, a survivor of the vaccine, used to lead an active lifestyle and run a charity. After receiving her first shot, she experienced cramping in her calf and was diagnosed with a blood clot. Despite not hearing from her doctor, she proceeded with her second shot. Unfortunately, she suffered from multiple strokes and spent 31 days in the hospital. Kelly Sue now faces challenges such as blindness, speech difficulties, and memory loss. Initially, her neurologist attributed her condition to the vaccine, but the topic became taboo after doctors started getting fired. Kelly Sue is frustrated that no one is investigating the cause of these adverse reactions. She currently battles high blood pressure and fights for her life.

Since age 4, I've been on meds like Lexapro and Abilify that made me feel like a zombie. Foster care kids in the US are given powerful mind-altering drugs at a rate 13 times higher than other children. A GAO report reveals infants in foster care are given psychotropic drugs with unknown long-term effects. One case involved a 7-year-old on 5 risky medications. Foster parents are pressured to medicate or risk losing their child. The system profits from drugging vulnerable kids with expensive drugs.

The transcript describes Italy under “total lockdown” during the coronavirus outbreak, with emergency rooms at or past breaking point and authorities warning of hospital bed shortages and morgue overflow, including reports of army trucks removing bodies and new infections and deaths reported daily. It asserts Italy had the highest death toll anywhere in the world at that time, attributing the situation to a significant elderly population and an overstressed health system. It then shifts to claims about how COVID deaths were reported. The transcript says ninety-nine percent of those who died from the virus had other illness, and that only twelve percent of death certificates showed direct causality from coronavirus while eighty-eight percent involved at least one pre-morbidity, often multiple. It also frames “excess death” as deaths above or below an average baseline. The transcript further claims Italy’s high death toll was influenced by age structure, the health system’s strain, and reporting practices. A series of interviews follows. The host interviews Alberto Contrini, described as a professor of communications and a former institutional media figure involved in discussions about propaganda during COVID. Contrini says Italy launched a “massive fear campaign,” referencing Bergamo and military trucks reportedly conveying coffins, but Contrini says each truck held one coffin. He also claims elderly patients entering hospitals with other pathologies were immediately declared COVID, attributing this to financial incentives: the transcript says hospitals received refunds five times higher for COVID patients than normal patients, encouraging diagnoses to be coded as COVID even when multiple conditions existed. Contrini also links the transcript’s claims to similar patterns described for the United States and says virologists on TV were paid by pharmaceutical companies to promote “massive propaganda.” He claims many doctors were financially incentivized (citing government payments per injection) and says dissenters were marginalized, including suspended doctors and ongoing legal actions. The transcript highlights a moment where Contrini describes asking Dr. Bassetti about contracts with pharmaceutical companies and says Bassetti removed his earphones and left. The transcript then interviews Dr. Mariano Amici, described as a COVID treating doctor. Amici claims that in a study of over ten thousand patients, his group “cured” over ten thousand people with “not even once” a single death, treating not only COVID patients but also patients of other concerns. He says the “explosion” of deaths was “made up,” describing alleged use of non-COVID images on national TV, claims about inaccurate nose swab tests, and assertions that people were misclassified as dying of COVID when they died from other causes such as car accidents. Amici claims he was “traumatized” by the situation and says protocols prevented doctors from treating patients, calling the protocol a “death protocol.” The transcript presents him as saying some doctors had successful early treatment approaches using steroids and antibiotics and later had those tools taken away. Next, the transcript interviews Rosanna Chiaverini Negri, a neurologist who describes herself as working to write protocols and detoxify side effects from a COVID “Name it vaccine” that she characterizes as an experimental genetic drug. She claims that early use of antibodies from healed people and heat is curative within “three days,” and says they treated “seventy thousand” patients with only “ten” hospitalized, bringing documentation to Italy’s Parliament and Senate. She says press coverage attacked the work and that some practitioners were suspended and had licenses removed. Raffaele Ragoli, described as an investigative journalist, says he went into a hospital on March 17 and saw what he characterizes as “hell,” including a policy to “stay home, wait, and just take paracetamol,” and guidance that he says discouraged standard treatments. The transcript says Ragoli attributes the perceived need for a declared pandemic to the WHO, including a claim that the WHO needed thousands of deaths to declare a pandemic and that there was a lack of cure. Ragoli says Italy was chosen as a front runner for a mandatory vaccination program, and he claims WHO strategy is influenced by organizations “on top” of governments and by entities including “Bill Gates” and major financial institutions. He also claims Tedros Ghebreyesus stated that the next pandemic would come, not if. Giovanni Trambusti, described as an electrical engineer specializing in data processing and statistical analysis, says he downloaded raw mortality data from ISTAT and compared it month by month to what was announced in media and government. He claims deaths were highly concentrated in northern areas (especially Bergamo and Brescia) and “almost nothing” in other parts of Italy. He attributes the lack of spread south to an alleged migration from north to south ahead of lockdowns, and says he sees “the numbers aren’t adding up.” The transcript then includes Dr. Pietro Gasparoni, described as treating vaccine injury. Gasparoni claims a mechanism involving immune suppression after “mass vaccination of meningitis combined with the flu vaccine” following meningitis cases in November 2019, leading to an immune-system low period and then a “COVID explosion” during January–February 2020. He references reported meningitis cases and quotes emergency responses described in the transcript around Sarnico and surrounding municipalities. The transcript also describes myocarditis and pericarditis claims through a cardiology interview with Dr. Giuseppe Barbuto, saying myocarditis first appeared in early 2021 and that 12–36-year-olds (especially males) were higher risk. The transcript states a claim that myocarditis was exclusively found in vaccinated people and cites other studies as supporting that vaccines, rather than natural infection, caused the increase. It says “mild myocarditis” is false and that myocarditis can last for years. Finally, it features multiple “vaccine injured” testimonials, including Amelia Padovano and others, describing severe post-vaccination symptoms and disability, including facial paralysis, paralysis and inability to walk, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombosis, neurological problems, and related losses. The transcript ends with additional claims about pressured suppression of debate and the desire for scientific replication and closed-door discussions, including calls to remove vaccine mandates and conduct a randomized pragmatist study.

Speaker 0 provides a candid update on her father’s health, describing a long and painful struggle with akathisia and a broader pattern of psych med injuries. She explains that her father has not taken a psych medication since January 2020, and the recent flare of neurological symptoms is not due to new meds. The August 2023–onward relapse is attributed to a combination of stressors (loss of both parents, moving countries, selling a home), mold exposure, and previous sensitivity to exposures, which apparently retriggered old neurological injuries. She notes that the symptoms have been misdiagnosed for years, and that the family has faced sepsis from pneumonia and a difficult course of recovery. Akathisia, described as the worst thing she’s ever seen, is a central feature. It is a neurological injury characterized by intolerable restlessness and an urgent urge to move, sometimes accompanied by crawling sensations under the skin. The speaker recounts her own two-week experience of akathisia after stopping Lexapro in 2015, followed by a two-and-a-half-year period of severe withdrawal symptoms. She emphasizes that withdrawal from psych meds is not simply a return of baseline symptoms but a neurological injury that can be misinterpreted as a relapse. She shares that stopping medications abruptly, especially after long-term use, can cause severe rebound and injury, and she advocates for a careful, gradual taper (roughly a 10% reduction at each step). The transcript covers broader systemic concerns about psych meds: millions in the U.S. are on psychiatric medications, with long-term use potentially causing mitochondrial dysfunction that manifests as neurological injury. She links these injuries to chronic conditions, fatigue, brain fog, and diverse sensitivities. She stresses that distracting online narratives—like blaming stem cell therapies for these symptoms—are not accurate in her family’s case; the stem cell treatments were not the cause of the current neurological issues. She explains that mold exposure and the resulting Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) likely contributed to the brain and immune system dysregulation. Mold-related illness may predispose individuals to mental illness, which in her family has historically been treated with medications that may have caused or worsened injuries. A central thesis is the connection between psych med-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and the potential for long-term neurological injury. The ketogenic/ carnivore diet emerges as a key part of her strategy to manage symptoms: mitochondrial dysfunction can be alleviated by providing mitochondria with an alternate fuel, improving energy production, which she argues is supported by emerging research. She references papers and metabolic research sites to support these claims and mentions a forthcoming podcast on these topics. She created prescribed-harm.com to catalog patient stories and provide a resource for families and clinicians, inviting others harmed by these medications to share their experiences. She asserts that the pharmaceutical industry often downplays or reframes the damage, and she urges broader awareness and better education before prescribing psych meds. In closing, she notes that her family is hopeful for recovery, that prayers and support are appreciated, and that there is light at the end of the tunnel as they pursue time for recovery and avoid triggering reactions. She signals ongoing discussion of mitochondrial dysfunction and psych med injuries in future episodes and posts, while thanking supporters for listening. Speaker 1 briefly adds two lines about a period of extreme hardship for his family, including his wife’s near-death experience, their daughter’s health problems, and social pressure, while emphasizing gratitude for mundane normality and breathing.

By age 24, after the WPATH files came out, I realized that the doctors who write the guidelines didn’t know what they were doing, and that everything that had happened to me was wrong and had nothing to do with evidence-based medicine. I was experimented on. I was not told they were experimental; I was told it was medicine and that it would help, and it did none of that. It gave me complications the doctors ignored or treated as separate illnesses. It made my already preexisting mental health worse, and my physical health continued to deteriorate because I had a collapsed lung and a large intestine up in my chest that was still ignored by the same medical system fast-tracking me for a disorder I did not have. When I found out what was wrong, I started making appeals. I made claims to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. They decided to reject my claim and chose not to take any further action because, according to their investigation, the doctors had done nothing wrong. I appealed that decision with the health committee, and we are still awaiting their decision on that. But those are how I'm getting the answers from the doctors of why they treated me the way they did, because they wouldn’t tell me to my face whenever I asked. So that’s how the regulatory system has approached it. That’s how the doctors have approached it. And even trying to apply the disability because I have recurring hernias from the reparative surgery that was done in 2023 for the physical defect I was born with that was missed, I still have complications from that. I am physically disabled, but disability has rejected me because they don’t deem it a recurring disability. So I’ve also had to appeal that decision. But this is what the medical system has left me with: a body that does not work, that is deteriorating, that was given drugs I was never supposed to have been given. I was approved for top surgery. Unfortunately, I did not go through with it, but there are several who do. There are several who go much, much further, and the complications are not explained. These people do not know what they’re signing up for because they are children. I was a child. I wanted help. That’s all I wanted. I did not need to be medicalized. I did not need to be cut up. I didn’t need to be drugged. I just wanted to be loved the way I was. That was all. Thank you. Excellent.

During twelve years of work, the speaker encountered no female patient who hadn't been sexually abused as a child. The speaker poses the question of who would choose to be sexually abused or traumatized in childhood, or aspire to become a drug addict and break the law. The speaker asserts that addiction is a response to pain, and that traumatic experiences shape the brain's physiology, biasing it towards addictive behaviors, including substance use.

Speaker 0 added a comment building on what Tina said about changes in personality, depression, and related symptoms. They stated that the issues are “very real” and said they have identified the reasons “from theory” and with “some doctors in Italy,” as well as “some pathologists” who have confirmed these reasons. Speaker 0 claimed that the spike protein “unfortunately attacks and destroys also the endocrine system.” They explained that the endocrine system includes “the glands producing hormones,” and they said that these hormones “are what make our emotions and feelings and all those things.” In their view, this connection is directly relevant to why people experience changes in personality and other emotional or mental effects. Speaker 0 then referenced an Italian pathologist “near Venice.” They said this pathologist “went on a newspaper” and reported that, among “all the brains he had investigated,” he found the pineal gland “completely destroyed” in “all the people who were vaccinated.” Speaker 0 presented this as an example supporting the idea that the spike protein is dangerous to the endocrine system. According to Speaker 0, because the spike protein affects the endocrine system—particularly through harm to hormone-producing glands, and specifically via the pineal gland as described by the Italian pathologist—the result is changes in personality. They also linked the endocrine disruption to depression, describing the emotional and personality changes as a downstream effect of the claimed destruction of hormone-related systems. Overall, Speaker 0’s main points were: (1) changes in personality and depression are described as real; (2) the reasons are said to come from theory and confirmation by doctors and pathologists in Italy; (3) the spike protein is described as attacking and destroying the endocrine system; (4) hormones from endocrine glands are said to govern emotions and feelings; (5) an Italian pathologist near Venice is said to have reported pineal gland destruction in the brains of vaccinated individuals; and (6) this endocrine-system impact is said to be why people experience changes in personality.

Abigail's physical changes due to hormone treatments were primarily seen in her voice. However, these treatments caused her to suffer greatly. The chemicals introduced into her body caused pain in her bones, affected her concentration, and disrupted her sleep. To alleviate these issues, she was advised to use CBD oil. Unfortunately, the hormone treatments had a negative impact on Abigail's life, leading her to take her own life. Her mother questions why these changes were allowed if they didn't bring her happiness.

The speaker describes discovering a post about testimony given on March 19 in Germany by a Pfizer employee regarding the Pfizer shots. They initially planned to summarize it but say they must put their feelings in the caption because they are too emotional to read aloud. They state, “I was a human lab rat, and they knew that. We were all human lab rats and they knew that.” They claim this information is emerging five years later and that documents were attempted to be sealed so they wouldn’t be seen, suggesting they could have been silenced “to be dead.” The speaker expresses validation and horror, noting that they still have doubt at times but insist, “They knew the whole time.” They describe being tortured and their injured friends being tortured by medical staff, gaslit and disregarded, with a sense that they were “lab rats” and that the medical system should have done no harm. The speaker says they are one of the lucky ones, alive, and describe learning how to stop listening to “their bullshit” and stop falling for their lies. They lament watching injured friends return to the pharmaceutical industry, calling it “the vomit,” and claim those injured don’t know what was done to them because “they didn’t even test it.” They urge viewers to watch the testimony, stating it will be linked in the caption along with the transcript. The speaker indicates they must get some sleep and expresses internal conflict: happiness that things are coming to light while they are still alive to see it, contrasting with the fear that it might not have happened. They acknowledge that many are vocal and not remaining silent. They thank supporters and encourage continued discussion and posting about the issue, asserting that although it is five years later and “old news,” people are still taking these shots. They exhort others to stay loud and persistent, saying the mask and the facade are cracking. The speaker closes with “Alright. Good night.”

Robin Philip has undergone two surgeries and months of radiation for a tumor she now believes was caused by birth control injections. Depo Provera is a progestin shot injected every three months. One in four women in the United States use it, with black women taking the shot at nearly double the national rate. Philip used it for nearly thirty years. Multiple studies have found a potential link between Depo Provera and meningioma, including one that found women who took the drug for more than a year had five times the risk of developing the tumor. Philip is among more than a thousand women suing Pfizer, the maker of Depo Provera, alleging the company chose to ignore relevant safety concerns and deliberately not study the long-term safety of Depo Provera. All these women have meningiomas; many have surgery, some have radiation, and their lives have been greatly impacted. The European Union added a warning label for meningioma to the drug in 2024. Canada has listed it as an adverse reaction since February 2006. No such warning exists in the United States. In a motion seeking dismissal of the case, Pfizer says it became aware of the risks of meningiomas in 2023 and made an application to the FDA to change the drug’s warning label. The company says the FDA rejected their effort to warn patients. The FDA declined NBC News’s request for comment, but in a letter to Pfizer included in the motion, it wrote that the findings of the available observational studies alone do not support the addition of a warning. Pfizer told NBC News it stands behind the safety and efficacy of Depo Provera.

Accutane is described as a “poisonous medication” linked to abortions. The transcript claims that in April 1988 the FDA released Accutane as a new drug, and that it caused one thousand spontaneous abortions, with seven thousand other abortions and additional side effects including joint aches, drying of the skin, and severe hair loss. It also claims that Hoffman LaRoche, who ran the FDA, stopped allowing women to participate in studies because the women were having spontaneous abortions, and that the company requested that women not be allowed into the studies anymore. The transcript asserts that studies are biased and written by drug companies to present different results, and contrasts a stated claim of a “thirty percent reduction in acne” with the reported abortion and hair-loss side effects. The transcript further claims that the company continued pushing Accutane forward despite being aware of serious side effects. It then alleges that Congressman Ted Weiss demanded in 1988 that a criminal investigation be launched against forty deaths caused by Accutane, and reiterates that it is described as killing people while causing abortions and hair loss. The speaker says Accutane is still being sold “to this day.” The transcript concludes with a broader claim that the medical system is protected and “poisons people on a regular basis,” and expresses outrage at the idea of people being prescribed Accutane. It argues that acne could instead be addressed through lifestyle and natural approaches, listing examples such as eating healthy, cleaning up skincare products, cleaning up water, using “dragon’s blood,” using “natural lotions,” using tallow, and eating raw eggs. The transcript closes by stating that, instead of these alternatives, people are prescribed Accutane to “cull the population.”

I often see youth who have already undergone medical interventions due to a backlog in mental health support. Children may not fully understand the impact of these interventions, making it challenging to discuss. It can be especially difficult for young adolescents starting puberty suppression. We aim to make kids happy in the moment, but it's crucial to consider the long-term effects on their development. This is a growing challenge in our field that requires further exploration.

Depression drugs cannot cure people, but they can influence certain symptoms like emotional numbness and reduced self-care. However, these drugs can also cause sexual dysfunction even after discontinuation. Overall, these drugs are deemed terrible and should not be used. Psychiatry is unique in the healthcare field as its leaders consistently lie about the capabilities of their drugs. This situation is disheartening.

"Antidepressants are causing permanent lifelong sexual dysfunction, including total genital numbness long after the patient has stopped taking the drug. Sometimes it's even completely permanent." "I'm personally speaking to a 23 year old woman at Vanderbilt University right now who is suffering with this exact thing." "This is the most heartbreaking shit I've ever heard in my life." "This total genital numbness cannot feel anything at all." "She's also experienced physical atrophy in her outward sexual organs." "There's a Reddit group." "It does 13,000 members, 958 contributions per week." "A recent study by doctor Irwin Goldstein, he actually examined the tissue of young men that were experiencing PSSD." "He said on the young men that he examined, they had the same tissue of someone in their seventies and above."