reSee.it - Related Video Feed

According to the latest report, US government data confirms a 143,233 percent increase in cancer cases due to COVID vaccination.

A recent study involving 99 million COVID vaccine recipients found increased risks of neurological and heart disorders, described as rare but significant. For example, the risk of brain swelling increased by 378%, myocarditis by 610%, and Guillain Barre syndrome by 286%. The cumulative risk of these adverse events raises questions about the overall safety of vaccines, especially considering the CDC's childhood vaccination schedule, which includes 72 doses without long-term safety trials. Each vaccine has a list of potential side effects, many serious, yet they are often labeled as rare. Historical data shows a rise in chronic illnesses among vaccinated children, suggesting a troubling trend. The notion that vaccine injuries are non-existent is misleading, as many children are experiencing adverse effects. It’s crucial to recognize and evaluate these risks comprehensively.

Vaccines must be carefully studied to ensure they do not worsen infections. Past vaccines, like the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine for children, have unexpectedly made things worse. Similarly, an HIV vaccine increased infection risk in some cases. It's crucial to conduct thorough studies in high-risk populations to understand how vaccines truly impact infections before widespread use.

A study in Cleveland on 51,000 healthcare workers showed a direct correlation between COVID vaccinations and infection rates. Unvaccinated individuals had lower infection rates compared to those with one, two, three doses, or a bivalent booster. The study found that the more shots received, the higher the likelihood of getting and spreading COVID.

There is a new mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, but there is no evidence to support its effectiveness or safety in human trials. Additionally, several studies from different countries suggest that these vaccines may actually increase the risk of contracting COVID-19 over time. This is concerning and not a typical outcome.

The largest COVID study found a link between the vaccine and heart/brain disorders. Data from 100 million people in 8 countries showed slight increases in conditions like myocarditis and Guillain Barre syndrome. The study does not prove the vaccine caused these issues. Despite concerns, experts say the vaccine's benefits outweigh the risks. People like Elizabeth Foster question the vaccine's impact on their health. It's important to consult with a doctor before deciding to get vaccinated.

A study from Cleveland on 51,000 healthcare workers showed a direct correlation between COVID vaccinations and infection rates. Unvaccinated individuals had the lowest COVID rates, while those with more doses had higher rates. The bivalent booster recipients had the highest infection rates. The study emphasized the importance of vaccination in preventing the spread of COVID.

The speaker describes a nationwide study conducted in South Korea, stating that every resident was included in the research. The study compared individuals who received the vaccine to those who did not, and the analysis was stratified by dose number (one dose, two doses, three doses, and four or more doses). A central claim of the speaker is that this study provides the strongest signal to date supporting vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, referred to as VADES. According to the speaker, as each dose was administered, the immune function of individuals declined. By the time of the fourth dose, the speaker asserts there was a significant increase in the risk of other infections, quantified as about a 550% increase, including infections such as the common cold, tuberculosis, and upper respiratory tract infections. The speaker notes that the effect was most pronounced in young people, specifically ages zero to nineteen, who reportedly had the highest risks of these other infections. The implication presented is that the injections are causing immune collapse and exhausting T cells, leading to immune dysregulation described as IgG4 class switching. The immune system is said to become dysfunctional as a result. Additionally, the speaker mentions that, consistent with other studies they reference, genes related to immune function are claimed to become shut down. The overall assertion is that these findings point to a troubling pattern of immune impairment associated with multiple vaccine doses, culminating in the claimed immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to other infections. The speaker emphasizes the magnitude and reliability of the sample size, stating that having an entire country’s population as the study cohort constitutes the strongest possible sample size. The summary of the presented claims centers on dose-dependent immune decline, a marked increase in non-target infections after the fourth dose, greater impact on children, evidence of immune system exhaustion and dysregulation, and purported genetic downregulation of immune pathways, all described as arising from the vaccination regimen in this nationwide South Korean study.

People tested at Quest have an upper antibody limit of 25,000. Unvaccinated individuals typically test under 1,000. Vaccinated individuals often test over 25,000, averaging ten times higher than the unvaccinated, even four years post-vaccination. These high antibody levels are alarming, suggesting persistent spike protein presence and potential health issues. COVID is no longer a major illness concern, but elevated antibody levels remain a concern.

Speaker 0 expresses that publishing the material would effectively end his career. Speaker 1 questions what in the data could make the outcomes catastrophic for his career. Speaker 2 notes the study as a “bombshell.” The study included 18,468 subjects, of whom 1,957 were fully unvaccinated. When comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, there was an increased risk of several chronic health conditions in the vaccinated group. Specifically, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis, with an adjusted figure of 4.29 times (range 3.26 to 5.65 across analyses). Speaker 4 adds that the study also found a threefold increase in atopic diseases, which are a subset of allergic diseases. The researchers reported almost a sixfold risk for autoimmune disease, listing autoimmune conditions such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), multiple sclerosis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. They note there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and the data showed a sixfold increase in autoimmunity among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3 highlights neurodevelopmental disorders, noting a five-and-a-half times increased risk. The discussion emphasizes that the immune system is intimately connected with brain development and functioning, suggesting that when the immune system is triggered by illness or vaccination, neuropsychiatric symptoms may arise due to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2 reports two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities and four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated, along with a threefold rate of developmental delay. The data also show, consistent with allergy and autoimmunity findings, six times more acute and chronic ear infections in the vaccinated group. Speaker 3 notes that in several health conditions, analysis could not be performed because there were none in the unvaccinated group, and the methods required nonzero counts in both groups. For example, there were two hundred sixty-two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group, while the unvaccinated group had zero cases of ADHD. The same pattern is described for other conditions: zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, ticks, and other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated group.

The UK Public Health England released data on illness rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. In people over 50, the rates of illness were higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group. This trend continued in the 50-60, 60-70 age groups as well. The data suggests that those who received two vaccine doses are more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 than those who are unvaccinated. This difference may be due to immunosensescence, where the immune system becomes less effective with age. The data contradicts the notion that the pandemic is primarily affecting the unvaccinated.

Scientists studied the death rates in Malaysia and nine other countries during the pandemic. They found that after 1.3 billion COVID vaccines were administered worldwide, 17 million people died from vaccines alone. The scientists analyzed all-cause mortality to determine the impact of the pandemic and vaccine rollout. They discovered that in all countries studied, all-cause mortality increased with each vaccine deployment. Additionally, there were unprecedented peaks in mortality following booster rollouts. The vaccine dose fatality rate increased with age, reaching almost 5% among those 90 years and older who received a fourth dose. No evidence was found to suggest that COVID vaccines saved lives. The report urges individuals to consider this information before getting vaccinated.

In a study of 1,000 people in Israel, it was found that those who received two vaccine doses were 27 times more likely to get reinfected. The vaccine does not prevent infections or transmission, as seen in studies from England, Scotland, and other European countries where triple-vaccinated individuals are most likely to die. On the other hand, natural immunity from previous infections, such as SARS CoV-one, can last for 18 years and provide long-lasting and broad protection. In conclusion, natural immunity should be considered as an important factor moving forward.

A peer-reviewed study from Norway analyzed the mask usage of over 3,200 individuals. After following them for 17 days, researchers found that those who wore masks more frequently had a higher incidence of testing positive for COVID-19. Adjusting for factors like vaccination status and gender, the study revealed that people who always or almost always wore masks were 40% more likely to catch COVID-19 compared to those who never wore masks.

Vaccinated individuals may still get COVID, but are less likely to experience severe effects like ICU admission or death. Vaccines were introduced late in the pandemic, after the virus had become milder and treatment had improved. Studies show misclassification bias in reporting vaccinated vs. unvaccinated hospitalizations. Some reports indicate higher rates of hospitalization and death among the vaccinated. Risk of COVID increases with each vaccine dose. Post-vaccine deaths are concerning.

Two years ago, most people would have refused gene or cell therapy, but the pandemic has changed perceptions of innovation. The COVID vaccine is not a traditional vaccine as it doesn't provide immunity or prevent transmission. The Pfizer vaccine wasn't tested for transmission prevention before its release due to the urgency. Vaccinated individuals can still get COVID-19. Countries with rapid mass vaccination have seen increased infections and deaths. A study from the Cleveland Clinic suggests that the more shots received, the higher the risk of getting COVID. Vaccination puts evolutionary pressure on the virus, leading to mutations. Epidemiological analysis shows a significant number of deaths related to the vaccines, with dangerous mechanisms of action and consistency with other fatal conditions. Temporal relation is also evident, with many deaths occurring shortly after vaccination.

There's concern about increased cancer risk after Covid vaccines, noting lack of UK data comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated. A study from Italy reported increased incidence of cancers six months after Covid vaccinations. The source is Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal, peer reviewed. The paper states: "People that had vaccinated with at least one dose, their chances of getting colorectal cancer the hazard ratio was one point three four. In other words thirty four percent more likely to get it." This is at a six month follow-up. It also claims: "Breast cancer fifty four percent more likely to get breast cancer in the vaccinated group." "Bladder cancer sixty two percent more likely to get it than the unvaccinated group."

A peer-reviewed study from Norway analyzed the mask usage of over 3,200 individuals. After following them for 17 days, researchers found that those who wore masks more frequently had a higher incidence of testing positive for COVID-19. Adjusting for factors like vaccination status and gender, the study revealed that people who always or almost always wore masks were 40% more likely to catch COVID-19 compared to those who never wore masks.

A study in Israel found that individuals who received two vaccine doses were 27 times more likely to get reinfected, indicating that vaccines do not effectively stop infection or transmission. Research from England, Scotland, and northern Europe shows that those who are triple vaccinated may have a higher risk of death. In contrast, natural immunity is shown to be long-lasting and robust, with evidence from SARS CoV-1 patients who retained immunity for 18 years. Therefore, natural immunity should be legally recognized as at least equal to vaccinated immunity, and it is likely to be lifelong.

A peer-reviewed study from Norway analyzed the mask usage of over 3,200 individuals. After following them for 17 days, researchers found that those who wore masks more frequently had a higher incidence of testing positive for COVID-19. Adjusting for factors like vaccination status and gender, the study revealed that people who always or almost always wore masks were 40% more likely to catch COVID-19 compared to those who never wore masks.

Vaccines can sometimes have unexpected effects. In some cases, vaccinating someone against a disease can actually make them more susceptible to the infection. This has happened before with vaccines like the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in children and an HIV vaccine that was tested a few years ago. So, it's important to carefully evaluate the safety of vaccines before administering them.

In a recent study, researchers examined autopsy reports of deaths that appeared to be linked to the COVID-19 vaccine. Using a rigorous analysis, they found that 73.9% of the cases showed that the vaccine either directly caused or significantly contributed to the deaths. Most of these deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the last vaccine dose, with cardiovascular issues being the main cause. The study was conducted by a team of doctors and experts in pathology, who reviewed 44 papers and 325 autopsies.

A study compared vaccinated and unvaccinated children and found that nasal allergy, allergic rhinitis, and autism were significantly higher in the vaccinated group. The risk of nasal allergy was 30 times higher, while autism was 4.2 times higher in vaccinated children. Additionally, vaccinated children were four times more likely to be diagnosed with pneumonia compared to the unvaccinated group. This study highlights the potential risks associated with childhood vaccinations.

During a 6-month period, 22,000 people received the vaccine while 22,000 others received a placebo. In the vaccine group, 1 person died from COVID, compared to 2 in the placebo group. However, the number needed to vaccinate to save one life is 22,000. Additionally, the vaccine group had 21 deaths from all causes, while the placebo group had 17. This means there were more deaths in the vaccine group. Furthermore, there were 4 to 5 cases of cardiac arrest in the vaccine group, compared to only 1 in the placebo group. This suggests that taking the vaccine increases the likelihood of dying from all causes and cardiac arrest.

Speaker 0 discusses this year's flu shot and mentions that flu season is longer than usual. He references headlines about flu vaccine links to higher infections, citing a Cleveland Clinic study involving their employees and the influenza vaccine during this respiratory viral season. In the study, 53,402 employees were observed; 43,857 (82.1%) had received the influenza vaccine by study end. Influenza occurred in 1,079 individuals (2.02%). The cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for vaccinated and unvaccinated groups early on, but over time the cumulative incidence increased more rapidly among the vaccinated. The study includes an adjusted analysis controlling for age, sex, clinical nursing job, employment location, and reports that the risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%. In other words, the data suggested a 26.9% greater chance of contracting the flu or other respiratory virus for the vaccinated group. The conclusion presented is that influenza vaccination of working-age adults was associated with a higher risk of influenza during the 2024-2025 season, suggesting the vaccine did not have the intended protective effect. Speaker 1 adds commentary, noting that the Cleveland Clinic study admits they effectively coerced over 80% of their staff to get the flu shot, implying these individuals are not biased against the vaccine and would be expected to defend it. They argue this makes the bias the opposite of what some might assume and suggest that the study should prompt reconsideration of vaccination. Speaker 1 then pivots to an appeal: they encourage viewers to sign up for their email list at thehighwire.com or ICANN, promising to deliver the study and related evidence in their inbox. They urge viewers to take the Cleveland Clinic document to their doctor and ask, “Should I get this year's flu shot?” If the doctor says yes, Speaker 1 counsels firing the doctor and presenting the document as a reason, claiming doctors may be unaware of the study. They emphasize firing doctors who do not know the study and assert that this week they wish to see doctors fired across the country if they cannot defend the use of the vaccine in light of the study. Speaker 1 concludes with a personal admonition to avoid doctors who, in their view, are not making informed decisions about health and the future of children. Speaker 0 revisits the broader context, noting that a flu vaccine with low effectiveness is not surprising since strains are guessed before the season and production is ramped up accordingly. He references Canadian headlines about low or no protection this year, and remarks that negative efficacy, such as -26.9%, is particularly noteworthy.