reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The USMCA is a good deal, but the speaker had a bad relationship with a person who worked for Trudeau's predecessor because they disagreed on the deal. The speaker claims to have called Trudeau "governor Trudeau," which may have hurt his election. The speaker questioned Trudeau about why the US was taking Canada's cars and suggested a 25% tariff on Canadian cars, to which Trudeau allegedly responded that it would mean the end of Canada. The speaker finds it hard to justify subsidizing Canada, potentially to the tune of $200 billion a year, while the US protects Canada militarily. The speaker believes it's hard for the American taxpayer to be happy about subsidizing Canada.

President Trump stated that the proposed 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods will be implemented on March 4 as planned. This is due to his claim that drugs are flowing into the U.S. from those countries. Trump said that drugs continue to pour into the country, killing hundreds of thousands of people, and that the U.S. is losing substantially more than 100,000 people. He stated that families are destroyed as a result.

Christopher Leland suggested that Canada should prepare a substantial retaliation list in response to potential tariffs from Donald Trump, proposing a figure of $200 billion as a starting point for consultation. She emphasized the need for immediate action, arguing that American politicians prioritize their own interests over Canadian concerns. Leland expressed a desire for American workers, like Wisconsin dairy farmers and Michigan manufacturers, to recognize the impact of tariffs on their businesses. She noted that Canada has unique economic leverage over the U.S. Despite her points, the discussion highlighted skepticism about her understanding of the situation and a call for a change in Canadian leadership, asserting that current politicians do not represent true Canadian interests. The speaker urged Canadians to prioritize their families and future generations.

Canada is described as sweeping the fentanyl issue under the rug by sources in the show, despite public moves like appointing a fentanyl czar and increasing northern border patrols after pressure from Trump and Kash Patel. The guest says Canadian law enforcement acknowledge the issue but feel resources are insufficient to crack down on transnational crime, with a sense that “the root of the problem” is not being addressed. The guest reports that the planning and production of fentanyl have shifted to Canada, with cartel operatives setting up labs there. They describe how cartels, after crackdowns on the southern border, moved operations into Canada where a visa is not needed for a tourist entry, allowing quick setup and networking with preexisting Canadian gangs such as the Hells Angels, Brother’s Keepers, Red Scorpion, and United Nations gang. Precursors come through the Port of Vancouver, where less than 1% of cargo is inspected, enabling easy importation of chemicals. The guest asserts that the majority of fentanyl production now occurs in Canada, with a claim of 99% certainty, and cites an operative for the Sinaloa Cartel in Canada showing labs on West Coast resources. Labs are described as often in suburban areas on farmland or small residences, not just in large urban centers. The production is said to have started in 2016-2017 as cartel operations moved into Canada, with ongoing Canadian law enforcement aware since then but under-resourced to counter transnational crime groups. The RCMP head reportedly estimated thousands of organized crime groups, but CSA’s Canadian intelligence suggests 668, highlighting a disconnect between agencies. The main cartel presence in Canada is labeled as Sinaloa and CJNG, with CJNG now possibly dominant due to Sinaloa’s weakening position and alliance with New Generation Cartel. The Canadian fentanyl flow includes enforcers recruited from Canada, including Quebec and Ontario, who manage payments, protection, and border activities to facilitate drug movement and violence. Recruitment extends globally to the Balkans, Armenia, Australia, England, and other Commonwealth countries to leverage foreign nationals who can blend in and avoid detection. Group chats reveal Canadian area codes and explicit hits-for-hire offers, with examples of payments (e.g., 55,000 Canadian dollars for a hit) and weapon procurement requirements. The border dynamics are described as significant: the northern border remains underprotected, allowing cross-border trafficking. The guest mentions that, even with a U.S. military or law enforcement option, the cartel leadership central to the operation would resist intensely if confronted on Mexican soil, implying that a direct US-backed intervention could be costly and dangerous for the cartel. A notable case described is a “BC Superlab,” a large, sophisticated operation producing meth and fentanyl, recovered in rural BC and Surrey, BC. Authorities found 400 kilograms of meth, 54 kilograms of fentanyl, plus MDMA and cocaine, plus 46 handguns, 21 AR-15 style rifles, 14 submachine guns, two .50 cal rifles, explosives, body armor, and nearly $1 million in cash. The lab’s equipment included jacketed reactors and other specialized items, with large quantities of precursors (5,000 liters of liquid precursor and 10 tons of powder) and evidence they may have been producing P2P, a key meth precursor. The RCMP described the operation as extremely sophisticated, with a network of metal ducting to vent fumes and a setup suggesting an international cross-border network with potential ties to Mexican cartel operations and other global criminal networks. Health Canada is testing unusual equipment to see if it signals new production methods. Investigators emphasize that the drugs were destined for abroad and that Vancouver’s infrastructure could facilitate expansion into Asia-Pacific markets, including China, Japan, India, Indonesia, Australia, and New Zealand. Despite the scale of the operation, only one person had been arrested at the time of reporting, underscoring the magnitude of the challenge and the global reach of the drug networks. Overall, the conversation frames Canada as a critical, expanding node in an international fentanyl production and distribution network, with entrenched organizational complexity, cross-border logistics, and multilingual, multinational recruitment that complicates enforcement.

Rampant illegal immigration and the illicit drug trade, particularly fentanyl, are costing the American people more than a potential trade war. President Trump aims to ensure that China, Mexico, and Canada prioritize U.S. national security as much as they do their own. Fentanyl's precursor materials come from China, are assembled in Mexico, and are the leading cause of death for Americans aged 18 to 45. Trump has committed to using every available tool to secure the nation, and addressing this crisis is part of that effort.

The speaker states that an historic flood of undocumented immigrants crossed the border during the first three years of the administration, with arrivals quadrupling from the last year of President Trump. The speaker asks if it was a mistake to loosen immigration policies. The other speaker responds that the policies proposed are about fixing a problem, not promoting one. The first speaker reiterates that the numbers quadrupled. The other speaker claims that they have cut the flow of illegal immigration by half, as well as the flow of fentanyl by half, but that Congress needs to act to fix the problem.

Speaker 2 stated he doesn't think they can change Donald Trump at this stage. Speaker 1 believes Pierre Poilievre, like Trump, will focus on the American worker, securing borders, ending fentanyl, and securing the world. Speaker 2 said he and Poilievre have a lot in common, but Speaker 1 says Poilievre is willfully blind to threats facing the country. Speaker 2 stated the U.S. doesn't want cars, steel, or aluminum from Canada because they want to make their own. Speaker 1 questioned how much steel is used these days. Speaker 2 recounted a conversation with Trudeau, whom he called "Governor Trudeau," about tariffs on Canadian cars. Speaker 2 claimed Trudeau said a 25% tariff would mean the end of Canada. Speaker 2 believes the U.S. subsidizes Canada to the tune of maybe $200 billion a year and that it's hard to justify. He added that the U.S. protects Canada militarily.

You are imposing tariffs on regular Americans, and we will respond. Canada is a crucial market for U.S. exporters, larger than China, Japan, the UK, and France combined. The anger in Canada is palpable, with the entire country rallying behind Prime Minister Trudeau. The tariffs are higher than those against China, which feels like a betrayal to a loyal ally. The justification regarding fentanyl and border security is flimsy, as only a tiny fraction of fentanyl comes from Canada. Canadians are proud of their sovereignty and will retaliate against these unjustified measures. The relationship between our countries has historically been beneficial, and we want to maintain that partnership. The current situation is seen as self-harm for America, and Canadians are uniting in support of their government.

Check out these insane tariffs that Canada imposed on the US last year: 250% for milk, 291% for butter, and over 200% for whey and cheese. Meanwhile, we charged them far less for the same goods. Since Trump announced tariffs, everyone suddenly became an economics expert. I don't know how tariffs will affect the economy, and neither does anyone else. But I do know tariffs led Apple to build a new factory and hire 20,000 Americans. Honda is building Civics here instead of Mexico. Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion to build five chip factories in the US. Tariffs pressure China, Mexico, and Canada to stop the flow of fentanyl. Tariffs are one tactic in an economic strategy. Are we willing to tolerate short-term disruption for long-term gain? Macroeconomics are complicated and take time to play out. Are you listening to people who want the President to fail, even if it hurts America?

Speaker 0 states that Donald Trump is in retreat due to opposition to his tariff policies, which are described as chaotic and damaging to the economy. These policies are said to discourage spending due to their unpredictability and harm American families. Speaker 1 claims tariffs send a message to China that their unfair trade policies must end and that failure to reform will have dramatic consequences. The speaker asserts China has a large and growing trade surplus with the U.S., partly due to free trade rules, but largely because China doesn't play fair by restricting access to their markets and not preventing the theft of intellectual property.

Tariffs imposed by the Trump administration are unjustified, as only about 0.2% of fentanyl entering the U.S. comes from Canada. If border security were the real concern, it could be easily addressed. Canada is also focused on stopping illegal U.S. guns that contribute to violence in Canada and is open to collaborating on asylum seeker issues. However, the president's comments about Canadian sovereignty, suggesting that becoming the 51st state would eliminate tariffs, have angered Canadians. They value their sovereignty and are committed to standing up against these tariffs, emphasizing their desire to maintain a strong partnership with the U.S. while being proud of their national identity.

Tomorrow, February 1st, President Trump will implement tariffs in response to the illegal fentanyl crisis. A 25% tariff will be imposed on Mexico and Canada, and a 10% tariff on China. These measures are aimed at addressing the distribution of fentanyl, which has resulted in the deaths of millions of Americans. This action reflects the president's commitment to his promises.

Speaker 1 expresses concerns about the $1.9 trillion COVID relief package, high inflation, and the country's direction. Speaker 0 acknowledges the need for action on roads and infrastructure but denies misallocation of funds. Speaker 1 raises issues of a wide open border and the use of Fentanyl to target children. Speaker 0 admits to discussing the matter with President Biden and expresses worry about Fentanyl poisoning. Speaker 1 questions the president's response and the number of illegal immigrants in the country. Speaker 0 mentions meeting with the ATF to address the Fentanyl problem. Speaker 1 argues that the border was secure under the Trump administration but is now open, leading to drug-related issues. They urge Speaker 0 to reach out to the president for a solution.

Tariffs have become a hot topic, raising questions about their implications for the US, Canada, and Mexico. The current situation highlights the leverage the US holds in negotiations. Mexican exports to the US account for 35% of their GDP, while Canadian exports make up 22%. In contrast, US exports to Mexico and Canada are only 1.2% and 1.5% of their GDP, respectively. This disparity suggests that Mexico and Canada cannot afford to prolong a trade standoff. The US is pushing for negotiations, not out of bullying, but in response to serious issues like the fentanyl crisis and illegal immigration, which have significant impacts on American society. The message is clear: those contributing to these problems must face consequences.

Only 43 pounds of fentanyl were found last year, which is less than a carry-on suitcase. The vast majority of fentanyl is brought in through Mexico, not Canada. Last year alone, there was a 2000% increase in illegal fentanyl. You're asking me for the president's justification for these tariffs. It's disrespectful to the families who have lost loved ones to this deadly poison. They are grateful that they finally have a president who is standing up to both Canada and Mexico, and most importantly, to China as well. The president added an additional 10% tariff on China because this deadly poison is being produced there and distributed through our neighbors. There need to be consequences.

Speaker 0 questions why Australia was "whacked with a tariff" despite a free trade agreement and a trade surplus, especially considering their importance as a national security partner. Speaker 1 states they are addressing the $1.2 trillion deficit left by President Biden. They claim Australia bans US beef and pork and is preparing measures against US digital companies. Speaker 1 says there is a global tariff on everything. Speaker 0 argues that "whacking" both friends and foes undermines national security, insults Australia, and damages our partnership. Speaker 0 expresses concern about the lack of trust from friends and allies due to this policy, set to take effect at midnight.

Tariffs are being imposed without justification, as only about 0.2% of fentanyl entering the U.S. comes from Canada. If border security were truly the concern, it could be easily addressed. Canada is also affected by the smuggling of U.S. guns that lead to violence in Canadian cities, and both countries could collaborate to manage asylum seekers. The recent threat to Canadian sovereignty, suggesting Canada could become the 51st state to avoid tariffs, has angered Canadians. They value their national pride and sovereignty, and any aggressive actions will be met with a strong response. Canada wants to maintain a friendly partnership with the U.S. while standing firm on its identity.

The speaker believes people are reacting hysterically to Trump's trade policies because they were taught that free trade is good, and tariffs are bad. Trump's perspective is that while free trade may improve GDP, it devastated parts of the US, costing people not just jobs, but their towns. The US is in the best position to negotiate trade because exports only comprise 11% of its GDP. If countries are rational, Canada and Mexico would concede to US demands, as 25% of their GDP comes from exports to the US. Europe is not much better, so they should also lower barriers. The wild card is politicians fearing job loss if they give in. The speaker acknowledges market pain but notes those who lost jobs are cheering. Trump is doing what he said he would do, fulfilling his promises.

The speaker believes everyone agrees on the problems of American deindustrialization, the unfair burden on the middle class from foreign tariffs, and the need to address issues like fentanyl and border security. The speaker asserts that tariffs are a tool to fight for the American working class against Wall Street elites. The speaker claims tariffs have already been effective, citing zero people crossing the southern border, record low fentanyl levels, and $1.2 trillion in manufacturing investment since January 21. The speaker suggests the stock market's performance reflects Wall Street punishing the president for prioritizing the working class. The speaker concludes that people are grateful to have a president who puts them first and challenges Wall Street, noting Wall Street has favored Democrats in recent elections.

There’s nothing that China, Canada, or Mexico can do tonight to prevent the tariffs from being implemented tomorrow. This is not a negotiating tool; it’s an economic decision due to significant trade deficits. Canada has a nearly $200 billion deficit with the U.S., and it’s unfair for the U.S. to subsidize Canada. Mexico has a $250 billion deficit, and while border crossings have decreased, the past administration allowed many criminals to enter the U.S. Fentanyl, primarily produced in China, is a major issue, with much of it coming through Mexico and Canada. Overall, these countries have not treated the U.S. fairly.