TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The Federal Register in 2023 reveals that the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission are collaborating to establish natural asset companies. These corporations will hold rights to ecological performance in areas like national reserves and farmlands, taking over management from public land agencies. The companies can license these rights from governments or private landowners, including publicly owned areas like national parks. The aim is to privatize these areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. Wall Street, particularly BlackRock, stands to benefit greatly from this, with the potential for trillions of dollars in economic value.

Update on the World Economic Forum: Klaus Schwab stepped down; the Nestle guy who believed that water wasn't a human right stepped in as co-chair, and now he's gone. We have somebody else moving in there. BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, runs almost $12 trillion in assets in 2024. Larry Fink points those assets toward new technologies and informs investors where the next opportunities are going to be; "The faster that we could find ways to mitigating the rising temperatures... we don't have much time... we need to be learning about these new, the new technologies and how to move forward. And as Bill Bill in his book wrote about, we we need to employ $50,000,000,000,000 to get to a to a green world." A critic counters: "$50,000,000,000,000 of taxpayer money towards an absolute disastrous hoax that only makes us richer." "Anybody who hatches a scheme that has Bill Gates laughing like a Scooby Doo villain should really alarm people at that point." "Behaviors are gonna have to change... At BlackRock, we are forcing behaviors." Missouri AG Andrew Bailey filed suit against BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard for illegally manipulating the energy markets, stating: "Over several years, the three asset managers acquired substantial stock holdings in every significant publicly held coal producer in The United States, thereby gaining the power to control the policies of the coal companies. Using their combined influence of the coal market, the investment cartel collectively announced in 2021 their commitment to weaponize their shares to pressure the coal companies to accommodate green energy goals." The piece notes that while some pause exists, "This is going full speed ahead."

Nature underpins every aspect of the economy; air, water, soil, oceans, and minerals—the building blocks of economies. While these models of economic growth have driven global prosperity, their unintended consequences are not sustainable on a finite planet. Resource extraction and pollution—greenhouse gas emissions, sewage, plastics—are beyond the earth's carrying capacity, causing significant societal and financial costs. This shows up as financial risk for institutions. Lack of water is leading to disruption of operations of supply chains where water is needed as an essential input for manufacturing or power production. The degradation of soil is leading to reduced agricultural yields. The decline of pollinator species is also having an impact on agriculture. So that's leading to direct financial risks for organizations, for businesses, and ultimately for investors.

Speaker 0 describes a deliberate effort to push retail investors toward crypto and programmable money to prototype and profit from it, while keeping them away from “real assets.” The idea is that if retail participants buy into programmable money, they will not compete with the equity holders, managers, and central banks who want to acquire gold and land without retail interference. By drawing retail money into the financialized system, those in power can build a “control grid” and limit retail influence over real assets. Speaker 1 reacts, noting the emphasis on “printed so much money” and asking why this leads to control of real assets. Speaker 0 explains that there has been a continuous expansion of paper, debt, derivatives, and financial assets, even as real asset creation—via new businesses and technology—also grows. The acceleration of financial assets outpaces real asset creation. A reference is made to a 2018 remark by the German finance minister at a Shanghai meeting: “the debt growth model is over,” and that there are “no reforms now that are not real reforms.” This is interpreted as signaling an end to the game of expanding debt, with everyone scrambling to gain control of real assets. In this context, huge profits begin to attract participants into distributive ledger programmable money, with the aim of pulling retail money away from real assets to build a control grid, while those who control programmable money simultaneously position themselves to seize real assets.

Speaker 0 argues that there is a shift toward bankers increasingly controlling both monetary and fiscal policy, describing it as a "financial coup d'etat." They claim that for centuries there has been a balance of power between the people's representatives who control fiscal policy (taxation) and bankers who control monetary policy. According to Speaker 0, bankers have decided to use digital technology to assert control over both sides of government policy, leveraging CBDCs (central bank digital currencies), stablecoins, and asset tokens as programmable money. They assert that this move is underway and cite Davos as evidence, noting that Larry Fink, the acting co-chair of the World Economic Forum, is aggressively promoting the idea of moving the entire financial system into a digital control grid. The speaker contends that the descriptions of the bankers’ intentions are becoming very open and explicit, and that the result would be the abolition or collapse of the republic in favor of a system where bankers control both monetary and fiscal policy. The speaker questions whether legislative representatives would remain in any executive or ceremonial role, describing the future as fluid and capable of many directions. They emphasize that the transition has been very incremental for decades, facilitated by the federal government not running its financial statements and operations in accordance with the law and not disclosing them properly. This, they claim, has allowed the shift to occur with the public largely unaware or complacent. Speaker 0 notes that many Americans have accepted the current system because they benefit from it in the short term—“as long as I get my check, I’m okay with the system as it is.” They frame this acceptance as part of the reason the changes have progressed with limited public pushback. In sum, the speaker contends that the bankers are moving to extend control from monetary policy into fiscal policy through digital technologies and programmable money, a process they describe as a quiet, long-running coup that could redefine the balance of power in government.

The Federal Register in 2023 reveals that the New York Stock Exchange is collaborating with the Securities and Exchange Commission to establish a new type of company called a natural asset company (NAC). NACs will hold rights to ecological performance in areas like national reserves and farmlands, taking over management responsibilities from public land agencies. These rights can be licensed from governments or private landowners, including publicly owned areas like national parks. The aim is to privatize these areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. Wall Street, particularly BlackRock, stands to benefit greatly from this, with the potential for trillions of dollars in economic value.

Three giant corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other and 89% of the S&P 500. They aim to buy every single family home in America, potentially owning 60% of them by 2030. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is on the board of the World Economic Forum. Their goal is for people to own nothing and be happy. Often, when someone is about to buy a home, an LLC with an ambiguous name, which is actually owned by BlackRock, swoops in with a cash offer, pushing the buyer out of the market.

Larry Fink, Soros, State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock have significant influence in various industries, including defense contracts, Hollywood, and pharmaceuticals. These companies hold a monopoly-like control over 88% of the companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone has assets under management worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. They have the power to shape people's lives, replace CEOs, and buy politicians. The military-industrial complex is a major concern, as defense contractors profit from wars. ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) initiatives are seen as a means of control rather than just making money. The goal seems to be about acquiring power and control rather than accumulating more wealth.

"Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy." "Aladdin is the brainchild of Larry Fink, the founder of BlackRock." "The genie is out of the bottle, and Aladdin has already reached a tipping point where one robot controls more wealth than any person or country." "On Aladdin's 20 birthday, Larry launched a top secret project at BlackRock, codenamed Monarch, led to the firing of its fund managers and replacing their funds with Aladdin's funds." "Joe Biden has appointed BlackRock executive Brian Deese as head of the National Economic Council, which basically means the oversight of Latin and BlackRock is now the responsibility of BlackRock."

Aladdin, a powerful robot created by Larry Fink, controls more wealth than any country on earth. It has quietly become the biggest company in the world, controlling $21 trillion of the global economy. Aladdin directs the actions of the US Federal Reserve, major banks, and investment funds, controlling half of all ETFs, 17% of the bond market, and 10% of the global stock market. It gathers trillions of data points to make better investment decisions than humans. Aladdin's dominance has made BlackRock the biggest shadow bank and the most powerful company on earth. With its AI capabilities growing, Aladdin's control over financial markets and assets continues to expand.

Speaker 0: So who are the people that actually get to be inflation? Well, they're the ones that are climbing up the network. They're the compromised ones. Why? What do they get? They get 0% money. The most corrupt money in the world is quantitative easing. Right? You essentially get the banks to buy the government's debt, and then central banks, put it on their balance sheet. So this is just pure corruption. This is below interest money. What about the banks? They get to create it for free. You know, they actually get to create it. They get a thousand decks on you you're paying 10%. They get they get to lever that up a 100 times. They get a thousand percent. And remember, this is all a debt based Ponzi scheme. The money to pay the interest doesn't exist, so you gotta find another person to take on the debt. You're either if you have a positive money in your in your bank balance, it's because somebody else is in debt. The money doesn't exist unless somebody else is in debt, and the money to pay the interest doesn't exist. So we create this economic environment where your money is continually being debased, and then you need to speculate in order to beat inflation. Now if you do a bit of speculation and you just invest some of your money in stocks, what happens? You're suddenly like, I don't know what stock to buy. I'm I'm not a professional trader. So there's a company out there, BlackRock, that will just buy all the stocks for me, and I just can give them a £100 a month or something. And, now I don't need to figure out what stock to buy. Okay. So now BlackRock is taking everyone's investment money that can't be bothered to figure out what stock through ETFs and index ones. Then they're taking everyone's pension. Then they're taking everyone's insurance contributions because you're trying to hedge some of the risk. And then when you get your house, you have to have insurance. And so where did BlackRock and all the asset managers in this financial industrial complex get all the money? It's your money. You paid for it. So then what do they do? Well, the banks create all of these. They they create new money every time they issue a mortgage. And then they say, do you know what? I don't even wanna take the risk of these mortgages anymore. What if can I just package it up and give it to someone else? So Larry Fink says, yeah. I've got all this money. All these people are putting these pension money in. Why don't we create something called a mortgage backed security? Let's package up all of these mortgages. Just put them into one product. And then what I can do is we can slap a credit rating on it. And if everyone complies, then they get this credit rating. Credit rating is not it's about compliance with the network. So now you've got all the banks are creating the money, and then they create these mortgage backed securities that allows them to control effectively all the real estate and transfer it. But who do they sell it to? They sell it to you. And so they created the money. They created the mortgage backed security, and then they sold it to your pension. So you paid for the very system for them to get the 0% money in the first place, and they're charging a fee for it. And what else do they get? They get a board seat on every company.

BlackRock, a major global asset manager, controls 40% of investable assets worldwide. They have investments in various industries like food, medicine, weapons, transportation, and media. This is public information. To sustain the economy, they create crises to boost demand. For instance, a war is necessary for a $90 billion weapon industry, a climate crisis drives demand for green energy, a pandemic is needed to sell vaccines, and drama fuels media traffic. This entire ecosystem is controlled by the upper class, and it's not a coincidence that we are always in a state of crisis.

BlackRock aims to unlock and take control of natural assets not in the financial system and turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street product. The plan is to build new asset classes on a universal ledger on blockchain with Aladdin-like risk management. The narrative ties this to a green model and decarbonization, saying the carbon market would unlock new assets and create debt. In the natural asset corporation model, one would identify a natural asset and issue shares at no cost to sell them. It's literally "it's literally just pointing out something outside and being like, this is mine. I'm going to fractionalize it and sell it to people and you're producing money in like, you know, out of thin air." The speaker claims this is financializing nature, framed as saving the planet but framing it as the only way to save the planet, the insane debt racket.

Speaker 0: I had a guy who worked, very, very, very high up at Citibank. And he told me around 2008, he said, Glenn, you know, don't worry about the financial system. And I'm like, uh-huh. And he said, you know, we're never gonna go broke. I mean, do you know how much just the national parks are worth? And I looked at him and said, are you seriously telling me that we should commoditize the national parks? And he said, it's gonna happen. And I wonder now if this is what he was talking about. If it was just a digital not actually selling them, it's just a digital commoditization of our parks. Speaker 1: Yeah. So apply this now to the the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era, you'll own nothing and be happy. Well Yes. There's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around, use it to speculate on. Mean, it's It's very insane. Yeah. And so, this is just one aspect of digital currency play. Obviously, there's a lot more than that just going on as well. I would argue that a lot of this push, particularly in The US for dollar stablecoins supposedly being better than a central bank digital currency, also falls into this paradigm we talked about earlier of, you know, moving from the public to the private of the public private partnership because a lot of these stablecoin issuers, you know, if the the big concerns about CBDCs was that they're seasable, they're surveillable and they're programmable, Well, all of those three things also can apply to stablecoins. The only difference is that you would have a private company issue it and control it. But we've seen time and again how a lot of these private entities are willing to do that. When contacted, just look at how Bank of America behaved with January 6, people accused of wrongdoing on that day, for You know, they have no qualms in doing that and engaging in those type of activities. And the biggest dollar stablecoin issuer, Tether, which just hired Bo Hynes from the White House, they have openly said that they are a close partner of the US government for dollar hegemony globally and have uploaded the FBI, the Secret Service and other aspects of the US government onto its platform directly and have seized tethers from people just because government told them to, and this was during the Biden administration. So they obviously are willing to do that under any administration, and it's essentially functioning as a de facto public private partnership, even though we're being told it's a it's much better than a CBDC, but in terms of its impacts on civil liberties, you know, that's not necessarily true. So, again, vigilance is is important here.

The lust to control other human beings is a story as old as time. There's a very strong drift in the direction of globalization, of the ultimate centralization of control in the hands of unelected officials at supernational organizations. They want all of the resources of the world in their pocket. The bigger picture is that an attempt is underway now to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy. This is a coup. They're saying we can control with rules. We don't need currency anymore. It's like an inverted prison. You are supposedly free to roam about, but everything you want to access is behind lock and key. The potential for social control is gigantic and potentially irreversible. All three strategies are built on the premise of a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide.

Speaker 0 contends that concerns over rising power bills due to AI data centers are about to worsen as BlackRock and Blackstone buy up local power utilities. The piece, attributed to The New American, claims globalist equity firms are acquiring local energy companies nationwide to support AI infrastructure, provoking pushback from ratepayers and regulators. The Associated Press is cited as reporting that private equity giants are purchasing utilities to power AI-driven data centers, raising ratepayer and regulator concerns, with Oregon Citizens Utility Board noting increased public discussion at Public Utility Commissions. Speaker 0 notes a widespread anxiety about electricity costs tied to aging and expanding power infrastructure, including lines, poles, transformers, and generators, as utilities harden for extreme weather. The narrative asserts that apart from general cost increases, the core issue is the AI race, and that large international asset firms are eager to back a technology with potential for surveillance, manipulation, and control, while also seeking strong returns on investment. It claims these firms have historically used monetary power to push corporate support for climate alarmism and transgender activism, and that BlackRock and Blackstone together controlled more than $13 trillion in assets (BlackRock about $12 trillion; Blackstone about $1.2 trillion). It states only the U.S. and China have GDPs larger than $13 trillion. Concrete buyouts and investments are listed: January 2024, Blackstone bought a 20% stake in Northern Indiana Public Service Company for $2.1 billion, with the utility planning to boost green energy production afterward. In January 2025, Blackstone outright bought Potomac Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Loudoun County, Virginia, for $1 billion, described as Blackstone’s most recent investment in power infrastructure for AI. In March 2025, Wisconsin’s Public Service Commission approved the buyout of Superior Water, Light, and Power by Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners, with BlackRock taking a 60% majority stake. A separate deal: Blackstone bought Hilltop Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Pennsylvania, for $1 billion, with executives Bilal Khan and Mark Zhu describing the acquisition as AI-focused. Blackstone is also seeking regulatory permission to buy Albuquerque-based Public Service Company of New Mexico and Texas New Mexico PowerCo, while BlackRock and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board’s attempted purchase of Minnesota Power faces regulatory turbulence; a Minnesota sale could determine how such firms expand in a sector linking households, data centers, and power sources. Speaker 0 adds that the rise of AI is providing these firms with an “excuse” to control infrastructure, and mentions Yuval Noah Harari and the WEF. It cites the WEF’s “you will own nothing” rhetoric and notes Harari’s hypothetical about future irrelevance, Neuralink, and a broader agenda including surveillance, ownership consolidation, and potential reductions in access to private property. It asserts Larry Fink of BlackRock is at the WEF and CFR, and that BlackRock’s broader investments include real estate, farmland, timberland, and single-family rental homes, as part of a “build to rent” scheme. The piece warns that one corporation controlling vast natural resources and power utilities amid rising prices would be disastrous, urging citizens to resist BlackRock’s influence. It contrasts China’s influence with BlackRock’s power, condemning ESG models and the World Economic Forum’s agenda toward a “great reset,” digital currency, digital ID, and reduced access to resources. Speaker 1 interjects with a separate 1999 statement about how genetic engineering will change us and implies a need to start conversations now, arguing that one direction relinquishes power to others while the other empowers individuals to fix themselves. Speaker 0 reiterates that the conversation centers on power, AI, and control, warning against allowing a single corporation to own essential resources. The closing note references the January 1999 statement on genetic engineering, while Speaker 1 emphasizes taking personal power to fix oneself, framing the discussion as a shift in responsibility.

The same individuals who claim to care for public health and the environment are actually harming both. Their push for electric vehicles and AI data centers requires extensive mining, threatening ecosystems in Latin America and Africa for resources like nickel and cobalt. This process also demands significant water, which they aim to privatize through carbon markets, effectively commodifying essential life resources. The concept of carbon credits originated from a banker linked to past financial scandals, illustrating a pattern of exploiting crises for profit. Instead of saving the planet, these actions are detrimental. We must reclaim our role as creators and supporters of one another, and work to eliminate those who are damaging our world.

Speaker 0: We tend to think about capital as only financial capital—cash and financial assets—but that is not the only value our economies depend on. Every aspect of the economy is fundamentally dependent on nature: the air we breathe, the water we drink, the soil, the oceans for the food we consume, and the minerals needed for technology and infrastructure. Without these forms of natural capital, economies wouldn’t exist; they are the fundamental building blocks. Yet the ways we have grown our economies and our models of economic development have been incredibly successful for global prosperity. But the unintended consequences of current growth models are not sustainable on a finite planet. The resources we draw from Earth and the pollution and waste we emit—greenhouse gas emissions, sewage, plastics into the ocean—are beyond the Earth’s carrying capacity. This is leading to significant direct impacts on society and substantial financial costs for the economy. Macro-level calculations show these costs, and they’re also showing up in practical ways as we breach environmental boundaries and undermine nature. These breaches translate into financial risks for institutions: lack of water disrupts operations and supply chains where water is an essential input for manufacturing or power production; soil degradation reduces agricultural yields; the decline of pollinator species affects agriculture. All of this leads to direct financial risks for organizations, for businesses, and ultimately for investors. The root cause is that decision-making within businesses and financial institutions currently relies on financial data and metrics that do not factor in nature. Nature is treated within the economy as though it is unlimited and predominantly free, and the risks and harms are not costed in financial terms. While macro-level costs can be calculated, they are not integrated into day-to-day decision making. The consequence is that our economies are placed at fundamental risk. We cannot do business on a dead planet. To protect natural systems, one solution is to bring nature onto the balance sheet—bring nature into the ways decisions are made within business, allocate a value to it, and integrate it into accounting and financial mechanisms.

Larry Fink is now running, I believe, the World Economic Forum. He's acting chairman. Terrifying. He says that everything will be tokenized and that everything will soon be on the same universal digital ledger or database and that everything on that database will have a unique identifier number. So, for you as an individual, your identifier number will presumably be your digital ID or directly linked to that, but everything will have a digital ID. The tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize not just assets we traditionally think of, like real estate, for example, or gold or, you know, physical assets as well as digital assets like Bitcoin. There's a major effort connected with people like Fink and also people like Mark Carney, who's now Prime Minister of Canada, to tokenize the natural world and transform it into financial assets. There was an attempt to do this to an extent under the Biden administration, I believe through the Department of Interior with natural asset corporations, but that has not gone away. There are groups—for example, one of the creators of the ETF model originally, which BlackRock now owns, iShares, his name is Peter Kanez, I think is how you pronounce it—who's trying to turn the Amazon Rainforest into a digital commodity, sort of similar to Bitcoin in terms of the scarcity idea that each hectare of the Amazon Rainforest would represent a token and financialize it that way. And then each hectare would then have its unique identifier, right, on the blockchain and would be serviced by surveillance drones and all sorts of stuff. So even our most natural, the places we conceptualize as the most natural places on earth, these people want to come in and place surveillance technology and tokenize it and put it on a blockchain and use it to, know, I would argue in the case particularly of natural asset corporations and the group behind it, the intrinsic exchange group, they just want to open up a huge new asset class. They call it Nature's Opportunity so that they can continue engaging in the same type of bad behavior that, for example, brought us the two thousand eight financial crisis, by, you know, can kentoopling, basically, the amount of assets currently in play. It's You know, insane. I had a guy who worked, very, very, very high up at Citibank. And he told me around 02/2008, he said, Glenn, you know, don't worry about the financial system. And I'm like, uh-huh. And, he said, you know, we're never gonna go broke. I mean, do you know how much just the national parks are worth? And I looked at him and said, are you seriously telling me that we should commoditize the national parks? And he said, it's gonna happen. And I wonder now if this is what he was talking about. If it was just a digital not actually selling them, it's just a digital commoditization of our parks. Yeah. So apply this now to the the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era, you'll own nothing and be happy. Well Yes. There's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around, you know, use it to speculate on. Mean, it's It's very insane.

A robot named Aladdin, created by Larry Fink of BlackRock, controls $21 trillion of the global economy. It directs major banks, investment funds, and traders, dominating ETFs, bonds, and stocks. Aladdin's influence extends to government decisions and real estate markets. With plans to expand further, concerns arise about its growing power and potential impact on wealth distribution. Larry Fink's vision of a super smart robot has evolved into a force reshaping financial landscapes worldwide.

Publicly traded companies like Pepsi, Nike, and Starbucks are in billions of dollars of debt. To maximize profit, CEOs take on debt to open new markets, then make more stock available to the public. Investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street buy the stock, gaining enough ownership to influence corporate boards. Board members are aware that firms like BlackRock can replace them if they don't comply. BlackRock demands companies practice ESG, pushing climate change and social agendas. Failure to comply can result in the removal of board members and the CEO. Private companies like X and Bass Pro Shop are protected from this influence. Elon Musk made X a private company, preventing firms like BlackRock from leveraging it. Bass Pro Shop, controlled by its founder, doesn't promote social agendas. The speaker advocates supporting private companies and promotes his private homeschool community and books on topics like the Bill of Rights, free speech, and ESG.

In the future, everything of value in the world will be represented by tokens on a blockchain, not physical items. This shift will eliminate the need for paper transactions and traditional financial institutions like DTCC. All transactions will occur in digital assets, leading to significant wealth creation opportunities.