reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The U.S. is developing an early warning system to detect potential geoengineering efforts, particularly those that could manipulate weather, such as solar geoengineering. This initiative, taking place in a secure location in the Rockies, aims to alert scientists about attempts by foreign nations or wealthy individuals to alter sunlight. Concerns are rising about the unintended consequences of such actions, which could disrupt weather patterns and harm agriculture and economies. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) will monitor aerosol concentrations to identify anomalies. Meanwhile, Florida is moving to legislate against climate engineering practices, reflecting growing awareness and pushback against these technologies.

The Tennessee State Senate has passed a bill that aims to ban the intentional release of chemicals into the atmosphere for geoengineering purposes, specifically targeting chemtrails. The bill, sponsored by Representative Monte Fritz and Senator Steve Sutherland, seeks to safeguard the environment and public health from unregulated geoengineering practices. If the bill is passed by the House, Tennessee will become one of the first states to establish a legal framework explicitly prohibiting the spraying of chemicals for geoengineering purposes. The legislation is set to be enforced from July 1, 2024. This development could set a precedent for other states to address concerns around environmental and atmospheric manipulation.

Following a viral post by GOP Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather to influence the 2024 election, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate. If signed into law, the bill bans releasing chemicals or using devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, punishable as a third-degree felony. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicions. Supporters of the ban cite insufficient scientific research and worry about the weaponization of weather modification. Cloud seeding, using silver iodide to induce rain, is a real practice, but some want to pause such activities. While the governor supports the ban, he opposes a House version that codifies geoengineering and weather modification. Opponents of the bill fear legislating based on "tinfoil theories" and argue for a more measured approach with proper methodology before imposing penalties.

A Politico expose revealed a secretive, multimillion-dollar ocean experiment, backed by crypto tycoons and elite philanthropists, to dim the sun and cool the planet. Researchers associated with the University of Washington's marine cloud brightening program planned a test larger than Puerto Rico but failed to notify California officials about an earlier, smaller trial. Emails show researchers considered massive tests off North America, Chile, or Africa, risking unpredictable weather shifts. Critics warn of potential consequences like wrecked farms, wildlife harm, and deadly termination shock, with some studies suggesting increased malaria or droughts. Politicians like Marjorie Taylor Greene are speaking out, and countries across Africa, Latin America, The Pacific, and Europe are signaling their support for the solar geoengineering nonuse agreement initiative. The Center for International Environmental Law highlights growing commitment to nonuse of solar geoengineering, citing the geopolitical, environmental, and social risks. The speaker suggests geoengineering has been happening for years and calls for a federal ban, considering foreign weather modification an act of war.

The speaker announces the filing of the Clear Skies Act, legislation to ban all weather modification and geoengineering. The goal is to protect the skies, water, atmospheres, and families. The speaker requests support for the Clear Skies Act.

Legislation is being voted on in New Hampshire to ban climate engineering operations. The draft of this legislation is well-drafted and uses scientific terms and descriptions. It is important to circulate this draft to other states to raise awareness about the issue. The activities in our skies, which involve the release of various elements like aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, polymer fibers, surfactants, and graphene, have significant implications. Some of these elements, such as polymer fibers and graphene, are used militarily as carriers of pathogens. Therefore, there are multiple levels of concern regarding what is happening in our skies.

Augustus Dorico, CEO of Rainmaker, clarifies that his cloud seeding company aims to end water scarcity using radar and drones to enhance precipitation. He does not oppose the bill's spirit but its current form. He distinguishes cloud seeding from solar radiation management (SRM), noting SRM is new, untested, and involves injecting reflective aerosols into the upper atmosphere with potentially global, long-term climate effects. Cloud seeding, conversely, is a local, short-term process of freezing or condensing water in existing clouds, a technology around for 80 years. Dorico addresses safety, stating cloud seeding uses small, safe amounts of silver iodide. He supports permitting and licensing for cloud seeding, as done in states like Texas and Utah, to ensure responsible and safe practices. He warns that banning weather modification in Florida could set a precedent, depriving farmers in arid regions of needed water and ceding weather control to countries like China, which has a $300 million budget for weather modification.

Following a viral post by GOP Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather to influence the 2024 election, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate. If signed into law, the bill bans releasing chemicals or using devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, punishable as a third-degree felony. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicious activity. Senator Garcia stated the bill aims to prevent weather modification from being weaponized, while proponents cite insufficient scientific understanding and prefer a cautious approach. Cloud seeding, using silver iodide to induce rain, is a real practice, but some worry about its potential misuse. Meanwhile, a more moderate version in the Florida House codifies geoengineering and weather modification, which the governor opposes. Opponents of the ban, like State Senator Tina Polsky, express concern that the legislation is based on "tinfoil theories" and that lawmakers are moving too fast without proper methodology.

Weather modification, or cloud seeding, has been ongoing since the 1940s. Government documents and reports from NASA, the National Science Foundation, and the CIA confirm this, detailing substantial funding and research into techniques like seeding clouds with silver iodide or dry ice. Recent state legislation banning cloud seeding and stratospheric aerosol injections further validates its continued practice. While presented as beneficial, this involves spraying harmful chemicals, like sulfur dioxide, into the atmosphere. This raises concerns, especially considering the potential health effects and environmental damage caused by sulfur dioxide, a colorless toxic gas that contributes to acid rain. The practice is linked to efforts to combat global warming, raising questions about motivations and long-term consequences.

A bill is moving through the Panchatula legislature to end so-called chemtrails, which some lawmakers believe are chemicals dumped from aircraft to manipulate the weather. Representative Kimberly Landry Coates claims the bill addresses the growing problem of white lines in the sky, which she alleges are "chemtrails" made of nanochemicals that change the weather, including nanoparticles of aluminum and barium. Coates claims the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration sends chemicals into clouds to reflect sunlight and cool the Earth, but NOAA denies conducting weather modification experiments. Coates believes multiple groups and contractors are involved, with contracts from at least nine federal agencies. She says she sees these lines in the sky at least once a week. The bill passed the house with a mixed vote and will now go to the state senate.

Following a viral post by GOP Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather to influence the 2024 election, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate. If signed into law, the bill bans releasing chemicals or using devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, punishable as a third-degree felony. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicions. Supporters of the ban cite insufficient scientific understanding and worry about the weaponization of weather modification. While cloud seeding is a real practice used to induce rain, some Florida lawmakers are concerned about geoengineering and weather modification. Opponents of the bill, like State Senator Tina Polsky, believe lawmakers are moving too fast and legislating based on "tinfoil theories" without proper methodology. The governor supports the ban but has concerns about a more moderate version in the Florida House.

Legislation is being proposed in the New Hampshire House of Representatives to make it illegal to intentionally release polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation. This news story highlights the efforts of lawmakers in New Hampshire to prohibit attempts to change the weather through scientific means. The speaker urges viewers to follow them for real news that is not covered by mainstream media.

A New Hampshire news story reports that legislation has been proposed in the state's House of Representatives to prohibit the intentional release of polluting emissions. This includes cloud seeding, weather modification, and excessive electromagnetic radio frequency and microwave radiation. The legislation would impose penalties for violations. According to the speaker, this is real news that people are not seeing on mainstream media.

Geoengineering is occurring through philanthropic funding, academic research, and state contracts. Cities and counties, such as Santa Barbara, may have cloud seeding contracts. More concerning are clandestine geoengineering operations at the federal level, often using undisclosed subcontractors. Even with state bans on aerosol spraying for weather modification—currently being considered in over 25 states—federal programs can still operate above those states. The challenge is identifying the extent of these federal projects and compelling subcontractors to disclose their activities.

The speaker is against heavy metals being sprayed over Florida, regardless of the method, claiming they cause major health issues through inhalation, absorption, and ingestion. They state that companies performing aerosol sprays should not be allowed to operate in Florida. The speaker wants to protect Florida's waterways, referencing a past bill to protect water runoff from farmland. They are not talking about visible lines in the sky, but the effects of acid rain. Quoting Lyndon Johnson, "he who controls the weather controls the world," the speaker asks for support for their bill, referencing Johnson's controversial past.

Augustus Dorico, CEO of Rainmaker, a cloud seeding company, testifies to support the spirit of a bill, but opposes its current form, which he believes would impede efforts to end water scarcity. He differentiates cloud seeding from solar radiation management (SRM), noting SRM is a new technology injecting reflective aerosols into the upper atmosphere with potentially widespread, long-lasting climate effects, while cloud seeding affects the lower atmosphere, using existing clouds to enhance precipitation locally and temporarily. Dorico asserts cloud seeding, unlike SRM, is safe, using small amounts of silver iodide, less toxic than aspirin. He advocates for permitting and licensing of cloud seeding, similar to Texas, Utah, Idaho, California and New Mexico, to ensure responsible and safe practices. Dorico warns that banning weather modification in Florida could set a precedent, depriving farmers in arid regions of needed water and ceding weather control to countries like China, which has a $300 million budget for weather modification.

Augustus Dorico, CEO of Rainmaker, a cloud seeding company, testifies to support the spirit of a bill, but opposes its current form, which he believes would impede efforts to end water scarcity and bring advanced technology to Florida and the U.S. He differentiates cloud seeding from solar radiation management (SRM), emphasizing that cloud seeding affects the lower atmosphere, using existing clouds to induce precipitation, and has been around for 80 years. Dorico states cloud seeding's effects are measurable by radar, local, and short-term, with minimal, well-characterized unintended consequences. He addresses safety, noting silver iodide is used in small, harmless quantities. He advocates for permitting and licensing of cloud seeding, similar to Texas, Utah, Idaho, California and New Mexico, to ensure responsible and safe practices. Dorico argues banning weather modification in Florida could set a precedent, depriving farmers in arid regions of needed water and impacting U.S. geopolitical standing, given China's significant investment in weather modification. He closes by advocating for cloud seeding permitting and licensing, while distinguishing it from SRM.

32 states are attempting to ban geoengineering in America. In Oklahoma, Senate Bill 430 was slashed by the energy subcommittee. A reporter from Veterans on Patrol News asked Governor Stitt if he would declare an emergency session to push the legislation through, but Stitt said no. His staff then questioned the reporter's credentials, asking if he was an activist or a journalist. The speaker encourages viewers to check on their state's progress and call their governors to demand a ban on geoengineering. The states listed are: Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming. The speaker urges Oklahoma residents to call Governor Stitt.

Marjorie Taylor Greene's claims about government weather control are supported by science. Despite media dismissing it as conspiracy, weather modification research is documented, including cloud seeding and geoengineering. The US government has a 5-year geoengineering study plan, and the USDA reports on cloud seeding. Robert Kennedy Jr. claims the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates have "hijacked" geoengineering for social control. Operation Popeye during the Vietnam War weaponized cloud seeding. Project Cirrus attempted to modify a hurricane, redirecting it to Georgia. Alexa confirms government cloud seeding, referencing Project Cirrus and its potential to cause storms and floods. Cloud seeding is sponsored by governments, industries, and insurance companies. Silver iodide, used in cloud seeding, poses health risks. NOAA recently scrubbed weather modification records from its website. NASA has a publication discussing weather as a weapon of war. The presenter suggests the public should consider weather modification a war against them. The speaker promotes a 3-month emergency food kit from My Patriot Supply.

Skies are being modified through weather manipulation, with the White House considering dimming the sun to combat climate change. YouTube is removing videos on this topic, sparking questions about its validity. Several states have banned weather modification, raising further concerns. Congress even proposed a bill to block out the sun for environmental reasons. The speaker suggests looking into Wilhelm Reich's cloud buster as a solution.

Weather modification is real, and the US government has been involved since the 1940s. The speaker suggests a conspiracy theory: the government might be manufacturing climate events to prove climate change is real. NOAA monitors weather modification projects and publishes reports. Mike Adams reported that these reports are being scrubbed. According to NOAA, weather modification is any activity intended to artificially change the atmosphere's composition, behavior, or dynamics, citing federal regulations. Examples include using aircraft propeller downwash or lasers. The speaker promotes TomRens.com, highlighting the 404 series books, ranger buckets, and organic emergency storable food. Discounts are available, especially with the checkout code "Rens."

RFK Jr. pledged on the campaign trail to "stop this crime." MTG's hearing quoted: "For years, anybody who questioned weather modification was labeled crazy or a conspiracy theorist. Now, we've learned that they've been doing it for decades." GAO notes: "injecting a cloud with silver iodide increases precipitation anywhere from zero to 20%," and asks: "Can you control the exact amount of precipitation that a cloud will produce... 100% certainty? Can you say that it will not cause or enhance flooding with 100% certainty?" "There is absolutely no way to measure the effectiveness of cloud seeding." "very little rules and regulations over this." Health concerns include: "sulfur dioxide... could reduce crop yields" and "acid rain." The butterfly effect was invoked: "small changes in initial conditions... second, third, fourth order consequences... unpredictable." Burchett urged: "Plain and simple, geoengineering and chemtrails need to be outlawed." Conclusion: "this practice needs to be banned immediately." "If what RFK Junior said is true, then it needs to be a federal ban with agencies like DARPA... criminal prosecution if they continue to do this."

New Hampshire lawmakers have proposed legislation that would make it illegal to intentionally release polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation. This news story highlights the growing concern about changing the weather through scientific means. The speaker urges viewers to follow them for more real news that is not covered by mainstream media.

I'm here to discuss House File 191, a bill to prohibit geoengineering, while also urging you to consider Senate File 142 as a superior alternative. Inspired by Tennessee's recent law and similar considerations in other states, as well as discussions in the EU and White House policy documents, this legislation addresses the potential for polluting atmospheric activities like cloud seeding and weather engineering. Past congressional hearings and Council on Foreign Relations discussions highlight the urgent need for regulation. Iowa is behind on this issue, and failure to act puts our health, well-being, and economic prosperity at risk. This bill is a necessary fact-finding exercise because the absence of information justifies a prohibition to gather data. I urge swift action in delivering Senate File 142 to the governor. It is the very least the people of Iowa can expect.

Augustus Dorico, CEO of Rainmaker, supports the spirit of the bill but believes its current form would impede ending water scarcity and bringing advanced technology to Florida and the US. He differentiates cloud seeding from solar radiation management (SRM), emphasizing that cloud seeding affects the lower atmosphere, uses existing clouds to induce precipitation, and has been around for 80 years. Its effects are measurable on radar, local, and short-term. Dorico addresses safety concerns, noting that cloud seeding uses small, safe amounts of silver iodide. He points to precedents for cloud seeding permitting and licensing in states like Texas, Utah, and California. While supporting permitting to ensure responsible and safe practices, he argues against regulations that would prevent Florida's access to beneficial technology. Banning weather modification in Florida could set a precedent affecting farmers in arid regions and US geopolitical standing, given China's significant investment in weather modification. He advocates for cloud seeding permitting and licensing, while distinguishing it from SRM.