TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. This is devastating. This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published.

Speaker describes a Henry Ford Medical Center study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children (2000–2016). Dr. Marcus Servis agreed to conduct it, recruiting a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. Using medical records, the study followed about sixteen thousand vaccinated and two thousand unvaccinated children and aimed to show the CDC vaccine schedule is safe to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Findings showed higher rates in the vaccinated group for several conditions: four point two nine times asthma, three point zero three times atopic disease, five point nine six times autoimmune disease, and five point five three times neurodevelopmental disorders. ADHD: two hundred sixty cases in the vaccinated group, none in the unvaccinated. After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated had a chronic health issue versus fifty seven percent of the vaccinated. The study’s publication was blocked because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe.

Had it been the unvaccinated, it had two point five times the rate of chronic disease. Two hundred fifty percent increase rate is what that means. Six times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. If they'd have shown that that was the unvaccinated group, Jimmy, you know they would have rushed this thing onto the market. They would have rushed it to publication. We've received a cease and desist letter from Henry Ford Health accusing us of defamation, saying the data is not good science. Marcus Zurbos, world-renowned virologist and head of the study, also led the Moderna vaccine trial for Henry Ford. He says it's a good study and would publish it as it is, but he's worried about losing his job. Why has that study never been done? Why has our government not said, look, compare vaccinated and unvaccinated; the vaccinated are healthier, with no autoimmune or neurological disorders.

Leading up to 02/2013, the Institute of Medicine was commissioned by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to review the safety of the CDC's childhood schedule as a whole. The IOM concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted" and "there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe." It noted it is "possible to make the comparison" through large databases, but to date the government has not conducted this comparison. Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No. In 02/2017, ICAN pressed for this exact study; Dr. Marcus Servis at Henry Ford Medical Center agreed to conduct, recruiting a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. The study (2000–2016) found vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma (4.29x), atopic disease (3.03x), autoimmune disease (5.96x), and neurodevelopmental disorders (5.53x; including developmental delay 3.28x, speech disorder 4.47x). ADHD occurred in 260 vaccinated vs none unvaccinated. Ten-year: 17% unvaccinated vs 57% vaccinated with at least one chronic issue. The study was not submitted for publication because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe: "The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe." It is claimed this reflects selection bias and corruption of science; conclusion: "We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."

The largest in US history comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated. At the Henry Ford Hospital system in Detroit, Michigan, they followed about 18,018 kids from birth to age 10 for ten years. They found that among the vaccinated, there was 300% to 600% more asthma, autoimmune disease, neurodevelopmental disorders, skin disorders, and speech delays, indicating higher chronic disease. After ten years, 57% of the vaccinated had chronic illness, compared with 17% of the unvaccinated. The study is described as historic and is not published; the authors reportedly refuse to publish it to avoid losing their jobs. It is claimed as the strongest study of its kind, and that it will be in the nightmares of the vaccine cartel.

Speaker 0 expresses that publishing the material would effectively end his career. Speaker 1 questions what in the data could make the outcomes catastrophic for his career. Speaker 2 notes the study as a “bombshell.” The study included 18,468 subjects, of whom 1,957 were fully unvaccinated. When comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, there was an increased risk of several chronic health conditions in the vaccinated group. Specifically, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis, with an adjusted figure of 4.29 times (range 3.26 to 5.65 across analyses). Speaker 4 adds that the study also found a threefold increase in atopic diseases, which are a subset of allergic diseases. The researchers reported almost a sixfold risk for autoimmune disease, listing autoimmune conditions such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), multiple sclerosis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. They note there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and the data showed a sixfold increase in autoimmunity among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3 highlights neurodevelopmental disorders, noting a five-and-a-half times increased risk. The discussion emphasizes that the immune system is intimately connected with brain development and functioning, suggesting that when the immune system is triggered by illness or vaccination, neuropsychiatric symptoms may arise due to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2 reports two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities and four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated, along with a threefold rate of developmental delay. The data also show, consistent with allergy and autoimmunity findings, six times more acute and chronic ear infections in the vaccinated group. Speaker 3 notes that in several health conditions, analysis could not be performed because there were none in the unvaccinated group, and the methods required nonzero counts in both groups. For example, there were two hundred sixty-two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group, while the unvaccinated group had zero cases of ADHD. The same pattern is described for other conditions: zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, ticks, and other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated group.

The transcript centers on a new vaxxed versus unvaxxed study promoted by Del Bigtree in his film An Inconvenience Study, which follows an exchange with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health in Detroit. Zervos agreed in 2016 to undertake a public health comparison of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children and published results regardless of the outcome. The film also cites prior evidence challenging vaccine safety, including Dr. Peter Abi (Abi) who, after promoting the DTP vaccine in Guinea Bissau, found that the vaccine protected against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis but was associated with more than a twofold increase in overall mortality; he notes that no routine vaccine was tested for overall mortality in randomized trials before introduction, and asserts that vaccines’ effects on overall mortality are not well understood. The discussion quotes a summary from Guinea Bissau stating that only half the children were vaccinated, enabling a perfect comparative study. The vaccination program, introduced in the late seventies after smallpox eradication successes, reportedly showed that the DTP vaccine was associated with two point three times higher mortality, with the twofold higher mortality linked to whooping cough protection not translating to overall mortality benefits. The film also highlights Dr. Paul Thomas, whose practice data on 3,324 children suggested unvaccinated kids had better health outcomes and fewer doctor visits; it lists numerous conditions with higher incidence in vaccinated children (fever, ear pain and infections, conjunctivitis, eye disorders, asthma, hay fever, sinus issues, breathing problems, anemia, eczema, hives, dermatitis, behavioral issues, gastroenteritis, weight/eating disorders, and ADHD with zero cases in the unvaccinated group). The Oregon Medical Board suspended Thomas’s license soon after publication, and the study was later retracted. The segment presents Thomas’s claims as the basis for ongoing concerns about vaccine safety, and the film frames these suspensions as part of a broader pattern of data being dismissed when results are unfavorable to vaccines. The film recounts how Bigtree recruited Dr. Zervos to conduct a large-scale study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children, using Henry Ford Health’s large database. Zervos completed the study in 2020 but chose not to publish, later telling Bigtree in an undercover recording that publishing results showing harm could effectively end his career. The revealed data included nearly two thousand unvaccinated children; among them, zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders. The study’s conclusion allegedly states that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination. The film presents a table with 18,468 subjects, including 1,957 fully unvaccinated individuals. When comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis (4.29x adjusted), about three times the risk for atopic diseases, nearly six times the risk for autoimmune disease, and a five-and-a-half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. It notes almost six times higher risk for autoimmune diseases such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, MS, and Guillain–Barré syndrome, and reports sixfold increases in autoimmunity and five and a half times neurodevelopmental issues, along with higher rates of acute and chronic ear infections. Some conditions could not be analyzed because none appeared in the unvaccinated group (zero cases), and the analysis could not be performed with zeros in a group. A highlighted conclusion states that exposure to vaccination is independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition compared to unvaccinated children. A graph reportedly mirrors national data showing 54% of American children with at least one chronic condition; vaccinated children have a 57% chance of developing a chronic disease in the first ten years of life, while unvaccinated children have a 17% chance. Time-to-event analysis reports that, at ten years, the likelihood of being free from a chronic illness is 43% in the vaccinated group versus 83% in the unvaccinated group. The broadcast directs viewers to watch the film at aninconvenientstudy.com or via Vigilant Fox, and notes a downloadable version. It references a press conference in which Donald Trump and RFK Jr. discussed vaccines, Tylenol during pregnancy linked to autism, and argues for more vaccine scrutiny by the administration. The program ends by promoting health resources and offers for Energetic Health Institute programs and related services with discount codes.

The CDC has not conducted studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children over time. In my practice, we analyzed data from all patients over 10.5 years, comparing those who followed the CDC vaccine schedule with those who did not. We included over 500 unvaccinated children and around 3,700 who received some vaccines. The findings were surprising; unvaccinated children experienced significantly fewer health issues, including infections and chronic conditions. The data showed a clear trend: the more vaccines a child received, the worse their health outcomes, including conditions like ADHD and allergies. Shortly after publishing this data, my medical license was suspended, with claims that I posed a threat to public health.

"Chronic disease has gone from twelve point eight percent in our children in the nineteen eighties to over fifty four percent of our kids now." "72 times we are altering the immune system of our children with our vaccine program." "There'd be one easy study to rule it out, compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children." "But we don't know because they've never done the study." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities."

A birth cohort study on the impact of childhood vaccination on short- and long-term chronic health outcomes reports results from a large sample (18,468 subjects). The discussion surrounding the study emphasizes that, if results showed vaccines were associated with chronic diseases, the findings would be highly compelling and valuable. The reported outcomes from the vaccinated group include: - Asthma diagnosis: vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. - Acute and chronic ear infections: six hundred percent more. - Speech disorders: four point four seven times the amount in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. - Learning issues and related developmental concerns: a six hundred and sixteen percent increase in learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, and language delays. In contrast, the unvaccinated group is described as having zero occurrences in several categories, including dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, and other psychological disabilities. The discussion highlights the magnitude of the differences as a major point of emphasis, with statements such as “It’s a big difference” and “This is devastating.” There is strong advocacy for the study’s publication, including claims that “This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis.” The speakers assert, “We are systematically making kids sick and not just a little bit sick, very sick.” They describe the study as potentially “the most important study that has ever been done,” insisting that it needs to be published, and noting that if a particular researcher “puts his name on this, his career is over.” Emotional reactions are evident, with admissions like “I mean, obviously, like, really emotional.” There is a specific mention that “Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this.”

The speaker hired an expert to analyze data from 2,700 variably vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in their practice, age-matched for comparison. The speaker claims the data, available at doctorsandscience.com, reveals significant differences in health outcomes. According to the speaker's slides, unvaccinated children had lower rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, other infections, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD/ADHD. The speaker states there were no cases of ADD/ADHD in unvaccinated patients over 10 years. The speaker suggests vaccines shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and negative health outcomes is not coincidental, citing multiple studies and mechanisms of action, including aluminum and immune activation from too many vaccines too soon. The speaker states that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study.

The documentary follows a growing concern: the rise of chronic illness and neurodevelopmental disorders in American children, with speakers outlining striking statistics, personal stories, and contested science around vaccines. Key facts and patterns: - A shift from decades ago to today: more than forty percent of American children now have at least one chronic health condition; estimates cited include that over fifty-four percent of kids have a chronic disease, up from twelve point eight percent in the 1980s. One speaker emphasizes that in forty years there has been “the greatest decline in human health ever recorded.” - Autism rates have surged: just a few decades ago, one in ten thousand children had autism; today, one in thirty-one. Other listed conditions include ADD/ADHD, tics/Tourette’s, narcolepsy, sleep disorders, IBS, autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus, Crohn’s), eczema, asthma, seizures, and various neurological issues. - The central question raised: what is causing this epidemic of chronic illness in kids? The film argues that rapid increases in incidence cannot be explained by genetic change alone, which would take generations. Story and study arc: - The narrative centers on a scientist who was willing to conduct a study into vaccine safety and vaccine injury, but who faced career-risking consequences when attempting to publish or disseminate results. - The film’s narrator and investigators say they compiled hidden-camera testimonies, interviews, and raw stories from parents whose children experienced serious adverse events after vaccines (eczema, seizures, chronic GI issues, sleep apnea, language loss, autonomic and neurological symptoms, and death in some cases). Stories include a child who lost language after vaccination, triplets who regressed into severe autism after their pneumococcal shot, and families describing chronic, ongoing medical crises following vaccines. - The film frames a broader debate: vaccines are safe and effective, with extensive global use and long-standing public health endorsement. Yet it argues that the vaccine safety narrative lacks certain types of trials, particularly double-blind placebo-controlled trials for childhood vaccines. It claims that, in some cases, no such trials exist prior to licensure, and that post-licensure safety surveillance is limited or incomplete. Vaccine safety testing and regulatory claims: - The film argues that none of the 72 vaccine doses on the childhood schedule has ever been subjected to a pre-licensure double-blind placebo-controlled trial, which is presented as the gold standard of safety testing. It asserts that safety assessments and post-licensure surveillance often rely on observational data rather than randomized trials. - A critical example is the hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB): the FDA-approved trial cited shows safety monitoring for only five days after each dose, with no placebo control. The film argues this is insufficient to detect autoimmune or neurodevelopmental issues that could emerge years later. - Dr. Stanley Plotkin, a leading vaccine expert, is interviewed regarding whether five days of safety monitoring captures potential autoimmune or neurological adverse events; the dialogue suggests concern about the adequacy of such safety windows and controls. - The documentary presents the notion that the absence of a placebo-controlled vaccine safety trial is used to argue safety, while retrospective studies and unblinded cohort analyses hints at potential signals that would merit more rigorous testing. Henry Ford Health System and the “vaccinated vs unvaccinated” study: - Dell and others pursue a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study using Henry Ford Health System data, with the aim of comparing health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. They argue that this kind of retrospective cohort study can reveal safety signals when randomized trials are unavailable. - The study reportedly found that vaccination exposure was associated with higher risks of several chronic conditions, including asthma, atopic diseases, autoimmune diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, Guillain-Barré syndrome), and neurodevelopmental disorders. They summarize that by ten years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health condition versus 17% of unvaccinated children; overall, two to four times higher risks across several categories were reported, with notable differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes. - The study reportedly found zero chronic conditions in the unvaccinated group for several categories, though the vaccinated group showed higher incidence in many categories. Autism did not reach statistical significance in this study due to small numbers. The presenters emphasize that retrospective studies have limitations (confounding, follow-up length, healthcare-seeking behavior), but argue that the signal deserves publication and replication. - The Henry Ford study reportedly faced professional and institutional barriers: a threat of defamation, failed attempts to publish, and internal resistance. The documentary showcases a dinner meeting where Dr. Marcus Zervos expresses willingness to publish but ultimately faces career risk, leading to discussions about “Galileo moments” and whether data should be released despite pushback. Industry and public health responses: - The film juxtaposes the public health consensus—vaccines save lives, the schedule is well tested, and billions of people have been studied—with dissenting voices from physicians, scientists, and parents who argue that independent, large-scale vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated analyses are necessary to truly assess safety outcomes. - It includes testimonials from doctors who faced professional pushback after expressing concerns about broader vaccine safety questions or demonstrating adverse effects in patient populations. - The documentary frames a call to replicate the retrospective study in other large health systems (e.g., Kaiser Permanente, Harvard Pilgrim, CDC’s VSD) to determine whether the Henry Ford findings hold across populations, and whether impaired health outcomes correlate with the breadth of vaccination exposure. Conclusion and call to action: - The film asserts that if the data are valid, this would constitute a sea-change in our understanding of off-target and nonspecific effects of vaccination and would necessitate reconsidering how the vaccination program is designed and implemented. - Viewers are urged to consider the evidence, demand replication, and reflect on the moral and ethical implications of vaccine safety research, balancing public health benefits with potential risks, and exploring alternate strategies to protect child health.

"Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study." "18,468 subjects." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent" "more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities." "None. It's a big difference." "This is devastating." "This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis." "We are systematically making kids sick, and not just a little bit sick, very sick." "This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published." "He knows. If he puts his name on this, his career is over." "Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this." "This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda."

Leading up to 02/2013, the IOM was commissioned by HHS to review the safety of the CDC's childhood schedule. The IOM concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects..." have not been conducted and "there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe," adding that "it is possible to make the comparison" using databases like the Vaccine Safety Data Link. "Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No." In 02/2017, ICANT pressed for a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study; Dr. Zervos at Henry Ford agreed to conduct it. The Henry Ford study followed births 2000–2016, finding vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma (4.29x), atopic disease (3.03x), autoimmune disease (5.96x), neurodevelopmental disorders (5.53x), including developmental delay (3.28x) and speech disorder (4.47x). ADHD: 260 cases vaccinated, none unvaccinated. After ten years, 17% unvaccinated vs 57% vaccinated had a chronic issue. The study was not published because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe. We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms.

- "Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated." - "When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions." - "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." - "They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease." - "Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders." - "Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities." - "We found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall two point five fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination."

In a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children, it was found that those who received vaccines in their first year of life were 2.48 times more likely to be diagnosed with gastrointestinal disorders. The study also showed that receiving just one vaccine or more during the first year of life led to twice as many developmental delays, 4.5 times more asthma cases, and twice as many ear infections. The study grouped partially and fully vaccinated children together and compared them to the unvaccinated group.

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis. This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published. Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this.

In a study conducted by Anthony Mawson in 2017, over 600 homeschool children were examined to compare the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6 to 12-year-olds. The study found that vaccinated children were more likely to be diagnosed with various conditions such as allergic rhinitis, other allergies, eczema, learning disabilities, ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, any neurodevelopmental disorder, and any chronic illness. The percentages of these diagnoses were significantly higher in vaccinated children compared to the unvaccinated. These findings are concerning and highlight the potential health risks associated with vaccinations.

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. None. It's a big difference. This is devastating. This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda. If he puts his name on this, his career is over.

The transcript follows a documentary-style examination of rising chronic illness in American children and a contested view of vaccine safety and testing. It weaves together personal testimonies, investigative reporting, and expert interviews to present a narrative that vaccines may be linked to widespread health problems and that the safety science behind vaccination is insufficient or flawed in certain respects. Key claims about child health trends - A diverse set of pediatric health issues is described as increasingly common: ADHD, allergies, eczema, psoriasis, autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus, Crohn’s disease), IBS, sleep disorders, seizures, and neurological conditions. Several speakers list multiple conditions affecting children, suggesting a broad chronic disease trend. - A striking statistic cited: “More than forty percent of American children now have at least one chronic health condition” (Speaker 5). Relatedly, autism rates are described as rising from “one in ten thousand” decades ago to “one in thirty one” today (Speaker 5). - An overarching contention is that these rapid increases are unlikely to be explained by genetics alone, given the relatively fast pace of change in incidence. The central study and the “hidden” narrative - The documentary frames a study led by a scientist who allegedly conducted research into chronic disease and vaccination but chose not to publish due to fear of repercussions. Hidden-camera investigations and interviews are used to explore why such data might remain unpublished and how the medical establishment responds to dissenting findings. - The film positions Dr. Zervos (Marcus Zervos), an infectious disease expert at Henry Ford Health System, as a pivotal figure who agreed to a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study but reportedly did not publish the results, leading the filmmakers to pursue further inquiry with him and others. Vaccines, safety testing, and the placebo question - A core claim is that vaccines have not undergone the gold standard of safety testing: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials for the entire childhood schedule. The film argues that no childhood vaccine has completed such a trial prior to licensure. - The hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB) is used as an example: its pre-licensure safety data reportedly cover only five days after each dose, with no long-term control group, and section 6.1 of the insert notes five days of safety monitoring, raising questions about detecting longer-term autoimmune or neurological injuries. - Opposing voices acknowledge ethical constraints around placebo trials in the presence of existing vaccines, but the documentary challenges this by pointing out that certain comparator trials (e.g., Prevnar 13 vs Prevnar 7) were not against saline placebo, and thus do not establish a safety baseline. - A recurring metaphor is the “whiskey study” scenario to illustrate how non-saline placebo comparisons can mislead safety conclusions. Retrospective and observational studies; the vaccine-safety signal - The film emphasizes retrospective and observational studies as alternatives to randomized trials, arguing they can reveal safety signals when prospective trials are unavailable. It highlights the Henry Ford Health System’s data as a major retrospective study: a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated analysis based on a large, integrated health database. - According to the film, the Henry Ford study found that vaccinated children had higher risks across multiple chronic health categories. Specifically, ten years of follow-up suggested: - Vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to have a chronic health condition overall. - An approximate fourfold increased risk for chronic health conditions in certain analyses. - A 4.29-times higher risk for autism was not statistically significant due to small autism counts in the unvaccinated group, but substantial signals were observed in other neurodevelopmental outcomes. - The study reported markedly higher rates of autoimmune diseases (around six times higher) and various neurodevelopmental disorders in the vaccinated group compared with unvaccinated peers. - In the ten-year window, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health condition versus 17% of unvaccinated children. - The documentary notes methodological limitations common to retrospective studies, such as follow-up differences and confounding factors, but argues that sensitivity analyses did not overturn the main findings. The vaccine schedule, broader policy, and dissent within the medical community - The narrative asserts that a large portion of physicians publicly defend vaccines as safe and effective, with long-standing support for vaccination policies and mandates. Yet it also recounts stories of physicians who faced professional pushback, licensing actions, or public criticism after raising questions about vaccine safety or suggesting alternative research paths. - The film mentions the Institute of Medicine’s 2011 report, which stated that there were over 150 injuries likely associated with vaccines that had not been studied, and it notes that no large, randomized comparisons between fully vaccinated and fully unvaccinated populations had been published by major institutions (as of the report’s release). - The filmmakers recount efforts to obtain a definitive vaccination–unvaccinated study from Henry Ford and other institutions, with some figures expressing willingness to publish if the study clearly demonstrated that unvaccinated children fared better, while others face professional or political pressures. Vaccine advocacy versus safety concerns; the call for replication - Pro-vaccine voices in the film emphasize that vaccines have prevented millions of deaths and remain broadly safe, citing the historical success of vaccines and the large body of published research supporting vaccine effectiveness and safety. - Proponents of re-examination advocate replicating retrospective cohort analyses in other large health systems (e.g., Kaiser Permanente, Harvard Pilgrim, CDC’s VSD) to test whether similar patterns emerge. They stress the ethical and scientific necessity of replication to determine whether the observed signals hold across populations. - The film closes with a call for replication and transparency: if the data are robust, publishing them could transform the understanding of off-target and non-specific effects of vaccination. If replicated, such studies could reshape how vaccines are administered and studied. The documentary also threads personal stories of vaccine injury, including cases of severe reactions after various vaccines and the emotional and logistical toll on families. It juxtaposes these individual tragedies with the broader debate over vaccine safety research, urging readers to consider the evidence, replication, and the possibility that current vaccine safety paradigms may require reassessment.

02/2013, the Institute of Medicine, commissioned by HHS, reviewed the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule and concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted." It also stated, "there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe," and noted, "The IRM report did say it is, quote, possible to make the comparison, meaning through vaccinated, unvaccinated children, through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as the vaccine safety data link, end quote." Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No. In 2017, ICAN sought this study; Del Bigtree met Dr. Marcus Zervos, who agreed to conduct it at Henry Ford. The study found vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, atopic disease, autoimmune disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders; ADHD occurred in the vaccinated but not unvaccinated; about 16,000 vs 2,000. After ten years, 57% vs 17% had at least one chronic health issue. It was not published because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe; "we can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."

Study: Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. 'The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis.' 'Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections.' 'Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.' 'Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase.' 'Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays.' 'Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities.' 'This is devastating.' 'This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda.'

"This study was based on actual medical records." "What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay, and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder." "After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue." "The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe." "We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."

I hired an expert to analyze data from 2,700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in my practice. The results showed that vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. Surprisingly, there were no cases of ADHD in the unvaccinated group. Despite this significant study, my medical license was revoked. The argument that association does not imply causation is often used to dismiss vaccine injury stories, but there are multiple studies and mechanisms explaining how vaccines can cause problems, such as immune activation from too many vaccines too soon.

My name is Dr. Brian Hooker, a vaccine safety scientist. The law shields vaccine manufacturers, and the vaccine schedule has grown to 73 doses by 2023. FDA approved vaccines with minimal safety testing, and CDC never studied the overall impact on children's health. Research shows vaccinated children are more likely to have developmental delays, ear infections, and asthma compared to unvaccinated children. Unvaccinated children have lower rates of autoimmune, neurodevelopmental, and other disorders.