TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

The Pentagon hides billions of dollars, with no accountability or audits. We've never received a satisfactory explanation. To uncover the truth, someone will likely have to leak information online before being silenced—a scenario I've often predicted.

Secrecy is unacceptable in a free society. Avoiding nuclear war is crucial, as victory would be meaningless. Correspondence with Khrushchev saved the world. We face a global conspiracy that uses covert methods to expand its influence.

We use unlimited force and control the global media to hide the truth from the public. People believe everything is done for good reasons, but it's not.

Secrecy is unacceptable in a free society, and we have historically opposed secret societies and oaths. The risks of concealing important information outweigh the reasons given for such concealment. We cannot combat a closed society by adopting its restrictions. Our nation’s survival must include the preservation of our traditions. There is a significant danger that calls for increased security will be misused to justify censorship and concealment. I will not allow this to happen, and no official in my administration should interpret my words as permission to censor news, suppress dissent, or hide facts from the public. We face a relentless conspiracy that uses covert methods to expand its influence, relying on infiltration, subversion, intimidation, and guerrilla tactics rather than open conflict.

There is a need for more public information and official secrecy. Secrecy is disliked in a free society, but we face enemies who are advancing globally without declaring war. Our way of life is under attack, but there are no traditional signs of war. We are opposed by a ruthless conspiracy that relies on infiltration, subversion, and guerrilla tactics. This system combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are hidden, mistakes buried, and dissenters silenced. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor credited, and no secret revealed.

Secrecy is abhorrent in a free society. We, as a people, have always opposed secret societies, oaths, and proceedings. There's a global conspiracy that relies on covert methods to expand its influence. This system has amassed vast resources to create a tightly-knit, efficient machine, encompassing military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. They keep their preparations hidden and bury their mistakes. Dissenters are silenced, and no one questions their expenditures or reveals their secrets.

Secrecy is not compatible with a free society. We oppose secret societies and oaths. The dangers of hiding important facts outweigh the reasons given to justify it. We shouldn't imitate a closed society's restrictions. Our nation's survival is meaningless without preserving our traditions. Increased security should not lead to censorship and concealment. No official in my administration should interpret my words as an excuse for censorship or covering up mistakes. We face a ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means to expand its influence. It's a tightly knit system that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. We must inform and alert the American people. We welcome controversy and will admit our errors. Debate and criticism are essential for success and survival. The press has a duty to inform, reflect, and lead public opinion. We need better coverage and understanding of international news. Government must provide full information within the limits of national security. The printing press is crucial for strength and assistance in maintaining freedom and independence.

We wear masks for protection and as a symbol of selflessness. Masks hide our identity to prevent attacks on our activists. They show that we prioritize the cause over personal gain. I, as a leader, remain unmasked to show my commitment and association with the organization.

We are facing a global conspiracy that uses covert tactics like infiltration, subversion, and intimidation to expand its influence. This system is highly organized, combining military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. It operates in secrecy, concealing its preparations, burying its mistakes, and silencing dissenters. No expenses are questioned, no rumors are spread, and no secrets are revealed.

I am in a Faraday cage to block signals and have a scrambler to ensure no communication in or out. I am an escaped slave from the system, urging others to break free from the 9 to 5 life controlled by corporations and government. Life is a mystery, beautiful when free from deception. I will keep speaking out. Thank you for listening.

Secrecy is repugnant to a free society. We oppose secret societies, oaths, and proceedings. There is a monolithic conspiracy that relies on covert means to expand its influence. It infiltrates instead of invading, subverts instead of holding elections, and intimidates instead of allowing free choice. This system has built a tightly knit, efficient machine combining military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations and mistakes are hidden, dissenters silenced, and no questions are asked. We need to inform and alert the American people to combat this and ensure freedom and independence.

A: The conversation opens with references to the Epstein files and a sense that people are ignoring shocking information, including an incident at the Atlanta Airport involving a well-dressed Black man who freaks out, which they say they saw on social media. B: They discuss reading the Upstate files and criticize others for going on with their lives as if nothing is happening, describing the public as “zombies” and likening society to invasion of the body snatchers. They mention revelations such as a global pandemic and aliens, and claim that “Miles have been released,” yet people act normal. C: They express a belief that a small group of about 8,500 people is manipulating events, including media such as the Colbert show, and that reality as they know it is fake. They discuss the idea of predictive programming and insist that by presenting certain material or jokes, the public becomes desensitized and complicit. A: They argue there is a grand design behind these phenomena to desensitize the public to the idea of demons or occult wrongdoing, including references to Luciferian influence and spells cast on the world. They discuss a Colbert skit in which a baby is handed to Moloch and a dramatic red furnace, claiming the audience’s laughter signals hypnosis or conditioning. B: They claim there is a coded language in the Epstein emails, where references to “pizza” and “beef jerky” are used as code, and that such codes exist even if others dismiss them as paranoia. They note that some language is cryptic and argue that there is a recognizable code, contrasting it with the public’s dismissal of such interpretations. A: They mention the Epstein indictment and a claim about sulfuric acid: right after he was indicted, he allegedly ordered large quantities of sulfuric acid (six hundred and fifty-five-gallon containers, with figures like 8,000 or 50,000 gallons discussed) to process bodies. They repeat the claim that “they’re eating babies,” underscoring a belief in extreme horrors behind coded communications. B: They expand the discussion to alleged ongoing sacrifices in Los Angeles, suggesting high-level musicians are involved in daily sacrifices, including claims about killing chickens as part of those activities. They hedge about naming individuals, expressing concern about legal risk and safety, and reaffirm their position that such activities occur at a high level. A: The conversation repeats the sense of omnipresent manipulation and secrecy, emphasizing that a hidden group is controlling information and that people are afraid to confront it, with ongoing claims about decoding messages and real-world horrors behind public narratives.

The Pentagon hides billions of dollars, with no accountability or audits. We need transparency. The only way to uncover the truth might be if someone leaks information online before mysteriously dying.

Secrecy is repugnant to a free society. We oppose secret societies, oaths, and proceedings. Excessive concealment of facts is more dangerous than the threats it claims to protect against. We shouldn't imitate a closed society's restrictions. Our nation's survival is meaningless without preserving our traditions. Increased security shouldn't lead to censorship or cover-ups. We face a ruthless conspiracy that expands through covert means, infiltration, subversion, and intimidation. This system combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. It operates in secrecy, burying mistakes and silencing dissenters. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, and no secret is revealed. Democracies must consider stricter restraints for national security against this kind of attack and invasion.

Taking on the intelligence community is incredibly risky. They have numerous ways to retaliate. Even a shrewd businessman would be foolish to antagonize them. I've heard they're extremely angry about how they've been treated and spoken about. I don't know exactly what they might do if provoked, but it's a dangerous game to play.

Speaker 0 argues that Ancestry DNA was never about helping you find your family, but about tracking bloodlines, finding lost kings, rulers and disruptors who once threatened the system, and those who have returned in new bodies, lifetimes, and identities. History, they claim, is not linear; it loops, and the rulers of today know that old enemies are being reborn and will do anything to stop them from waking up. They assert that they can trace every bloodline, every descendant, every possible return of an old ruler, an exiled king, a lost revolutionary, and if someone is born with the wrong DNA, a genetic signature that once belonged to a threat to their system, they know immediately and can stop them before they wake up. The speaker asks if the elite care about being 5% Viking or 10% Italian, implying they do not; for thousands of years, power has been passed down through family lines not because of wealth or privilege, but because certain souls always return to the same genetic pools. They claim the rulers of the past practiced inbreeding to ensure their souls would return to their dynasty, kept extensive genealogy records to know who belonged to which bloodline, and created secret societies that only accept specific families because they believe power reincarnates within their lineage. They assert these elites have always been obsessed with tracking souls through DNA, and with modern technology they no longer have to guess. The real reason mass DNA collection programs were launched was to find and neutralize threats before they wake up. Since DNA testing became popular, intelligence agencies gained access to private DNA databases without consent, genetic data was bought, sold and cross-referenced against historical bloodlines, mapping ancient royal lineages, fallen empires, and revolutionary leaders to their modern descendants. They claim they are searching for someone, or many someones—the ones who opposed the system before, the ones who once sat on thrones never meant to return, the ones who have the power to remember and fight again. If they find you in their system, they act before you do: they discredit certain people before they rise to power, they silence those who start remembering too much, they neutralize threats before they can shake the system again. Because if you wake up, if you remember who you were, if you realize why you are really here, the cycle ends, the throne is taken back, and their illusion of control collapses forever. The final question: who were you before? This is not a game. The war for control did not start in this lifetime; it has been happening for centuries, for ages, for cycles upon cycles of reincarnation. And now, the system is collapsing, more people are waking up, and the ones in power are desperate to track, suppress, and erase those who were never meant to return. So ask yourself, why were you born in this time? Why does history feel familiar? Why do you feel drawn to certain places, symbols, eras as if you lived them before? You might not just be a person searching for your past. You might be the past searching for itself. And the ones who rule now, they know who you are. The only question is, do you?

Secrecy is not welcomed in a free society. We oppose secret societies, oaths, and proceedings. Excessive concealment of facts is more dangerous than the threats it claims to protect against. We should not imitate a closed society's restrictions. Our nation's survival is meaningless without preserving our traditions. Increased security should not lead to censorship and concealment. No official should interpret this as an excuse to censor news or cover up mistakes. We are opposed by a ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means. It is a system that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations, mistakes, and dissenters are hidden. Public scrutiny is necessary for understanding and support. We welcome controversy and intend to be candid about our errors. Without debate and criticism, no administration or country can succeed. The press is protected by the First Amendment to inform and reflect our dangers and choices. International news requires greater coverage and analysis. Government must provide full information within the limits of national security. We rely on the printing press to keep us free and independent.

Secrecy is repugnant in a free society, and we oppose secret societies and oaths. Excessive concealment of facts is more dangerous than the threats it claims to protect against. Increased security shouldn't lead to censorship or cover-ups. We face a global conspiracy that relies on covert tactics to expand its influence. It's a system that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. We must inform and alert the American people, and I welcome criticism and debate. Our press is protected by the First Amendment to inform and reflect on our dangers and opportunities. We need better coverage of international news and improved understanding. Government must provide information within the limits of national security. We rely on the press to keep us free and independent.

We need to stop this because there are more levels to it than we currently understand. These so-called "globalists" rely on censorship and secrecy because their power depends on people not knowing what they're doing with their money. If Americans truly understood how our money is being used to set up a separate government that ignores the needs of real people, we would be outraged. These individuals have essentially created their own government within ours, using NGOs and operating with different rules and vocabulary. The goal of this interview is to make the public aware that this separate government exists and is funded with our money.

Secrecy is not acceptable in a free society. We must not hide facts to protect our traditions. We face a secretive global conspiracy that operates covertly. We need the press to inform the public and hold us accountable. Criticism and debate are essential for success. The press must inform, educate, and challenge public opinion. International news is crucial, and the government must provide information beyond national security limits. The press is vital for a free and independent society.

Secrecy is not compatible with a free society. We oppose secret societies and oaths. Excessive concealment of facts is more dangerous than the threats it claims to protect against. We shouldn't imitate closed societies' restrictions. Our nation's survival is meaningless without preserving our traditions. Increased security should not lead to censorship or concealment. No official should interpret my words as an excuse for censorship or cover-ups. We face a ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means. It conscripts vast resources for military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations, mistakes, and dissenters are hidden. Public scrutiny is essential for understanding and support. We accept responsibility for our errors and expect you to point them out. Debate and criticism are vital for success and survival. The press is protected to inform, reflect, and lead public opinion. Government must provide information beyond national security limits. We rely on the press to uphold freedom and independence.

Secrecy is unacceptable in a free society. We oppose secret societies, oaths, and proceedings. A global conspiracy uses covert tactics like infiltration and subversion to expand its power. It operates in secrecy, concealing preparations and burying mistakes. Dissent is silenced, and no secrets are revealed.

Secrecy is unacceptable in a free society. We must avoid risking global nuclear war, where victory would be meaningless. The correspondence between leaders, particularly with Khrushchev, played a crucial role in preventing disaster. We face a powerful and unified conspiracy that uses covert methods to expand its influence, relying on infiltration rather than direct invasion.

We are planning something unprecedented that requires a big crew and tight security, including guns. The target has not been disclosed.