reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A Springfield, Ohio resident reports witnessing two Haitians in a park, one carrying a machete and the other a dead duck. The speaker claims local authorities are aware of ongoing issues. The speaker alleges that a friend lost her home because Haitian immigrants offered the landlord $1800 monthly rent, far exceeding her previous $600 payment. Another friend, a pest control worker, reportedly found a skinned dog hanging in an apartment, and management dismissed the report. The speaker asserts that Haitian immigrants are frequently involved in car accidents and questions how they pass driving tests, claiming they are given answers at the DMV. The speaker believes the mayor opposes Trump's visit to conceal these issues and accuses the immigrants of eating local ducks.

New Yorkers are reportedly alarmed by Muslim community patrols operating in Brooklyn. The patrols consist of members dressed like police officers driving cars identical to police squad cars. Some residents fear this is a form of Sharia law enforcement. Others allegedly denounce residents for drinking, claiming it is a Muslim area where alcohol is not permitted. Some Muslims have also reportedly raised questions about the need for these patrols.

The speaker claims Springfield residents are at risk because they can't afford housing or healthcare, and schools and hospitals are overwhelmed. They allege Kamala Harris allowed 20,000 Haitian migrants to be dropped into the Ohio town of 40,000 people, overwhelming services. The speaker says constituents have brought approximately a dozen concerns, 10 verifiable, and a couple they discuss because constituents are reporting them firsthand. They cite the example of migrants capturing and eating geese from the local park pond, which they claim was initially dismissed by the media but later confirmed by 911 calls. The speaker says they are focused on the suffering caused by Kamala Harris opening the border.

The speaker describes repeated interactions with Epic representatives while serving as training sergeant for the Plano Police Department. He contends there is a general misunderstanding that the community plan aims to build an Islamic Sharia friendly area, asserting that the Epic neighborhood already exists in Plano for nearly twelve years. He states it comprises 74 residential properties, a massive mosque, schools, a medical clinic, and multiple businesses, and includes an office of an Islamic financing institution called the UIF Corporation. He claims the UIF Corporation is not a bank, describing it as a Michigan based corporation whose publicly stated purpose is to “engage in financial transactions that are Sharia compliant.” He asserts that local government officials south of Plano have known for years that only Muslims can purchase homes inside that neighborhood, and that one must be a member of their mosque to live there. The speaker describes the first house built in the neighborhood as being located right next to the Plano Police Academy, noting it as a huge structure with two separate front doors. He describes the rear of the property as being just a few feet from a large outdoor warning siren, and the house as having a large second story platform overlooking the restricted access parking lot where the police department stores specialized vehicles such as bomb trucks, bomb disposal equipment, and the SWAT team’s armored vehicle. As a court recognized expert in SWAT team tactics and procedures, he states that the house has “all the hallmarks of a fortress and a command post.” He elaborates that the rear of the house resembles an observation post and a shooting platform. He questions why someone would build a house so close to a giant warning siren and a police training site and why there would be a huge platform overlooking those specialized police emergency vehicles. He identifies the first owner of that house as a leader in the EPIC neighborhood and also as the co founder of the Yaquin Institute for Islamic Research, urging listeners to visit their website and read what it says about instituting Sharia law. The speaker claims this is not a matter of radicals hiding in plain sight, stating they are not hiding and have been open about their beliefs and their intent. He asserts that local government decision makers have failed to ask hard questions for fear of negative publicity and being labeled as bigots. He says he is not here to spread innuendo or to make unfounded accusations, but is asking everyone to look at the evidence and the confirmed facts that are already in existence. He closes by thanking the judge and mister Deenan.

Savannah Hernandez reports from North Texas, exploring demographic and cultural changes. She notes Frisco’s rapid growth in Indian population over the last decade, rising from about 10% in 2010 to over 30%, and mentions one of the area’s largest Hindu temples dedicated to Hanuman located in a residential neighborhood. Inside the temple, she observes people walking barefoot, piles of shoes, and multiple deities being worshiped; she talks with two couples—one who came from Colorado specifically to visit the temple, and another Indian man from California who says Tuesdays and Saturdays are the temple’s busiest days. Hernandez cites broader statistics: North Texas has one of the country’s largest Indian populations, more than doubling from around 100,000 in 2010 to over 235,000 today, with Indian Americans making up roughly 3% of the Dallas–Fort Worth area and higher concentrations (over 10–30%) in suburbs like Frisco, Plano, and Irving. She describes accompanying changes in culture—Indian grocery stores, restaurants, Hindu temples, Bollywood screenings, and Holi festivals. At a Holi festival in McKinney, the team interviews attendees who discuss the festival as a color festival with roots in India; participants recount living in Texas since 2016 and coming from various parts of India (Mumbai, Gujarat, Hyderabad). They describe a strong Indian community in Dallas–Fort Worth, with celebrations of festivals from North to South India and a sense of the community feeling like home. The report shifts to rising Muslim demographics, contrasting experiences of Texans who feel the state’s home identity is changing. Savannah and her colleague visit a neighborhood in Irving—Ali Akbar Court—where street signs display Arabic inscriptions and Eid decorations appear on homes. They note a campaign sign for a city council candidate with an Islamic-sounding name and observe street names such as Amal Saleh Drive and Mahmoud Egal Drive, highlighting what they perceive as a Muslim-centric zone adjacent to a broader Texas landscape. They discuss Epic Mosque (formerly East Plano Islamic Center) and Epic City, a proposed 400-acre, Muslim-centric city with a large mosque, Islam-based K–12 schools, and over 1,000 homes. Protesters gather as locals express concerns about assimilation, water resources, and potential governance implications, arguing Texas already has enough cities and warning about resource strain. Inside Epic Mosque, the team interviews President and founder Samir, who differentiates Epic Mosque from Epic City, stating Epic City is not the mosque and that Epic City plans evolved from a desire to expand Epic’s concept. However, independent reporting reveals that Epic Mosque helped organize Epic City, with a video showing leaders discussing creating a large, Islam-centered city open to all. An independent journalist, Brianna Morello, is quoted discussing perceived deception and concerns about Western values, with claims that some mosque officials advocate political aims and that some materials discuss broader intentions to “bring Islam to the forefront” and potentially “conquer the West.” Reports indicate ongoing investigations by the Texas Attorney General and other agencies into Epic City, alleging securities violations, attempts to circumvent local oversight, and possible fair housing discrimination. No construction permits for Epic City have been issued as of March 2026, and the land purchase site is shown as farmland near Plano. The piece also covers Kaufman County in a separate vein, where SCE Holdings—a Dubai-based company tied to Muslim-city projects—has pursued land deals that sparked resident opposition. Reporter Mary Rook explains how developers have moved southward from McKinney, Rockwall, and Hunt County, facing increased resistance and concerns about water infrastructure if a large Muslim-centric development were to proceed. Keller County residents discuss the need for multiple water districts and drought considerations, while some supporters argue the projects could reflect a diverse Texas future. In closing, the reporters reflect on the scale of demographic change in North Texas, including Hindu temples, mosques, and Muslim-centered initiatives, and they emphasize that many rural Texas towns are being targeted, potentially shaping the state’s cultural and political landscape for the next decade.

A group of 160 men are expected to move into the area soon, causing concern among residents who already feel unsafe. The speaker worries about the impact on their children and calls for support from the community to prevent any negative consequences. Without support, they fear losing the battle against the incoming group.

A proposed 402-acre "Epic City" is planned by the East Plano Islamic Center in Texas, featuring over 1,000 homes, a school, college, retail, and a mosque. Concerns are raised about the development being a Muslim-only space, despite claims it will be open to all. It is argued that large, dedicated Islamic areas pose a threat, referencing "no-go zones" in Europe where Islamic values allegedly supersede Western laws. The speaker suggests this development is part of a larger trend of replacing Americans with foreigners holding different values and accuses Muslims of seeking to implement Sharia law. While acknowledging "good" individual Muslims, the speaker focuses on "institutional Islam" and its perceived conquest values. Governor Abbott is quoted discussing potential violations related to the development, including misleading investors, fair housing violations, and building permits. The speaker believes the governor is not addressing the core issue, which is the development of a Muslim-only community. The speaker questions why this is not being built in a Muslim country and hopes Texas will stop the development.

The speakers discuss what they describe as a mass and opaque operation affecting elections. They claim that the total amount involved is “way beyond anybody’s imagination” and that neither the state nor the federal government knows it. They allege that a judge would bow to the head of the “Somalian mafia,” and describe the situation as a voting block whose members will vote together. They state that if someone does something against “our community,” they will vote for that person’s opponent, asserting that there is ballot harvesting and that they have witnessed it firsthand. The implication is that the voting bloc coordinates to influence election outcomes. They describe Cedar Riverside as a major, massive apartment complex and ask how many Somalis live there, noting that there are “one complex” and “20 more just like this around the Twin Cities,” totaling “probably a 100,000 or more people.” They claim these people are all Somali and are “living rent free.” They further claim they are driving vehicles paid for by others, eating food paid for by others, and that “they’re everything they do is something that you paid for,” implying that public funds or subsidies support them. The speakers allege that an entire block will vote for a single candidate, with “one person” going to collect all the ballots. They assert there is no tracking and that there could be multiple people living in an apartment, possibly nine ballots, with someone then “collect[ing] all the ballots.” The dialogue emphasizes a coordinated effort to manipulate voting outcomes through ballot collection and bloc voting, portraying the Somali community as organized to vote as a unified force in elections while alleging widespread use of ballot harvesting and ballot collection practices.

The video follows Tyler Oliveira, an independent journalist, visiting Kiriyos Joel (Curious Joel), a Hasidic Jewish traditional community in upstate New York described as a large, growing, tightly knit enclave dominated by Hasidic Jews who largely speak Yiddish. The dialogue paints a picture of a community with unusually large families, strict modesty and gender roles, private religious education, and a mix of work patterns that rely on both self-employment within the community and outside labor. Key facts and claims as presented: - Demographics and family size: The community is described as a village of about 40,000 Hasidic Jews in upstate New York, with families averaging seven children. When discussing typical family size, several participants mention numbers like seventeen to eighteen children, though others give more conservative figures. One interviewee says “Ten, twelve, fourteen, fifteen” is common in the larger families, with a repeated emphasis on seven to ten as a norm in some households. - Economic profile and poverty: The town is described as one of the poorest towns in America, with around 40% living beneath the federal poverty line. The transcript notes reliance on public assistance, Medicaid, housing vouchers, food stamps (EBT/SNAP), and cash aid to support large families. - Employment and Torah study: A recurring theme is that many men spend significant time studying the Torah full-time, with three hours of daily prayer/study mentioned by some interviewees. Yet other participants indicate that men work in industries like construction, driving or bus services, or run private businesses. Women are described as working in some cases (e.g., teaching, health care, retail, childcare) and in other cases primarily managing households, especially when children are very young. Some individuals report that women work after children are older or part-time in addition to domestic duties. - Education and institutions: The community uses private religious schools (Torah study is emphasized), with most schools described as privately run. A significant portion of the schooling and social life centers on maintaining the community’s religious practices and modest dress codes. The synagogues, private kosher markets, and a complex network of private buses and community services are prominent features. - Welfare and tax considerations: The dialogue repeatedly questions how families can afford many children on limited incomes, noting welfare programs (Medicaid, SNAP/EBT, housing assistance) that help, particularly for large families. Some participants acknowledge that welfare usage exists (including potential tax credits and other subsidies tied to children), while others push back against the idea that welfare dominates, arguing instead that benevolence within the community and private charity play major roles. There is discussion about how much welfare benefits are worth relative to the costs of raising many children, including taxes and tuition. - Community economics and charity: A common claim is that wealthier members of the community fund many services and subsidize others through charitable giving. The existence of kosher supermarkets run with the help of Mexican labor is described, along with private safety services, volunteer EMS, and community-owned buses and infrastructure. The interviewee notes that two groceries, Maitiv, offer substantial discounts, and that the community supports one another to afford large families. - Labor dynamics and assimilation: Several interviews contrast Hasidic work patterns with non-Jewish labor participation nearby (e.g., Hispanics in construction, retail, and labor). There is a sense that many Jewish residents own or run businesses, while a notable portion of practical labor appears performed by immigrant workers. A discussion arises about whether non-members can move into the community, with responses suggesting it is possible but may be uncomfortable for some residents, given the desire to preserve religious life. - Zionism and Israel: A notable viewpoint expressed by some community members is opposition to the state of Israel before the Messiah, with Zionism described as not Judaism and the state as secular. This stance frames a broader tension between religious life in Kiriyos Joel and external political narratives. - Public interactions and challenges: The video captures tensions around filming, interviews, and the community’s encounter with outside observers, including skepticism about welfare claims and how the community is portrayed. Observations highlighted by the video’s framing: - The community presents itself as a self-reinforcing, tightly knit unit with private institutions, mutual aid, and communal oversight aimed at preserving religious life. - The economic reality described mixes private enterprise, charitable support, and reliance on public programs, particularly given large family sizes. - The overall portrait emphasizes a life integrated around Torah study, prayer, family, education, and a network of community-run services, with welfare and tax considerations continuing to be debated among residents and visitors.

Speaker 0: How would you feel if it was a hotel at the end of your vote? If your daughter was having to walk past one of these hotels every day? Speaker 1: I completely get it. I mean, local people, by and large, do not want these hotels in their towns, in their place, and nor do I. I'm completely at one with them on that. I'm not, in any way underestimating the strength of feeling that there is. The speakers acknowledge the strength of local opposition to these hotels. They express alignment with residents' views of concern today.

My drone captures a massive camp with numerous houses and quarantine camps for children. The facility appears to be expanding, possibly funded by tax dollars. The speaker questions the legitimacy of the operation and notes the presence of surveillance and private property signs. They express concern over the scale of the camp and the unknown activities occurring there.

A speaker discusses a Muslim American Society mosque in Philadelphia where children allegedly sang about beheading infidels. The speaker questions the surprise surrounding this, stating that mosques teach Islam and this is part of Islam. The speaker then asks if the video of the incident can be obtained and notes that the mosque was not shut down, nor was there an FBI or Philadelphia police investigation.

The speakers express concern about resources being allocated to people who have never lived in their communities before. They argue that the safety of their black communities, already plagued by crime, is being compromised by placing unvetted non-taxpayers near vulnerable populations. They call for an Office of Black America to address these issues. One speaker shares a personal story of being placed on a waitlist while immigrants were prioritized. They emphasize the importance of taking care of their own communities first. The speakers also highlight the negative impact of having a large number of migrants in their community without proper monitoring and housing plans. They urge others to stand strong and not sell their homes.

The speaker discusses the planned construction of "Epic City," a 402-acre Islamic community in the Dallas suburbs, featuring over 1,000 homes, a school, college, retail stores, and a mosque. This reminds the speaker of the late David Horowitz, who warned against importing Muslims. The speaker expresses concern over the exclusive nature of the development, despite claims it will be open to all, and suggests it poses a threat to American values, referencing "no-go zones" in Europe. He claims Islam has conquest values and seeks to implement Sharia law. He criticizes the leaders, including Texas Republicans, for enabling the "great replacement" and questions why this is being allowed. While acknowledging there are good individual Muslims, the speaker focuses on "institutional Islam." He contrasts this with assimilated Muslims like Dr. Zudi Jasser, who speaks out against radical Islam. The speaker cites Governor Abbott's response to the development, which involves a criminal investigation by the Texas Rangers into potential violations. The speaker claims the developers initially stated it would be a Muslim-only space, but later backtracked. He questions why such a community is being built in Texas rather than the Middle East.

I'm in a predominantly white, Trump-supporting neighborhood, and I've noticed that many of the local Muslims are also white. They can be unfriendly. It confuses me why certain people are sent to engage with them. Given the demographics, it would make more sense to send someone who would be more accepted, like a white person, to facilitate better communication. When they see someone who is Black, it creates an immediate barrier, as there's a lack of acceptance. A more relatable representative could ease their questions and concerns.

The Epic City compound in Texas is causing concern, with lawmakers now addressing it due to social media attention. John Cornyn requested a DOJ criminal investigation into the "Islamic compound," citing an unlicensed funeral home as evidence of Sharia law implementation, raising fears of honor killings, stonings, and covered-up deaths. Ken Paxton is also calling for an investigation. Greg Abbott stated Sharia law does not exist in Texas, but some believe Muslims are implementing it without permission. Abbott directed the Texas Rangers to investigate the Plano Islamic Center's development. Texas passed a Sharia law bill in 2017 prohibiting communities following Sharia law. Representative Chatline urged action against the "Sharia law city," but Ken Paxton is seen as taking the lead in cracking down on it.

- The speaker argues that data centers are expanding globally despite claims of an energy crisis, describing this growth as dangerous and indiscriminate. Project Matador in the Texas Panhandle is highlighted as potentially the largest data center, planned up to 18,000,000 square feet (about 6,000 acres) and reportedly using up to 96,000,000,000 kilowatts of electricity per year. Conservative figures are used for illustration. Texas residential electricity use is stated as approximately 172,000,000,000 kilowatts annually, meaning Matador could consume roughly 55–65% of all Texas residential electricity, with hundreds more centers either operating, under construction, or planned in the state (87 in operation, about 135 under construction, and a pipeline of over 600 planned). - The video cites reports of data centers destroying communities nationwide and worldwide. A segment about Meta’s new AI data center in Richland Parish, Louisiana, is presented: the center is 4,000,000 square feet and 2,250 acres (roughly 70 football fields). Residents describe rising rents due to out-of-state workers, disruption to local businesses, constant noise and bright lights, and a halo over homes. The speaker notes that the area has long faced job and poverty issues, and while some view the AI center as an economic opportunity, the disruption is described as significant and ongoing. - A conservative view is attributed to the Louisiana report, followed by the speaker’s own assertion that AI data centers will drain water and energy, potentially enabling a “smart city” agenda that renders rural areas unlivable and pushes populations to cities. The speaker suggests rural communities may be targeted as part of a broader strategy. - The discussion moves to Utah, where the Stratos project is described as rivaling Matador in scale. Jason Basleronex (the speaker’s reference) describes a proposed largest hyperscale data center in Box Elder County, Utah (approximately 40,000 acres, 62 square miles), backed by Canadian billionaire Kevin O’Leary and fast-tracked by Utah’s Military Installation Development Authority with Governor Spencer Cox. The public would be locked out of decision-making. The project is linked to anticipated 50% increase in CO2 emissions, polluted water, and 24/7 noise and light pollution. The implication is that the initiative operates as a military operation, with national security justification cited. - A clip from Noah B Price is cited to illustrate living near a data center: water usage of 5,000,000 gallons per day in a drought state, with residents unable to collect rainwater in some areas, constant roar, and destroyed property values. The clip is used to argue about the “AI future” and potential government abuse of technology, including references to a broad list of dystopian outcomes (social credit systems, programmable digital currency, cars controlled by tech, rural self-sufficiency eliminated, and gene-edited humans integrated with AI). The speaker suggests these are directions supported by certain tech and government actions. - The video concludes with a call for local communities to band together, elect representatives who oppose the agenda, and protect their communities as a sanctuary against the “eye of Sauron” at Palantir HQ. It frames the data-center expansion as a threat to rural living and a push toward an AI-driven, controlled future. - The message ends with an advertising note for Genesis Gold Group and a free wealth protection guide via dailypulsesilver.com, promoting gold and silver investment as a hedge.

We are allowed to take control of our own country. We're allowed to say, no. You're not gonna Islamicize our cities. No. You're not gonna do that. Dearborn has become an Arab state. It's a Middle Eastern Islamic capital in the American heartland. "But the mosque in East Dearborn are now at times waking us up at 05:30 in the morning with the call to prayer." CBS Detroit did examine Dearborn's noise ordinance and found that loudspeakers between the hours of 10PM and 7AM are in violation of the or. "Number one, church bells are much more beautiful. Number two, church bells don't ring at five in the morning. And three, America is a Christian country." Hearing that sound over a loudspeaker coming from a mosque is not normal. It's not traditional. It's not American.

There are communities in Irving, Texas, where street names are in Muslim, and they have Allah Akbar courts. Their school teaches the Quran, and they shun Western ways. Residents claim Texas will be the home for all Muslims. These communities have Islamic-only parks and a large mosque in the center. Pets, specifically dogs, are not allowed. The speaker states that this is the future and that they are already doing it. The speaker mentions the Villas Of Andulas community in Irving as an example. They believe this is part of a larger plan to spread these communities throughout the state with outside help.

Residents express concerns about the influx of Haitian immigrants into their small town, claiming it's a deliberate "displacement" strategy. They allege the immigrants receive financial assistance via an app-loaded card, enabling them to pay cash for houses and drive up prices. One person says they saw receipts showing $13,000 on EBT food and $29,000 on EBT cash balances. They claim schools are overwhelmed, curricula are affected by non-English speakers, and healthcare systems are seeing a rise in "3rd world diseases" and HIV cases. One person states that 19-year-old Haitian men are enrolling as freshmen in schools. Crime is reportedly rising in what was already the 2nd most dangerous place in Ohio. Some residents believe the situation is a deliberate effort to transform the town into "a little Haiti," questioning who benefits from this alleged displacement.

I want to know why helicopters and airplanes keep spraying something over us. It's causing stuff to fall off my roof and into my garden bed. I can hear the planes coming over and dropping garbage on my house. I don't understand why they are doing this to us. They need to stop.

I don't want houses on my land. Conservation easements are needed to prevent rural areas from being covered in houses. A 180-acre grass farm nearby was turned into 18 houses, which is concerning. People buy land, mow it, and fertilize it for aesthetics, not for growing food. It's wasteful and unsustainable.

A resident expresses feeling unsafe in her neighborhood due to homeless encampments and confrontations with non-English speakers who are throwing trash in her yard. She states she has tried to help the homeless to prevent them from squatting on her property. She says she weighs 95 pounds and feels unable to defend herself, and her elderly husband wants to move after 45 years in the home due to the mental toll. She questions who is protecting citizens if the city is protecting those under temporary protected status, and asks for a reason to stay in the town.

A speaker claims homeless people are living behind Lincoln School, and that code enforcement and the police won't address it. The speaker alleges they witnessed Haitians at Walmart eating tomato paste with their fingers and eating fruit at Kroger's before discarding it. The speaker believes the city is deteriorating, citing increased car insurance rates due to a tripled accident rate in Springfield. They question why squatters and tent cities are not shared throughout the city. Another speaker states that people have expressed concerns about personal safety, including women afraid to walk in stores or being stalked in parking lots. The speaker claims that these concerns are not about race and accuses the council of using identity politics to ignore and mock their real concerns.

Hundreds protested Epic City at the courthouse, forcing the meeting to be moved to an auditorium. Locals voiced strong opposition, but Epic City responded on YouTube, stating they will not stop the project. They implied funding is secured and permits won't be a problem, suggesting local government involvement. The source of funding remains unknown, as does whether those approving the project are being funded. The speaker urges continued vigilance and pressure on the state of Texas to halt Epic City.