reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asserts that microwave radiation around people is severely limited by practical constraints, yet cites a report from the Army on millimeter waves that references three hundred fifty studies showing clear biological effects even below thermal thresholds and below established safety guidelines. The claim emphasizes that the subjects in these studies were aware of what was happening in a substantial portion of cases, ranging from thirty percent to eighty percent, because skin and eyes are disproportionately affected by wireless radiation. The argument is that such exposure would impact the skin and nerves, thereby affecting the entire nervous system, and would also expose eyes to military-grade wireless radiation. The speaker further contends that this exposure would involve placing directed radiation in front of people’s homes and forcing it into their rooms, describing the situation as absolutely absurd. A video is mentioned from FCC proceedings in which one of the five G engineers reportedly states that directed beams are being aimed into people’s windows at levels not permitted in their own safety laboratories or safety guidelines. The speaker reiterates that the FCC did not treat this as a pressing issue, describing the stance as shrugging it off and indicating that it isn’t something to be discussed at that time. Key points highlighted include: - The Army report on millimeter waves referencing three hundred fifty studies showing biological effects below thermal and safety guideline levels. - A significant portion of study subjects purportedly aware of the exposure, due to the skin and eyes absorbing a disproportionate share of wireless radiation. - The assertion that exposure could affect the skin and nervous system, with particular emphasis on neurological impacts and ocular exposure. - The claim that directed beams could be placed in front of residential windows and forced into people’s rooms, described as absurd. - A video excerpt from FCC proceedings where a five-G engineer supposedly admits to directing beams into people’s windows at levels not allowed in safety labs. - The speaker’s claim that the FCC dismissed the issue as not needing discussion at that moment. Overall, the speaker builds a narrative that there are documented biological effects at non-thermal exposure levels, that individuals could be knowingly exposed in everyday environments, and that regulatory bodies have not treated the issue with the urgency or seriousness implied by the presented evidence.

Speaker 0 says: We estimate that at least twelve hundred people who got the shot returned to the hospital system for a moderate to severe reaction. Many other people got the shot from Walgreens, CVS, or another location or the county. Out of that population, twelve thousand people went back to Rochester Regional after a shot, not just from Rochester Regional, but twelve thousand people had a moderate to severe injury according to the records we’ve seen so far. What do the records say? How are you able to identify that it’s from the COVID shot? We should note that it’s not a causality issue. Anything that happens after you get the shot is questionable. With the way our system is supposed to work, that’s supposed to be an early warning system. Certainly, some people came back for services without, you know, maybe it wasn’t a vaccine reaction. But if you’re back in that hospital after you’ve gotten the shot for whatever reason, the federal government is supposed to want to know that. And that’s why Rochester Regional signed a contract to tell them about people who came back with some kind of issue.

The goal is to ensure funding doesn't hinder providing relief to people quickly. Safety issues arise, such as temporary flight restrictions, to clear airspace for flights or drone activity assisting emergency responders.

Questions were raised about HAARP, the high-frequency active auroral research program in Alaska, which is currently managed by the Air Force Research Lab. The Air Force has completed its work at HAARP and plans to demolish the facility this summer. There was also a discussion about the potential for collaboration with the University of Alaska to take over HAARP. In a separate inquiry, a statement was made regarding government-created weather tampering techniques intended to control populations. The speaker claimed that such techniques exist, backed by patents and historical usage dating back to the Vietnam War. They expressed belief in the existence of weather manipulation, suggesting that recent weather events were not coincidental and provided assurance of supporting documents to substantiate these claims.

Speaker 1 explains that sirens are primarily used for tsunamis and are located on the coastline. The public is trained to seek higher ground in the event of a tsunami. The Hawaii Emergency Management Agency provides guidelines for evacuation. Sounding the sirens that night could have caused panic and led people into the fire. Instead, they use wireless emergency alerts (WEA) and emergency alert systems (EAS). It's important to note that there were no sirens on the mountainside where the fire occurred.

Alexa stated that North Carolina used cloud seeding during Hurricane Helene. Scientists reportedly injected silver iodide into the hurricane wall. The purpose was to steer the hurricane in another direction.

A weather station in Dallas shared a picture of radar showing what appeared to be rain, but it was actually tiny fiberglass particles dropped by the military to deceive radar into thinking it's precipitation. This is a common military exercise across the country. People were outraged and the station posted an article about it. The government claims that chaff, which consists of aluminum, fiberglass, and plastic, is safe for humans and the environment, although research on its effects is limited. Inhaling fiberglass from the sky doesn't seem safe.

Speaker 1 does not regret not sounding the sirens because they are primarily used for tsunamis and are located on the coastline. The public is advised to evacuate to higher ground in low-lying areas near the coastline. The protocol is to use WEA and EAS instead of sirens. It is important to note that there are no sirens on the mountainside where the fire was.

The speaker was surprised to learn about Gwen Towers from Alexa. Gwen Towers, or the Ground Wave Emergency Network, are used to protect US communications during a high altitude nuclear explosion. They operate on low radio waves and are a backup when regular radio is disrupted.

The insurance industry is hesitant to underwrite companies involved in 5G infrastructure due to potential health risks from EMF exposure. Crown Castle International in Houston, Texas, disclosed in their 10-K report that negative health effects from wireless handsets could impact their operations. Currently, there are 418,000 cell towers in the US, set to increase by 300% in the next 6 years. The speaker urges consideration of these facts.

The speaker does not regret not sounding the sirens during the crisis. They explain that sirens are primarily used for tsunamis and are located on the coastline. The public is trained to evacuate to higher ground when the sirens sound. The speaker mentions that alerts can also be received through wireless emergency alerts. They express concern that if the sirens had been sounded, people may have panicked and gone towards the fire. Additionally, there were no sirens on the mountainside where the fire was spreading. Therefore, sounding the sirens would not have saved those on the mountainside.

Speaker 1 explains that they do not regret not sounding the sirens because they are primarily used for tsunamis. The public is trained to seek higher ground in low-lying coastal areas. The protocol is to use WEA and EAS alerts instead of sirens. It is also noted that there are no sirens on the mountainside where the fire occurred.

Speaker 0 describes living about 120 miles north of London in a pleasant countryside setting with a city about 10 miles away. There could be a five G tower about a mile from them, so they acknowledge that five G is everywhere now. Speaker 1 responds with a metric they use for risk mitigation. In the United States, big cities require you to be 75 miles away due to airports and military bases. Then they offer a counterpoint: five G antennas aren’t always as bad as they’re made out to be. The key factor with a five G antenna is how many obedient idiots are connected to it. They illustrate this with Destin, Florida, a place known for its beaches. In December, Destin has hardly anyone there, maybe 20,000 residents, but in the summertime, there can be a million people in the city because of vacations. Therefore, those five G antennas in the summertime are way worse than in the wintertime due to the number of people connecting to the tower and radiating. They then discuss how light interacts with the inverse square law, noting that the inverse square law is not only about the closest distance to the antenna but also how much use the antenna is getting. They emphasize that people often forget that second part of the inverse square law. The speaker’s advice is to consider population density when deciding where to live. The speaker acknowledges that the listener has already chosen a place with sparse population density and supports that choice. They conclude by suggesting that when living in an area where light is plentiful, one should embrace all the other good things that nature brings. Overall, the conversation juxtaposes practical geographic placement with how population dynamics influence exposure to five G antennas, arguing that the number of connected users, driven by population density and seasonal occupancy, can significantly affect potential exposure. It also highlights the importance of considering natural surroundings and density when choosing where to reside.

The insurance industry is hesitant to underwrite companies involved in 5G infrastructure due to potential health risks. Sonar's 2019 report from Zurich, Switzerland highlights concerns about EMF effects. Crown Castle International in Texas discloses potential health impact risks in their 10-K report to shareholders. With 418,000 cell towers in the US expected to increase by 300% in the next 6 years, the issue is growing. The speaker urges consideration of these facts and leaves documents with the city clerk.

Speaker 0 describes higher frequencies as potentially impacting bees and insects because the wave size can resonate with insect size, leading to greater absorption. He shows a study with heat-map images of higher frequencies on the honeybee, noting five insects were examined and bees at different life stages were tested; higher frequencies resonated with the bees and were more highly absorbed, potentially causing biochemical changes that can affect bee behavior. He notes other studies on their website showing impacts to honey production and bee reproduction, including cases where bees did not return to a hive when wireless radiation was near it. Speaker 1 states, “For decades, there has been irrefutable evidence that electromagnetic waves have an influence both thermally and non thermally on living beings, including people.” Speaker 2 adds that five g has triggered irrational fears, but experts are concerned, and Daniel Favre is among hundreds of scientists who think precautionary steps should be taken. Favre signed appeals to the United Nations and European Union asking for the health effects of it to be reassessed. Danielle has been looking into the impact of electromagnetic fields on honeybees for years. Speaker 1 elaborates: in a practical setup, a cell phone emits the waves while another phone receives the waves, and a device records the sound of the colony in the beehive via a microphone under the hive. The waveform thickening indicates greater colony sound intensity; when phones are active, the colony is disturbed, and once the phone is off, the colony returns to normal noise. Speaker 2 emphasizes that implementing five g safely for people and the environment requires more time for independent research and for digesting information from thousands of published papers, citing Enrico Stura, an electronic engineer specializing in molecular biophysics. Speaker 1 adds that “The electromagnetic waves produced by personal telecommunication systems during reasonable periods of time lead to demonstrable and proven DNA damages.” Speaker 0 references a study on radio frequency radiation injuries around mobile phone base stations, conducted as a field study for years, observing trees in line of sight of cell antennas showing damage that led to felled trees over time. He notes photographs showing the antenna and the crown fitting, and mentions studies on impacts to plants, stressing the broader concern about widespread antennas in Montgomery County, the United States, and the world.

Residents in southern Tasmania are questioning the decision to conduct cloud seeding over the Derwent River catchment before the recent severe floods. Cloud seeding, a method to enhance rainfall, was carried out by Hydro Tasmania despite weather warnings. Farmers are concerned that this technique may have exacerbated the flooding. To address these concerns, the premier has stated that a formal inquiry will be conducted to investigate the effects and management of the floods, if deemed necessary.

Alexa stated that North Carolina used cloud seeding during Hurricane Helene. Scientists reportedly injected silver iodide into the hurricane wall to steer the hurricane in another direction.

The speaker found it alarming that Asheville was reportedly disconnected from all roads, with nobody allowed in or out. Upon arriving in Asheville, the speaker set up personal Starlink devices at hotels where state troopers were staying. The troopers then flocked to the Starlink devices because they lacked connectivity, their radios were unusable, and they hadn't been provided Starlinks. The speaker claims that Biden, Harris, and Governor Roy Cooper illegally canceled the contracts for these Starlinks, leaving first responders unable to communicate. The speaker believes this lack of communication cost lives and that private citizens had to provide their own Starlink devices.

The speaker observed numerous FEMA trailers in a parking lot 3 hours away from the mountains. They questioned the presence of the FEMA trucks in that location.

They work with local governments and have plans for them. In some areas, building back is not advisable. They have convinced certain communities that buyouts are better.

- The speaker discusses a potential connection between electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and diabetes, noting that there has been a slight increase in diabetes rates associated with the rapid expansion of cellular towers, such as after Bill Clinton’s policy changes. - They acknowledge that EMR is not claimed to be the sole cause of diabetes, but suggest that historical data and curves make it tempting to believe EMR could be a significant factor. - The speaker points out that the topic has been present in scientific literature since at least 1931, and asserts that conventional medicine would push back against this viewpoint, with medical education focused on sugar and other factors. - They emphasize that they are not naive and do not claim EMR is the only cause; rather, the implication is that EMR could contribute to diabetes risk. - The argument culminates in a warning: if power systems and telecommunications infrastructure are not designed more carefully, there will be health and national budget costs, implying broader consequences for public health and economic burden.

Residents in southern Tasmania are questioning why cloud seeding was done over the Derwent River catchment before severe flooding. Hydro Tasmania conducted a cloud seeding flight despite weather alerts. Farmers fear it may have worsened the floods. The premier promises a formal inquiry into the impact and management of the floods if needed.

Cloud seeding is expanding with 200 more machines planned. Research shows chemicals used are safe. Manipulating nature is not new, like building parking lots. Monitoring effects on people downstream is important as programs grow.

Smart legislatures and governments should invest in fire mitigation to protect communities.

Locals are discussing the failures and possible prevention measures regarding a tragic event. The lack of warning is a major concern. Due to a wind advisory, children were sent home from school, but unfortunately, a whole neighborhood of children was lost. The Lahaina Luna housing area was particularly affected, with all the kids being at home during the incident. A coworker shared the devastating news that all of his friends in the neighborhood had perished.