reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Because there was such a mass vaccination campaign with a product that, you know, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people were injured in this process, what work is the NIH doing in terms of research to somehow help these people? Because just from my own experience, my wife and I made a film about this, right? These people were, even though in some cases they were supported a bit by, but mostly just completely gaslit and just, no, your issue doesn't exist. Right? So how are you approaching this? Speaker 1: Well, you're absolutely right. There were absolutely like, lot patients of who were vaccine injured were gaslit, pretending as if they didn't get injured or that somehow their symptoms are all Speaker 1: in their head or something. Actually, this is part of a broader phenomenon, where, you have patients with conditions that are poorly understood, where the medical system will gaslight them leave. They can they're telling you it's a a psychological issue rather than a physical issue. It should make you think that you're crazy because you you you have symptoms that you just, you know you have, but you can't convince anyone else to do anything about it. Injury is one of them, long COVID, MECFS, Lyme chronic Lyme disease, a whole host of these conditions where it just fits a very similar pattern. Speaker 1: The key underlying thing is that there isn't excellent science to guide decision making for clinicians or anybody else, for patients. And I've made sure that people know at the NIH that I'm very interested in investing in answers for patients for all of those. Vaccine injury, long COVID, MECFS, chronic Lyme. We need to get better answers. The the gaslighting happens because the, if you're let's say you're a doctor and you see a patient and you have no idea what's causing their condition. Speaker 1: Right? Because the scientific literature doesn't have an answer. You're gonna be unless you're an amazing doctor who's really good at, you know, sort of being honest and compassionate, you're going to be wanting to, like, move on to the next patient. And, it's really, really unfortunate. The answer is to get good answers, right? Speaker 1: So invest in, research on treatments, on underlying physiology, physiological causes, you know, basic biological knowledge, so that those patients actually can can the doctors and the caregivers for those patients can will treat them correctly. Speaker 0: So but is is NIH doing this for people that are that have been COVID vaccine injures against a huge number of people relatively. Speaker 1: We have investments in that, and we're going have more investments in that at the start, you know, this year. For all of those conditions, I think patients deserve an answer, and I'm definitely, interested in finding I would love to know myself.

The speaker shares their experience with a vaccine safety specialist who advised them to submit vaccine injury reports. However, when the speaker sent in six reports, public health denied them and claimed there was no evidence of harm. The speaker also mentions that after they wrote a letter to a doctor, the College of Physicians warned doctors not to contradict the public health narrative or they would be investigated and disciplined. This warning has led to doctors staying silent and not questioning the narrative. The speaker submitted 14 vaccine injury reports, but all were denied by public health, who claimed they were coincidences and not vaccine injuries. The speaker concludes that reporting vaccine injuries is impossible as public health censors them to maintain the belief that side effects are rare.

The speaker discusses the DMED database controlled by the Department of Defense, which contains data on various diseases and their significant increases. They mention specific diseases like hypertension, nervous system diseases, esophageal neoplasms, multiple sclerosis, digestive organ neoplasms, Guillain Barre syndrome, migraines, and ovarian dysfunction. The speaker confirms that these diagnoses are found in military members, as the database is used by the Defense Medical Department. They highlight the problem of lack of transparency and response from military leaders regarding the evidence of soldiers being harmed by their own leaders. The database is not accessible to the public.

Lee Dennis, a human rights attorney, is working with Tom Rentz on a whistleblower issue in the military. They highlight a concerning trend regarding acute myocarditis cases in the Department of Defense (DOD). Initially, there were 1,239 cases, but now it has decreased to 307. Similarly, in January 2022, there were 176 cases, which has now dropped to 17. This significant decrease raises suspicions. The military possesses a comprehensive dataset, and prior to the COVID-19 vaccination, acute disease cases averaged 1.7 million. However, after the vaccine was mandated, cases skyrocketed to nearly 22 million in just 10 months. This drastic increase of 20 million demands scrutiny and raises questions about data manipulation within the DOD.

From March 2020 to March 2024, 941 people in the military community were administered remdesivir. Of those, 601 died, representing a death rate of 64%. The speaker questions whether remdesivir directly caused the deaths, or if other factors were involved. They also question whether the Department of Defense has been forthcoming with information about this.

The speaker discusses a passage from a book titled The Zapping of America: Microwaves, Their Deadly Risk, and Their Cover Up, describing a "deep" issue related to Down syndrome. The core claim presented is that Down syndrome has appeared with unusual frequency among the offspring of airline pilots, and that the FAA and medical experts have been silent about this observation, as have people working in the aviation environment more broadly. The speaker states that this elevated incidence of Down syndrome among children of airline pilots has been suggested as a fact in the excerpt. A specific investigation is mentioned: a Fort Rucker study proposed to determine the exact extent of birth defects, including Down syndrome, within this population. The study was proposed in the nineteen seventies but was opposed and subsequently dropped. The speaker indicates a motive for the suppression or blocking of the study, suggesting that the military and the airlines did not want this information public. Further, the speaker recounts that officials at the National Airlines Pilot Associations were against the study and reportedly told local councils not to proceed with it. Additionally, it is claimed that the medical consultants for the National Association were very opposed to the study. The overall narrative presented implies a deliberate resistance to investigating birth defects, including Down syndrome, among children of airline pilots, with the claim that such opposition came from both aviation authorities and medical advisory bodies connected to the airlines. In sum, the passage alleges that Down syndrome among offspring of airline pilots has been unusually high, that there was a proposed Fort Rucker birth-defect study in the 1970s that was opposed and dropped, and that opposition to the study came from the National Airlines Pilot Associations and their medical consultants, who allegedly urged local councils not to proceed. The speaker frames these events as part of a broader pattern of silence by the FAA and medical experts regarding Down syndrome and other health concerns in aviation environments.

A lab medicine specialist claims to be seeing twice as many cancer diagnoses above the baseline in their laboratory. While acknowledging this is anecdotal, the specialist notes a significant change in disease patterns based on nearly three decades of experience. After consulting with colleagues who reported similar anomalies, including micro clots and clotting conditions, the specialist called for the government to analyze its database by age group. The speaker testified in a Senate Committee hearing with Senator Johnson, where a whistleblower presented data from the Department of Defense Medical Epidemiology Database showing an increase in cancers. The speaker claims the military then froze the database and altered four to five years of previous data to make it appear consistent. The speaker suggests this is a significant issue, comparing it to Watergate, because data from 2001 and 2015 shows that data from 2016-2020 was changed to make the 2021 data appear less severe.

The exemption for pharmaceutical companies from liability for vaccine injuries is alarming. Many people have experienced severe side effects, yet discussing these issues is often taboo. One individual shared that their worst illness in 15 years followed taking the vaccine, despite having had COVID multiple times. There’s a reluctance, especially among those on the left, to acknowledge vaccine injuries due to fear of being labeled anti-vaccine. Some public figures have suffered serious side effects but choose to remain silent. Others, like a colleague, worry about lasting effects such as dizziness and balance issues. This reluctance to discuss vaccine-related health concerns highlights a broader issue of censorship around the topic.

Vaccines are claimed to be safe, easy to take, and protective. However, Judy Roberts took a shot in November 1976 and two weeks later, she says she experienced numbness in her leg. She was diagnosed with Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS). Roberts was mostly confined to a wheelchair for over a year and will have leg braces for the rest of her life, along with weakness in her hands. Roberts says she was told to take the shot by someone with the government, who allegedly knew facts they didn't release because they believed people wouldn't take the shot if they knew. Roberts says she will never take another shot that the government tells her to take.

Medical authorities are denying the existence of vaccine-related cancers, leaving patients without proper research or treatment options. Doctors are being threatened and silenced, with some losing their positions and labs for speaking out. Only a few doctors are raising the alarm, while the medical establishment ignores the issue. This denial extends to other vaccine injuries, such as myocarditis, which can lead to sudden cardiac arrest. The denial prevents the development of new treatments and solutions. The medical authorities' refusal to acknowledge vaccine injuries is causing harm and preventing the advancement of medical knowledge and care.

People glaze over when the possibility that "these things" caused problems is raised. Some confidently state the COVID vaccine saved millions of lives, but it's unclear how they know this. Many people know others who were negatively affected by the vaccine but don't want to admit it, claiming correlation isn't causation. The news scared people with death tolls, and there's a lot of money involved, including huge bonuses for fully vaccinated kids. Instead of attacking those who say this, it should be investigated as a potential conflict of interest.

There is a group of people called the "invisibles" who have experienced adverse effects from vaccines. They have been ignored by the medical community, dismissed by mainstream society, and hidden by institutions. The president of a committee dedicated to listening to these individuals shared that they were abandoned and suffering. When they finally had a hearing in the Senate, they were told that they were not expected or accounted for. This reality was disregarded and continues to be. One person's mother, for example, became partially paralyzed and experienced nausea after receiving two vaccines. She is still in the hospital after three years. Despite similar stories, some people deny that the vaccines are to blame.

Long COVID, caused by the spike protein, is affecting multiple medical disciplines. Since 2022, I've seen over 2,000 patients with COVID-19 or vaccine-related issues. Many patients had faith in medicine shattered due to adverse effects. Some were forced to choose between vaccination or losing their careers. Military service members are being harmed, with 30 individuals in my clinic facing significant issues like myocarditis and being medically discharged.

I, along with other Air Force veterans and a DOD contractor, have become sick and disfigured after serving at the Nevada Test and Training Range, including Area 51, in the 80s and early 90s. We were there to protect technology, like the F-117 Nighthawk, but were unaware of the dangers we faced. At a reunion, we discovered many of us had developed tumors. A contractor also suffered severe health issues, including multiple cancers and the removal of his vocal cords. The VA is denying our medical claims due to our service records being data masked, making it hard to prove the link between our illnesses and service. Research shows the area was contaminated with nuclear materials, but the government prioritized national interest over our health. I started an advocacy group connecting with hundreds of sick veterans. We feel betrayed and ignored.

The exemption for pharmaceutical companies from liability for vaccine injuries is alarming. Many people have experienced severe side effects, yet discussing these issues remains taboo. After receiving the vaccine, I felt sicker than ever, even after having COVID multiple times. Many friends report feeling ill after their second vaccine dose, but this side effect isn't openly acknowledged. The history of pharmaceutical companies lying and facing fines raises concerns about their accountability. Political donations from these companies influence discussions, and there's a reluctance to address vaccine injuries, especially among those on the left. Some individuals fear being labeled as anti-vaxxers, despite experiencing lasting effects like dizziness and balance issues. Many are hesitant to speak out, even if they believe they were vaccine-injured.

Tonight, I want to talk about the forgotten ones, the ones nobody talks about. I want to talk about our military, the silent heroes. Our soldiers and police officers who are in contact with the population are now on their fifth vaccine dose. So far, 67 soldiers have been repatriated due to serious and lasting side effects, and sadly, they have passed away at an average age of 27. These young, healthy soldiers, some of them newlyweds or young fathers, died in silence. They won't receive any national ceremony or medals because they didn't die for France. They died on the altar of a vaccine that wasn't even a real god. I urge you to act quickly with the powers entrusted to you by the citizens' vote, so that this can stop and never happen again. We, as scientists, humbly offer our help if you wish. Let's work together for the common good. Perhaps this is the start of a new citizen-oriented policy. We are counting on you.

The transcript describes Italy under “total lockdown” during the coronavirus outbreak, with emergency rooms at or past breaking point and authorities warning of hospital bed shortages and morgue overflow, including reports of army trucks removing bodies and new infections and deaths reported daily. It asserts Italy had the highest death toll anywhere in the world at that time, attributing the situation to a significant elderly population and an overstressed health system. It then shifts to claims about how COVID deaths were reported. The transcript says ninety-nine percent of those who died from the virus had other illness, and that only twelve percent of death certificates showed direct causality from coronavirus while eighty-eight percent involved at least one pre-morbidity, often multiple. It also frames “excess death” as deaths above or below an average baseline. The transcript further claims Italy’s high death toll was influenced by age structure, the health system’s strain, and reporting practices. A series of interviews follows. The host interviews Alberto Contrini, described as a professor of communications and a former institutional media figure involved in discussions about propaganda during COVID. Contrini says Italy launched a “massive fear campaign,” referencing Bergamo and military trucks reportedly conveying coffins, but Contrini says each truck held one coffin. He also claims elderly patients entering hospitals with other pathologies were immediately declared COVID, attributing this to financial incentives: the transcript says hospitals received refunds five times higher for COVID patients than normal patients, encouraging diagnoses to be coded as COVID even when multiple conditions existed. Contrini also links the transcript’s claims to similar patterns described for the United States and says virologists on TV were paid by pharmaceutical companies to promote “massive propaganda.” He claims many doctors were financially incentivized (citing government payments per injection) and says dissenters were marginalized, including suspended doctors and ongoing legal actions. The transcript highlights a moment where Contrini describes asking Dr. Bassetti about contracts with pharmaceutical companies and says Bassetti removed his earphones and left. The transcript then interviews Dr. Mariano Amici, described as a COVID treating doctor. Amici claims that in a study of over ten thousand patients, his group “cured” over ten thousand people with “not even once” a single death, treating not only COVID patients but also patients of other concerns. He says the “explosion” of deaths was “made up,” describing alleged use of non-COVID images on national TV, claims about inaccurate nose swab tests, and assertions that people were misclassified as dying of COVID when they died from other causes such as car accidents. Amici claims he was “traumatized” by the situation and says protocols prevented doctors from treating patients, calling the protocol a “death protocol.” The transcript presents him as saying some doctors had successful early treatment approaches using steroids and antibiotics and later had those tools taken away. Next, the transcript interviews Rosanna Chiaverini Negri, a neurologist who describes herself as working to write protocols and detoxify side effects from a COVID “Name it vaccine” that she characterizes as an experimental genetic drug. She claims that early use of antibodies from healed people and heat is curative within “three days,” and says they treated “seventy thousand” patients with only “ten” hospitalized, bringing documentation to Italy’s Parliament and Senate. She says press coverage attacked the work and that some practitioners were suspended and had licenses removed. Raffaele Ragoli, described as an investigative journalist, says he went into a hospital on March 17 and saw what he characterizes as “hell,” including a policy to “stay home, wait, and just take paracetamol,” and guidance that he says discouraged standard treatments. The transcript says Ragoli attributes the perceived need for a declared pandemic to the WHO, including a claim that the WHO needed thousands of deaths to declare a pandemic and that there was a lack of cure. Ragoli says Italy was chosen as a front runner for a mandatory vaccination program, and he claims WHO strategy is influenced by organizations “on top” of governments and by entities including “Bill Gates” and major financial institutions. He also claims Tedros Ghebreyesus stated that the next pandemic would come, not if. Giovanni Trambusti, described as an electrical engineer specializing in data processing and statistical analysis, says he downloaded raw mortality data from ISTAT and compared it month by month to what was announced in media and government. He claims deaths were highly concentrated in northern areas (especially Bergamo and Brescia) and “almost nothing” in other parts of Italy. He attributes the lack of spread south to an alleged migration from north to south ahead of lockdowns, and says he sees “the numbers aren’t adding up.” The transcript then includes Dr. Pietro Gasparoni, described as treating vaccine injury. Gasparoni claims a mechanism involving immune suppression after “mass vaccination of meningitis combined with the flu vaccine” following meningitis cases in November 2019, leading to an immune-system low period and then a “COVID explosion” during January–February 2020. He references reported meningitis cases and quotes emergency responses described in the transcript around Sarnico and surrounding municipalities. The transcript also describes myocarditis and pericarditis claims through a cardiology interview with Dr. Giuseppe Barbuto, saying myocarditis first appeared in early 2021 and that 12–36-year-olds (especially males) were higher risk. The transcript states a claim that myocarditis was exclusively found in vaccinated people and cites other studies as supporting that vaccines, rather than natural infection, caused the increase. It says “mild myocarditis” is false and that myocarditis can last for years. Finally, it features multiple “vaccine injured” testimonials, including Amelia Padovano and others, describing severe post-vaccination symptoms and disability, including facial paralysis, paralysis and inability to walk, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombosis, neurological problems, and related losses. The transcript ends with additional claims about pressured suppression of debate and the desire for scientific replication and closed-door discussions, including calls to remove vaccine mandates and conduct a randomized pragmatist study.

Speaker 0 discusses the presence of mycoplasma in commercial vaccines. He frames this as a common issue and uses a personal anecdote to illustrate resistance to testing. He describes traveling back to Washington and sitting next to a vaccine manufacturer who was upset about being bumped from first class. The conversation turns to concerns about mycoplasma, and Speaker 0 asks the manufacturer why vaccines aren’t tested for this organism. The manufacturer, en route to the FDA and other officials, becomes increasingly nervous as Speaker 0 shares what they had found. Speaker 0 directly asks, “why don’t you test these vaccines for mycoplasma?” The manufacturer’s immediate reaction is defensive, asking, “what are you trying to do, drive us out of business?” Speaker 0 clarifies that the question stems from concerns about safety, prompting the manufacturer to hedge and offer excuses. In the exchange, the manufacturer’s stance is that testing for such infections is expensive. Speaker 0 interprets this as an indication that the companies may be afraid of what they might discover if testing were conducted. This anecdote is used to illustrate a broader problem: the difficulty in convincing authorities and the public to take the issue more seriously and to pursue more thorough investigations into vaccine safety. The overall point conveyed by Speaker 0 is that mycoplasma contamination in vaccines is a known concern, but testing is often resisted due to cost and fear of uncovering problematic findings. The anecdote highlights perceived reluctance within the industry to pursue rigorous testing, which Speaker 0 argues contributes to the broader challenge of getting authorities to address and investigate the issue more seriously.

The speakers discuss a broad denial about vaccine injuries and the idea that, despite evidence, the medical establishment and political figures push the narrative that vaccines are safe and effective. They claim that many people who are vaccinated want to move on and avoid acknowledging serious side effects, including turbo cancers, undetected myocarditis, and neurological issues, and that autoimmune disease is being attributed to other causes. They argue that the medical establishment, federal health agencies, and some members of Congress who produce supportive content, such as segments like Steve Colbert’s, advocate for taking the shot. They question how many people were killed or died from the shot, asserting that Bayer’s data shows “close[ly]” to thirty-nine thousand worldwide, and that if only ten percent are reported, the true number would be in the hundreds of thousands. They claim there are millions of adverse events, but that this is denied and covered up. The speakers contend that the shot was not a real vaccine. They describe it as gene therapy rather than a traditional vaccine. They explain a sequence in which a vaccine is typically an attenuated or killed virus that requires adjuvants like aluminum or mercury to stimulate the immune system, because the attenuated or killed virus may not work well on its own. In contrast, they say this shot is mRNA, which is modified so it does not degrade. They describe how it is put into a lipid nanoparticle designed to permeate barriers like the blood-brain barrier, and they assert it would never stay in the arm, distributing all over the body. They claim the lipid nanoparticle allows the mRNA to enter cells, hijack cellular structures, and cause the cells to express spike protein, which the body then attacks as foreign. When asked who is responsible, they reference a “doctor Frankenstein” figure and name Francis Collins, head of the NIH, and Anthony Fauci as possible figures in question. The response indicates that while they consider all of them criminally liable, they would say it is primarily Fauci, with acknowledgment that people like Collins are implicated as well.

I spoke with a congressperson who mentioned getting Guillain Barre from a flu vaccine. When discussing vaccination, it's crucial to address concerns and focus on the benefits, data, and safety of the COVID vaccine. Listening to people's worries is essential.

Many unvaccinated children are found in the Amish community, where chronic diseases like autism, ADD, autoimmune diseases, and epilepsy are rare. The U.S. Government has studied the Amish for decades but has not released any reports to the public, likely because it would reveal that not following vaccination guidelines leads to better health. This suggests that the CDC may have been withholding data that shows their recommendations may harm the public.

The speaker finds it difficult to find someone who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine, and even senior consultant colleagues haven't connected their ailments to the vaccine. The speaker claims the vaccine causes autoimmune diseases, of which there are 131 types, all reportedly linked to the vaccine. Individually, these appear as coincidences, but collectively, a high percentage of vaccinated people suffer from one or more autoimmune conditions. The speaker is annoyed by their GP practice constantly pushing boosters, even knowing their views, suggesting they are incentivized by payment. The speaker believes that if the practice adhered to "first do no harm," they would refuse to administer the vaccines.

Many colleagues who have signed see many side effects in their clinical practice that are not being associated with the vaccine. This raises concerns about the high rate of vaccine side effects compared to other vaccines. Studies estimate that at least 80% of suspected cases are not reported. These safety signals are alarming for healthcare professionals, leading to a lack of trust in these vaccines. In the neurology intensive care unit, unclear autoimmune diseases have been observed, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, which is believed to be linked to vaccine-induced damage to the smallest blood vessels that supply the smallest nerve fibers. These autoimmune diseases are difficult to explain but often occur in relation to vaccination campaigns.

Lee Dennis, a human rights attorney, is working with Tom Rentz on a whistleblower issue in the military. They highlight a concerning trend regarding acute myocarditis cases in the Department of Defense (DOD). Initially, there were 1,239 cases, but now it has decreased to 307. Similarly, in January 2022, there were 176 cases, which has now dropped to 17. This drastic reduction raises suspicions. The military possesses a comprehensive dataset with baselines, showing that acute diseases in the years leading up to the COVID-19 vaccination were around 1.7 million. However, after the vaccine was mandated, the number skyrocketed to nearly 22 million in just 10 months. This significant increase suggests possible manipulation of the data, warranting further investigation and tough questions for the DOD.

Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge that the flu vaccine and its recommended dosage are ineffective; in a larger dose, it can be harmful. Nevertheless, the flu vaccine is still recommended for older people and the chronically ill. A senate subcommittee headed by Abraham Rebikoff charged that the federal government wasn’t doing a good enough job of informing the public about ineffective vaccines. Scientists at the Division of Biologic Standards test vaccines for potency and safety before licensing them for public use. However, the division does not determine the effectiveness of the vaccine. That is left to the manufacturers. A case in point is the influenza vaccine. Four scientists in charge of work on the flu vaccine during the 1960s found it to be ineffective, and they refused to give it to their own families. Two were transferred to other work, a third left the division, and over the entire ten-year period, not one word of their unfavorable findings was allowed to be published. But a more serious case involving the relationship between the leaders of the division and their scientists involves the adenovirus vaccine, a vaccine given to thousands of American soldiers to prevent certain cold-like symptoms. When it was shown that the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market. But that was three years after the division’s own scientists had pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justifies the use of the vaccine by saying it took three years to examine the evidence against it. "It is more important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent." "It is more important to use the vaccines" "than to take them off the market" "and to remove the agent." Thus, for three years, American troops were injected with a cold-preventing vaccine, which was causing cancer in laboratory animals. And some of the division’s scientists who charged they were prevented from publishing results of experiments which show some of the vaccines to be ineffective. "It's the control officer in 1960 who has grave doubts about the potency of influenza vaccine. These doubts were made known to the director of the division and through the proper channels."