TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In 2018, the Dallas elections had irregularities, similar to what we're hearing now. Texas hired a cybersecurity group to investigate these irregularities, finding 10 different ways the Dominion equipment could be manipulated. Texas outlawed the use of Dominion, but it was still used. This group spent 2 years reverse engineering how to rig an election using Dominion. Meanwhile, another cybersecurity group, including hackers and other experts, mapped out the election manipulation plan. They approached DHS and CISA for a meeting, but they refused to attend. It's concerning how many people turned a blind eye to this issue. Lawyers involved may not understand the technology, but they should be held accountable.

Several counties expressed concerns about certifying election results but were told by the Secretary of State to do so. Out of the eight counties I personally spoke to, six said they were forced to certify. One county was only 106 votes off, but the Secretary of State's office insisted on certification. Another small county was 2.3% off and was told to recertify. When the Secretary of State visited Coffee County, they brought three people with guns, badges, and handcuffs, along with two Dominion Tech representatives, creating an intimidating atmosphere. During the recount, there were no Democrats or Republicans present, and the Dominion techs struggled to get the machines to work. The Secretary of State was unresponsive and unhelpful throughout the process.

Two employees from Clark County Technical came forward independently and revealed that they found discrepancies in the number of votes recorded by voting machines. The votes would change between the closing of the polls at night and their reopening the next morning, with votes appearing and disappearing overnight. When they tried to verify the integrity of the voting machines, they were only allowed to visually inspect the outside of a USB drive, which was useless. They were denied a forensic examination.

In a local county commissioner race, the Dominion machine results showed Lorne Alexander with 34.67%, Marshall Orson with 41.35%, and Michelle Long Spears with 23.98%. Since no candidate reached 50%, a runoff was needed. Spears found precincts where she received zero votes, including her own. A hand recount revealed discrepancies, with Spears gaining 3,620 votes. The hand count showed 2,810 more votes than the machines reported, raising concerns about the machines' accuracy. This highlights the need for trustworthy voting systems. If Spears hadn't raised concerns, the discrepancies may have gone unnoticed. Translation: In a local election, the Dominion machines initially showed Lorne Alexander and Marshall Orson leading, but Michelle Long Spears raised concerns after receiving no votes in some precincts, including her own. A hand recount revealed significant discrepancies, with Spears gaining thousands of votes. This raised doubts about the accuracy of the machines and the need for reliable voting systems. Without Spears' intervention, the issues may have gone unnoticed.

When I started recording ballot numbers and names from mail-in ballots, I noticed they were in sequence, which is unusual. The envelopes had no date, just "November 0-2020." When I questioned this, I was told not to interfere. The ballots were all from the same street in Detroit, with similar signatures and no date stamp. They weren't in the system and were being entered manually. It seemed suspicious.

Two Waynesboro electoral board members are suing Virginia election officials, claiming they cannot certify the November election without changes to state election policy. Board Chairman Curtis Lilly argues that ballot machines violate the Virginia Constitution because they count votes in secret. Lilly and another board member are demanding that Waynesboro hand count each vote and livestream the counting process. Lilly says people are concerned about whether their ballots are being counted correctly. The lawsuit is reportedly being funded by Lilly's attorney and a conservative woman from Rockingham County, whose name he did not disclose.

I discovered the source of how ineligible individuals are being added to voter rolls. It's an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker, who has a controversial background. ERIC, funded by George Soros, contracts with states to access sensitive DMV records protected under privacy laws. Their membership agreement prevents disclosure of citizenship status, allowing them to add names to voter rolls without confirming eligibility. These names are then shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received significant funding from Zuckerbucks in 2020.

During an election integrity conference, a citizen journalist spoke with Reynaldo Valenzuela, the director of elections at Maricopa County, Arizona Recorder's Office and Elections Department. Valenzuela allegedly explained how to vote twice by moving from a state that uses the ERIC system to one that doesn't. The journalist tried to record the conversation but failed. They also engaged in conversations with three other individuals, including Bill Gates. The journalist became a citizen journalist to uncover the truth and is motivated by their love for their country.

We've noticed design flaws in ballots from different counties, including see-through paper and consistent hole placement for yes/no votes. This trend is concerning. I'm interested in the role of nonprofits advising county clerks on ballot design.

There are democrat attorneys trying to remove RFK Jr. from the ballot using legal actions in multiple states. RFK Jr. wants a fair fight against Trump, not to win through legal actions. He criticizes the Democratic Party for disenfranchising voters and limiting choices on the ballot, calling for true democracy with more options for voters. The current situation resembles Soviet-style elections where only party-approved candidates are allowed.

We have concerns about mail-in ballots in Clark County, with reports of ballots found in trash cans and multiple ballots sent to one address. Signatures were supposed to prevent fraud, but we haven't been able to verify them. We suspect there are ineligible voters, including deceased individuals and those who have moved. A voter was turned away due to someone else casting their ballot. We're taking legal action to stop the counting of improper votes. Thank you.

Several counties expressed concerns about certifying the election results but were told by the Secretary of State to do so. Out of the eight counties I personally spoke to, six said they were forced to certify. One county was only 106 votes off, but they were still told to certify. Another small county was 2.3% off and had to recertify. When the Secretary of State visited Coffee County, they brought three people with guns, badges, and handcuffs, along with two Dominion Tech representatives. They intimidated the county and conducted a recount without any Democrats or Republicans present. The Dominion techs faced difficulties with the machines, spending two hours trying to resolve the issues. The Secretary of State was unresponsive and unhelpful throughout the process.

Speaker 0 recounts what happened yesterday as it relates to the actual fact pattern of law and a warrant issued by a magistrate judge based on probable cause after evidence was submitted, not a Trump-appointed judge. He notes that the law enforcement process in America works this way. He argues that declarations of perfection of the 2020 election are inconsistent with what happened, and then lays out specifics. He asserts that drop boxes were “invented out of thin air,” with no basis in Georgia law. He says mobile voting units moved through Fulton County to 80% Democrat precincts, 81% Democrat precincts to be precise, and that this was not envisioned in Georgia law. He claims 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms with a first-class stamp were mailed to every registered voter in Georgia, again “nowhere envisioned in Georgia law.” He adds that if the same ballots are counted three times, the numbers should match, but they did not. Regarding the recount, he states that 3,930 double-scanned ballots were found in Fulton County alone, and thousands of those were confirmed by the state election board. He notes that Governor Kemp raised concerns from the Rossi report and that there were double-scanned ballots, but even after double scanning, the numbers did not match on the second recount, being off by eight hundred fifty ballots. He asks, “Not one person here can answer the question of how that happened.” He says ballot images were deleted and test ballots were included in the recount process, and that this was confirmed. He then discusses Democrats’ response to legitimate questions about the 2020 election. A former constituent, Derek Summerville, former FBI agent, ran data analysis with Mark Davis. They questioned the 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms (with a first-class stamp), noting that if a national change of address form was filed, forwarding could occur. They identified reasonable cause to question the validity of 39,141 of those ballots cast. They found that 160 people were registered to vote from a single UPS store, 2,138 from one church in Fulton County, and 1,391 from a shuttered 1,000-square-foot building in Fulton County. The transcript states that thousands of people remain registered to vote in Fulton County at UPS stores, storage units, pack mails, and homeless shelters that haven’t been open for over five years. Summerville and Davis filed objections to these voters, but Stacey Abrams sued them in federal court and they won—Judge Jones ruled in their favor, not Stacey Abrams. The speaker notes that since then, “twelve zero” of the 39, zero voters had been removed from the voter rolls because Summerville and Davis were correct that they were no longer eligible to vote; 9,500 had updated addresses outside Fulton County, proving that those voters were ineligible. Ultimately, 84% of the votes whose eligibility Summerville and Davis challenged were proven to have been invalid voters in the 2020 election. The speaker concludes by urging an end to the charade of the most perfect, most secure election in history and advocates cleaning up Fulton County’s voter rolls for future elections.

My wife and I went to vote in Morgan County, where we recently moved. We updated our voter registration, but when we arrived at the precinct, our names weren't in the system. Poll watchers and clerks mentioned they were experiencing more voting issues than ever, affecting both new and long-time residents. We were allowed to vote provisionally, but our names won't be counted in the tally for about a week. This raises concerns about the voting process, especially in a small, predominantly red county in Alabama. What does this mean for voting issues across the country? Let's discuss.

A project called IV3 identified over 25 million ineligible records in the nation's voter rolls. They are monitoring to see if these ineligible records are used to cast ballots. Any instances of this will be immediately reported to the proper authorities and litigation partners. This is described as a "1,000 front war" that is not easy, but focus must be maintained. Despite "propaganda," the speaker believes they are winning and that "liberty will find a way," but it is important to "stay in the fight." The message is to focus on the signal.

We've been trying to elect good candidates in local elections but keep losing by narrow margins. After a recent election, we suspected cheating, especially after hearing claims about fraud in Detroit. While checking the voting list for a recall, I found friends who had been registered to vote without their knowledge, despite never voting. This pattern continued when I looked into my own voting history after moving to Ohio, where I was also registered back in Detroit without consent. I discovered many others in similar situations, including someone who had never voted but was used in multiple elections. We obtained a massive list of voters from the clerk's office to investigate further.

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 to explain what they wanted to get from the board if they had been allowed to continue. Speaker 1 mentioned that since 2019, voters have no way of knowing if their vote was counted properly because they can't read the QR code. Even if the words on the ballot match their vote, the QR code remains unreadable. Speaker 1 believes the board panicked when they were about to discuss this issue.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

I noticed that the ballot numbers and last names on the absentee and mail-in ballots were in sequence, which is unusual because these ballots should come in different numbers. This raised my suspicion. I asked about the date on the envelopes, but there was only November 0, 2020, with no second number. When I questioned this, the supervisors became angry and accused me of disrupting their work. I didn't want to be kicked out, so I didn't challenge anything further. The ballot numbers were all from the same area, with similar signatures, and there was no date stamp after 0. None of these ballots were showing up in the system and were being manually entered, even though they knew these details wouldn't be in the poll book or system.

We have created the most extensive voter fraud organization in American politics. We have a lot of work to do. I don't need your help to get elected, but I will need it once I am elected. It's not just about who gets to vote or making it easy for eligible people to vote. It's about who gets to count the vote and if your vote actually matters. It's about election subversion, not just voting. Who counts the vote? Count the vote? Count the vote?

I checked my voter registration and found out I wasn't registered in Fulton County, so I had to return to Muskogee County to vote. However, when I got there, I was rejected again. Now, I have to go back to Atlanta. Just think about the chaos if this happened last minute. It doesn't matter; I would drive to DC if necessary to avoid a bad situation. I’m determined to do whatever it takes.

I won't go to church anymore, but I hope you'll stand up for what's right. It's important to get people to vote and be scared of the truth. Winning elections matters. I'm Field Searcy, a Grady County boy. Let's keep this video on record for transparency in our elections. We need volunteers for phone work. There's a secret box involved, and I've worked with it.

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin faces growing scrutiny after filing charges against Colonel Conrad Reynolds, the decorated army veteran who led Independence County’s vote to return to hand counted paper ballots. Prosecutors accuse him of violating "exit polling laws," a rarely enforced misdemeanor, after organizing a ballot referendum that overwhelmingly passed with 63% of voters choosing paper ballots over machines. Reynolds, soon to be inducted into the Arkansas Military Veterans Hall of Fame, has been a national leader in election reform, working closely with members of President Trump’s team in Washington on election security and vulnerabilities in voting systems. He continues to hold a top secret security clearance, which includes routine polygraph examinations. Reynolds says the prosecution is politically motivated and that the "establishment is trying to stop the paper ballot movement before it spreads to other counties. They're terrified of losing control of the election system," end quote. The controversy raises a broader question inside Arkansas: why would a Republican administration led by governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders oppose the very hand counted paper ballot system that grassroots conservatives overwhelmingly supported? State officials have not publicly responded. The case has drawn sharp national criticism. Mike Lindell said, "please share." Reynolds is described as a hero and is claimed to be "guilty of trying to save our country and get to paper ballots hand counted." General Michael Flynn wrote on x, "this is GOP law fair, and it must end." Sarah Huckabee, please step in and stop this ridiculous persecution. Attorney Sydney Powell posted, "what the hell? Sarah Huckabee, this prosecution is ridiculous and obviously lawfare." Attorney general Tim Griffin, "exit polling is not election engineering." Political strategist Roger Stone shared, "top MAGA leaders are asking governor Sarah Huckabee why Arkansas indicted colonel Conrad Reynolds, a proponent of paper ballots." Reynolds’ attorney, Chris Corbett, calls the prosecution political payback, saying, "it's law fair, targeting a decorated army veteran because he's been effective." Reynolds has "worked tirelessly to strengthen election security in Arkansas and across the nation, and now he's being punished for it," end quote. Reynolds will appear tomorrow morning at 9AM at the Independence Courthouse in Bateville, Arkansas to be booked, fingerprinted, and photographed, an image that his supporters say will symbolize courage in the growing national paper ballot movement. Reporting at the White House for Lindell TV, Kara Kashtanova.

I sent my concerns to the Secretary of State before the election, expecting them to forward it to the right people. After the election, I followed up with my post-election concerns, but I haven't received a response from the Secretary of State. I attended a Board of Elections meeting last week and planned to testify about securing the ballots. However, I was muted just 15 seconds into my presentation.

Several counties expressed concerns about certifying election results but were told by the Secretary of State to certify. Out of the eight counties I personally spoke to, six said they were forced to certify. One county was only 106 votes off, but the Secretary of State's office insisted they certify that number. Another small county was 2.3% off and was told to recertify. When the Secretary of State visited Coffee County, they brought three people with guns, badges, and handcuffs, along with two Dominion Tech representatives, creating an intimidating atmosphere. During the recount, there were no Democrats or Republicans present, and the Dominion techs struggled to get the machines to work. The Secretary of State was unresponsive and unhelpful throughout the process.