reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker questions whether the planet is warming and if it should be our main concern. They explain that while temperatures have been unusually high in recent times, this warming trend started over 300 years ago during the little ice age. Proxy data, such as ice core and sediment data, is used to estimate temperatures from hundreds of thousands of years ago. The speaker argues that throughout history, warmer periods, like the medieval warm period and the Roman warm period, were beneficial for humanity and led to flourishing civilizations. They suggest that we should celebrate warming and increasing carbon dioxide levels as they have positive impacts on Earth's ecosystems and human conditions.

Former vice president Al Gore's film, "An Inconvenient Truth," presents the theory of man-made global warming based on ice core surveys. These surveys show a correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature, but fail to mention that temperature actually leads carbon dioxide by 800 years. Ice core records consistently demonstrate that temperature changes precede carbon dioxide changes. Carbon dioxide is a natural gas produced by all living things, and humans contribute only a small fraction of it compared to volcanoes, animals, bacteria, and dying vegetation. The oceans are the largest source of carbon dioxide, with warmer temperatures leading to increased emissions. The time lag between temperature changes and carbon dioxide levels is due to the oceans' slow warming and cooling process. Earth's long climate history does not support the idea that carbon dioxide determines global temperatures.

- They mentioned 8.2 kilo year event, which occur roughly 8,000 years ago, and the Younger Dryas period, which occurred roughly 12,700 years ago. - Now, what does these two events have in common? During these two events, there was a geomagnetic excursion. - Here's the study for the event 8,200 ago. So they suggest based on evidence found in a volcano in China that roughly 8,000 ago, there there was an unrecognized younger Holocene geomagnetic excursion. - So this suggests that this climate change eight thousand years ago occurred because of geomagnetic excursion. - During the Younger Dryas, there was also a geomagnetic excursion called the Gothenburg magnetic excursion. - So you can see that it ranges from 30,000 years to 12,000 years ago before present, exactly aligns with the younger, driest, abrupt climate change. - And what's happening today? Of course, there is a geomagnetic excursion. - You can see the pole shift acceleration around 1994. Just watch this acceleration.

The video discusses the relationship between temperature and carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in ice cores. Professor Ian Clark, a paleoclimatologist, explains that ice cores can provide data on past temperatures and atmospheric CO2 levels. Surprisingly, the research shows that changes in temperature precede changes in CO2 levels by about 800 years. This suggests that CO2 is not the cause of temperature changes, but rather a product of them. Multiple studies support this finding, indicating that temperature fluctuations lead to changes in CO2 levels, not the other way around. These findings challenge the fundamental hypothesis of human-induced climate change.

The speaker argues that life on Earth is in crisis due to crop failure, social and ecological collapse, and mass extinction, framing these as part of Extinction Rebellion’s climate alarmist narrative and a broader political and financial “climate industrial complex” that aims to control purchases, diet, and travel in the name of sustainability and net-zero emissions. They contend that people rely on governments and the media rather than data, and promise to show that temperatures fluctuate, are not unprecedented, and that natural disasters are not getting worse. They claim climate data is unreliable and that CO2 plays a small role in climate, while presenting scientific evidence that we are not in a climate crisis. Using a 65-million-year temperature graph, the speaker states the Earth today is in a cool period and is coming out of an ice age, noting that life thrived in much warmer times without human CO2 emissions. They assert that over the last two thousand years there have been two warm periods and two cold periods, including the Roman warm period, the cold Dark Ages, the medieval warm period, and the Little Ice Age, with current warming described as a recovery from the Little Ice Age. The three degrees Fahrenheit of warming cited by scientists and the media is described as not unprecedented and not cause for alarm due to ongoing fluctuations. The speaker argues that warming and CO2 emissions have not made natural disasters more frequent or violent, citing hurricane and wildfire data. They reference a graph from the Bulletin of the American Urological Society showing a slight downward trend in US hurricanes per year since 1900, and a North Atlantic hurricane intensity graph from 1920 to 2016 showing no trend. They claim the 2014 US National Climate Assessment presents an illusory upward trend by focusing on a red-highlighted portion. They also claim that US and global acres burned by wildfires have been decreasing since 1900. Regarding data reliability, the speaker highlights a gap between climate model predictions and observed data, noting that temperature measurements from weather balloons align with satellite data, while climate models over-predict warming. They discuss the urban heat island effect, giving Paris as an example where city temperatures are much higher than surrounding rural areas, suggesting data can be biased to frighten the public. The speaker argues CO2 is not the climate control knob, as it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere, and that historical CO2 levels have been far higher than today. They cite MIT oceanographer Carl Wunsch (spelled as Karl Wench) to claim that when oceans warm, more CO2 is released, and when oceans are cold, CO2 is absorbed. A graph is described showing CO2 rising centuries after temperature increases, implying temperature drives CO2 more than the reverse. They acknowledge CO2 may have some small influence but emphasize many other factors—volcanic activity, cosmic rays, and the sun—and claim limiting CO2 would largely stunt biodiversity with little effect on temperature. The speaker argues CO2 is essential for photosynthesis and that farmers use high CO2 in greenhouses to boost crop yields, illustrating CO2 as a life-giving gas and stating it would green the planet and increase food supply if CO2 increases. They conclude that climate change is an existential threat in Western discourse but offer this as historical context from Aztecs to the Salem witch trials. They mention carbon taxes and individual CO2 budgets as signs of climate issues infiltrating daily life and frame their conclusion as pursuing truth by examining data themselves. In summary, the speaker presents historical temperature variability, critiques of data and models, downplays CO2’s role, highlights CO2’s benefits to plant growth, and asserts that the climate crisis is a hoax to be opposed by scrutinizing data personally.

Geologists argue climate for 250 years, dismissing climate science as a new, flawed field. They rely on evidence, not models, pointing out past ice ages and warmer periods. Current temperatures are cooler than historical peaks, with a recent warming trend post-little ice age. The speaker questions the significance of current climate records, emphasizing the Earth's long-term climate fluctuations and the minimal impact of current carbon dioxide levels. They argue that drastic changes in CO2 levels would harm plant and animal life.

The speaker challenges the idea of man-made global warming, stating that the science behind it is weak and uncertain. They argue that the Earth's climate has always changed throughout history, with periods of both warmer and cooler temperatures. They mention the Little Ice Age in the 14th century, when the Thames River froze over, and the Medieval Warm Period, which was associated with prosperity. They also highlight the Holocene maximum during the Bronze Age, when temperatures were significantly higher for over 3,000 years. The speaker concludes that climate variation in the past is natural.

The speaker challenges the idea of man-made global warming, stating that the science behind it is weak and uncertain. They argue that the Earth's climate has always changed throughout history, without any help from humans. They mention the Little Ice Age in the 14th century, when the Thames River froze over and ice fairs were held. They also discuss the Medieval Warm Period, a time of prosperity and vineyards in Europe. Going further back, they mention the Holocene maximum during the Bronze Age, when temperatures were significantly higher for over 3 millennia. The speaker concludes that climate variation in the past is natural.

Speaker 0: We have been cooling down for the last four thousand years. If we look at the last thirty eight years, there has been no change in temperature. In the last hundred and fifty years, we've had three warming periods and three cooling periods with a total warmth of about point six degrees Celsius. 1850, what happened then? Oh, yes. That was the end of the Little Ice Age. Do you think it's gonna warm or cool after Little Ice Age? Of course, it's gonna warm. So if you start taking measurements from 1850 in the industrial revolution, we have been warming. If you take measurements from the medieval warming, we've been cool. We've cooled about five degrees since then. If you take measurements from the Roman warming, we've cooled about five degrees. So as soon as someone tells you, oh, it's warming, the reply you give is since when?

Professor Yann Clark, a renowned paleoclimatologist, studies temperature variations in the Arctic over hundreds of thousands of years. By analyzing ice cores, they have discovered a surprising relationship between CO2 levels and temperature. The temperature increases first, followed by a rise in CO2 levels, with an 800-year delay. This suggests that temperature changes lead to CO2 increases, rather than the other way around. Multiple studies on ice cores support this finding, contradicting the belief that CO2 causes global warming. These findings challenge the fundamental hypothesis of human-induced climate change.

The speaker, Professor Ian Clark, is a paleoclimatologist who studies Earth's temperatures in the Arctic over hundreds of thousands of years. He explains that ice cores contain data on climate variations and CO2 levels. Surprisingly, the research shows that temperature changes precede CO2 changes by about 800 years. This suggests that temperature drives CO2 levels, not the other way around. Multiple studies confirm this pattern, contradicting the belief that CO2 is the cause of global warming. The evidence from ice core drilling disproves the fundamental hypothesis of human-induced climate change.

This video discusses various facts about CO2 and climate change. The speaker, a chemical engineer, presents information from the CO2Coalition.org website, highlighting key points. These include the long-term trend of decreasing CO2 levels, the diminishing warming effect of CO2 as its concentration increases, the benefits of CO2 for plant growth, and the natural cycles of glacial advances and interglacial periods. The speaker also mentions that current warming trends are not unusual or unprecedented, and that models used by organizations like the IPCC may overstate the impact of CO2. The video concludes by emphasizing the importance of empirical data and real-world evidence in understanding climate change.

For the past 10,000 years, it has been warmer than today for about 95% of the time. Throughout the Earth's history of 4.65 billion years, there has been substantial ice on the planet for only about 5-10% of that time. Currently, we have low levels of CO2 compared to Earth's history. The carbon dioxide in the room is around 900, but there is nothing bad about it. In fact, the more carbon dioxide, the better.

In this video, the speakers discuss historical climate changes to provide context for the current climate debate. They mention Jean Jouzel, a well-known climatologist and geologist in France, who studied the ice in Greenland and found that there were significant temperature variations of up to 16 degrees Celsius during the last deglaciation around 10,000 years ago. They argue that the small temperature changes we are experiencing today are insignificant compared to past variations. They also mention periods of significant warming in the past, where temperatures increased by about 10 degrees Celsius, leading to changes in vegetation and the appearance of pre-agricultural societies. They conclude by referring to the current period, known as the Holocene, which has been relatively stable for the past 12,000 years.

Ice from the Viking Age, around the year 1000, indicates that Greenland was about 1.5 degrees warmer than today. The Nordgrip project is drilling through the ice sheet to gather a 3-kilometer ice core, which holds climate data spanning over 120,000 years. By inserting a thermometer into the drilled hole, researchers can accurately map historical temperatures, reconstructing the last 10,000 years. Temperature data shows that around 4,000 years ago, it was 2.5 degrees warmer than now, followed by a gradual decline until the medieval warm period a thousand years ago. Other core samples confirm the end of the Little Ice Age about 140 years ago. While there has been a global temperature increase in the 20th century, determining whether this rise is man-made or a natural variation is challenging, as observations began at the coldest point in the last 10,000 years.

The Greenland ice core project, Nordgrip, is reopening to extract the last few meters of ice, which holds crucial climate data spanning over 120,000 years. By drilling the ice core and measuring temperatures with precision, scientists have reconstructed temperature changes over the past 10,000 years. The graph shows that around 4,000 years ago, temperatures were 2.5 degrees warmer than today, but gradually decreased until the Roman age. During the medieval warm period, temperatures reached a peak before declining to the lowest point in the last 8,000 years around 1875 AD. This coincides with the start of meteorological observations. Similar warm and cold periods have been confirmed in other parts of the Northern Hemisphere through carbon dating and measurements. However, it is challenging to determine if the 20th-century temperature increase was due to human activity or natural variation.

The transcript claims a classified CIA document titled *National Cultural Development Under Communism* (first published June 1957, immediately classified, approved for release 08/24/1999) explicitly mentions “Tartaria,” and uses the document to argue that Soviet communist authorities interfered with Muslim and minority cultural life, including through suppression of religion, confiscation of mosques and literature, and rewriting history. The document is presented as beginning with a Bolshevik proclamation dated 12/07/1917 promising Muslims of Russia—Tatars, Tatars and related groups in Volga, Crimea, Siberia, Turkestan, Transcaucasia, Chechens, mountain peoples, and those whose mosques and prayer houses were destroyed—that beliefs and customs and national and cultural institutions would be “forever free and inviolate,” and that they should organize national life in complete freedom. The transcript states Lenin and Stalin promised equality, sovereignty, self-determination (including secession), abolition of national and national religious privileges, and freedom of development for national minorities and ethnographic groups, followed by Soviet suppression contradicting those promises. The transcript then details a sequence of repressive measures attributed to communists in the Muslim regions of Russia: confiscation of mosque lands (1918); outlawing Muslim religious brotherhoods (1921–1922); ridicule of Islam and undermining spiritual leaders; making Islamic religious life “virtually impossible” (1929); elimination of Islamic leadership via arrest and deportation (and “liquidation”); closing nearly all village and most city mosques; suppressing religious literature through alphabet changes, confiscation of religious texts including the Quran, and suppression of religious publications; dismissal of pious practicing Muslims from responsible positions. It cites a decline in the number of mosques admitted by Soviet authorities: from 7,000 mosques in European Russia alone at the time of 1917, to 1,312 mosques in the whole Soviet Union by 1942, with examples including Tashkent (from 300 to 20), Samarkand (from over 100 to 17, with only one usable), Bukhara (from 360 to one), and Al Maratha (no mosques remaining). It also states communist authorities condemned publication of Muslim literary works except those extolling Russian and Russians. The transcript returns to cultural heritage, arguing that communist interference extended to history. It describes a specific directive dated 08/09/1944 by the Central Committee of the Communist Party, instructing the Tatar provincial committee to conduct a “scientific revision” of Tartaria/Tatar history to eliminate “shortcomings and mistakes” of a nationalistic character by writers and historians, in order to remove references to “great Russian aggressions” and hide the “real course” of Tatar-Russian relations. It further claims historians in Muslim areas of the USSR rewrote history at party orders to portray Russians favorably, and that truthful histories were withdrawn and destroyed to deny Muslims and Tatars access to genuine accounts of the past. The transcript emphasizes that the CIA document’s inclusion of “Tartaria” in the 1950s is presented as important. In addition to the CIA-document discussion, the transcript shifts to historical geography research using early modern books and maps. It describes a “compendium of geography” released in 1691 by Lawrence Ecard and an additional world description (1715) with similar geography, suggesting they copied from shared sources while showing minor coordinate differences. The transcript quotes from the 1690/1691 geography text portraying “Tartary” as the “greatest country in the world,” lying east of Russia and north of Persia, India, and China, bounded by longitudes 83rd to 180th degree and latitudes 39th to 72nd degree, with an asserted length of about 4,000 miles and breadth about 2,000 miles. It states Tartary had ancient provinces (Scythia, Sake, Sogdania, and part of Cimatia Asiatica, plus some Old Persia) and had remained unconquered until “Anno eleven sixty two,” when the Tatars and “obscure people” overran it and elected a monarchy, with “a good part” later “fallen away.” The transcript discusses claims that Tartary is related to Mongol rule and uses the name “great sham of Tartary” as associated with China, asserting the emperor is “also the famous country of China.” It further claims that “Shambalu” (presented as the imperial seat) is not Peking/Beijing, proposing that commonly asserted identifications are mistaken. It argues using references to “Kambalu,” “Khanbaliq,” and “Kambaluk,” and compares placement with the Great Wall, claiming Kambalu is north of the Great Wall and that “Beijing/Peking” is south of it. To support its geographic argument, the transcript quotes from a printed book (1679) attributed to Tamerlane’s historian, describing a conflict involving Calyx and the city of Kambalu/Kambaluk/Kumbalu, and then describes an invasion of China beginning with references to “Liyotom and Pekin,” using repeated references to wall-crossing as evidence that “Kambalu” and “Pekin/Beijing” are presented as distinct. It maintains that if the same locations were involved, the narrative of crossing the wall and the sequence of revolt and conquest would not align. It then discusses plotting the claimed Tartary coordinates on maps and connects coordinate ranges to areas where Russian expansion and treaties (e.g., Treaty of Natchinsk) are said to have affected Tartaria’s location, arguing that exact location around the time of the document is “debatable.” The transcript develops further geographic assertions about “Cathay” versus “Manji,” stating that Cathay is north of the Great Wall and Manji is south of it. It references multiple maps (including those from 1689 and 1570) to claim “Cathay” corresponds to areas beyond the Great Wall and that Kambalu is located in Cathay. It describes river names and regions (including references to Obi and other rivers/lakes difficult to locate today), and it ties these claims to how Tamerlane is said to move to Cathay and then “jump the wall” into China. It then moves into “American Tartary” discussions. Using references from 1652 and other materials (including Uzziah Priest and later authors), it argues that some 17th–19th century sources used the phrase “American Tartary” (or “an American Tartary”) to describe areas in North America that resemble “Asiatic/Tartary.” It addresses claims that one map (1652) suggests Tartary-controlled North America by matching coloration but argues it does not indicate full continental control. The transcript then expands into multiple “lost city” and “gold” narratives (e.g., Quivera/Quivera stories tied to Coronado, and alleged connections to “King Tartarax”), also citing an 1851/1830s style literature tradition that portrays indigenous peoples as having Tatar/Scythian origins or characteristics. The transcript repeatedly states that learned people in the 1700s–1800s believed connections between Tatars/Scythians and indigenous North American peoples, tying this to Bering Strait crossing theories and various scholarly arguments. Later, the transcript returns to Greenland and ice. It begins with claims that satellite imagery appears to show Greenland as “completely” covered in ice, and discusses an asserted ice-free history: it states beryllium-10/aluminum-26 dating suggests Greenland bedrock was exposed for more than 280,000 years until about 1,100,000 years ago, and it summarizes claims of long-term ice-sheet coverage “for the last eighteen million years,” with periods of reduction. It argues that if Greenland’s ice disappeared, it would most likely appear as an archipelago due to bedrock depression under ice weight. The transcript connects this to references in older literature (e.g., Burton’s *Anatomy of Melancholy*) describing Greenland as frozen for “half the year,” and it discusses old maps showing possible passages or canals through Greenland. It claims forums and maps (including ones from 1747/1592 and later) suggest a central passage “formerly passable” but later choked with ice. It mentions a 1888 expedition by Friedrich Nansen and notes that Nansen’s planned route aligned with the location of the alleged canal. The transcript concludes by stating that its Greenland and canal information is attributed to external forums, and frames the central question as whether there could have been ancient ruins or a once-passable Greenland corridor, then transitions back to broader Tartaria/indigenous-origin discussions and ends.

Between 2007 and 2012, scientists drilled deep into Greenland's ice as part of the NIEM project to uncover the climate story of the last interglacial around 125,000 years ago. What they found puts today's climate panic into perspective. Back then, Greenland was around eight degrees Celsius warmer than today. Sea levels were four to eight meters higher. Yet the planet didn't collapse and Greenland didn't melt. There were no tipping points and no mass extinctions. The planet was far warmer and life flourished. So when activists claim that two sea of modern warming spells catastrophe, the ice, the data, and the history, all say otherwise.

Over the past 4000 years, the planet has been cooling down. In the last 38 years, there has been no change in temperature. In the last 150 years, there have been 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods, resulting in a total warmth of about 0.6 degrees Celsius. The warming after the little ice age in 1850 is expected, and if measurements are taken from that time, we have been warming. However, if measurements are taken from the medieval warming or the Roman warming, we have actually been cooling by about 5 degrees. So, when someone says it's warming, the question to ask is, since when?

Speaker 0: The first ice core survey at Vostok in the Antarctic found a clear correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature. Speaker 1: Going back six hundred fifty thousand years, the temperature history shows that the relationship is complex, but there is one relationship far more powerful: when there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer. Al Gore says the relationship between temperature and CO2 is complicated, but there was something important in the ice core data he failed to mention. Professor Ian Clark notes that the link between CO2 and temperature exists, but the link is the wrong way round. Speaker 2: When examining ice cores, climate on long scales is recorded in geological material. Ice samples use isotopes to reconstruct temperature; the atmosphere imprisoned in ice is liberated to analyze CO2 content. Speaker 0: Professor Clark and others have discovered a link between CO2 and temperature, but the link is reversed. Speaker 2: In the Vostok ice core, as temperature rises from early to later times during a deglaciation, CO2 follows with an eight-hundred-year lag, meaning temperature leads CO2 by about eight hundred years. Speaker 0: Major ice core surveys consistently show that temperature rises or falls, and then after a few hundred years, CO2 follows. Speaker 3: Therefore, carbon dioxide is not the cause of warming; warming produced the increase in CO2. Speaker 2: CO2 clearly cannot be causing temperature changes; it is a product of temperature changes. Speaker 4: The ice core record challenges the fundamental assumption of the theory that CO2 increases in the atmosphere cause warming, showing that the assumption is wrong. Speaker 0: How can higher temperatures lead to more CO2 in the atmosphere? Carbon dioxide is a natural gas produced by all living things. Speaker 5: Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant; living things grow with CO2. Humans produce only a small fraction of atmospheric CO2, in the single digits percentage wise. Speaker 0: Volcanoes produce more CO2 each year than all human sources combined. Animals and bacteria produce about 150 gigatons of CO2 per year, compared with 6.5 gigatons from humans. Dying vegetation, such as falling leaves, is another large source. The biggest source is the oceans. Speaker 6: The ocean is the major reservoir into which CO2 goes when it comes from the atmosphere, or from which it is re-emitted. Heating the surface makes the ocean emit CO2; cooling allows the ocean to dissolve more CO2. Speaker 0: The warmer the oceans, the more CO2 they produce; the cooler they are, the more they absorb. There is a time lag of hundreds of years between temperature change and CO2 change due to the ocean’s huge size and depth, giving the oceans a memory of temperature changes. Speaker 6: The ocean’s memory can extend up to ten thousand years. A current North Atlantic change may reflect events in distant parts of the ocean decades or centuries earlier. Speaker 0: The modern warming began long before widespread use of cars or electric lights. In the past 150 years, temperature rose just over half a degree Celsius, but most of that rise occurred before 1940. Since then, temperature has fallen for four decades and risen for three. There is no evidence from Earth’s long climate history that CO2 has ever determined global temperatures.

Glacial ice studies are often used to support the theory of human-induced global warming. These ice cores contain data that goes back hundreds of thousands of years. By analyzing the ice, scientists can determine past temperatures and the CO2 levels trapped within. Professor Clark and other researchers have found a correlation between CO2 variation and air temperature, but not in the expected way. The temperature changes occur first, followed by CO2 changes with an 800-year delay. This suggests that temperature leads CO2 changes, rather than the other way around. Multiple studies have shown this pattern, contradicting the hypothesis that CO2 is the primary cause of climate change. Ice core drilling provides evidence that challenges the fundamental assumption of human-induced climate change.

The speaker explains the true temperature history, stating that it was warm from 800 AD, cooled down around 1300, and started warming again since 1900, way before CO2 became significant. They criticize Michael Mann's mathematical algorithm, which produced a flat line for temperatures from 1880 to 1980, claiming it is insignificant compared to the actual temperature changes. The speaker points out that the warming started before human-induced atmospheric carbon dioxide became meaningful. They express frustration with the scientific community's lack of questioning and attribute it to funding influences. They emphasize the need for independence in order to speak out freely.

The speaker discusses the manipulation of data regarding hockey stick graphs and climate change. They argue that the hockey stick graph, which shows a sudden increase in temperature after 1950, is false and based on statistical errors. They mention the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period as periods of temperature fluctuations that are visible in other graphs. The speaker claims that the Medieval Warm Period resulted in a prosperous time, with the colonization of Greenland and the cultivation of vineyards.

Over the past 4000 years, the planet has been cooling down. In the last 38 years, there has been no change in temperature. In the last 150 years, there have been 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods, resulting in a total warmth of about 0.6 degrees Celsius. The warming after the Little Ice Age in 1850 was expected, and since then, we have been warming. However, if we consider measurements from the medieval and Roman warmings, we have actually cooled about 5 degrees. So, when someone claims it's warming, the question to ask is, "since when?"

For the past 4000 years, the planet has been cooling. In the last 38 years, there has been no temperature change. Over the last 150 years, there have been 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods, with a total warmth increase of 0.6 degrees Celsius. The end of the Little Ice Age in 1850 marked the start of warming. Since then, we have warmed due to the Industrial Revolution. If we measure from the medieval and Roman warmings, we have actually cooled by about 5 degrees each. So, when someone says it's warming, ask them since when?