reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe both fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury syndromes. These side effects can be categorized into four major groups: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurological problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to typical treatments, and abnormalities in the immune system. These effects are not controversial or theoretical; they are real and have been documented extensively.

Myocarditis, or heart damage, is more common than previously thought. Studies in the US military and Thailand show that around 20% of people who receive the COVID vaccine develop myocarditis, as confirmed by echocardiograms and other tests. This means that out of every 1 million vaccinated individuals, 200,000 will experience heart damage. Unfortunately, 50% of those with myocarditis will die within 5 years. This alarming increase in myocarditis cases is due to the cardiotoxic nature of the vaccine. This information comes from Dr. Cressel and Shoemaker in Toronto, Canada.

The US government has paid over $5.22 billion to vaccine victims via the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). As of June 28, 2024, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reported 48,101 deaths and over 2.6 million adverse events. These figures are verifiable facts, accessible through government links.

They classified the post-vaccine troubles into three categories: immediate effects like pain, swelling, and redness; symptoms resembling COVID-19; and post-COVID injection syndromes. The latter includes inflammatory and multisystemic syndromes with various complications such as cardiac, neurological, hematological, vascular, immune system, reproductive health, cancer, and congenital issues. It is important to consult a doctor if experiencing any of these symptoms.

Italy is described as being under total lockdown as coronavirus deaths continue to spike, with emergency rooms at or past breaking point. Authorities warn that Lombardy is running out of hospital beds and that morgue space has been exhausted, while army trucks transport bodies and new infections and deaths are reported daily. The president of the region asks for more military presence on the streets, with roadblocks and controls to limit movement without valid reasons. The transcript frames Italy as a new “ground zero,” noting almost twelve thousand five hundred cases at the time. A communications professor and former media and institutional figure, Alberto Contrini, is interviewed about why he believes Italy’s death toll rose. He says that fear propaganda included the use of large military trucks shown on TV carrying coffins, which he claims corresponded to one coffin per truck. He also claims that elderly people entering hospitals with other conditions were immediately declared COVID cases. Contrini attributes this to hospital reimbursement being reported as five times higher for COVID patients than for normal patients. He also alleges that incentives and payments led doctors to classify and treat patients in ways that increased COVID counts, including government payments per injection and “virologists” on television who he says were paid by pharmaceutical companies to promote a “massive propaganda.” He claims many doctors were suspended or marginalized for refusing these practices, and he describes legal actions by suspended doctors as ongoing. Contrini compares the Italian situation to the United States and says similar incentives and staging were used elsewhere, including treatment and reporting dynamics that he says manufactured death counts. He further suggests that, from his perspective as a media figure, the pattern of events implied opportunism evolving into something scripted before the outbreak reached Italy. He says other outbreaks were ignored by authorities despite doctors and scientists who believed they had effective approaches early. The transcript then shifts through multiple medical and investigative testimonies. Dr. Mariano Amici is described as having coordinated a study of over ten thousand patients who, he says, were all cured without a single death, treating COVID and other conditions successfully before protocols were imposed. He claims high death numbers were “made up,” images shown were not from COVID, and that the number of infected people was inflated by incorrect nose swab tests. He also claims incorrect treatments were used and that even patients who died from other causes were diagnosed as COVID to increase payment and change death rates. He says he found it “traumatizing” and that peers were pressured to comply with protocols and avoid losing their jobs. Rosanna Chiaverini Negri, described as a neurologist and holistic doctor, states she worked to write protocols to heal COVID patients and detoxify patients from “side effect” of what she calls an experimental genetic drug rather than a vaccine. She says she and others treated seventy thousand patients, with only ten hospitalized, and submitted medical records to Italian parliamentary bodies. She claims the media called the treatments witchcraft and that some doctors were suspended and had licenses removed. Raffaele Ragoli, an investigative journalist, says he went into a hospital on March 17 and saw conditions he describes as “hell.” He claims government policy required patients to stay home and take paracetamol, and that certain doctors used antibiotics against Ministry of Health guidance. He connects the narrative to mandatory vaccination policies and alleges that COVID was used to create fear and large-scale emergency measures that reduced rights. He also cites statements from WHO leadership about future pandemics and suggests biolabs and biological research are ongoing. He later asks whether the virus itself was actually responsible for the concentrated “explosion” seen in Bergamo and whether death patterns continued across Italy. Giovanni Trambusti, an electrical engineer focused on data processing and statistical analysis, describes downloading raw mortality data from ISTAT month by month to compare announced COVID numbers with real mortality. He claims mortality was highly concentrated in northern areas such as Bergamo and Brescia and “almost nothing” occurred elsewhere, and that the contagion did not move south even when people migrated south to avoid lockdown. He says he cannot explain the specific mechanism behind the northern concentration but insists that the numbers show an “explosion” in Bergamo. Dr. Pietro Gasparoni provides a hypothesis about the Bergamo surge. He describes alleged multiple meningitis cases in late 2019 and mass meningitis vaccination around January–February 2020, claiming that immune systems were low in the first two weeks after vaccination and made COVID infection spread more easily in that period. The transcript then emphasizes what it says are vaccine-related effects using mortality patterns. Trambusti is described as asserting that excess mortality in 2022 rose in regions where COVID deaths supposedly declined and suggests this indicates deaths were not from COVID. He claims a “fourteen-day trick” in death classification after vaccination, where deaths within fourteen days were categorized as if people were “unvaccinated,” producing a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative while the vaccinated were allegedly misclassified. He also claims spikes in mortality by age group aligned with vaccine rollout. A cardiologist, Dr. Giuseppe Barbrow, is quoted about myocarditis and pericarditis beginning in early 2021 and affecting males particularly in ages twelve to thirty-six. He claims myocarditis is not “mild” and that myocarditis can persist and generate potentially fatal arrhythmias. The transcript claims a view that the increase was driven more by vaccination than natural infection. Finally, multiple vaccine injury accounts are included, describing paralysis, loss of mobility, myocarditis within hours or after doses, thrombosis, pericarditis, neurological symptoms, and inability to walk. The narrative repeatedly frames these injuries as resulting from the COVID vaccines and contrasts them with being told to comply with protocols and vaccination. The closing portion returns to calls for scientific debate and study replication in Italy, including a request for replication of the “Henry Ford study,” a randomized pragmatic study, and removal of mandatory obligations “vis a vis such evidence.” The transcript ends with the host thanking a team and those who enabled the trip and work producing the film and study.

There are 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines cause real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and immune system abnormalities.

Mandating vaccines, like in France, is seen as a sensible approach to reopen. The Australian government compensates hundreds of citizens for COVID vaccine injuries. It is important for customers to know that store employees are vaccinated. COVID injuries include heart inflammation, damaged capillaries, and autoimmune disorders. News Corp supports mandating vaccines for its employees. Former Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Nick Coatsworth, suggests incentives or penalties for those who choose not to get vaccinated. He also emphasizes the need to assess compensation claims promptly. Currently, 1,000 individuals are awaiting approval for compensation. Mandating vaccines is considered a sensible approach.

In an 18-month period, ACC in New Zealand paid out $7,560,000 for COVID vaccine injuries, with only 1,664 out of 4,156 claims accepted. This is significantly higher than the typical annual payments for vaccine injuries in 2018 and 2019, which were around $146,000. The high bar for acceptance raises concerns about the safety of COVID vaccines compared to previous years.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines have real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and immune system abnormalities.

Approximately 5 to 9% of people who receive the COVID-19 vaccine may experience heart damage, resulting in 50,000 to 90,000 cases per million individuals. If someone develops myocarditis, there is a 75% chance of death within 10 years. This information is difficult to share, especially with families and individuals affected by myocarditis. The only options for those with vaccine-induced myocarditis are either facing a high mortality rate or undergoing a heart transplant, which may offer some hope. These truths are heartbreaking, and it is distressing that we have been deceived and allowed such harm to occur in our bodies and the bodies of our loved ones.

Reports from the DMED database in 2021, after the vaccine rollout, show alarming increases in several conditions. Myocarditis reports increased 2800%. Cancers of various types increased 300 to 900%. Infertility in both genders increased 500%. Miscarriages increased 300%. Neurological disorders increased 1000%. Demyelinating disorders increased 500%. MS increased 600%. Guillain Barre syndrome saw a 500% increase. HIV increased 500%. Pulmonary embolism increased 400%. These are presented as some of the most alarming findings in the DMED database.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines have been proven to cause real side effects in four major categories. Firstly, cardiovascular issues such as heart inflammation, myocarditis, and cardiac arrest. Secondly, neurologic problems including stroke, Gambray syndrome, and neuropathy. Thirdly, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments. Lastly, immune system abnormalities. These side effects are not controversial or theoretical, but rather a reality.

Studies have suggested myocarditis is a risk factor from COVID. However, it's claimed that the idea COVID is more of a cause of myocarditis and is more severe is untrue, based on literature reviews, assessments, and real-world experiences. Evidence supporting this claim was included in a written statement. An official information act request was made to determine the number of myocarditis cases due to COVID infection. The Ministry of Health couldn't provide a single case. Conversely, there were over 900 cases of myo- and pericarditis on the CALM safety report 46 by November 2022.

I have analyzed the data on work disability days, doctor visits after vaccination, and work disability days related to COVID-19. Based on the bKKalen data in Germany, there has been a significant increase in work disability days, about a hundredfold, due to vaccine side effects, totaling 383,170 days for the first three quarters. These figures have been published and can be found in my statement. As for COVID-19-related absences, there were 374,000 work disability days certified by doctors. Additionally, data from INNEC shows a considerable number of severe cases requiring hospitalization due to vaccine side effects. In 2021 alone, there were 23,000 severe cases and 3,000 cases requiring intensive care. Furthermore, 282 deaths were attributed to vaccine side effects.

The speaker discusses the recognition of side effects from the Covid-19 vaccine by public authorities. After two years of conspiracy theories, the link between the vaccine and various health issues is now acknowledged. Only 72 out of 241 cases have received compensation for vaccine-related adverse effects. The main incidents recognized are cardiac disorders, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis. Neurological disorders, such as facial paralysis, and severe vascular issues like strokes, thrombosis, and pulmonary embolisms, have also been reported. The difficulty in reporting adverse events and the low number of victims seeking compensation are highlighted. The speaker suggests that the media downplayed the severity of these effects during vaccination campaigns.

An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. The goal is to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

The COVID vaccines had different impacts on human health. The mRNA vaccines had a small price, with a rare side effect of myocarditis, mainly in boys and young men. The overall risk was about 1 in 50,000, and for young children, it was close to 1 in 500,000. However, the cases were generally mild and resolved on their own. On the other hand, the viral vector vaccine had a higher price, with a risk of blood clotting issues, including fatalities. The mRNA vaccines did not have any reported deaths. Overall, the price paid for the mRNA vaccines was considered small, while the viral vector vaccine had a higher risk.

After the vaccine rollout in 2021, reports from the DMED showed significant increases in health issues: myocarditis by 200%, various cancers by 300-900%, infertility by 500% for both genders, miscarriages by 300%, neurological disorders by 1000%, demyelinating disorders by 500%, MS by 600%, Guillain Barre syndrome by 500%, HIV by 500%, and pulmonary embolisms by 400%. These are just a few of the concerning findings in the database.

They classified the post-vaccine troubles into three categories: immediate effects like pain, swelling, and redness; symptoms resembling COVID-19; and post-COVID injection syndromes. The latter includes inflammatory and multisystemic syndromes with various complications such as cardiac, neurological, hematological, vascular, immune system, reproductive health, cancer, and congenital issues. It is important to consult a doctor if experiencing any of these symptoms.

Since April 2021, there have been reports of cases of stroke, myocarditis, pericarditis, and menstrual disorders following Covid vaccination. Yesterday, two individuals were compensated by the National Compensation Organization for Medical Accidents (ONIAM) for these side effects, and 768 other cases are currently being reviewed for compensation. In 2022, ONIAM received 5,000 compensation requests, with 3,500 medical assessments conducted. They approved 85% of their offers, compensating over 1,130 people. Additionally, 140 compensation requests were filed by victims of transfusion-related contamination. The ONIAM has received 1,020 compensation requests related to Covid vaccines, with Pfizer being the most implicated. The majority of compensated cases involved cardiac issues, neurological disorders, and other miscellaneous problems.

The panel discusses replication (replicon) vaccines and their potential dangers, focusing on how they differ from conventional messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and what new risks might emerge as this technology develops. Key points and concerns raised - Replicon vaccines concept and fundamental differences - Replicon vaccines use replication-capable genetic material, so the embedded genetic information not only makes antigen proteins but also multiplies inside the cell. They are described as having both constitutive function (the ability to make proteins) and, crucially, the capacity to replicate, which distinguishes them from traditional, non-replicating mRNA vaccines. - It is explained that replication introduces additional mutation and recombination opportunities, because the RNA genome is copied more than once, and the process can produce variants that differ from the original design. - Central dogma exceptions and viral biology - The speakers explain that while the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) generally governs biology, some viruses violate this, with RNA viruses that replicate via RNA-dependent replication and even some reverse-transcribing retroviruses that convert RNA to DNA and integrate into genomes. This context is used to frame why replicon vaccines could behave unpredictably. - Potential risks of replication and spread - A core concern is that the replicon approach might allow the vaccine genome to spread beyond the initial target cells, potentially reaching other cells and tissues, or even spreading to other people via exosomes or other means. Exosomes can transport DNA, RNA, and proteins between cells; thus, the replicon genome could in theory be disseminated. - The possibility of homologous or heterologous recombination between replicon genomes and wild-type viruses could yield new variants. The panel emphasizes the difficulty of controlling such recombination in a living system. - Specific material and design considerations - The use of viral components like spike protein genes in replicon vaccines raises concerns about how these proteins might mutate or recombine during replication, potentially altering antigen presentation or safety. - A concern is raised about the lack of repair mechanisms in RNA replication (as opposed to DNA replication), which could make error rates higher and lead to unpredictable changes. - The panel notes that current replicon vaccine designs (including those using alphavirus backbones) inherently carry high mutation and recombination risk, and that the replicating systems may encounter unpredictable evolutionary dynamics inside the human body. - Safety signals and clinical anecdotes - The speakers cite cases of adverse events temporally associated with vaccines, including vascular inflammation and thrombosis, stroke-like events, and myocarditis, to illustrate that immune responses to vaccines can be complex and occasionally severe. They emphasize that such observations do not establish causality, but argue they warrant careful scrutiny. - There are references to cases of acute vascular and neural complications following repeated vaccination, and to broader immune dysregulation phenomena, including IGG4-related disease and immune dysregulation syndromes that can involve multiple organs. - One example concerns a patient who developed sudden limb problems after the third dose, requiring surgery; another describes myocardial involvement after multiple doses and subsequent inflammatory sequelae. - DNA contamination and analytical findings - Kevin McKernan’s analysis of certain Japanese CoronaVac vaccines is cited: both DNA contamination and the presence of SV40 promoter elements were detected in some vaccine lots, with DNA amounts exceeding some regulatory benchmarks in at least one case. The concern is that DNA contamination, or the presence of promoter sequences, could influence integration or expression in unintended ways. - It is noted that vaccines using lipid nanoparticles can potentially deliver nucleic acids into cells; in the presence of exons or promoter sequences, there could be unintended cellular uptake and expression. - Implications for public health and policy - The panel underscores the need for caution, thorough investigation, and long-term observation of any replication-based vaccine platform before broad deployment. There is a call to evaluate risks, monitor long-term outcomes, and consider the possibility that replication-competent constructs could drive unforeseen evolutionary dynamics within hosts or communities. - There is contention about how information is communicated to the public, with particular emphasis on avoiding misinformation while ensuring that scientific uncertainties are transparently discussed. - Broader scientific context and forward-looking stance - The speakers discuss how the field’s approach to gene-based vaccines is evolving rapidly, and they stress that the compatibility of replicon systems with human biology is not yet fully understood. - They frame their discussion as not merely about current vaccines but about the trajectory of vaccine platforms: if replication-based or self-dispersing systems prove too risky or unpredictable, the prudent path might be to favor conventional, non-replicating strategies until safety, efficacy, and containment of unintended spread are more firmly established. Closing and takeaways - The session closes with emphasis on careful evaluation of replicon vaccines, awareness that viral genetics can behave differently in humans than in theory, and a call for continued discussion, independent verification, and transparent communication as the technology develops. - Throughout, speakers acknowledge the complexity of immune responses to vaccines, the potential for unexpected adverse events, and the importance of safeguarding public health while advancing vaccine science.

We have found more adverse effects than officially reported from the COVID vaccine. Serious harms and deaths are at unprecedented levels. We are committed to compensating those affected, but the financial burden should not fall on taxpayers. Our goal is to fight for justice for vaccinated individuals, expose discrimination against the unvaccinated, and reveal the truth about the COVID pandemic and vaccine safety.

They classified post-vaccine issues into three categories: immediate effects like pain, swelling, and redness, but vomiting, diarrhea, fainting, etc. are not considered immediate side effects. They also mentioned Covid-like illnesses that resemble Covid-19, with data from Israel showing that 11% of people had Covid within two weeks of the anti-Covid injection. They warned about post-Covid injection syndrome (P0IS or P0V), which includes various inflammatory, multisystemic problems like cardiac, neurological, hematological, vascular, immune system, reproductive health, cancer, and congenital complications. This classification highlights the wide range of adverse effects and raises concerns about the vaccine's safety.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines cause real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and abnormalities in the immune system.

Approximately 15% of people are injured by COVID-19 vaccines, with around 2.5% experiencing heart damage. The pharmaceutical industry suggests that not all vaccine vials are the same. It has been discovered that 80% of deaths from Pfizer vaccines come from 30% of the lots, while 80% of deaths from Moderna vaccines come from 20% of the lots. These lots may have varying concentrations of genetic material and contaminants, affecting their quality. This issue is currently receiving significant attention.