TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

"The use of some 19,000 electronic voting machines in the city of Chicago and Cook County primary on March 21 is now under intense scrutiny." "The US company that makes the machines, Sequoia, was bought in 2005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen." "I think that American elections ought to be run by American companies and ought to be run by American citizens, not Venezuelan nationals." "We believe this is a national security issue. There is no way that companies belonging to non US corporations should have access to our elections." "In the case of, Smartmatic, there are a number of unanswered questions." "Certainly, our government should know."

A Microsoft certified security expert provided evidence of a Dominion vote counting machine in a swing state with a wireless card connected to a thermostat's wireless network. The IP address traced back to a city in China, linked to a Chinese corporation involved in questionable dealings with American politicians. There is a thick binder of documented evidence showing foreign access and interference in the election, including public statements from the FBI and DHS warning about Iran's involvement. The evidence is undeniable, and those questioning it should argue with the FBI and DHS. The photographs and IPs provide conclusive proof of foreign interference in the voting systems.

A group of Venezuelan businessmen bought an American company that supplies electronic voting machines and counts votes, but the government has not reviewed the sale. Smartmatic, based in Boca Raton, provides voting machines in local US elections, but only has a few employees in Florida and is a labyrinth of international holding companies owned by Venezuelan businessmen. Electronic voting experts claim it's nearly impossible to verify if a proprietary system is tamper-proof. Voter watchdog groups and some in Congress are calling for a full review of the ownership of all electronic voting companies to determine if it poses a risk to US elections. The US Treasury Department would not confirm if a review was underway on Smartmatic. Watchdog groups question why US voting machines would be under the control of citizens of another country, especially one with a suspect election process. One congressman wrote to the Secretary of Treasury asking for a review of Smartmatic's ownership, which he says is offshore and murky.

We demonstrated how easily election machines can be hacked, raising concerns about the limited number of companies controlling voting technology. 43% of American voters use machines with security flaws, and some states lack a paper trail to verify results. The lack of transparency in cybersecurity practices is alarming.

"Smartmatic is a labyrinth of international holding companies owned by Venezuelan businessmen." "When Smartmatic bought The US voting machine companies, the US government did not review the sale." "Many experts say those voting machines were manipulated in Venezuela to give president Hugo Chavez a victory." "Exit polls done by The US firm Penn shown in Berlin had Chavez losing 41% to 59%." "But the next day, Chavez declared victory, reversing the score, saying he won 59% of the vote." "All these machines talk to a central computer and report on their results." "And in that mechanism, as they communicate with the center, the central machine can report anything." "The Chavez government gave Bizta, Smartmatic, and another company a $91,000,000 contract to run voting machines for the February."

A Venezuelan-owned firm may take over a US voting machine company, sparking concerns about democracy. Smartmatic, owned by Venezuelans, controls Sequoia, a major voting machine manufacturer. Critics fear foreign influence on US elections. Congress and watchdog groups demand an investigation into the sale. The Treasury Department's lack of transparency raises suspicions. Concerns about national security and the integrity of American elections are at the forefront. The need for clarity and accountability is emphasized.

A Venezuelan-owned company, Smartmatic, bought the U.S. voting machine company Sequoia in 2005, raising concerns about the security of American elections. Smartmatic is based in Boca Raton, Florida, but most of its employees are in Venezuela. Critics question why a foreign-owned company, particularly from a country with a suspect election process, controls U.S. voting machines. Some in Congress are requesting a Treasury Department review of the sale, similar to the CFIUS review process used in the Dubai Ports deal. The Treasury Department acknowledged awareness of the sale but couldn't confirm if it had been reviewed. Some find the lack of a clear answer unacceptable. A congresswoman is investigating the situation.

The speaker reveals that Dominion and ES&S are the two main systems used for electronic voting in the US, accounting for 95% of the electronic voting. They also mention that these companies have partial ownership by the Chinese Communist Party. Speaker 1 acknowledges that this information was previously mentioned and has now been confirmed by Congress.

Clark County Technical employees independently discovered that votes were changing on voting machines and USB drives overnight. They were only allowed a visual inspection of the USB drives and denied a forensic examination.

A firm primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen, Smartmatic, bought the US company Sequoia, which makes electronic voting machines. Concerns arose because Smartmatic has ties to the Venezuelan government, including a $91 million contract and a government minister on the board of directors of a related company. Critics suggest the Venezuelan government could manipulate US elections. Smartmatic's structure involves international holding companies, and the US government didn't review the sale when Smartmatic bought Sequoia. Experts claim Smartmatic machines were used to manipulate Venezuelan elections, reversing exit poll results that favored Hugo Chavez's opponent. Smartmatic also built a production facility for electronic voting equipment hardware just outside Beijing, China, and then shipped the hardware to a warehouse in Taiwan. The hardware was marked as manufactured in Taiwan and shipped to both Smartmatic and Dominion for use in US elections. Dominion voting systems manages elections in almost all the swing states in The US, which determines who wins the presidency. Dominion moved its research and development and servers which store swing state voting information to its office in Belgrade, Serbia, where Venezuelan, Chinese, and Serbian software engineers maintain system administrative status over swing state elections. Three Smartmatic executives were indicted in Florida for bribery during the 2016 Philippines election, allegedly to alter election results. The Venezuelan mafia, with assistance from China and Iran, has been rigging elections in 72 nations.

A Venezuelan-owned company, Smartmatic, bought the U.S. voting machine company Sequoia in 2005, raising concerns about the security of American elections. Smartmatic is based in Boca Raton, Florida, but most of its employees are in Venezuela. Critics question why a foreign company, particularly from a country with a suspect election process, controls U.S. voting machines. Some in Congress are requesting a Treasury Department review of the sale, similar to the CFIUS process used for the Dubai Ports deal, but the Treasury Department can't confirm if a review occurred. A congresswoman contacted the Secretary of the Treasury requesting a review of the ownership. The ownership is offshore and murky, and no one seems to know who owns it. Some believe American elections ought to be run by American companies and American citizens, not Venezuelan nationals.

A report discusses a deal that could allow a Venezuela-owned firm to take over one of the United States’ top voting machine companies, as Hugo Chávez-led Venezuela shifts the region leftward. Critics claim this places democracy “for sale” without action. The focus centers on the Chicago and Cook County primary on March 21, which used about 19,000 electronic voting machines. The machines’ manufacturer, Sequoia, was bought in 2005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen. When Chicago experienced problems with the machines, a dozen Venezuelan employees were on hand to assist. Chicago officials argued that American elections should be run by American companies and American citizens, not Venezuelan nationals. Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida; however, the company’s president testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida, while the majority of workers are based in Venezuela. Watchdog groups questioned why US voting machines would be under the control of citizens of another country, especially a country with a voting process deemed highly suspect. They framed the issue as a national security concern, arguing that companies owned by non-US nationals should not have access to US elections. The treasury department’s role in monitoring sales of US companies to overseas investors—where national security is a concern, similar to the Dubai ports deal and the CFIUS process—was highlighted. Some in Congress demanded an investigation. In Smartmatic’s case, questions remained regarding ownership, which led to a letter to the secretary of the treasury requesting a review of the ownership. The process is described as offshore and murky, with unclear ownership details. It was asserted that the government should have clarity on this matter. reporters attempted to verify whether the 2005 Sequoia sale had been reviewed by CFIUS. Treasury officials acknowledged awareness of the sale but could not confirm whether it had been reviewed. Congress members and voter watchdog groups pressed for a clearer answer and a formal review. The dialogue included strong criticisms of the Treasury Department, with speakers accusing it of incompetence for reportedly stopping over 1,500 reviews while failing to provide a clear answer about whether CFIUS reviewed the voting-machine sale. The discussion noted the need for accountability and information, including potential outreach to John Snow, then the Treasury secretary, to obtain a definitive explanation for the public. Ultimately, the speakers emphasized that the issue deserved examination and pledged to continue pursuing answers, praising a Congresswoman for her efforts and calling on the White House to provide an explanation by Monday evening. The conversation ended with a commitment to actively seek clarity.

Clark County Technical employees independently discovered votes changing on voting machines and USB drives at night. They were only allowed a visual inspection of the USB drives and denied a forensic examination.

The speaker is alarmed by events in the 2020 US presidential election, drawing parallels to the 2013 Venezuelan election where Smartmatic software allegedly changed votes. Vote counting abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software while Donald Trump was ahead. During the night, vote reporting went offline, and when it resumed, there was a significant shift favoring Joe Biden. According to the speaker, votes in 27 or 28 states counted by Dominion are sent outside the US to Germany and Spain, where Smartmatic, a company founded in Venezuela in 2005 to fix elections, does the counting. Smartmatic has a history of election interference in Venezuela and Argentina, and allegedly botched an election in Chicago. The speaker claims Smartmatic stopped vote counting and subtly switched votes, around 10 per district, which was discovered in Antrim County.

A firm owned by Venezuela could be allowed to take over one of the country's top voting machine firms. The US company that makes the machine, Sequoia, was bought in 2005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen. When Chicago had problems with the machines, a dozen Venezuelan employees were there to help with the election. Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida, but the majority of the workers are based in Venezuela. Watchdog groups question why US voting machines would be under the control of citizens of another country, especially a country whose own election process is highly suspect, calling it a national security issue. Some in congress are demanding an investigation into Smartmatic's ownership, which is offshore and murky. The Treasury Department is supposed to monitor sales of US companies to overseas investors where there is a question of national security, but can't confirm if the sale of Sequoia in 2005 had been reviewed or not.

New evidence shows Venezuelan businessmen bought a US voting machine company critical to elections without government review. Smartmatic, owned by Venezuelan businessmen, supplies voting machines in the US. Concerns arise about the ownership of Smartmatic and its ties to Venezuela. Questions about election integrity and potential fraud during the 2020 elections are raised. Calls for a full review of Smartmatic's ownership and transparency in elections technology. The chairman of Smartmatic is Lord Mark Malloch Brown, a British diplomat with ties to George Soros. Allegations of irregularities in elections and the need for accountability are highlighted.

Two Clark County Technical employees revealed that votes on voting machines and USB drives changed overnight. They were only allowed a visual inspection of the USB drives and denied a forensic examination.

The speaker suggests that the Venezuelan election results were manipulated in favor of the government due to the programming of the astromatic machines. A Harvard mathematician analyzed the numbers and concluded that the smart mathematic system must have been involved. The machines communicate with a central machine that can report any information. Although Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida, the company's president testified that only a few employees work there, while the majority are based in Venezuela.

Venezuela-owned firm, Smartmatic, which owns US voting machine company Sequoia, is under scrutiny for potentially compromising American elections. During the Chicago primary, Venezuelan employees were present to assist with the machines, causing outrage among officials who believe American elections should be run by American companies and citizens. Watchdog groups and some members of Congress are demanding an investigation into the ownership of Smartmatic, as its offshore ownership is unclear. The Treasury Department, responsible for monitoring sales of US companies to foreign investors, cannot confirm if the sale of Sequoia in 2005 was reviewed. Critics argue that allowing a non-US corporation access to US elections poses a national security risk.

Antonio Mojica and Alfredo Anzola received a small business loan from the Venezuelan government before the recall election. They started a company called Vista, which adapted voting software for Smartmatic machines used in the 2004 elections. The Venezuelan government owned 28% of Vista's stock, and a government minister was on the board of directors. Smartmatic, primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen, later bought Sequoia, a top US electronic voting system company. Experts believe that Smartmatic manipulated voting machines in Venezuela to give President Hugo Chavez a victory. Smartmatic is based in Florida, but most of its employees are in Venezuela. The use of Smartmatic's machines in the Chicago and Cook County primary elections raised concerns about foreign influence in US elections.

Antonio Mujica and his partner Alfredo Enzola received a small business loan from the Venezuelan government just months before the recall election. Venezuelan corporate registration documents show the government owned 28% of the stock of Bizta, a company they started that adapted voting software for the Smartmatic machines in the 2004 elections. The same document shows Chavez government minister Omar Montillo was on Bizta’s board of directors. The Chavez government gave Bizta, Smartmatic, and another company a $91,000,000 contract to run voting machines for the February election. The next year, the owners of Smartmatic, primarily Venezuelan businessmen, bought Sequoia, one of the top electronic voting system companies in the United States, for $16,000,000. Smartmatic is a labyrinth international holding company structure. Smartmatic Group NV of Curacao Netherlands Antilles owns Smartmatic International BV of Amsterdam, which owns Smartmatic Corporation of Florida, which bought Sequoia Voting Systems of California, USA. When Smartmatic bought the US voting machine companies, the US government did not review the sale. Many experts say those voting machines were manipulated in Venezuela to give president Hugo Chavez a victory. Polls done by The US firm Penn shown in Berlin had Chavez losing 41% to 59%. But the next day, Chavez declared victory, reversing the score, saying he won 59% of the vote. “Everything was computed in the favor of the government.” So the only explanation is that the smart mathematic machines had been programmed in that way. A mathematician crunched the numbers on the Venezuelan election. “All these machines talk to a central computer and report on their results. And in that mechanism, as they communicate with the center, the central machine can report anything.” Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida. But the president of the company, Jack Blaine, testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida. The majority of the workers are based in Venezuela.

Dominion, a key player in vote tabulation, received a $400 million investment from Credit Suisse, a Chinese bank, just weeks before the election. Another company, Seidel, which recently declared bankruptcy, had its assets acquired by a new entity with ties to George Soros and Venezuela. Additionally, Kamala Harris' husband is linked to one of these companies. The software used for elections originates from Hugo Chavez's Venezuela, while the machinery and tabulation services are connected to Venezuelan and Chinese interests. This raises concerns about foreign influence in the election process, suggesting a potential manipulation of our electoral system.

Voting in America is conducted by private companies contracted by the county. However, there are no national security standards for these companies, making it easy to change votes without leaving a trace. Additionally, the votes from Texas and 28 other states are sent to a server in Frankfurt, Germany, owned by a multinational company based in Barcelona, Spain, which controls and reports the votes.

Smartmatic built a production facility in China and shipped hardware marked as Taiwanese to Smartmatic and Dominion, violating US law. Dominion manages elections in almost all US swing states. Evidence suggests the Venezuelan regime owns the source code used in Smartmatic and Dominion machines, which are manufactured in China. Dominion moved its R&D and servers with swing state voting information to Belgrade, Serbia, where Venezuelan, Chinese, and Serbian engineers alter elections as directed by foreign entities. Voter information is stored on Huawei servers linked to Hong Kong. CISA consulted Smartmatic and Dominion regarding election irregularities. Smartmatic executives were indicted in Florida for bribery related to altering election results in the Philippines. The CNE source code can prove election alterations. The FBI allegedly tried to obstruct investigations. Smartmatic was created at the direction of Hugo Chavez, and its source code was designed to alter election results. The Venezuelan CNE owns Smartmatic's source code. Smartmatic entered the US market and orchestrated Dominion's purchase of Sequoia, inheriting the Smartmatic source code. Smartmatic publicly broke with the Venezuelan regime in 2018. Dominion and Smartmatic's actions are controlled by the Cartel del Sol, the Cuban DGI, and the Chinese CCP.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.