reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We would expand our efforts to raise funds and engage with the business community. Our message is that we are reasonable and won't destroy everything or take away their assets. It's a big job.

The World Economic Forum is often dismissed as a conspiracy theory, but the Federal Liberal Party seems to be copying its policies. Scott Morrison's trusted digital identity bill is a direct copy of the World Economic Forum's global digital identity project. This bill aims to shift the global economy towards an access model, where you rent goods and services instead of owning them. It essentially means a life via subscription. While they claim it will help sustainability, it actually leads to a closed loop economy where the rich get richer and you have less. It's like a form of slavery.

Members of Congress should not trade stock due to the unfair advantage they have with information. Some lawmakers oppose a stock trade ban, but the issue is clear. Congress is seen as a rich man's club, with some members making significant profits from trading. While it's not technically illegal, it's a problem that needs to be addressed. There is a proposed bill to prevent this, but some disagree with the divestiture provision. If amended to allow holding private assets, it may gain more support. Without the amendment, many Republicans may vote against it.

A speaker emphasizes shifting focus away from Saudi Arabia and toward Venezuela, stating that the country has more oil, infinite potential, and will open markets. The plan is to privatize all industry and move government operations out of the old sector. The speaker highlights Venezuela’s huge resources—oil, gas, minerals, land, technology—and notes its strategic location relative to the United States. The message asserts that American companies are in a “super strategic position to invest,” and that Venezuela will be “the brightest opportunity for investment of American companies, of good people that are going to make a lot of money.”

The Federal Register in 2023 reveals that the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission are collaborating to establish natural asset companies. These corporations will hold rights to ecological performance in areas like national reserves and farmlands, taking over management from public land agencies. The companies can license these rights from governments or private landowners, including publicly owned areas like national parks. The aim is to privatize these areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. Wall Street, particularly BlackRock, stands to benefit greatly from this, with the potential for trillions of dollars in economic value.

The Federal Register in 2023 reveals that the New York Stock Exchange is collaborating with the Securities and Exchange Commission to establish a new type of company called a natural asset company (NAC). NACs will hold rights to ecological performance in areas like national reserves and farmlands, taking over management responsibilities from public land agencies. These rights can be licensed from governments or private landowners, including publicly owned areas like national parks. The aim is to privatize these areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. Wall Street, particularly BlackRock, stands to benefit greatly from this, with the potential for trillions of dollars in economic value.

The federal government isn't a company to dismantle. It requires constitutional adherence, not a Shark Tank takeover approach. The government is fat and hasn't been scrutinized in a century. An individual is willing to do this work for free, but isn't cutting enough. In private equity, when dealing with a broken company, you cut deep and fast, then rehire. He should cut 20% more. It's all fat and waste. You can't be surgically precise, you have to cut more because you don't know. We've never audited government for a hundred years.

To Elon and Vivek, my advice is straightforward: cut to the chase. In Argentina, we've delegated powers from Congress to the executive branch, allowing us to make swift changes. Our regulation minister has a counter showing how many days these powers remain in effect. We have divisions focused on deregulation, cutting public spending, and reducing government structure. Daily, we eliminate around 15 economic restrictions. My recommendation is to push limits and remain vigilant. This agenda isn't politically motivated; it’s about removing privileges. While some will complain, those losing privileges must justify their stance to society, which can be uncomfortable for them.

The speaker announces plans to open Venezuela for foreign investment, describing a $1,700,000,000,000 opportunity across multiple sectors. The opportunity is not limited to oil and gas, which are highlighted as huge, but also spans mining (including gold), infrastructure, and power. The speaker emphasizes that the opportunities will touch the entire energy value chain, stating that they will open all upstream, midstream, and downstream activities to all companies. In addition to energy, the speaker identifies opportunities in technology, AI, and tourism. They note that Venezuela has 2,800 kilometres of pristine Caribbean coastland ready to be developed, suggesting significant potential for coastal or tourism-related projects. A central part of the plan is to establish a favorable environment for foreign investment. The speaker asserts that they will bring rule of law, open markets, and security for foreign investment. They also mention a transparent massive privatization program that is waiting for investors, implying a broad and clear path to privatizations as part of the reform agenda. Key points highlighted include: - A $1.7 trillion opportunity encompassing oil and gas, mining (gold), infrastructure, and power. - The energy sector potential described as DRIP with 17 gigawatts of opportunity that needs rehab, indicating substantial modernization and development needs. - Broad openness to investment across the entire oil and gas value chain: upstream, midstream, downstream. - Additional growth areas in technology, AI, and tourism. - 2,800 kilometres of Caribbean coastline ready for development. - Commitments to rule of law, open markets, security for foreign investment, and a transparent privatization program designed to attract international investors. The overall message is that Venezuela is positioning itself as a major, diversified investment destination with a comprehensive framework to protect and promote foreign investment, underpinned by large-scale privatization and development of a broad range of sectors.

A Dutch participant, confirming they are from the Netherlands, explains that they work with an AI and technology company that is trying to create a new form of universal basic income. The approach combines infrastructure with monetizing what people use on their phones, aiming to generate passive income by allowing companies to directly purchase individuals’ data on the platform. In terms of practical rollout, they say they are in agreement with a “193 Nations State.” The system would be pushed directly to people’s phones, described as being similar to how, during the COVID period, people could use their phones to log in and out. People would have the option, and the government would recommend using it if they choose to. The process would appear directly on the phone. When asked how it would be sold or monetized, the discussion touches on the government and a new form of taxable revenue. The speaker suggests that by creating a new asset from data, money can be earned and taxed by the government, presenting a potential solution for governments. The other participant asks for clarification on how it actually works: if you provide data to a particular company, that company must pay you for that data, and the payment would be taxed by the government. The response affirms that it is a system. Regarding timing, they express hope that, if things go well with Davos this week, the rollout could occur in the coming years. They claim to be in agreement with major institutional actors. Reproduced key points include: - A Dutch AI/tech company aiming to establish a universal basic income model by monetizing end-user data and platform usage. - The monetization involves companies buying individuals’ data on the platform, generating passive income for users. - Rollout would be direct to users’ phones, with government recommendations and alignment with an international framework described as a “193 Nations State.” - The mechanism envisions creating a new asset from data that can generate revenue and be taxed by the government. - Practical operation described as: you provide data to a company, that company pays you, and the government taxes the payment. - A tentative timeline anticipates progress if Davos proceeds well, suggesting an upcoming rollout in the coming years and alignment with major institutions.

We are in a monetary revolution where the power needs to be taken back from the private families and central banks that print money. The government is not in control. This is why we can't see change in congress or have a government that works for us. We need a peaceful revolution, a monetary revolution, where we stop using their money and instead invest in assets like gold, silver, Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Global Boost. These assets can't be inflated or seized. Remember your seed phrase and keep it secure.

I think most Americans stopped paying attention to South Africa after the end of apartheid in 1994, but the situation there has deteriorated. The democratic system set up in the 90s is being used to promote socialist ends. Black Economic Empowerment, for example, has nothing to do with economic empowerment. The ANC, South Africa's ruling party, has strong communist ties and is implementing policies that are actively discriminating against taxpayers. The government isn't protecting lives or property and is pushing to expropriate private property without compensation. This is coupled with a radical ideology being taught at universities that dehumanizes white people and could be a predicate for genocide. It's a collapsing society and the West cheers it on, but it's time to wake up to what's happening there.

My conservative friends believe high taxes are the issue, but the real problem is that taxes don't fund the government. The government is mainly financed by printing money through treasury bonds bought by the fed. Taxes are collected to maintain the illusion that they fund the government, but in reality, money is printed out of thin air to finance it.

To understand Elon Musk's actions with the federal government, look at his Twitter takeover. He implemented cost-cutting measures: mass layoffs, reduced real estate, and employee buyouts—similar to a recent federal government email. This mirrors his "zero-based budgeting" approach. While Twitter's revenue decreased after these changes (partially due to an advertising boycott), its profitability increased significantly. Adjusted EBITDA rose from $682 million to $1.25 billion, even with reduced revenue. This demonstrates that eliminating unnecessary spending can increase profitability, leading to taxpayer savings and reduced government debt. Ignoring the negative narrative, Musk's methods could benefit the federal government, resulting in lower taxes and improved services for the American people.

You can privately own ATMs, placing $1,000-$3,000 of your cash in them. You can profit $3-$4 every time someone withdraws $20. One of the speaker's busiest ATM locations was filled with $4,000 and makes about $800-$900 every month in profit. The speaker considers ATMs an asset and a vehicle to get closer to financial freedom. Follow the speaker's page to learn about the ATM business.

Disinformation is profitable, so we must trace the money. A significant portion of advertising revenue supports harmful content. We need to collaborate with the global advertising industry to redirect ad dollars. This involves creating exclusion and inclusion lists to prioritize funding for accurate and relevant news and information. We must challenge the global advertising industry worldwide to focus its resources on disseminating truthful and beneficial information.

The speaker discusses the myth that those who support privatization want a smaller government and more freedom. They argue that the leaders of Petrobras can be held accountable for prioritizing the interests of minority shareholders over selling oil at a higher price domestically. Despite being a mixed economy company, the government controls Petrobras and manipulates it for its own benefit. Over the years, foreign investors have gradually acquired a significant percentage of Petrobras shares, making it less of a Brazilian company. This explains why structural changes are difficult to implement in Petrobras. Ultimately, the speaker suggests that Petrobras is no longer a Brazilian company.

We need funds for Ukraine's reconstruction, and one solution is to utilize Russian assets. If Russia has caused damage, we can use the money from those assets to rebuild Ukraine. This is a key point I want to discuss.

Speaker 0: The argument is that BlackRock, by unlocking and taking control of as many natural assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system, can deepen and expand its control over not just people in the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well and essentially turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street financial product. The goal, as described for Larry Fink in particular, is to develop new asset classes that can be used to fuel their existing business model and perpetuate it for millennia forward. One idea discussed for years is natural assets, what they call nature's economy—actual assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system—as a way to perpetuate what they do and broaden their control over the natural world, turning the natural world into tradable financial products. The supposed plan includes having all of this on a universal ledger on blockchain, presumably, and making it trackable and surveillable, so that it can be surveillable and automated. In this framework, Larry Fink would have his risk management AI—Aladdin—exercise control over these assets in unprecedented ways, to serve their benefit. Concurrently, there is movement toward a new financial governance system that pushes infrastructure toward a “green model” or decarbonization. The broader aim of the global carbon market, according to the narrative, is to unlock many new assets and far more collateral, enabling the creation of new debt and expanding the existing models to unprecedented levels, effectively perpetuating them indefinitely. A central feature of the natural asset concept, at least in the natural asset corporation model, is that you identify a natural asset such as a forest, river, or lake, and then, at no cost to you, you issue shares in that natural asset and sell those shares. The implication is that you can point to something in the natural world and declare it yours, fractionalize it, and generate money almost out of thin air by selling those shares. The natural world is vast, and the claim is that they’re financializing it all, framing it as the only way to save the planet. But really, it’s the only way for them to save their insane debt racket.

There are misconceptions about Ukrainian reforms being expensive, but there are cost-free actions the government can take to improve the economy. Corruption has been a major obstacle to growth, but addressing it doesn't require large expenses. Ukrainian officials are committed to tackling corruption and are enthusiastic about making changes.

Disinformation is profitable, so we must trace the money. A significant portion of the funding for harmful content comes from the global advertising industry. We need to collaborate with this industry to redirect ad dollars. This can involve creating exclusion and inclusion lists to target funding towards accurate and reliable news and information. We must challenge the global advertising industry worldwide to prioritize funding for truthful and relevant content.

It seems odd that many people in the bureaucracy with salaries of a few hundred thousand dollars somehow accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth while in their positions. We're curious where this wealth comes from. Maybe they're good at investing, and we should seek their advice. But mysteriously, they get wealthy, and we don't know why. The reality is that they're likely getting wealthy at the taxpayer's expense, and that's the honest truth.

The federal government isn't a company to dismantle like on Shark Tank; it must be run constitutionally, and the current administration is restoring services and jobs that have been disrupted. The government is fat and hasn't been scrutinized for a century. Finally, someone is willing to address the waste. However, cuts aren't deep enough. In private equity, when fixing a bankrupt company, you must cut severely and quickly, even 20% more than initially planned, then rehire to minimize trauma. There's so much waste in the federal government that needs addressing. You can't be surgically precise when auditing the government. You have to cut more because you don't know where all the waste is. We've never audited the government before.