TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asserts that packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants. Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA. The possible consequences are unending, including disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation, which can lead to cancer and developmental defects. Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable. Speaker 0 further states that cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist, and therefore contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must be expected to be the rule and not the exception. Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil. That person is turning his back on the horror scenario that is unfolding in front of our very eyes. Fellow citizens and physicians of the world are urged to turn away from the perpetrators of this monstrous crime against humanity. Speaker 0 concludes with admonitions to do this to save yourself, your descendants, and to rescue the name of your family or go down in history as one of the greatest criminals of all time. Speaker 1 responds: Thank you very much, professor Bhakti. You continue to be an inspiration both scientifically and ethically for all of us.

The speaker discusses mRNA technology and its anticipated role in vaccines, noting that many corporations have banked in the biotech industry with mRNA as the presumed future vaccine technology. They reference a recent Korean cohort study that reportedly found five or six cancers associated with the vaccine, highlighting that this study had large statistical power and evaluated all cancer types. In contrast, they mention that studies examining a single cancer type, such as lymphoma in Sweden, did not find an association. The speaker says the Korean study’s broad analysis is leading to “writings on the wall for mRNA technology,” and asserts they do not believe it will be the future vaccine technology. They shift to a broader threat landscape, arguing that the traditional focus on emerging infectious diseases is outdated. They claim the real threat is not old-world diseases but synthetic pathogens and synthetic life, noting that gain-of-function technology has evolved rapidly in the last two to three years. The speaker states that “the future threat we need to be mitigating against and protecting against is actually synthetic pathogens and synthetic life.” Finally, they assert a provocative claim about life creation, saying, “we've actually already created single cell life. It exists.”

Every day, just the 1% of the cells of your DNA that gets replicated stretches from here to the sun four times. If you're to line it up end by end, that's very hard to conceptualize. But it should give you a little bit of humility before you go and start monkeying with it with these vaccines that can actually alter your DNA. And that's what I'm gonna show you. Is that the vaccines had a DNA contamination in them that didn't tell you about that could in fact alter your genome. Alright? These people are vibe coding your genome. And this is a major attack surface to the human gene pool because if this thing starts to alter the lifespan of people, it's going to part you with your Bitcoin. You're gonna end up spending money in a fiat system that has no controls, has no liability, and ends up oftentimes inducing mandates to get what it wants done. Many people had have peer have gone and replicated this work. It happened on Twitter. It did not happen very quickly in the peer review system. The peer review system kinda kicked it out. Some of these papers have now been peer reviewed, but it took years for them to come to this conclusion. Now, the FDA, the EMA and the TGA have all admitted that this mistake has happened. How did it happen? There's a big bait and switch. Pfizer actually ran the trial of 22,000 people on the process on the left and after they got to the trial, they then switched to the process on the right and didn't retrial the drug. And in doing so, they left a tremendous amount of excess DNA behind in the product. So all of the vaccine efficiency numbers you've heard in the news are flawed. They're not real because that's not what actually went into the trial. What went to the public was actually something that came out of this process too. It's published now in the BMJ that this fraud happened and no one has yet been prosecuted for it. So what did they leave in there? What they left in there was something we know from the polio scandal. If you're not familiar with the polio scandal, that polio vaccines were also contaminated with something known as SV40 and it created a massive cancer wave. Now the whole virus isn't in these vaccines, but there is a very curious part of this called the SV40 region that Pfizer intentionally removed from the disclosure that they gave to the FDA. So the FDA has admitted that this SV40 material is in there. They did not spell this out to the regulators. The regulators did not find them and they're actually running cover for them saying this DNA is too little consequence to matter, it's too small, and it's not functional. But we know it's functional because Dean et al has published that this piece of DNA drives DNA straight to the nucleus. It gets used in gene therapy vectors.

The symposium covers the potential safety and threat of “replicating” vaccines, especially LepriCon (leprecon) vaccines, in the context of Covid-19 vaccines and genome‑editing concepts. The speakers present a chain of claims and concerns, some drawing on reports and others presenting theories about how these next‑generation vaccines could behave in humans and populations. Key points and claims presented - Emerging mechanisms and risks: The panel notes that blood vessel inflammation and thrombosis mechanisms are increasingly observed, including in vaccine contexts, with examples from individuals who needed limb amputation and others who developed severe vascular events after vaccination. One case involved a 70‑year‑old man who, after a third dose, developed embolic events necessitating shoulder joint surgery, and another where a 60‑year‑old man developed acute limb ischemia and died; both are presented as suggesting a serious vascular mechanism linked to vaccination, though causal connections are not established. - Replicating/vector vaccines and their concerns:荒川博士 and others discuss LepiCon vaccines as vaccines that replicate inside the body. The concept involves “replicating viral vectors” where the genome can mutate and evolve during replication. The green‑highlighted segment in a slide (the antigen gene) plus a blue/orange segment (replicating gene cassette) is used to describe how LepriCon vaccines are designed to carry viral genes and replicate, with the assertion that replication, mutation, and recombination can occur, potentially generating new variants inside the host. - Differences from conventional vaccines: The discussion contrasts LepriCon vaccines with standard mRNA vaccines. In conventional mRNA vaccines, messenger RNA is delivered and translated into antigen proteins, then degraded; in LepriCon vaccines, replicating RNA/DNA can persist and continue producing antigen, with mutation and recombination possible. The panel emphasizes that LepriCon vaccines use replicating/copying mechanisms and that the genetic material can be copied in ways that differ from natural human biology, potentially creating unpredictable variants. - Central dogma and exceptions: The speakers reference the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) but note exceptions in viruses, including RNA viruses that can reverse‑transcribe to DNA (retroviruses) and RNA viruses that replicate RNA directly. They discuss how LepriCon vaccines would rely on replicative processes that do not follow the usual linear flow and why this could complicate predictions about safety and behavior in humans. - Potential for unintended spread and environmental impact: A major concern raised is that self‑replicating vectors could spread beyond the vaccinated individual, via exosomes or other intercellular transport, creating secondary infections or non‑target spread. Exosomes could ferry replicating genetic material, raising fears of new infection chains or “outbreaks” stemming from the vaccine itself, and even suggesting the possibility of vaccination‑induced spread akin to an attenuated or modified pathogen. - Safety signals and immunology concerns: The discussion touches on immune system risks, including immune dysregulation, autoimmune phenomena, and unexpected inflammatory responses. IGG4‑related disease is highlighted as a potential adverse outcome post‑vaccination, with descriptions of glandular and systemic involvement and the idea that high IGG4 levels could have immunosuppressive effects that alter responses to infection or vaccination. The panel notes observed increases in certain immunoglobulin subclasses after multiple LepriCon doses and discusses the possibility of immune tolerance or enhanced immune responses that could be harmful. - Historical and theoretical context: References are made to past epidemics and speculative pandemics caused by misused or dangerous vaccine platforms, drawing on central molecular biology concepts and historical anecdotes about how vaccines can be designed and misused. The discussion frames LepriCon vaccines as a high‑risk platform that could, in theory, generate recombinants, escape mutations, or cause unintended immune and inflammatory consequences. - Clinical and regulatory implications: The speakers call for caution, arguing that more evidence is needed before approving or widespread use of LepriCon vaccines. They emphasize the need for long‑term observation and transparent communication about risks, and criticize the potential for insufficient understanding among healthcare workers and the public. They also urge that any future vaccine development should consider the possibility of genome editing, recombination, and exosome‑mediated spread, and stress the importance of not underestimating possible adverse effects. - Real‑world observations and skepticism about hype: Several speakers underscore that the danger is not merely hypothetical; there are reports of adverse events, including stroke‑like conditions, inflammatory diseases, and immune dysregulation in vaccinated individuals. They stress that the evolution and mutation of replicating vaccines could outpace current surveillance methods, and that “information manipulation” or lack of transparent reporting could mislead the public about risks. - Final reflections and call to action: The concluding messages advocate recognizing the potential failures of messenger RNA vaccines and acknowledging that both conventional and replicating platforms may carry risks. The speakers urge ongoing critical analysis, cautious progression, and robust verification of claims through transparent, independent investigation. They close with thanks to the organizers and a hope that the discussion may contribute to broader public awareness and informed decision‑making. Notable emphasis and unique considerations - The core concern centers on LepriCon vaccines’ replication, mutation, and potential to spread beyond the vaccinated person; exosome transport and genomic/cellular integration are highlighted as mechanisms that could generate new risks not present with non‑replicating vaccines. - The discussion stresses that IGG4 responses could become alarmingly high after certain doses, potentially leading to immunosuppressive effects or autoimmune phenomena, and presents IGG4‑related disease as a potential complication to monitor. - The speakers insist that safety and transparency are paramount, and that misinformation or optimistic narratives about rapid vaccine development could lead to harm if new platforms are adopted without comprehensive evaluation. Overall, the symposium foregrounds cautious scrutiny of replicating vaccine platforms, frames potential biological and regulatory risks, and calls for careful, evidence‑based assessment before broader deployment.

The speaker discusses the ideology of scientists who have questioned the origins of viruses like AIDS, hepatitis, and Ebola. They mention Dr. Duisburg from the University of California at Berkeley as one of these scientists. The speaker also mentions that the COVID vaccines contained varying percentages of bioweapon material, with the booster having the highest concentration. They note that over 13 billion COVID vaccines were administered to around 5 billion people, but not all individuals received the vaccines. The speaker suggests that the PCR swab was another method of inoculating people with nanotechnology, specifically Graphene Ferric Oxide. They mention facing pushback when trying to publish their research on this topic, but eventually succeeded. However, they were subsequently attacked.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 engage in a discussion about allegations surrounding vaccines. Speaker 0 asserts that, up until about a year and a half ago, he would not have endorsed such views, but now, after considering what is happening, he feels compelled to admit that colleagues and friends who have claimed this is genocide may be right. He states, “There is no other agenda. There is no other explanation,” insisting that there can be no alternative interpretation for current events. He contends that these vaccines, described as gene-based vaccines, are not needed because we are not dealing with a killer virus that is destroying mankind, and that anyone who says otherwise is lying to one’s face. He further claims that the so-called vaccines could never have protected against infection because the antibodies are not present when they are needed. He adds that resistance and immunity to these viruses is not antibody-based but is based on T cells that are present in every human being. He then makes a grave assertion about the vaccines, describing them as “the most terrible instruments that have ever been introduced into the human body to destroy humans,” asserting that they affect “the mind, going to the heart, going to the organs and to the entire body,” and concluding that these vaccines are going to destroy mankind. Speaker 1 frames the discussion by highlighting that Michael Yiddin described the situation as genocide and criminal, and asks Speaker 0 to explain, noting that Speaker 0 had stated the same views. The exchange centers on whether the situation constitutes genocide and criminal acts, with Speaker 0 acknowledging the possibility but using strong language to emphasize his conclusions about the vaccines’ necessity, mechanism of immunity, and potential harm. Overall, the dialogue presents a trajectory from initial reluctance to endorsement of genocide claims, driven by claims that gene-based vaccines are unnecessary, not protective against infection due to lack of antibodies, rely on T-cell-based immunity, and may cause widespread harm to the mind, heart, and other organs, culminating in the assertion that such vaccines could destroy mankind.

The speaker describes unbridled enthusiasm and irrational exuberance for life as sacrificing safety. They state they presented autopsy work on death after COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, where thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists attended. As people visited, the speaker was stunned by what they call scientific seduction by messenger RNA technology. They predict a cataclysmic recognition that mRNA platforms are unsafe, claiming there is no way to break down pseudourrogenated messenger RNA. The speaker asserts that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna remains in patients’ bloodstream three years after the shots, described as intact.

- Humanity is allegedly at a stage similar to the time of Noah, with the unvaccinated being the only "pure" humans with unaltered DNA. - Supreme Court has allegedly ruled that vaccinated people are patented goods, no longer human, and transhuman, without natural person rights. This applies worldwide under US patent law since 2013. - Nanotechnology is allegedly being deployed in COVID-19 vaccines to form networks capable of controlling nanomachines within living human beings. - Graphene oxide is allegedly a key component, activated by microwave signals, boosting frequencies to power nanotech machinery for self-assembly. - COVID-19 vaccines allegedly contain graphene oxide, which builds structures when spike proteins bind to blood cells, causing blood clots and heart failure. - Internal Pfizer document allegedly outlines the manipulation of mRNA to contain graphene oxide, with 15 billion nanoparticles per shot. - Rain and snow samples show extremely high levels of aluminum, indicating a threat from global geoengineering programs. - COVID-19 was never about a virus, but about getting W band wireless body area network and sensors in bodies with nodes. - Second wave will be from vaccine induced injury, compounded by fear and the introduction of 5G technology. - Nanosensors were allegedly embedded in people's cartilage during COVID tests.

Two years ago, most people would have refused gene or cell therapy, but the pandemic has changed perceptions of innovation. The COVID vaccine is not a traditional vaccine as it doesn't provide immunity or prevent transmission. The Pfizer vaccine wasn't tested for transmission prevention before its release due to the urgency. Vaccinated individuals can still get COVID-19. Countries with rapid mass vaccination have seen increased infections and deaths. A study from the Cleveland Clinic suggests that the more shots received, the higher the risk of getting COVID. Vaccination puts evolutionary pressure on the virus, leading to mutations. Epidemiological analysis shows a significant number of deaths related to the vaccines, with dangerous mechanisms of action and consistency with other fatal conditions. Temporal relation is also evident, with many deaths occurring shortly after vaccination.

My colleagues' ignorance is shocking and inexcusable. They have failed to study immunology and are complicit in mass murder. They supported the vaccination program without understanding the dangers. The ultimate goal of this corona madness is to install mRNA vaccines for all infectious diseases worldwide. The WHO aims to control health management globally, and once all countries sign on, we will be lost. These mRNA vaccines are not just for coronaviruses, but for all diseases, including the flu. They are already developed and ready to be introduced.

Speaker 0 presents the statement of Joseph Sanson, based on the sworn statement of the late professor doctor Francis Boyle, described as the greatest authority in bioweapons legislation and the author of it. Boyle is asserted to have concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA injection is a bioweapon, and that he knew this “like no other” before his death, which occurred shortly after he declared willingness to testify under oath in court. The core of Boyle’s argument, as presented, is that the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain derivatives of illegal military gene function research, and therefore qualify by definition as a military biological weapon system—a bioweapon. This bioweapon is said to consist of two integrated components: a pathogenic load and a delivery mechanism. It is asserted that the pathogenic load results from illegal gene or function research. Boyle is described as referring to an article in Nature Medicine, with a link included in the plea note. If opened, the article is claimed to warn that true scientists believe an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus, and that what is called the “new normal” are not scientists but faith fanatics. The 2015 Nature Medicine article is summarized as reporting that, based on findings, researchers synthetically created an infectious fully SHC014 recombinant virus with robust viral replication in vitro and in vivo, a SARS-like coronavirus with a spike protein optimized for human infection. The article is attributed to researchers including those affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, implying that the spike protein and pathogenic payload were the result of illegal gain-of-function research. The spike protein mRNA is described as providing instructions to human cells to produce this pathogenic spike protein, emphasized as not being a natural spike protein but an illegally developed, synthetically made pathogen optimized for human infection. The delivery system is identified as nanolipid particles (NLPs) that encapsulate the mRNA payload and deliver it into cells. The rhetoric labels these as fat globules, and Boyle is said to declare that this is actually a nanotechnology-enhanced delivery platform. This technology is described as being paid for, developed, financed, and conceived by the Pentagon and its research institute DARPA, with the claim that the virus was aerosolized and engineered with nanotechnology from the beginning, indicating a long-term program for advanced delivery systems. The claim is made that this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections, with the NLP delivery system described as the result of a specific teacher-sponsored program for nanotechnological biological weapons. The presentation by Samsung is cited for further legal implications, and it is argued that Gates and Borla qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the danger lies in continued genetic tinkering. mRNA is being integrated into every vaccine. Therefore, no vaccines should be taken. All vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies because there is so much money in it.

The speaker argues that an irrational, unbridled enthusiasm for new possibilities leads to a sacrifice of safety. This enthusiasm, in their view, has adversely affected precautionary considerations and risk assessment. They reference presenting autopsy findings related to deaths following COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, an event attended by thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists. In conversations with attendees, the speaker was surprised by what they describe as a scientific seduction surrounding messenger RNA technology. The core concern expressed is that this eagerness to embrace mRNA platforms is accompanied by a neglect of safety considerations. The speaker asserts that there will be a cataclysmic recognition that messenger RNA technology represents an unsafe platform. They emphasize that, as they understand it, there is no way to break down certain aspects of the technology they refer to as “pseudourogenated messenger RNA,” noting this within the context of their work in research laboratories. The statement implies a belief that the degradation or metabolic processing of this form of RNA poses unresolved issues. A central, striking claim presented is that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna has been found in their patients’ bloodstream three years after vaccination, and that this RNA is intact. The speaker underscores this as evidence tied to their observations and research experiences, asserting the persistence of the RNA in the circulatory system over an extended period. Overall, the message conveys a perspective that rapid adoption and optimism around mRNA vaccines and technologies have overshadowed safety considerations, and it anticipates a future realization of safety concerns associated with these platforms. The speaker ties their warnings to concrete experiences at a major scientific conference and to specific, long-term biomarkers observed in patients, presenting a narrative of ongoing research findings and anticipated paradigm shifts in how the safety of mRNA vaccines is perceived.

- The discussion opens with a critique of how public health authorities in the United States and much of the media discouraged experimentation with COVID-19 treatments, instead pushing vaccination and portraying other approaches as dangerous. The hosts ask why treatments were sidelined and treated as heretical to question. - Speaker 1 explains that the core idea was to stamp out “vaccine hesitation,” which he frames not as a purely scientific issue but as a form of heresy. He notes a broad literature on vaccine hesitancy and contrasts it with the perception of the vaccine as a liberating savior. He points to a Vatican €20 silver coin (2022) commemorating the COVID-19 vaccine, described by Vatican catalogs as “a boy prepares to receive the Eucharist,” which the speakers interpret as an overlay of religious iconography with vaccination imagery. They also reference Diego Rivera’s mural in Detroit, interpreted as depicting the vaccine as a Eucharist, and a South African church banner reading “even the blood of Christ cannot protect you, get vaccinated,” highlighting what they see as provocative uses of religious symbolism to promote vaccination. - They claim that the Biden administration’s COVID Vaccine Corps distributed billions of dollars to major sports leagues (NFL, MLB) and that many mainline churches reportedly received money to push vaccination, with many clergy not opposing the push. The implication is that monetary incentives influenced public figures and organizations to advocate for vaccines, contributing to a climate in which questioning orthodoxy was difficult. - The speakers discuss the social dynamics around vaccine “heresy,” using Aaron Rodgers’ experience with isolation and shaming in the NFL and Novak Djokovic’s experiences in Australia to illustrate how prominent individuals who questioned or fell outside the orthodoxy faced punitive pressure. They compare this to a Reformation-era conflict over doctrinal correctness and describe a psychology of stigmatizing dissent as a tool to enforce conformity. - They argue the imperative driving institutions was the belief that the vaccine was the central, non-negotiable public-health objective, seemingly above other medical considerations. The central question they raise is why vaccines became the sole priority, seemingly overriding a broader, more nuanced evaluation of medical options and individual risk. - The conversation shifts to epistemology and the nature of science. Speaker 1 suggests medicine often relies on orthodoxies and presuppositions, rather than purely empirical processes. He recounts a Kantian view that interpretation depends on preexisting categories, and he uses this to argue that medical decision-making can be constrained by established doctrines, which may obscure questions about optimization and safety. - They recount the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and discuss Sara Sotomayor’s dissent, which argued that liability exposure is a key incentive for safety and improvement in vaccine development. They argue that the current system creates minimal liability for manufacturers, reducing the incentive to optimize safety, and they use this to question how the system encourages continuous safety improvements. - The hosts recount the early-treatment movement led by Peter McCullough and others, including a Senate hearing organized by Ron Johnson in November 2020 to discuss early-treatment options with FDA-approved drugs like hydroxychloroquine. They criticize what they describe as aggressive pushback against such approaches, noting that McCullough faced professional sanctions and lawsuits despite presenting peer-reviewed literature. - They return to the concept of orthodoxy and dogma, arguing that the medical establishment often suppresses dissent, citing YouTube removing a McCullough interview and the broader pattern of silencing challenge to the vaccine narrative. They stress that the social and institutional systems prize conformity and punish those who deviate, creating a climate of distrust toward official health bodies. - The discussion broadens into metaphysical and philosophical territory, with references to the Grand Inquisitor from Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. They propose that elites—whether religious, political, or scientific—tend to prefer “taking care” of people through control rather than preserving individual responsibility and free will. The Grand Inquisitor tale is used to illustrate a recurring human temptation: to replace personal liberty with a protected, paternalistic order. - They discuss messenger RNA (mRNA) technology as a central manifestation of Promethean or Luciferian intellect—humans attempting to “read and write in the language of God.” They describe the scientific arc from transcription and translation to mRNA vaccines, noting Francis Collins’s The Language of God and the idea of humans “coding life.” They caution that mRNA vaccines involve injecting genetic material and point to the symbolic and ritual power of vaccination as a form of modern sacrament. - The speakers emphasize that the mRNA approach represents both a profound scientific achievement and a source of deep concern. They discuss fertility signals and potential adverse effects, including myocarditis in young people, and cite the July 2021 NEJM case study as highlighting safety concerns for myocarditis in adolescent males. They reference the FDA deliberative-committee discussions, noting that some influential voices publicly questioned the risk-benefit calculus for young people, yet faced pressure or dismissal within the orthodox framework. - They describe post-hoc investigations and testimonies suggesting that adverse events (like myocarditis) might have been downplayed or obscured, and they assert that public trust in health institutions has eroded as a result. They mention ongoing debates about whether vaccine-induced changes might affect future generations, referencing studies about transcripts of mRNA in cancer cells and liver cells, and they stress the need for independent scrutiny by scientists not “entranced” by the vaccine program. - The dialogue returns to the broader human condition: a tension between curiosity and restraint, knowledge and humility. They return to Dostoevsky’s moral questions about free will, responsibility, and the limits of human knowledge, concluding that scientific hubris can lead to dangerous consequences when it overrides open inquiry and accountability. - In closing, while the guests reflect on past missteps and the need for integrity in medicine, they underscore the ongoing questions about how evidence is interpreted, how dissent is treated, and how society balances scientific progress with humility, transparency, and respect for individual judgment.

Recent findings suggest that DNA contamination in COVID jabs may act as a self-replicating infectious agent. Initially believed to be RNA, evidence shows billions of DNA copies coding for the spike protein in the vials. If this DNA integrates into bacteria or human cells, it could replicate and spread, potentially causing mutations linked to cancer. A case study revealed a patient, who had received four jabs, developed cancer with high levels of plasmid DNA in their tumor. This raises concerns about gut health and the inflammatory nature of the spike protein. It’s crucial to be proactive about detoxifying the gut and maintaining health. Resources and protocols for addressing these issues are available on my website.

"you were two to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the COVID vaccine than you were to be hospitalized with COVID." "what is more better described as a gene therapy than as a vaccine." "$500,000,000 worth of investments in the mRNA technology for vaccines." "mega analysis of all the data." "Hundreds of studies, peer reviewed studies showing the harms of the mRNA vaccine." "the side effects of this gene therapy was so enormous and progressive, it was difficult to fathom." "The millions of molecules of mRNA entering the cell is creating biochemical havoc." "It's disrupting protein metabolism." "It's interfering with tumor suppressor genes." "In other words, it may be a risk factor for cancer." "it's highly likely that the COVID vaccines have been a factor, a significant factor in the cancer of members of the royal family."

RNA vaccines are a new approach that provide instructions to create specific shapes instead of using traditional methods. Bill Gates, in collaboration with MIT and backed by organizations like the United Nations and the Rockefeller Foundation, is developing a vaccine that could alter our DNA using mRNA and CRISPR technology. This technology cuts DNA at specific points to insert new sequences, aiming for compliance with global health mandates. Additionally, a human implantable quantum dot microneedle system is being created, which acts like a tattoo to store identification and vaccination records. This system requires an enzyme called luciferase to function and is designed to be permanent, raising concerns about personal autonomy and genetic modification. Urgent collaboration is needed to reach the global population.

Kevin McKernan argues science is not owned by anyone and should be decentralized. He suspects bioweapon components are involved in current health issues, alleging government-funded science is distorted. Death records indicate a rise in cancer, but Massachusetts remains silent. McKernan notes similarities between asbestos and spike protein inflammation. He emphasizes the need to decentralize science to prevent future lockdowns and civil liberty infringements. DNA sequencing is becoming cheaper, allowing individuals to analyze genomes independently. McKernan highlights the importance of Bitcoin in decentralizing science, as fiat currency manipulation distorts markets. McKernan warns that centralized healthcare could drain Bitcoin wealth on one's deathbed. He criticizes GMOs for market distortion and advocates for public domain genomes to prevent patenting. The medical system is distorted, leading to economic burdens due to mitochondrial issues caused by the spike protein. He accuses the medical establishment of censoring dissenting voices and manipulating data, citing examples like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. McKernan reveals mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA, including SV40 components, potentially modifying genomes. He claims regulators are aware but complicit, and that Pfizer altered its trial process.

Scientists can learn how to teach the flu virus how to infect human tissue, and some are already doing this. The scientific community isn't trying to cause a pandemic, but they are arrogant about their ability to contain a respiratory pathogen. COVID evolved from scientific experiments in a laboratory that was trying to do good things, like make a vaccine vector, but it escaped, and over 20,000,000 people died. Nature will continue to try to change, but the species barrier for amino acids is pretty high. Some scientists believe gain of function research is needed to protect humanity against emerging pathogens, but they don't consider the fact that they may be emerging them like with COVID.

The Pfizer vaccine contains not only mRNA but also plasma DNA from the vector used in its production. I sequenced samples from two batches of the vaccine in Colombia and found this DNA, which raises concerns about potential health risks. This DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to permanent changes. Such integration poses theoretical risks, including autoimmune responses and cancer, depending on where the DNA inserts itself in the genome. While these risks may be rare, they warrant investigation to understand their implications better.

We don't fully understand the long-term effects of modifying DNA and RNA. Recently, Facebook announced it would remove false claims about COVID-19 vaccines, specifically those suggesting the vaccine changes DNA. However, a leaked tape reveals Mark Zuckerberg stating that the vaccine modifies DNA, which contradicts Facebook's own policy. This statement would likely result in censorship on the platform today. The concern remains about the implications of such modifications and the unknown long-term side effects.

The Pfizer vaccine may contain DNA in addition to mRNA, according to a researcher who sequenced the vaccine in their lab. The DNA is a vector used in the production of the mRNA. The researcher expressed concern about the potential consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. The DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells and become a permanent part of them, posing a risk of genome modification and autoimmune attacks. There is also a theoretical risk of future cancer depending on where the foreign DNA lands in the genome. The researcher believes further investigation is needed to determine if these risks are occurring.

Philip Buchholz, a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology and cancer genomics researcher at the University of South Carolina, describes himself as an expert on how the human genome can be altered and which alterations cause cancer. He emphasizes his skill in DNA sequencing and detecting foreign DNA pieces at very low levels, noting that his lab used these abilities during the pandemic to invent the spit-based COVID test. He asserts that the Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA, and that this DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when producing the mRNA. He claims to have proven this by sequencing in his own lab. Regarding evidence in Columbia, he says a colleague in the College of Pharmacy was in charge of the vaccination program and kept every vial, including empty ones with a small amount left at the bottom. He states he received these vials and examined two batches from Columbia by sequencing, sequencing all the DNA in the vaccine to determine its content, and notes it is surprising that any DNA is present at all. He asserts this DNA can be identified and the mechanism of its presence inferred, and that he is alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it. He explains that this DNA could cause rare but serious side effects, including death from cardiac arrest, noting there are cases of suspicious death after vaccination and that DNA is a plausible mechanism. He argues that this DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that were transfected with the vaccine, describing it as a permanent fixture in the cell and in its progeny indefinitely. He says this makes the DNA different from RNA because it can be permanent, posing a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells like stem cells, and potentially causing a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. He adds that while autoimmunity is not his field, the cancer risk is within his purview and it is a possibility.

Nicholas Holcher, an epidemiologist and foundation administrator at the McCullough Foundation, appears on the WiderWake Media Podcast to discuss what he calls harms from the mRNA COVID vaccines and to critique mainstream approaches to the pandemic and public health policy. - Vaccine definitions and mRNA technology - Pre-2000 definition: a vaccine is an injectable or oral product that introduces a killed part of a virus or an inactivated form to the body so that encountering a wild-type version would not infect or would cause a less severe illness. - He asserts that mRNA injections are not vaccines: they are a gene transfer platform using modified messenger RNA with long persistence in the body (via N1-methylpseudouridine), delivered in lipid nanoparticles. He claims these bubbles distribute systemically, including to the brain, heart, bone marrow, and reproductive system, and that they instruct cells to produce a spike protein, effectively turning organs into “toxic spike protein production factories.” He says this leads to autoimmune attack on those tissues and contributes to adverse events, including myocarditis, strokes, immune destruction, and “turbo cancers.” - History and purpose of mRNA in vaccines - According to Holcher, work on this technology existed for decades but animals testing showed high mortality or sterilization in ferrets and mice, preventing approval except under a declared global emergency. He contends the COVID-19 crisis enabled emergency use authorization across Western countries, with ulterior aims to inject the globe with mRNA technology. - Global impact and uptake - He estimates about 70% of the global population received at least one COVID-19 injection (mRNA or viral vector). He notes Eastern countries used non-mRNA platforms (e.g., AstraZeneca/J&J in some places; Sinovac elsewhere) but that uptake in the West was high. - Harms and evidence - Excess deaths: cites a study by Dennis Brancourt et al. estimating around 17 million deaths worldwide as a result of COVID injections (as of September 2023); he claims US deaths could be in the hundreds of thousands to millions. - Turbo cancers: cites multiple studies in 2023 showing increased risk of seven cancer types (colorectal, bladder, breast, thyroid, prostate, etc.) in vaccinated groups; cites a major cancer journal, OncoTarget, reporting hundreds of turbo cancer cases across 27 countries, with Pfizer contributing most cases. Holcher also mentions his own group’s work with Neo7 Bioscience documenting genomic integration of vaccine-derived mRNA in a stage IV bladder cancer patient (31-year-old woman) with a segment of mRNA found in circulating tumor DNA on chromosome 19; another study reported thousands of dysregulated genes in post-vaccine cancers, including p53, KRAS, and BRCA. - Definition of turbo cancer: per Merrick et al., rapid, aggressive tumor progression with sudden onset and early metastasis, often in younger individuals, and resistant to treatment. - Fertility, pregnancy, and autism - Fertility: cites studies suggesting fertility impacts, including Karaman et al. finding depletion of primordial follicles in rats after mRNA vaccination; Manichi et al. reporting 33% lower conception rates in vaccinated women in Denmark; a study indicating a ~20% drop in sperm concentration and motility with no recovery over five months. - Autism: asserts a large body of evidence linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders, citing a 136-study review with 107 studies finding positive associations between vaccines and neurodevelopmental issues, including autism, attributed to toxicity and immune system disruption, particularly in children with high vaccine exposure and reduced detox capacity (CYP450 impairment). - Other topics tied to vaccines and public response - The COVID-19 period and vaccine skepticism: claims the pandemic catalyzed a large anti-vaccine movement because people were compelled to take an experimental gene therapy product. - Sam Altman and gene editing: discusses Altman’s Preventive venture with the aim to reduce heritable diseases via in utero gene editing but warns of the path to designer babies and the potential for harm in early-iteration edits, citing prior CRISPR experiments on human embryos that produced deformed offspring or nonviable results. - AI, workers, and future society: predicts two-tier society with implanted or enhanced individuals and a replacement of human labor by robots and AI systems; discusses military and surveillance ambitions in gene editing and AI augmentation. - Mental health and digital life: references a randomized trial showing that turning off mobile Internet improved depression scores and well-being to an extent comparable to or greater than antidepressants. - World Health Organization (WHO): notes the US has pulled out of the WHO, arguing this is good for the US but potentially harmful for others still in the organization; expresses concerns about the pandemic treaty and ongoing global health governance, including vaccine passport-style surveillance. - FDA and public health policy: acknowledges some shifts (e.g., cutting doses from the childhood schedule) but argues the FDA remains compromised and too aligned with vaccine industry interests; criticizes the removal of a potential black box warning for vaccines and calls for more accountability. - Resources and contact - Holcher invites listeners to follow him on X (Twitter) at @nichulsher and to read their work on focalpoints.com and through McCullough’s network. Note: The transcript presents Holcher’s claims and interpretations about vaccines, turbo cancers, autism, fertility, and policy changes. The summary reproduces these points without endorsement or evaluation.

I am a scientist with expertise in various fields, including quantum mechanics and environmental science. I have analyzed all cause mortality data and concluded that there was no pandemic and no particularly virulent pathogen. The virus does not spread across borders, as evidenced by the absence of excess mortality in some countries. I have also studied global warming and determined that it is not occurring. Moving on to vaccines, my research shows that they are toxic and associated with peaks in all cause mortality. The risk of dying per injection increases with age, doubling every 4 or 5 years. We have observed these patterns in multiple countries. Our work will continue, challenging the establishment scientists who propagate lies and serve the propaganda industry.