TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

The speaker believes that the biggest challenge in conservation is the increasing human population. They express concern about the lack of resources and suggest that action needs to be taken to address this issue.

There is concern over the increase in wildfires and the lack of people in rural areas. The speaker questions why there are fires and blames the abandonment of these areas. They criticize the new management approach, which restricts activities like tree cutting and planting. The speaker argues that in the past, when people lived in these areas and took care of the forests, there were no problems. Now, with the cost of firefighting and the reliance on taxes to pay for it, the speaker questions the effectiveness of the current approach. They also mention the excessive bureaucracy and restrictions in the country, which they believe contribute to the current issues of drought and wildfires.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

So I think one area of mutual agreement and priority is vegetation management. But I think we wanna work with you to really recognize the changing climate and what it means to our forest and actually work together with that science. That science is gonna be key. Because if we if we ignore that science and sort of put our head in the sand and think it's all about vegetation management, we're not going to succeed together protecting Californians. K. It'll start getting cooler. I wish You you just watch. I wish science agreed with you. Hey. Well, I don't think science knows, actually.

There is a significant water issue despite no drought, as water is being diverted to protect a small fish species. This water, which flows naturally from Canada, could be used to benefit the land and forests, which are currently dry and at risk. The lack of water contributes to the high costs of forest fires, amounting to billions annually. Additionally, environmental regulations prevent proper forest management, such as raking and clearing debris. Simple maintenance could reduce fire hazards and improve forest health.

Agenda 21 is a real plan to remove humans from rural and suburban areas. It has been implemented in the US and supported by every president. It is a global plan implemented locally in every city and town. It aims to control all aspects of life, including land, water, plants, animals, and human beings. The plan is called communitarianism, which balances individual rights with the rights of the community. The individual always loses in this philosophy. Agenda 21 is a stealth plan happening in plain sight. It includes smart growth and wildlands, which restrict mobility and shift land ownership from private to public. This is a takeover of our nation and an administrative coup d'etat. It is sold as an economic driver but is designed to fail.

Speaker 0 contends the US Forest Service Agency is added again, targeting "half a million acres" of Cimarron And Comanche National Grassland and, importantly, "coming after your private property land." The process began in 2023 under Biden administration guidelines; "we have new guidelines now," and "the secretary of ag ... has the power to stop it." "'Drivers and stressors is code for why they need your land." "Herbivory, which is code for cattle grazing." They claim "Land ownership is a stressor on what the US Forest Service Agency wants to accomplish here with this new assessment so they can take this land from the public and so they can take private land." They state "Land ownership patterns in the Cimarron And Comanche National Grasslands are highly fragmented" ... "This fragmentation poses challenges to us taking over the land is what they wanna say, but they can't." "The private landowner is in their way." "They take land from ranchers, and once they perfect the process, they go after anyone that's in their way." "You're in their way." "Please share this. This must stop. We gotta get the word out. We gotta stop this crazy crap."

A situation is unfolding in Colorado where urban residents are allegedly controlling the state, potentially ending farming, ranching, and private land ownership. A proposed committee, excluding farmers and ranchers, would decide the fate of public and private lands under the guise of conservation. This committee could designate any species as endangered, imposing restrictions on land use if that species is present. This could lead to hundreds of restrictions, dictating activities like tree cutting or cattle movement. The speaker characterizes this as an activist environmental proposal to seize control of the entire state, enabling them to dictate land use, both public and private, in the name of conservation.

The Wildlands Project proposes converting at least 50% of North America into wilderness areas, interconnected by corridors and surrounded by buffer zones with limited resource use. This plan aligns with Agenda 21, adopted by over 100 heads of state, detailing societal transformations for sustainability. The UN's Commission on Global Governance aims to create a world standing army and consolidate global financial institutions. The biodiversity treaty emphasizes protected areas, including core wilderness and biosphere reserves, which are voluntary agreements with the UN. The goal is to significantly reduce the human population and regulate activities within these areas, impacting every individual globally. Many national parks are now designated as UNESCO World Heritage Sites, often without public awareness.

Thirty years ago, ranchers were removed from their land here to protect the endangered desert tortoise. My family lost our grazing permit, which we paid almost $50,000 for, because of this. But now, that same land is being bulldozed for a huge housing development, which has me and other residents wondering if this land was ever really protected. Town officials say the private developer who bought the land has the legal right to build and that the town needs the tax revenue for infrastructure. But to me and others, it feels like the land was just reserved until someone came along with the right price. With recent zoning changes, we fear it’s too late to save the land and the tortoises.

Last night, I evacuated my home in LA due to wildfires, prompting me to reflect on a conversation between Joe Rogan and Donald Trump about wildfire management in California. Trump highlighted two issues: water management and forest maintenance. In 2023, California's policies led to the diversion of 195.5 billion gallons of water into the ocean to protect the Delta smelt, while forests remain overgrown with dead trees. A study found 91.4 million dead trees across California, which environmental policies have prevented from being cleared, contributing to devastating fires. Misguided environmental protections often harm both human lives and the very species they aim to protect. California's government struggles with ineffective policies, leading to increased homelessness and inadequate crisis response. While grateful for government support, it's clear improvements are necessary.

The UN's 30 by 30 agenda aims to seize 30% of all land and water on Earth, disregarding private property rights. The European Union is implementing it, and California and Joe Biden are using similar language, mentioning conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030. The speaker claims this isn't about conservation but about taking, facilitated in the US by the sustains act, which allows the government to receive private funds for conservation programs. This act assigns value to environmental services provided by privately owned land, such as pollination, photosynthesis, and clean air/water, monetizing them through partnerships between private investors and the government, without landowner consent. The speaker asserts this is a seizing of American assets aligned with the UN's goals, without public consent or input. Representatives, according to the World Economic Forum, are now solely responsible, without needing to consult the public.

Illegal immigration is a federal crime, not a human right. President Biden is using national parks for the benefit of the 3 million illegal immigrants he released into the country. This bill aims to stop this misuse of public lands. However, the impact goes beyond that. It affects social services, schools, hospitals, homeless shelters, neighborhood safety, national security, and the rule of law. The American people must decide if they want this to continue or if they want a president who will prioritize recovering our nation's lands and sovereignty.

I don't want houses on my land. Conservation easements are needed to prevent rural areas from being covered in houses. A 180-acre grass farm nearby was turned into 18 houses, which is concerning. People buy land, mow it, and fertilize it for aesthetics, not for growing food. It's wasteful and unsustainable.

Vegetation management is a mutual priority. Working together, recognizing the changing climate and its impact on forests, is important. Science will be key to this effort. Ignoring the science and believing vegetation management is the only solution will not protect Californians. It will start getting cooler. Science doesn't know.