TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The transcript discusses several intertwined points about the FDA's funding, information sources, and a personal health journey. It states that the FDA gets 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry, and that this information was released only after a rumor claimed 50% of their funding came from big pharma. The speaker notes, “the people that you’re supposed to be making rules and regulations for are the same people that are paying you money,” describing this as a conflict of interest and urging readers to consider the implication of funding influencing regulatory decisions. The speaker then shifts to their personal experience with health issues and the challenge of finding valid information that isn’t paid for by big pharma. They share a statistic attributed to women with similar issues: “85 to ninety percent of the women who experience the same issues that I experience notice changes in their symptoms or alleviation completely from their symptoms simply by changing their diet, namely going gluten free.” Although the speaker says they personally are not inclined to adopt gluten-free changes, they are cutting out refined carbs and sugars from their diet and report progress: “I've been on this diet for two days now, and I already feel a ton different.” This personal anecdote is presented in the context of comparing diet-driven symptom changes to pharmaceutical influence. The speaker mentions ongoing changes to their living space and routines as part of their broader stance. They say, “we're putting up our squat rack again in our home gym,” signaling a strengthening or lifestyle shift. They also report, “we did get some egg laying birds,” suggesting new household activities. Throughout, there is a reiterated sentiment directed at big pharma: “basically saying a big to big pharma,” underscoring their stance against pharmaceutical influence. Finally, the speaker emphasizes the surprising nature of the 47% funding figure and reiterates, “I still can't believe it's 47% of their funding, and they think that's okay.” They invite audience engagement, closing with, “as always, I look forward to hearing your thoughts about all of this down below.”

The government is being questioned for covering vaccine injuries inadequately. Concerns were raised about mRNA vaccines being contaminated with DNA fragments, making them genetically modified organisms. Professor Delglish warns that these vaccines may cause cancer relapses. He calls for a halt on mRNA vaccines and demands full disclosure of data. The speaker urges for transparency and ethical principles in pandemic management. The debate emphasizes the importance of following scientific evidence.

Over 15 months, my wife and I toured Australia, speaking to 30,000 people in 300 venues about the struggles of anti-vaxxers. I fear that in the future, there will be apologies for mandating vaccines. As a pilot, I apply problem-solving skills to this issue and urge the government to listen to medical experts calling for a halt to mRNA vaccines. We need to investigate vaccine injuries and bring transparency to the situation to prevent a major human factor failure in history.

Politicians daily reported COVID cases and deaths, but now 29,000 excess deaths raise concerns. A document blames Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for the rise in deaths. The Australian Senate rejected investigating excess deaths. Politicians pushing vaccines are accused of lying about the threat of COVID. Lockdowns were unnecessary, and the vaccine rollout was called a theater.

Health authorities and the media have been accused of misleading the public about the safety of COVID injections, with evidence suggesting they concealed adverse event data. Recent emails from Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) reveal that officials acknowledged the potential for DNA fragments from mRNA vaccines to integrate into human genomes, contradicting their public statements. Despite this, the TGA focused on dispelling public fears rather than investigating risks. Concerns have been raised about the lack of testing for DNA integration and the overall safety of the vaccines. Senator Gerard Renick criticized the TGA for its poor quality assurance and lack of accountability, highlighting the need for greater scrutiny of vaccine safety and the political failures that allowed these issues to persist. The situation reflects broader frustrations with government transparency and public health decisions in Australia.

Australia's healthcare system, supported by dedicated workers, is facing unprecedented challenges, including rising sickness levels among healthcare professionals. Concerns have been raised regarding synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, with findings indicating contamination levels far exceeding safety limits. A report co-authored by 52 scientists highlights the potential risks, including cancer mutations from minimal contamination. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has been criticized for dismissing these concerns without proper investigation, using inadequate testing methods. The Port Hedland Council has called for a suspension of these vaccines following alarming cancer trends in their community. Urgent action is needed to ensure the safety of all Australians, invoking the precautionary principle until independent testing can confirm or dispel these contamination claims. Transparency and accountability are essential to protect public health.

In 2022, Australia had over 10 million COVID cases, with over half the country infected despite vaccination efforts. The excess deaths in 2021 were higher than expected, and there were over 140,000 reported vaccine injuries, three times higher than previous years. The TGA, responsible for monitoring vaccine injuries, ignores these signals. The head of the organization, Professor Skerritt, has a conflict of interest as it is funded by Big Pharma. The chief health officer, Professor Brendan Murphy, hadn't read the non-clinical report on the Pfizer vaccine and made incorrect statements about it. The law in Australia states that vaccination cannot be coerced and individuals must be properly informed about the vaccine's contents.

I urge the British, Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, and US governments to recognize the global health crisis linked to the mRNA vaccine platform, which has been used for COVID-19, RSV, flu, and tetanus. During the pandemic, we were constantly updated on COVID cases, yet now we face a significant health crisis affecting potentially hundreds of millions due to this mRNA technology. While it is known to be cost-effective and profitable, it is also causing injuries to millions, with potential generational effects. Governments must acknowledge this serious issue, as ignoring it raises concerns.

We submitted a paper on COVID vaccine injuries to The Lancet, which was taken down due to pressure from the pharmaceutical industry. The paper has now passed peer review and will be published, showing that 74% of sudden deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. More evidence is emerging daily on the harm of COVID vaccines, urging politicians to act preemptively.

The speaker questions the independence of regulatory agencies like the TGA, suggesting that they may be influenced by pharmaceutical companies that fund them. They criticize the quick adoption of COVID vaccines and the authorization for their use in young Australians, even before approval in the US and Europe. They argue that a Royal Commission is needed to investigate these issues and hold those responsible accountable. The speaker also mentions the Pfizer trials, claiming that there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group. They highlight the large amount of money spent on vaccines and the lack of transparency regarding contracts and terms. They believe that mandating vaccines violates international human rights.

Government regulators are influenced by big pharma, with FDA employees receiving royalties from approved vaccines and drugs. FDA's budget heavily relies on pharmaceutical industries, leading to agency capture. For instance, NIH owns half of the Moderna vaccine, with high-level deputies under Fauci receiving $150,000 annually from it indefinitely. This conflict of interest is not widely discussed in mainstream media, as speaking out can lead to censorship.

I recently heard stories of people losing their children to Pfizer injections, some experiencing immediate or gruesome deaths. The FDA knew about potential risks like cancer from as far back as 2013, but suddenly in 2020, these concerns were ignored. This seems like a premeditated crime, with regulators aware of the dangers. Military involvement in pushing these products is suspicious.

Elected officials are not acting in the people's best interest, serving pharmaceutical companies with the mRNA shot. They all use the same script, talking about safety without considering the risks of the injection. The vaccination campaign will be remembered as the biggest medical scandal and crime against humanity.

In this video, the speaker discusses the COVID situation in Australia. They mention that despite a high vaccination rate, over half the country has contracted COVID. They also talk about excess deaths in 2021 and a high number of vaccine injuries. The speaker criticizes the Australian health department for not addressing these issues and accuses the head of the organization of having a conflict of interest due to funding from Big Pharma. They also mention that the chief health officer hadn't read a report on the Pfizer vaccine.

The government is criticized for not adequately addressing concerns about mRNA vaccine contamination with oncogenic material. Professor Angus Delwych warns that mRNA vaccines should be banned due to safety risks. The loss of trust in pharmaceutical companies is highlighted, calling for transparency and data disclosure. The importance of ethical medical science in pandemic management is emphasized. The need for societal coordination, human rights respect, and adherence to scientific principles is stressed. The speaker questions the government's handling of vaccine safety and urges for accountability in the face of potential risks.

The Port Hedland Council in Australia has voted to suspend the Moderna and Pfizer COVID vaccines due to concerns over synthetic DNA contamination. They found levels of residual DNA in the vaccines up to 145 times above legal limits, raising fears of health risks such as cancer and immune disruption. The council plans to inform all local councils in Australia and health practitioners about these findings. This follows independent testing and pressure from federal MP Russell Broadbent, who has sought government accountability. The council aims to inspire other local governments to demand proof of vaccine safety from federal authorities, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability regarding COVID-19 vaccinations.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

Last year, an inquiry recommended a Royal Commission into the government's COVID-19 response after hearing testimony from highly qualified witnesses. The government responded by stating it does not support a Royal Commission, working with State Governments on an inquiry, the proposed terms of reference, or further public involvement. Instead, the government will continue with its own inquiry comprising bureaucrats and a university academic closely involved in the COVID response. The speaker suggests this is a cover-up and questions if pharmaceutical industry donations to the Labor Party influenced this decision. The speaker lists donations from pharmaceutical companies to the Australian Labor Party in 2022-2023, totaling almost $1,000,000. Donations include AbbVie Pharmaceuticals ($14,000), Alexion Pharmaceuticals ($33,000), Amgen Biopharmaceuticals ($27,500), Aspen Medical ($83,000), AstraZeneca ($33,000), Bayer ($33,000), Bristol Myers ($52,000), H. A. Technical Pharmaceuticals ($54,000), Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceuticals ($36,000), Merck Sharp Dome ($66,000), Novartis ($33,000), Pfizer ($25,000), Roche ($66,000), Sanofi Aventis ($42,000), Pharmacy Guild of Australia ($154,000), Medicines Australia ($112,000), and Bunnings owners Wesfarmers ($110,000). The speaker states that 1 Nation received no donations from these industries because it is "not for sale."

Synthetic DNA contamination in Biogen and Moderna's COVID-19 vaccines poses a national crisis for Australia. Research confirms excessive levels of synthetic DNA, with findings indicating potential integration into human DNA and self-replication, raising concerns about long-term health risks. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) dismissed these findings as misinformation, but this has been challenged by experts. Mortality rates have risen post-vaccination, correlating with booster shots, and there is a disturbing trend of aggressive cancers emerging after vaccination. Despite over 60 million doses administered, health authorities have not monitored cancer trends, creating a critical oversight. Immediate action is needed to halt the distribution of contaminated products and prioritize public health over profit. The truth must prevail for the sake of future generations.

We submitted a vaccine injury paper to The Lancet about COVID-19 vaccine-related sudden deaths. The paper was taken down due to pressure from the pharmaceutical industry but has now passed peer review and will be published. It found that 74% of sudden deaths were caused by the vaccine. More evidence is emerging about the harm of COVID-19 vaccines, and politicians should act before it's too late.

Australian lawmakers and officials are admitting they were misled into enforcing coercive vaccine mandates, citing rising deaths and evidence of harm. They are calling for an urgent inquiry and the suspension of mRNA vaccines globally. A New South Wales health minister admitted a link between COVID-19 vaccines and a surge in hospitalizations and heart problems. A lawmaker highlighted synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, up to 145 times higher than safety limits, potentially causing cancer and other health risks. Each vaccine shot tested contained trillions of synthetic DNA fragments, including SV40, known to cause cancer. It is claimed that using biological weapons to harm people violates the Geneva Convention. An Australian judge, Helen Rife QC, who dismissed a lawsuit against Pfizer, allegedly failed to disclose her ties to the company. Senator Malcolm Roberts is pursuing those responsible for what he calls the "greatest crime" of the 21st century.

Australia has administered over 60 million vaccine doses to over 20 million people. Despite this, governmental health authorities have chosen not to monitor new or emerging cancer trends, and have failed to make post-vaccination cancer trend data publicly available, which is a critical oversight. Given the massive contamination levels of rogue residual DNA in the Australian vials, we must expect an ongoing rise in cancers and other genetic disorders in Australia. This is a potential long-term health crisis. This matter must be taken seriously. We must advocate for immediate public health responses and monitoring of these trends. Without action, Australians are vulnerable to preventable diseases that may devastate families and strain our healthcare system. These gene-based vaccines should never have been considered. The technology had never been proven to be effective in preventing coronavirus infections and was unsafe long before 2021.

The World Health Organization worsened global health during the pandemic by supporting coercive mandates for harmful pharmaceutical products. They have not apologized for the harm caused. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a major funder, profited from investments in COVID mRNA vaccines. We must resist and refuse to comply with these actions. Our voices must be heard to protect our rights. Thank you to everyone standing up with courage.