TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A businessman told the speaker that the same fat shot drug cost him $88 in London, but $1,300 in New York. He was stunned that the identical pill, made in the same plant by the same company, had such different prices. The speaker discussed this with drug company representatives. They argued for about half an hour, but ultimately the representative admitted there was no justification for the price difference.

The speaker claims to have never seen a cancer patient without an oral infection, after consulting with dozens, if not hundreds, of patients. The speaker asks cancer patients about root canals. The speaker describes patients with ALS-type or neurological symptoms of 10-15 years duration improving after root canals are addressed. The speaker recounts a story about their father, who was paraplegic and had chronic conditions. After mercury removal, root canal work, extractions, and infection cleanup, his health improved remarkably at age 76.

Speaker contrasts health care in the US and Italy. They state that 'doctors in The US will prescribe antibiotics at any chance they can,' while noting that their boyfriend in Italy was sick and 'he went to his doctor, and his doctor told him to get rest and drink some milk before bed.' They ask, 'I'm sorry, but where is that information in The US?' and describe the difference as 'crazy to me the difference that we see between health care in America versus health care in Italy,' adding that this is 'one tiny example of how the system works in America versus Italy.' The remarks illustrate a perceived disparity in how health care systems operate across the two countries.

The speaker believes orthodontics would dramatically change if their views were accepted, requiring many practitioners to alter their methods or leave the field. The speaker made a comparison on national television between twins, favoring the "On The Street Method" of a Dr. Muse. Reflecting on this, the speaker states a preference for Dr. Muse's method. The speaker's comments were widely reported, and orthodontists reacted negatively, viewing the speaker as a traitor who would undermine faith in orthodontics. The speaker states that this outcome was, in a way, the intention. This event initiated a lasting conflict between the speaker and the field of orthodontics. The speaker concludes that there was no alternative.

The speaker confirms the USMCA is in place and considered a good deal for all countries. The speaker expresses dislike for the previous person they worked with on the deal, claiming she was terrible and tried to take advantage of the deal. This led to a bad relationship that was ended. A negotiation is coming up in the next year or so to adjust or terminate the USMCA.

The speaker discusses a dentist who filed teeth to place veneers, causing the teeth to die and require root canals. They explain that dead tissue in the body decomposes, leading to chronic inflammation and immune system issues. The speaker warns against root canals due to the potential for bacterial byproducts. They admit to previously supporting root canals but now acknowledge scientific evidence suggesting otherwise. Translation: The speaker talks about a dentist who filed teeth to put veneers, causing the teeth to die and need root canals. They mention that dead tissue in the body decomposes, leading to chronic inflammation and immune system problems. The speaker advises caution with root canals due to the risk of bacterial byproducts. They used to support root canals but now recognize scientific evidence indicating otherwise.

In the late 1980s, the speaker's father, a pioneering implant dentist, was approached by the CIA for a four-year secret tour at an underground base in Maryland. The CIA was hiring top dentists for cybernetics work, offering $400,000 annually. The speaker's father declined. He had previously performed dental procedures on high-level CIA personnel without anesthesia, while being observed. According to the speaker, current experiments are reportedly "really bad," at an "island of doctor Moreau level." The speaker suggests that "we're not in Kansas anymore."

A documentary called The Root Cause, which exposed issues and educated the public, was removed from Netflix after a class action lawsuit by the American Association of Endodontists, who claimed it was scaring the public. The speaker suggests the removal protects the financial interests of endodontists. The speaker also claims there are natural alternatives to root canals, such as black seed oil. Additionally, too many dentists perform unnecessary root canals as a knee-jerk response to deep decay. Instead of immediately performing a root canal, the speaker uses ozone to disinfect deep decay and a laser pulp cap to protect the nerve, keeping the tooth vital.

The speaker claims most people don't brush their teeth correctly and that they didn't learn the proper method until dental school at age 23. The speaker introduces the Bass Method, which involves angling the toothbrush towards the gum tissue instead of brushing straight on. The method consists of making small circles at the gum line and then flicking the brush downwards.

Long queues are a common problem across the country, including in Bristol. It's difficult to find a dentist accepting new patients in the area. The nearest option is 50 miles away, requiring a 2-hour journey each way on public transport. This situation is unacceptable.

A businessman told the speaker that the same fat shot drug cost him $88 in London but $1,300 in New York. The drugs were identical, made in the same plant by the same company. The speaker discussed this with a representative from the drug companies, who admitted there was no justification for the price difference.

The speaker asserts if asked for a conspiracy theory they are certain about, their answer is root canals. They reference a YouTube video that was formerly a Netflix documentary called The Root Cause, which they say discussed a large psyop by the dental industry and big pharma aimed at damaging people's health through root canals. They claim the documentary is banned and cannot be watched in the United States; viewers must use a VPN to access it, alleging that it is prohibited by the American Dental Association, which they claim is in bed with big pharma. The speaker contends that dentists cannot discuss the topic because they would lose their licenses. The core claim is that root canals are filled with hazardous substances, specifically mercury and formaldehyde, along with “all sorts of chemicals” that disrupt meridian lines. They state that these root canals disrupt the ability to think properly. The speaker cites a figure of “thirty million plus people a year” receiving root canals and asserts that many of them become sick as a result, linking a range of health issues to root canals. They mention ADHD, cancer, memory loss, and heart failure as possible outcomes connected to root canals, implying a broad set of illnesses can be tied back and connected to the procedure. Throughout, the speaker presents the narrative as a controlled suppression of information by industry and regulatory bodies, framing the root canal practice as a systemic health hazard rather than a standard dental procedure. The emphasis is on alleging a deliberate cover-up and a correlation (or causation) between root canal treatments and significant health problems, with the suggestion that mainstream medical and dental authorities are complicit in concealing the alleged risks.

The speaker claims that fluoride burns holes in concrete, stating “Fluoride burns holes in the concrete. You can look up Rock Island, Illinois. Fluoride built burns holes in concrete.” They assert that this demonstrates fluoride is not needed for dental care, arguing that “you don’t need fluoride treatments.” According to the speaker, fluoride treatments are “just to burn holes in your mouth and then cause you to go back to the dentist over and over and over again,” implying a cycle of repeated dental visits as a consequence of fluoride treatments. Building on this premise, the speaker emphasizes an alternative approach to dental issues, stating that if someone has any types of teeth issues, the recommended remedies are “coconut oil, pearl. That’s it.” The speaker frames these remedies as the simplest possible path to healing the body, saying, “When you really think about healing the body, it’s so simple.” The overall message presented is that traditional fluoride dental treatments are unnecessary and potentially harmful, and that natural substances like coconut oil and pearl are sufficient for addressing dental concerns, presented as a straightforward, uncomplicated solution.

Speaker 0 found out he had 10 cavities, which will cost $3,000 and three visits to fix. Speaker 1 states that 10 cavities with braces is a common situation that can be avoided. The speaker notes that braces make it easier to get cavities between the teeth because most people don't floss between their teeth, since they have to use floss threaders, which takes a long time. The speaker recommends using a water flosser or braces floss picks to keep teeth clean and cavity-free.

A common asthma drug costs almost $500 in America, but less than $40 in The United Kingdom. The speaker highlights the significant price difference, noting one person paid a small amount for the same shot in the UK. The weight loss drug Ozempic costs 10 times more in The United States than in the rest of the developed world, according to the speaker, who questions the reason for this disparity.

A common asthma drug costs almost $500 in America, but less than $40 in The United Kingdom. The speaker stated that an individual in the UK paid a small amount for their shot, contrasting sharply with the $500 cost in the US. The weight loss drug Ozempic costs 10 times more in The United States than in the rest of the developed world. The speaker questions the reason for this disparity.

The speaker contrasts their experiences with the healthcare systems in the US and Canada after a mountain biking accident. In the US, an ER visit for a knee injury, including a CT scan, cost $800 without insurance and took only a couple of hours. The speaker contrasts this with Canada's system, funded by high taxes (almost 50% of paychecks), which they feel provides poor service. They describe long wait times, rude nurses, and inadequate care in Canadian hospitals. The speaker questions whether "free" healthcare in Canada is worth the high taxes and suggests a two-tiered system like Australia's might be better. They prefer the US healthcare system, roads, and freedoms, criticizing Canada's perceived shift towards communism and a "Justin Trudeau police state." They are now stuck in the US for a few days due to their injury.

The speaker avoids sugar and simple carbohydrates like bread. As a side effect of this diet, they no longer get plaque buildup on their teeth. They believe this is because eliminating sugars deprives bacteria of the food source needed to form biofilm on the teeth.

Speaker 0 highlights that root canals and wisdom teeth removal are common procedures but alleges there are important things not disclosed. The speaker argues that teeth are not separate from the rest of the body; they are living organs with nerves, blood supply, and communication with the body. If you had a dead organ inside you, you wouldn’t leave it there, yet the speaker claims that with a root canal, that is exactly what happens. The speaker references traditional Chinese medicine, stating that each tooth is connected through meridians to specific organ systems in the body. Therefore, when a root canal is performed and a dead tooth remains in the mouth, some believe that those entire meridians become compromised, and chronic health issues can sometimes bubble up. The speaker asserts that no one is connecting those health issues with a dead organ sitting inside the mouth. Regarding wisdom teeth, the speaker says you’re not just getting teeth pulled when they’re removed. Those wisdom teeth contain powerful stem cells that are harvested, researched, and sold for massive profit. The speaker notes the irony in how this is not typically disclosed when people are having their teeth removed and billed. The speaker contends that people are left wondering why chronic issues never resolve, emphasizing that the mouth is not separate from the body and is one of the main gateways. The speaker suggests that nothing about this feels accidental, though acknowledges the possibility of being labeled a conspiracy theorist. Finally, the speaker invites viewers to learn how to support the whole body outside of the system and states, if you want to learn, to comment “heal now.”

The speaker recalls having wisdom teeth removed at age 20 and mentions an insurance company offering a $5,000 reward for removing wisdom teeth. They claim to have learned that wisdom teeth are connected to the heart and that there is no reason to remove them. They state that wisdom teeth are pulled out so they could get a “from the” and then mess with the meridian line, and that wisdom teeth are connected to the brain and the heart. They assert that when people get their wisdom teeth removed, they often start developing heart issues, implying a causal link to the procedure. The speaker argues that the meridians of the wisdom teeth connect not only to the brain but also to the heart, so removing them disrupts the body’s pathways. They claim the dentist industry is a break off of the industry, that they fluoridate mouths, take teeth out, and x-ray people, and that all teeth are meridian lines; messing with those meridian lines messes with the body’s pathways.

Although I am not a doctor, I’m a nurse. On the front lines we knew what was happening. When we asked for ibuprofen, they said no. When we asked why we weren’t giving steroids, the answer was “we’re just following orders.” Following orders has led to the sheer number of deaths in these hospitals. I didn’t see a single patient die of COVID. I’ve seen a substantial number die of negligence and medical malfeasance. When I was on the front lines of New York, I became globally known as the nurse in the break room sobbing, saying they were murdering my patients. Pharmaceutical companies had gone into those hospitals and decided to practice on the minorities, the disadvantaged, the marginalized populations with no advocates, because the very agencies that should protect them were closed while we were sheltering in place. While I was there, pharmaceutical companies rolled out remdesivir onto a substantial number of patients, which we all saw was killing the patients. And now, it’s the FDA-approved drug that is continuing to kill patients in the United States. As nurses, we’ve collected a descriptive amount of information that you may not get from the doctors. Doctors do quantitative data; we do qualitative data with a humanistic, phenomenological approach in nursing research. We’ve collected data from patients across the country for which we’ve helped patients through the American Front Line Nurses and the advocacy network so nurses could advocate for these patients. This data pool shows that as these patients get remdesivir, they have a less than twenty-five percent chance of survival if they get more than two doses. Now they’re rolling it out on children as well and into nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities as early intervention, even though doctors Pierre Corre and Merrick have demonstrated that there are cost-effective medications out there, and we are going to see the amplification of death across the country. We haven’t even touched on vaccines, which our expert panels have described; I won’t touch on that since many are far superior to me. Two days ago I flew out my first 10-year-old with a heart attack and had to fight the ER doctor because he said, “ten-year-olds don’t have heart attacks.” I argued for thirty minutes to force his hand to get an EKG and found a STEMI; the 12-lead EKG lit up. He said it wasn’t possible, and I said, “was just vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible.” People contact me and the nurse advocates at American Front Line Nurses to help advocate, because there’s victim shaming—“it’s anxiety,” “it’s this.” But if they acknowledge it as a vaccine injury, the physician, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic may not get reimbursed, so it’s labeled as anxiety, neuropathy, or Guillain–Barré syndrome, when it’s very realistically a vaccine injury. I’ve traveled to South America, India, and South Africa, working in hot zones, stopping the spread of the virus and doing early intervention. Nowhere in developing nations do I see these issues that we see here in the United States. I’m a very proud American citizen from a family of immigrants. Our level of health care has deteriorated to substandard third-world-nation health care. You are better off in South America in a field hospital than in level-one trauma designer hospitals in the United States. As nurses, we are getting reports across the country from American frontline nurses about patients not getting food, water, or basic care. How come a patient hasn’t been fed in nine days? Why do I need a court order to force a hospital to feed a person who isn’t intubated and who would like food? If they’re on a ventilator, they’re not given water or basic care. We’re not allowed to take a BiPAP mask off to help someone eat. I’ve had patients who haven’t been bathed, haven’t been fed, and haven’t been given water, or been turned. This isn’t a hospital; this is a concentration camp. Nowhere in the United States do we isolate people for hundreds of hours with no human contact; it’s not allowed even in prisons. In hospitals, we isolate patients from their families for days, and you have to say goodbye over an iPhone, or you have to shuttle people in to see them. I was fired for sneaking a Hispanic family in to say the last rites to their family. Thank you, Senator Johnson, for giving nurses the opportunity to represent our patients, because we’re not often thought of as leading professionals, though we are the missing link between the doctors and the patients. Thank you for this time. Thank you for being a nurse.

I’m heading to the United States for the third time to seek faster cancer care, as my tumor markers are rising. A year and a half ago, I was diagnosed with stage 4 ovarian cancer in Canada. If I had waited for treatment there, I wouldn’t be here today. As a dual citizen and veteran, I accessed medical benefits in the U.S. and received timely, aggressive treatment, leading to no evidence of disease by March 2024. However, this aggressive cancer has a high chance of recurrence. Despite trying various treatments, including off-label medications, it seems to be returning. In Canada, I was told I might wait two weeks for a CT scan, but the U.S. oncology team can see me immediately. Time is critical, so I’m on my way to the U.S. for urgent care.