reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Geoengineers discuss implementing weather control through aerosols to manipulate wind speeds and cloud formation. HAARP and chemtrails are used as weather weapons to influence precipitation and storm patterns. The introduction of aerosols in the atmosphere leads to droughts and floods, impacting agriculture and water rights. The California drought results in water restrictions, land acquisition, and prioritization of corporate agriculture over small farmers, leading to public suffering. Water scarcity becomes a critical issue with implications for the future.

Scientists and researchers are experimenting with using lasers to manipulate the weather. By firing trillion-watt lasers into the sky, they can create ions that act as seeds for rain and lightning. This experimental technique has shown promise in the laboratory. In the past, governments have allegedly used similar methods to control the weather, but without conclusive results. The use of lasers could have implications for drought areas, agriculture, outdoor events, and even hurricanes. However, it only works with existing water vapor in the air and cannot create rain from a clear blue sky.

Physicists are experimenting with lasers to manipulate weather, potentially causing rain and lightning. By firing trillion-watt lasers into the sky, they aim to rip apart electrons, creating ions that act as condensation seeds. While still experimental, the process has worked in the laboratory, precipitating rain from water vapor. Allegedly, governments have experimented with weather control for decades, including the CIA during the Vietnam War. The use of lasers represents a more physics-based approach to weather modification. The implications could be significant for drought areas needing rain, outdoor events, agriculture, flooding, and even hurricane control.

We are here to address a long-standing issue in our province regarding the systematic and legal intervention in weather patterns. We have been denouncing the use of cloud-seeding planes by certain companies and insurers, which prevents rainfall and leaves us without water. These practices have been going on for over 20 years, and we demand that they be prohibited and investigated. These planes inject chemicals into the atmosphere to prevent hail, but they also disperse storms and hinder rainfall. This is a well-documented phenomenon, supported by organizations like the World Meteorological Organization. These weather modification practices, including anti-hail efforts, have been around for over a century in Argentina.

Speaker 0 argues that in the last four years there have been four “once in a century storms,” naming hurricane Helene, the Maui fires, and California wildfires. They claim these events are part of a pattern of engineered weather, stating that “they openly admitted at Davos, and our government is geoengineering” and that chemicals such as nickel ion are sprayed into the sky from aircraft to soak up moisture. The white trails seen across the sky are described as absorbing water, expanding, and then being guided with frequencies and directed energy weapons to create these storms. The speaker asserts that there will be “undeniable…proof that our government engineered this storm,” and asks how long it would take before someone is imprisoned for poisoning a road with water that freezes and causes deadly accidents, using an analogy about a steep hill and a road turned to ice. They claim the coming storm will kill American citizens and wonder when those responsible will be held accountable, inviting viewers to check out the video for proof of government geoengineering. Speaker 1 responds by stating the elephant in the room: the flight path is not normal. They note four different planes, including a Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker, flying highly unusual patterns right before the historic ice storm. They explain that the Stratotanker is typically used for aerial refueling, but these patterns suggest otherwise, mentioning that the KC-135 Stratotanker “could potentially be adapted for geoengineering purposes, such as stratospheric aerosol injection,” which releases reflective particles to cool the planet. They imply the United States Air Force is seeding clouds before the storm, calling it a coincidence yet suggesting it is related to geoengineering. They describe “the produce, the chemtrail” of USAF Stratotankers flying in circles over the Front Range. Speaker 0 adds that not only is there fumigation across nearly every state ahead of the historic ice storm, but in Tennessee there are visible signs of a massive amount of electromagnetic energy being pumped into the atmosphere ahead of the storm, while suggesting it is not a coincidence. They note Texas appears cloudy, followed by Indiana, and then claim to observe “frequency waves.” Speaker 1 reiterates the focus on Oklahoma, underscoring the widespread pattern and the associated frequency waves as part of the atmospheric manipulation preceding the storm.

In the early 1900s, Charles Hatfield claimed he could make it rain. Los Angeles farmers paid him $100 after he delivered rain. Lake Hemet operators contracted him for $4,000 to deliver four inches of rain; 11 inches fell, and the lake rose 22 feet. San Diego City contracted him to fill Lake Marina in one year for $10,000. After Hatfield erected his towers and released chemicals, it rained heavily for days. Lake Marina filled, but record-breaking rains caused dams to rupture, resulting in 20 deaths and 35 inches of rain that month. Lawsuits ensued, but the city refused to pay Hatfield. The California Supreme Court ruled it was an act of God, absolving both Hatfield and the city of liability. Despite being known as a "cloud coaxer" and "rainmaker," scientists doubted his abilities. Hatfield never received his money.

Hurricane Helene was artificially created, similar to cloud seeding, to control and manipulate the weather. The purpose was to flood and devastate certain places, thereby crashing land values and reducing the amount paid out as compensation.

In this video, the speakers discuss Charles Hatfield, a man who claimed he could make it rain. Los Angeles farmers paid him $100 to make it rain, and he delivered with 11 inches of rain falling. He was then contracted by San Diego City to fill Lake Marina, and heavy rain started falling after he set up his towers. However, the rain became excessive, causing dams to rupture and resulting in 20 deaths. The city council refused to pay Hatfield, and the California Supreme Court ruled it as an act of God, making neither Hatfield nor the city liable for damages. Hatfield was known by various names, including the rainmaker. He did not receive his payment, and his secret method remained unknown.

In the early 1900s, Charles Hatfield claimed he could make it rain for $50. Los Angeles farmers paid him $100 and he delivered 11 inches of rain, exceeding expectations. San Diego City also contracted him to fill Lake Marina for $10,000. Hatfield's towers and chemicals caused heavy rain for five days, resulting in the filling of Marina Reservoir and record-breaking rains. However, dams ruptured, causing 20 deaths and lawsuits in the millions. The California Supreme Court ruled it an act of god, absolving Hatfield and the city of liability. Hatfield was known by various names, including the rainmaker.

The excerpt discusses a line of devices associated with counteracting daily weather modification by altering atmospheric conditions. It references Trevor James Constable and Wilhelm Reich, who are described as the innovators behind the Cloudbuster, a apparatus purported to counteract weather modification taking place in the skies. A notable credential linked to Constable is that he worked for the U.S. Navy, and, in addition, helped the state of California “clean up the skies” and get rid of smog using devices like this. The claim is made that California knows how to restore cleaner skies with these kinds of tools. According to the account, the devices are shown “here” and are said to be synchronized to a running water source. The mechanism described involves changing the etheric fields and the etheric waves of the earth, with the ether described as moving continuously throughout the planet. The narrative states that the devices can “dam up the ether,” as Constable would do, which would lead to rain. In other words, by manipulating the etheric flow, the devices are claimed to induce precipitation. Beyond rain, the text asserts additional effects: the devices could cause plants to grow faster and could clear up areas affected by smog and pollution, as well as toxins and chemicals that have been released into the sky. The overall proposition presented is that these weather-modification countermeasures operate by influencing etheric energy, using synchronization with a water source, to produce environmental and agricultural benefits. The content links the Cloudbuster to a broader effort to address atmospheric contamination and weather manipulation, highlighting a historical claim about military and state usage, as well as potential environmental improvements attributed to the technology.

Cloud seeding is increasing, with plans to add 200 ground machines before next season. There are questions about the safety of chemicals sprayed and the ethics of manipulating nature. Cloud seeding has been practiced since the 1940s and 50s, and research suggests silver iodide levels are negligible at ground level. It's argued that humans have been manipulating weather for a long time. Further research is needed to monitor the effects of cloud seeding programs on downstream populations as they expand. The current manipulation is intended to help the planet.

Burning Man 2023 got rained out, which reminds me of something. I wonder why the fastest teams are seen in the clouds. Airplanes have flown over with smoke preceding cars, but the media doesn't report it. Someone claims that unknown people are seeding the clouds for hours each day. There are many things happening with these elements, like sticky fun and going down. If we think hard, maybe we can stop the rain.

We’ve identified a key factor in the fires: climate change. But what does that really mean? Since 1964, California has engaged in weather modification, which raises questions about its impact. Reports indicate that efforts to augment rainfall have gone wrong, leading to significant flooding. When these programs ceased, rainfall diminished, contributing to fire risks. This situation suggests that the issue may not solely be climate change but rather ongoing weather manipulation. The trails seen in the sky could be linked to these operations, reminiscent of tactics used in Vietnam. Historical context shows that these practices date back to the 1950s, prompting further investigation into their implications.

The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SPAW) recently conducted its first cloud seeding event as part of a 4-year weather modification program. Cloud seeding involves injecting silver iodide mixed with acetone particles into clouds to enhance rainfall or snowfall. However, cloud seeding has faced ethical and environmental concerns in the past. Studies have shown unintended consequences such as increased urban flooding and potential harm to aquatic life due to the use of silver iodide. Some residents affected by the cloud seeding express frustration and hope for insurance coverage for damages caused by manipulated weather events.

In Dubai, the speaker asks if it will rain, but it's actually a sunny day. The UAE government invested $20 million in cloud seeding research. Cloud seeding involves releasing salt into clouds to make droplets bigger and cause rain. The National Center of Meteorology in Abu Dhabi controls the cloud seeding process, which includes sending aircraft to specific cloud locations. The center manufactures a salt substance that is put into flares to enhance rainfall.

Authorities in an unspecified location experiencing a heat wave used cloud seeding missiles to create a storm. The speaker expresses surprise at the existence of such technology, wishing it were available in Manchester to eliminate clouds. The cloud seeding was successful, resulting in a storm. However, the situation escalated, leading to widespread freezing conditions.

Cloud seeding, a practice involving the release of chemicals into clouds to induce rain, is being discussed in relation to recent floods in Dubai and Yorkshire. Graham Taylor highlights concerns about the impact of cloud seeding on weather patterns, while Professor Ambaum emphasizes the need for further assessment of its effects. Despite conflicting reports on the effectiveness of cloud seeding, there is growing scrutiny of its potential role in extreme weather events globally.

I wish we had cloud-seeding missiles to clear the skies earlier. Interestingly, they used them just the day before, and it worked. The storm dissipated, but things quickly spiraled out of control, resulting in chaos with pans and barrels everywhere.

Ben Liddickstein, the first person to intentionally use cloud seeding for military purposes, discusses his experiences in Vietnam and with Project Stormfury. He explains how cloud seeding was used to create rain and damage enemy supply routes. Liddickstein also discusses the potential for weather modification to reduce hurricane damage and the legal and political challenges associated with implementing such measures. He emphasizes the need for government action and expresses disappointment that weather modification is not being utilized more widely.

Can't tell people the weather is controlled by Gerald from Top secret CAA weather control division. Dick speaking. There is no escape. Flooding and even hurricanes could be subject to weather modification. To block sunlight from reaching the earth. Lasers really to change the weather? The chemicals that they're spraying from the air. We've been doing this since the nineteen forties and fifties. We have been manipulating weather for a very long time.

Forming and drying is permanent, but we have a method called cloud seeding, which enhances existing storm systems. Garrett Camins leads a major cloud seeding company in the U.S., noting that interest has surged due to megadroughts. Currently, there are 42 cloud seeding projects in the American West, including Utah, where planes release microscopic particles into clouds to encourage rainfall or snowfall. This process can increase snowpack by 3 to 15%, crucial for irrigation. States like Arizona, Nevada, and California fund cloud seeding in Utah to boost their water supply. Researchers at the University of Colorado are developing AI to deploy cloud seeding drones. Ground-based cloud seeding also exists, using silver iodide particles to enhance snowfall. Despite recent heavy snowfall in the Southern Rockies, experts warn it will take several years of similar conditions to replenish water systems adequately.

The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority conducted its first cloud seeding event as part of a 4-year program to enhance local water supplies. Cloud seeding involves infusing silver iodide into clouds to create rain or snow. Concerns about the environmental impact and toxicity of silver iodide have been raised. Residents affected by the cloud seeding express anger and demand insurance coverage for man-made weather events. Some individuals believe there are suspicious activities in the skies.

The US government has admitted to controlling the weather in the past, as seen with Operation Popeye. At the Burning Man Festival in 2023, heavy rain caused flooding, leaving one person dead and around 70,000 people stranded. The area turned into a muddy pit, making it difficult for people to leave or enter. Similar weather incidents occurred in the past, such as at Woodstock in 1969, where concert-goers blamed cloud seeding by unknown entities and questioned why the media didn't report on it.

In the early 1900s, Charles Hatfield claimed he could make it rain and was hired by Los Angeles farmers to bring rain for $50. He built a tower and used chemicals, resulting in 11 inches of rain falling. San Diego City also contracted him to fill Lake Marina for $10,000, and it started raining after he set up his towers. However, heavy rain caused dams to rupture, leading to 20 deaths and lawsuits. The California Supreme Court ruled it as an act of God, so neither Hatfield nor the city were liable for damages. Hatfield was known by various names like the rainmaker, but he didn't receive his payment. The fate of Hatfield remains unknown.