TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: I know a little about human trafficking. The human trafficking portfolio fell underneath me in the counterterrorism shop where I was ahead. I worked with Tim Ballard at the White House to stamp out human and child sex trafficking. He was doing incredible work back then. Speaker 1: I'm the bad guy in the story. Last week, I got a call from some of the accusers, and what they're accusing him of is really not just—they're just really bad stuff. Really, really bad things. At first, because I've been friends with Tim for so long, I thought, that's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. Blew by them. Ridiculous. Until they persisted, and I started hearing more. I just heard somebody had filed in the HR complaints or something. Like, that's not possible. Well, the more the complaints come out, the worse it gets. These women called last week, and they wanted to do a show with me. That's not something I've even offered Tim. And I don't want to be the one making the calls on this. I'm not a journalist, and I'm also involved. Tim has been a friend of mine. OUR is a great organization, but I also stand up for victims. And I don't feel remaining silent on this or neutral if I know is acceptable. I don't know what they've done, but I've passed the women's number onto Leon Wolf, our news director, and said, put a journalist on this if you want. And I told him at the time, take it where it leads. I just want the truth. I just want the truth. So he put our best investigative reporter on it, and I heard last night that they are close to finishing the story. I was hoping that it was gonna be released today because this is yeah. If if if if it's true, I can't believe how many of us were duped. Speaker 2: Got pearlized. But it's still some guy who got fried and cried by the side. We gonna steal, slide, slide, slide until they all die. These niggas ain't seeing me because these niggas be small fry. I got big dude status, k l

Speaker 0 says, "And I don't know how the executives over at Turning Point USA sleep at night." He adds, "No matter what the cost is, you tell the truth. That's it." He alleges that "about forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright" and that he "refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors." He challenges TPUSA to answer: "Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself?" He asks for "'the name of the Jewish donor who sponsored the Hamptons weekend'" and whether there were LLCs paying Rob McCoy. He asserts, "Charlie did not die pro Israel. He did not die for Israel," noting that "Friends of Israel were pressuring him really badly." He vows to expose lies and ends, "Somewhere, Charlie is watching."

- A tweet claims that Leslie Wexner financed the mass rape and trafficking of thousands of American children for over a decade, and that he is currently in a 26,000 square foot mansion in New Albany, Ohio, thinking that he is above the law. The tweet is dated 04/28/2020. - Speaker 0 notes how crazy that tweet is and highlights it as a reminder. - The conversation then shifts to praise for a female conspiracy figure, described as “the most prolific of all the conspiracy,” “the most well read,” “the one with the most recall,” and “the most quoted.” They express admiration for how she is able to find information and stay ahead of topics. - They mention they are trying to get her on, and wonder how she is so good, what her background is, and how she finds all this information, noting that she’s always way ahead of everything. - The speakers reiterate that 2020 was crazy and that she was “fucking way ahead of everything,” calling it crazy.

Speaker 0 delivers a rapid-fire set of bragging lines about wealth, fashion, and success: “Go see my eyes red on my demons,” “My postie racks up just to motivate my niggas,” “Rappers need a stylist bad, but I ain't use a stylist yet,” “I signed a million dollar contracts in my box to steal a text,” “Wake up, check my bank account, phone numbers in there, bitch. I'm blessed,” and references to private jets, being fresh off the press, sipping drinks with lines, a tinted eye, a moving piece, and owning a new bulletproof Cadillac. He notes money, private flights, and the ability to charge for Instagram content, while cutting off a girl who didn’t pick up. The tone centers on opulent lifestyle, independence, and status. Speaker 1 shifts to a hostile, accusatory monologue: “All over the place, guys. Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, Laura Loomer.” He claims Gabe Hoffman “is running humps on people” and calls him a “bad guy.” He says he looks like he’s seen a ghost and that someone close to him was there to infiltrate him, describing these people as “really fucking bad” and stating they are “evil,” including claims of them being “unregistered foreign agents.” He asserts he will be watching everything they do and declares ongoing surveillance and vigilance: “I will be watching. Everything you do, I’m gonna be watching.” Speaker 2 notes a logistical detail: “Hell yeah. On my way back to the site to get my burner phone so I can use my ghost accounts…” indicating plans to obtain a burner phone for anonymous or modified online activity. Speaker 3 adds a blunt, explicit line about using “ghost accounts” for actions, saying, “can use my ghost accounts to fuck,” reinforcing the theme of covert or deceptive online activity. Overall, the transcript juxtaposes an ostentatious wealth/aspirational rap persona (Speaker 0) with a conspiratorial, accusatory stance toward specific public figures (Speaker 1), and mentions of circumventing scrutiny or anonymity online (Speaker 2 and Speaker 3). The named individuals identified by Speaker 1 are Jack Kosoviak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer.

Speaker 0 claims to have recordings and documents exposing malfeasance within a nonprofit, alleging board members took money from donors and used children to further an agenda. Speaker 1 denies knowledge and deflects, objecting to questions about investments in companies, some potentially in the medical field and possibly sold to big pharma like Pfizer. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of conflicts of interest. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of being a cheat and a liar. Speaker 0 vows to get justice, not revenge. The timing of events is deemed suspicious, and a board statement is considered a critical turning point.

Speaker accuses Oprah Winfrey of ignoring the suffering of women and children. They claim that Oprah was involved in recruiting women for Harvey Weinstein and accuse her of being involved in child trafficking and handling minors. The speaker believes that with Oprah's connections, wealth, and influence, it is impossible for her to be unaware of these activities. They mention Rose McGowan's statement that Oprah was involved in the Weinstein case. The speaker concludes by saying that we live in a small world and implies that the truth will eventually come out.

The speaker claims that if videos existed of someone committing felonies on an island, the public would have seen them. They assert that there are tens of thousands of videos of Jeffrey Epstein with children or child pornography and hundreds of victims. They state that no victim will ever get released due to the volume of evidence. The speaker concludes that the FBI is diligently processing this evidence.

The speaker discusses reactions to Candace’s incident reports and what Candace allegedly said, including Fort Huachuca confirmation and that Mitch Snow, Michael, and Harry were there. They plan to show what Candace actually said, noting it seemed like a subliminal address while a larger group tries to debunk her. They also mention George Webb and that many have told them to check his work, though they’re unsure. They summarize Valhalla VFT’s position: if by Friday Mitch returns all the money to Candace and Candace donates it to Mitch’s victims, the situation could move forward positively; otherwise, they will go “scorched earth” on Friday and reveal everything about the man. The speaker expresses discomfort with a pattern they’ve observed: three people—Valhalla VFT, Balak’s Tones, and George Webb—initially express support for Candace and claim they want her to reach out, but then publicly attack or debunk her. They note that all three claimed to care about Candace, and then shifted to public attacks after alleged private communication. George Webb is described as briefly protective, then chastising Candace in posts; Balak’s Tones is said to have given Candace an ultimatum (twenty-four hours) to shut down the GoFundMe and redirect funds to “victims,” followed by a series of videos and attacks. Valhalla is described as shifting from supportive to attacking as well, creating an odd pattern. The speaker outlines personal experiences with these figures: George Webb did not answer a question about how a clip connecting to Fort Huachuca related to his claims, and has a tendency to block on social media; Valhalla is accused of reframing and proclaiming the story “done” while moving toward public attacks. Balak’s Tones is accused of issuing ultimatums and then attacking Candace if her response did not align with his demands. The speaker argues that if these individuals genuinely cared about Candace, they would press for the questions she must answer. They examined Valhalla’s claims about building numbers, foyer requests, and license plates: one building number checks out, the other’s existence is unclear; the foyer request answer is reportedly not verifiable by Candace’s team alone, though she has people who could obtain it; the California license plate claim “checks out.” The overall tension centers on the ultimatum to shut down the GoFundMe by Friday and the shifting portrayal of Candace’s story by these three figures. The speaker concludes by noting Valhalla’s deep emotional stance against toxic spousal situations may influence his views, suggesting his past conversations with witnesses and victims inform his strong stance, which, in the speaker’s view, colors his approach and may contribute to the public attacks. They acknowledge liking Valhalla and recognizing the no-tolerance stance, but feel it clouds judgment and pushes toward attacking Candace.

Speaker 0 discusses emails suggesting Bill Gates had additional affairs, tried to obtain medication to treat a sexually transmitted infection, and planned to give the medicine without the recipient knowing; his representative says all of this is false. It is not on you to respond to the details of that alleged behavior. The question posed is about the speaker’s dominant emotion when reading these news articles with these details. Speaker 1 answers: Sad. Just unbelievable sadness. Unbelievable sadness, right? And again, I’m able to take my own sadness and look at those young girls and say, my god, how did they, how did that happen to those girls, right? And so for me, it’s just sadness. Sadness for, you know, I’ve left, I had to, I left my marriage. I had to leave my marriage. I wanted to leave my marriage. I had to leave the, I felt I needed to eventually leave the foundation. So it’s just sad. That’s the truth. Right? And it’s kind of like, at least for me, I’ve been able to move on in life.

Speaker 0 accuses the group of being pedophiles for not caring about child sexual abuse, claiming they “probably enjoy child porn” and are not looking. They ask Monica: “You’re not a pedophile? Then why aren’t you doing anything about the child abuse that's happening in the county?” They assert, “If you cared, you'd want to stop it,” and imply they would act if it happened to one of their own children or grandchildren, asking, “What if it happens to your grandchild? Would it matter then?” The speaker concludes by demanding action and states, “Next speaker, please.”

Gavin Newsom and his wife allegedly called up the FireAce organization, which they are calling a "$100,000,000 money launder scam." They allegedly instructed FireAce to delete information from their website after Spencer posted a screen recording on TikTok. The speaker claims this was done to conceal that they supposedly took fire victim money for their "little made up nonprofit." The speaker states that the information has been removed from the website since yesterday.

Speaker 0 presents a Nehemiah analogy: he builds a wall while the townspeople shout at him to come down, and he repeated, “I cannot come down. I am busy building.” She says she feels the same: no time to address the noise, and their silence does not mean complacency. She asserts that Turning Point USA and the handpicked staff loved by her husband are not involved in the alleged conspiracy, and they are busy building. She emphasizes that grieving in their own way, they are trying hard to find answers after something evil happened. Any lead is sent to authorities, with calls to dig into it and not leave any rock unturned, aiming for justice for her husband, herself, and her family more than anyone else. Her breaking point comes when others come after them: “Come after me. Call me names. I don’t care. Call me what you want.” She will not tolerate targeting of her family, Turning Point USA family, or the Charlie Kirk show family, especially when people profit from attacking those she loves. She declares righteous anger, saying this is not okay, a mind virus, and that she believes in the judicial system. She notes their team is working hard, and she apologizes for any language, insisting it’s not okay. Speaker 1 remarks that they have never seen her like this, to which Speaker 0 responds that her reaction is righteous anger. She stresses that their team is human, not machines, and has faced more death threats and kidnapping threats than ever before. The team is exhausted; every time the threats are brought up, they must relive trauma from the day her husband was murdered. She acknowledges that her team is rocked to the core and must endure ongoing public scrutiny and conspiracies. She questions whether the online hostility has intensified because she shines a light on issues, asking what people expected from her. They note that some target her accessories, normalizing an atmosphere of personal attacks. She quips about a “conspiracy collection,” suggesting that those who want to pick her apart can do so—this had been happening even before her husband’s murder. Speaker 0 concludes that the abuse was occurring prior to Charlie’s murder, and both she and her partner have endured persistent, harrowing criticism and threats for years.

Speaker 0 describes Candace Owens with highly inflammatory language, calling her an evil scumbag and a degenerate cunt. He accuses her of burning everything down and gloating while she does it, and claims she has security, though not the same level as others. He asserts that she lies about security and that her actions harm others, while conservatives who criticize her lack “balls” to call her out. He acknowledges that others have begun messaging him in support of criticizing Owens, but he dismisses credit for any such actions he didn’t claim. Speaker 0 asserts that Owens is hypocritical and hypocritically claims she loves Charlie Kirk while allegedly destroying what he built. He states he has bullets fired at his property and has to live in the middle of nowhere, with strangers approaching his Maryland home and residents being beaten when attempting to live there. He contends that Owens does not live the way she portrays, and that she is “burning everything down” and is evil. He claims the conservative movement is fractured and suggests Republicans are on track to lose the midterms, asserting that they were trending in a different direction until Charlie Kirk was murdered, calling it “the most effective political assassination in history.” Speaker 0 further asserts that Owens has turned Turning Point into “the perpetrators of the crime that was against them” and says he is not paid by any of these groups, has no special ties to Turning Point USA, and was not invited to their event. He contends that he does not want to participate with them and feels that conservative media are cowardly for not standing up to Owens. He mentions Megyn Kelly, appreciating her kind words but calling the situation pathetic bullshit. He emphasizes that no one is paying him, there is no Russia or Israel involvement, and he is simply risking his life by speaking out. Speaker 0 reiterates his frustration at Owens being placed in a thumbnail on her piece and calls her a “fucking cunt.” He insists that Owens benefited from the situation, and that she “killed Charlie” with her actions, claiming, “No one benefited more than her.” The exchange includes Speaker 1 confirming disbelief that Owens included him in the thumbnail and echoing the sentiment that she didn’t fly or act consistently with her claimed security.

Speaker 0 claims to have recordings and documents exposing malfeasance within a nonprofit, alleging board members took money from donors and used children to further an agenda. Speaker 1 denies knowledge and deflects, objecting to questions about investments in companies, some potentially in the medical field and possibly sold to big pharma like Pfizer. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of conflicts of interest. Tensions escalate with personal attacks, Speaker 0 calling Speaker 1 a cheat and liar, while Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of being a cheat and liar. Speaker 0 vows to get justice, not revenge. The discussion revolves around investments, potential conflicts of interest, and a broken story within the organization.

The speaker states they cared about the server, the network, and their family first, including their partner, Shay. The speaker accuses someone of staying up all night to slander them and acting like a psychopath while pretending to be a traditional wife and mother. The speaker claims this person was going after their girlfriend, who hates them. The speaker then says they will show viewers that they still have their Twitter account when the video was made.

The speaker addresses questions about their testimony regarding John, particularly concerning victimhood and police reports. They explain they testified only when asked by John's former associates. The speaker agrees their testimony alone isn't enough to convict John, but claims there's corroborating evidence from siblings, an ex-spouse, detransitioners, and online articles detailing past incidents. The speaker alleges John hasn't credibly refuted the evidence, instead resorting to personal attacks and generalizations. They claim many people, some anonymously due to fear, have similar experiences with John. The speaker highlights email evidence where John seemingly incriminates himself. They accuse John of lying about his credentials, including his work with sex offenders, and concealing his divorce and criminal charges. The speaker argues police reports aren't the sole determinant of a legitimate case, as abusers may file preemptive reports or victims may be unable or unwilling to file due to fear, lack of support, or the statute of limitations. They criticize John's behavior as mirroring abusive safeguarders seeking to exploit vulnerable individuals. The speaker believes John is being exposed because he preaches a false gospel and is spiritually abusive.

The speaker expresses support for victims of a "political TikToker" she has criticized for over a year. She claims nobody initially believed her about his "disgusting behavior," and she fears he will ascend into the political hierarchy despite allegations against him. Having known him since she was 18, she asserts any apology from him would be insincere and gaslighting. She describes him as "sick," "perverted," and someone who has evaded consequences for too long. She is glad the issue is gaining traction, agreeing with another woman's assessment that his advocacy for women is a ploy. She states she could write a "novel" about his actions, but some incidents she cannot discuss due to legal reasons. She thanks the woman who came forward, stating it renewed her strength to speak out. She reiterates her support for other victims.

Speaker 0 accuses the man of lying, noting he claims he only ever met him once while they had lived next to him for twenty-some years. Speaker 1 explains that, with his wife present, they apologized, left, and decided they will never be in the room with that disgusting person again—social, business, or philanthropy—because that guy was there. Speaker 0 adds that it’s a disgrace how this guy has a job today, calling him a proven liar advising the president of the United States every day, and says they’re done with these people.

Speaker 0 notes that the people are not accusing him of rape or selling anyone; they are facing charges including human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit. Speaker 1 describes OnlyFans as “the best hustle in the world.” He explains the alleged methods: using the “lover boy method,” coercing by being nice, and not mentioning webcam until after sex. He says mentioning webcam on dates “just doesn’t work” and claims he would never do that, arguing the technique is to proceed normally and introduce webcam later. Speaker 2 and Speaker 3 discuss a program called PhD on corporatetake.com: “PhD is a pimp and hose degree.” He claims it teaches how he met girls, how he got girls to like him, how he got girls to fall in love with him to work on webcam, and how to have them spend more time with him. He describes inviting a prospective recruit to a meeting and bringing a girl who works for “Your bottom bitch” to explain the selling. The process emphasizes a “first girl” as pivotal, with girls on camera together the first day so the new girl can observe and imitate. Speaker 4 recounts specific experiences: being bought wine and becoming nervous about webcam work; the narrator describes wealth from webcam operations and retaining girls; he mentions four locations and 75 girls, with roughly half of the money going to the workers, claiming a 50% split and suggesting taxes explain the disparity. Another worker, paid a flat £15 per hour, notes large sums from clients who believed they would meet the girl. Speaker 1 describes a pattern where men fell in love with his models and sent large amounts of money, including people selling houses and life savings. He states: “I used sex as a tool to make women love me so they'd obey me and live in my house to make me money. That’s what I wanted. So I was a pimp in that sense.” He discusses the emotional manipulation that led clients to believe they would meet the girl. Speaker 5 remains skeptical, labeling the operation “pimpy.” Speaker 1 argues about the Me Too era, saying he is not a rapist in a way that would be labeled, yet he admits he likes the freedom to do what he wants. Speaker 6 challenges Speaker 1 by quoting his own statements: that his job was to meet a girl, sleep with her, get her to fall in love, and then get her on webcam to become rich together. Speaker 1 denies that exact quote, but Speaker 6 insists it matches what was said on the website. Speaker 0 reiterates that the belief is he was charged with human trafficking, and Speaker 1 clarifies that “human trafficking” is framed as forcing a girl to work for financial gain, noting TikTok accounts from some girls as part of the justification. He reiterates the PhD as a pimp and hose degree he claims to be pleasant about.

Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.

Speaker 0: Some viewers may find the following video disturbing. Viewer discretion is advised. Speaker 1: This is a fact. We are all being controlled by an elite, wealthy, and privileged few. When Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire, was found guilty of sex trafficking, he was set to squeal on all the elites in Hollywood and in Washington who used his child sex services. But Epstein was found dead in a cell from, quote, suicide. Why do the elites want children from sex traffickers? Adrenochrome. It is harvested from children for a euphoric and life enhancing benefit. This satanic cabal of Hollywood and political elites all need the adrenachrome to maintain their positions of power, and they will continue to do so until we stand up against them. Now, do you have any questions, Craig? Speaker 2: So does Oprah drink the same blood as Obama or is it usually a different kid? Speaker 1: It's kids from all over the world. Speaker 0: There was a recent Newsweek article about how blood from young people can slow aging. Connecting the circle tree system of old and young mice is documented to have rejuvenating effects on cells, tissues, organs and various functions. Is this where vampire myths and lore throughout human history and cultures derives from? Queen Elizabeth the second is related to Vlad the Impaler which makes Prince Charles the heir to Dracula's bloodline. Aldous Huxley's 1954 essay, The Doors of Perception written mostly about his experiences with mescaline discusses the possibility that adrenochrome is a compound with similar effects to the psychedelic cactus. Speaker 1: He has not taken it and doesn't know how one would obtain it saying just how it spontaneously produced within the human body. He describes it as a product of the decomposition of adrenaline which is surprising correct. There's a brief mention of Dren Crom in the 1962 novel A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess, where it's an optional addition to the cocktail which is a glass of milk Moloco Plus. But probably the most cited use of the compound is in Hunter S Thompson's Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. The controversial author Hunter S. Thompson was allegedly linked to Larry King as implicated in the testimony from Paul Bonnachie who he looked at in the Franklin scandal in the Deep State War Part four Satanic Panic. Paul Bonnachie was the pedophile victim who revealed that Thompson directed a graphic snuff film made near Sacramento, California at a location called Bohemian Grove. Speaker 2: What is this shit? That stuff makes pure masculine seem like ginger beer, man. Adrenochrome. Adrenochrome? Where'd you get this? Never mind, it's absolutely pure. What kind of monster client have you hooked up with this time? Satanism freak. I think there's only one source for this stuff. The adrenaline gland from a living human body. I know. Speaker 3: When someone is being sacrificed, ladies and gentlemen, which is a very horrible thing, the person is terrified and adrenaline is pumped into their body. When you drink that blood, you get the high, the adrenaline high, that that person was in. And you, after a while, become addicted to that adrenaline high. There's also a very top secret. This substance, it's called adrenalchrome, and just the very existence of it's been kept very secret by these people. If you time things just perfectly right, as the person is being sacrificed, you can stick a needle here at the base of skull and if you know what you're doing and the timing is correct, you can extract adrenal chrome, which is a very valuable drug, natural drug on the Illuminati's black market. This is why you will see that well, backtracking just a little bit, the establishment news media said that the reason why Al Gore carried blood in a suitcase was that he was a hemophiliac. But the truth of the matter is that he's become addicted to blood. Speaker 0: This video shares a large data dump and paper trail of documents that are potentially the most shocking evidence of the existence of Adrenochrome yet. The volume of data is extensive and points out that this happens on an industrial scale and is part of a worldwide network. This information was left on a USB stick purchased in Germany. The person posted the information to the boards and it contained data from a company called CYM that allegedly runs camps and evaluates children. There are allegedly secret detention centers set up inside various corporations where kids as young as three years of age are tortured and harvest on mass for adrenochrome. In the documents, they are called detention centers so they can masquerade as juvenile detention centers to the public eye. But you don't detain three year olds in such centers nor do you harvest adrenochrome in legitimate detention centers, obviously. It seems from the data it is unproductive to kill the kids just to harvest this stuff, instead they're repeatedly tortured and then harvested whilst being allowed to live. The average age of the children in these detention centers is nine to 10 years. For satanic services, they probably kill the kids for each harvest but on an industrial scale, that's just not practical. Images one to 12 in the documents are the names, ages and the locations of the kids as well as how long they have been harvested. Images 12 to 18 in the documents show a few of the retail outlets where the elites can buy this stuff including the prices, the quality and the amount which is in milligrams. Image 21 shows the front names of the companies that have the kids and from this, can clearly see they are running the exact same front companies in four different countries and have the number of kids per front company in each country listed as well as the total per front company name listed. There is also a column to indicate whether the child is suicidal as if they are the instructions seem to be to step up production and harvesting to maximize what they can get from the child before it gives up and dies. There was also a website on a black paper from the dark web that was linked to the launch of a private crypto that was allegedly for invited people to buy Adrenochrome through an ERC 20 token. This information was scrubbed from the internet, but before it was, I did survey through it. And although I cannot verify its authenticity, there were about 20 pages of legal jargon attached to the terms and conditions which seemed like a lot of work for someone to do for just a lark. So it looks like the deep state were using Wuhan to process their adrenochrome. This is what Adrenochrome looks like as you can actually buy it on alibaba.com. Speaker 4: In Tulsa, but he's down there saving children as we speak because they're pulling kids out of the darkest recesses of hell right now and dumbs and all kinds of the adrenachroming of children. Speaker 5: No. Jim, you you said you said a word a minute ago, and I I wanna clarify what that word was because you said a word. And I wanna make sure that you said adrenocrome. Speaker 4: Yeah. Speaker 5: And a lot of people here, there's about 4,500 people here. There's Yep. About a half million people streaming online. We're having some cyberattacks. That feed's been going on and off. It's it's a but you said that word. And by a show of hands, who's heard that word before in this building? Could you please explain to the extent that you want to or not want to what that is? Because some people have never heard that before, and we need to discuss that. Speaker 4: Essentially, you have adrenaline in your body. I'll just simplify it. And and when you are scared, you've produced adrenaline. If you're an athlete, you get in the fourth quarter, you have adrenaline that comes out of you. If a child knows he's going to die, his body will, secrete this adrenaline, and they have a lot of terms that they use that he takes me through. But, it's the worst horror I've ever seen is screaming alone even if I never ever ever ever saw it. It's beyond and these people that do it, there'll be no mercy for them. Speaker 6: When they torture the children, it causes a physical reaction of the endomorphins in your body to just increase because of the terror and the pain. So when the satanists drink the blood, they actually get like a chemical, you know, high, like a drug high from the blood of a tortured victim. And this little boy was found in the basement dead with no blood, skinned alive and crucified. This cannot happen to any more children. I can't do it alone. Speaker 7: Let me just point out that pedophilia does not stop with sodomizing children. It goes straight into terrorizing them to adrenalyze their blood and then murdering them. It also includes murdering them so that they can have their bone marrow harvested as well as blood. Speaker 8: Through the sacrifice ritual and they build up the terror. What happens is the terror reaches a point where a certain adrenaline pours into the blood and the people doing the ritual then drink that blood and they get a real high from that adrenaline. Speaker 9: What they need is for it to be secreted in the blood is they need terrorization of of their victims. They before they are killed for their blood. And it they have to terrorize them to get this to come out in the blood and be secreted in the blood. They are killed at that moment as they are staring into their eyes, and they will drink and they drink the blood, and the blood is highly sought after. Then they have these children that they're kidnapping and bringing in from other countries, and no one misses them because these are third world countries. Speaker 10: It's even worse than before because they are using all these kids arriving with the refugees. They are taking them from the boats directly and bringing them in their pedophile networks, taking their organs. They found hundreds of emptied bodies put back together in Egypt and in other places before. This is scandalous. I think this is really becoming revolting. Speaker 9: And children are the they have the most energy, the purest energy, the they're the highest form of sacrifice. They are used as actual blood sacrifices during these rituals. I have seen at rituals. I have seen George Bush. I have seen Madeleine Albright. Speaker 9: I have seen Henry Kissinger. I have seen Ronald Reagan. I have also, by the way, seen his wife, Nancy Reagan. I have seen Hillary Clinton before I knew she was Hillary Clinton at the time at these rituals. She is involved. Jay Rockefeller, Gerald Ford, these people seem to all be connected. I've seen all of them drink human blood and consume human flesh, and, they have their own, goblets in which they have blood, these these goblets are encrusted with jewels. Speaker 0: Now, this next section comes with a warning as it features a person who myself and others have offered to help before but won't accept it for their own reasons which I respect, but I will ask you to send them your prayers and good energy. Speaker 11: Hello. My name is Katie Groves, and I am a survivor of the child snuff industry. This video is about my experience growing up in a child snuff ring known as uncle Sam's snuff factory. This ring was located in Central Texas, and I will speak about it in the past tense only because I do not have current knowledge of its existence, but that does not mean I have any reason to believe that it has been shut down. My home was in Austin, and I recall the drives being about forty five minutes to get to this place. I recall it being in farmland, the entrance at least, most of the ring being underground. High ranking government officials and military agencies orchestrate it To believe that there are deep underground military bases that commit mass genocide against children, film it, and sell it on the black market to watch it is unfathomable to most people. I spent the first seventeen years of my life being taken to that place on a near daily basis, sometimes held for longer periods of time in which I Speaker 10: was Speaker 11: incarcerated, did not know if I would ever see daylight again. I witnessed thousands of murders. They called it Uncle Sam's snuff factory. It is the very literal definition of hell on earth. It is not unique. There are other places like it all over the world. I have been trafficked there as well. It is one of those places where a person can get literally anything they want for the right price if they have the connections to be there. I have seen wealthy aristocratic white women ordering children of color on menus to be delivered, dead, cooked on platters in a wing of the place they called Cannibal's Kitchen. And the reason I'm alive and the reason I survived is because I was born into an organized crime family involved with the CIA who ran this operation. I have the genetics, the family background to be a candidate for perpetration, for continuing the cycle of violence, for being one of the quote unquote leaders or members of the group. So I was kept alive for experimentation, for slavery for use. Because we're not just talking about death, we're talking about the worst possible ways to die. Children being boiled alive in shit and piss that predators paid to donate into iron tubes. We're talking about children cut apart, fed to other children for people's sexual gratification. This is reality. And all I ask of those who watch this is that you remember that while it may be excruciatingly painful for you to look at this reality, to think about this being possible, there are children. I ask you to remember and acknowledge that there are children who are surviving it every day. And if they can do that, maybe you can muster the strength, if you have it, to look, to stop the madness. I doubt if that will ever happen. You can help the collective damage created by these rings. And hopefully one day that collective spirit will be strong enough to take this stuff out at its source. To go down into the trenches and actually rescue the majority of the children in child trafficking who never make it out. Speaker 9: Don't forget to subscribe and click the notification bell for more must see videos.

The conversation threads through a tangled set of relationships and alleged secrets surrounding Erika and her past marriages. Speaker 0 introduces Erika’s first husband, Derek Chelsvigg, and notes a young daughter from Erika’s earlier marriage, questioning why this history is hidden and suggesting possible trafficking concerns. They mention an apparent photoshoot with Erika’s ex-husband and speculate about whether Erika had another daughter, while observing that information about her past is being scrubbed online. The speakers reference Erika’s old Instagram and her ex-husband’s social media remaining private, implying secrecy around Erika’s past. They wonder if Erika is a time traveler and recall a past shoot with someone named Tyler, asking whether he was murdered or disappeared. They mention Cabot Phillips dating Erika after the marriage, and a timeline: seven days after that marriage, Cabot Phillips is seen playing ball with someone named Charlie. They propose theories that Erika could have harmed Charlie or that Charlie simply disappeared, and note that an ex-boyfriend may have reappeared in the scene. The possibility is raised that Erika is a honeypot moving between relationships, with “stepping stones” in her life. Speaker 0 also reveals that Erika has a sister, and asks where she is. Speaker 2 introduces a whistleblower: an insider who warns that exposing the truth would provoke retaliation against him and anyone who helps him. This person found emails, approvals, and signatures tying Erika’s wife’s charity work to the same network, and says he didn’t yell or accuse but went quiet, believing that if Erika is part of the network, everything has been a lie. For him, the matter shifted from politics to a personal crisis, and he says that if he stays quiet, he’s “one of them”; if he speaks, he’s dead, but people deserve to know. Speaker 0 asserts that Charlie discovered information about Erika and discussed filing for divorce two days before Charlie’s disappearance; there has still been no autopsy released, and Erika is the only person who could release it, labeled as “Sussy.” Speaker 1 announces a situation that is “absolutely out of control,” criticizing incompetent politicians and referencing a presidential figure, then broadens to state-level politics with John McCain mentioned. The speaker complains about campaign contributions, special interests, and lobbyists, and predicts political turnover. They vow to “make this country so great again” and describe an event where, according to the speaker, reporters who were crying were present—hard, better reporters who were once known to the speaker as not good people. The exchange ends with a more casual check-in: “How you doing back there?”

The speaker names Jack Pisobiak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer, accusing Gabe Hoffman of “running ops on people” and calling him “a bad guy.” The speaker says they “look like I’ve seen a ghost” and describes someone very close to them as having likely been there to infiltrate them. They warn that “these are really fucking bad people,” expressing that they are “beyond pissed” and unable to fully describe the internal feeling. The speaker repeats that “these people are bad” and asserts that they “tried to set someone up that you know and love.” The individuals are labeled as “evil,” and the speaker concludes by claiming they are “unregistered foreign agents.”

The speaker claims that if videos existed of someone committing felonies on an island, they would be released. They assert that there are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child pornography and hundreds of victims. The speaker states that no victim information will be released due to the volume of evidence. They claim the FBI is diligently going through this evidence.

The speaker references Brock Pierce, described as an Epstein client and alleged child abuser and as a cofounder of Tethr, and asks, “Who is friends with Epstein client and alleged child abuser, Tethr cofounder Brock Pierce.” They then say, “I don't know shit about Brock's history, and I've never met him. I don't know if he's an Epstein client. I don't know anything about these allegations, and I don't really care at this point because it doesn't affect my life at all.”