reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker on David Chang's Netflix show stated they would eat human meat if a fancy restaurant served a tiny piece, even making Chang speechless. The speaker knew the statement wouldn't be well-received. They clarify they haven't eaten human meat, referencing the "Bodies" exhibit. They feel everything has been eaten in fine dining except human meat. The speaker then jokes about what body part they would offer to be eaten, such as their belly or arm, after passing away naturally. They suggest a thigh, saying it tastes like chicken.

The speaker on David Chang's Netflix show said they would eat human meat if a fancy restaurant served a tiny piece, which made Chang speechless. The speaker knew the statement wouldn't go over well. They clarify they haven't eaten human meat, but have been to the Bodies exhibit. They feel like everything has been eaten in fine dining, so the one thing that hasn't been served is human meat. The speaker would offer their belly or a piece of their arm to be eaten after they pass away naturally. They joke that a thigh would taste like chicken.

On David Chang's Netflix show, the speaker mentioned that if given permission, they would eat human meat. However, they quickly clarified that they would never actually try it. The speaker also joked about making David Chang speechless with their comment. They discussed how they feel like they have eaten everything in fine dining, except for human body parts. They mentioned being willing to try certain body parts, like the arm, but ultimately concluded that it wouldn't taste much different from chicken.

Cannibalism is technically legal in most of the US, except in Idaho. In 49 states, there are no laws against consuming human flesh, organs, or blood. However, killing someone or disposing of a body for this purpose is strictly prohibited. Interestingly, some people who have tried it claim that it tastes good. In Idaho, though, cannibalism is considered a crime, and those found guilty can face up to 14 years in jail.

Two speakers discuss a controversial hypothetical about legalizing a sexual act with animals. Speaker 0 says he would legalize feastiality and argues from a benevolent dictator perspective. They refer to a prior case where someone pleasured a horse and allegedly reached a conclusion, questioning who is harmed. Speaker 1 pushes back, noting that rape victims can sometimes experience orgasms and that this does not justify the act. Speaker 0 doubles down but acknowledges the disagreement. They discuss consent, arguing that the animal cannot really consent and would not mind, and acknowledge the awkwardness of the topic. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 deciding to leave it be.

Some people have a weakness for juicy steak and can't resist it. However, there is potential to use human engineering to make us intolerant to certain types of meat, similar to how some people are intolerant to milk or crayfish. An example of this is the long star tick, which can cause meat allergies if it bites you. By applying human engineering, we may be able to tackle significant global issues.

Chef Keith reveals the secret ingredients in his sausage: fish liver, human flesh, or shark. The others are shocked and disgusted, hoping it's shark. Chef Keith confirms it's actually human flesh, causing one person to vomit. Chef Keith defends it as a renewable protein source and mentions the stigma surrounding it. The conversation becomes heated as they discuss the ethics of using human flesh. Chef Keith argues that it's popular in his restaurant and that people enjoy it. The video ends with the mention of small villages.

Let's bow our heads and bless the meal. Everyone, say Namaste. Now, let's get some food. The line is long, so I'll grab something fresh off the grill. We have sausages, brisket, and ribs. Do you have any vegan options? Unfortunately, no. I guess a bun with ketchup will have to do. By the way, have you seen my husband? I’m starting to worry. I think he went around the house. Who's your favorite Batman? What have you done? You're eating meat! It was an accident; it means nothing to me! Don't go! I just haven't had real food in a while.

We are eating human meat. There aren't enough plants to produce as much meat as we consume. I'm visiting Good Harvest, where six tons of human meat are engineered daily. This processing plant has been running for over eight months. Mick Ross oversees the production line, managing 60 staff who engineer 50,000 steaks daily. How do we grow human meat? We use nutrient vats to process thin slices of tissue in a nutrient-rich mix, where cells grow and fuse into a large "cake" over 24 hours. This 30-kilogram protein cake yields nearly 100 steaks, all grown from one person's cells. We've mastered engineering human cells to create the flavors and textures of steaks. I would feed my family human steaks, and I already have. This is engineered human meat.

Speaker 0 states that everything in the room is edible, including himself, and that this is called cannibalism.

I believe that war is not a good thing, but sometimes you have to fight back when someone is attacking you. I won't go after anyone who isn't attacking me, but it's important to defend yourself and not allow anyone to kill you.

Some people have a weakness for juicy steaks and can't resist them. However, it's interesting to note that we already know a lot about our intolerances. For instance, I personally have a milk intolerance, while others may be intolerant to crayfish. It's possible that we could use human engineering to make ourselves intolerant to certain types of meat, specifically bovine proteins. This concept is not entirely new, as there is a tick called the long star tick that, if it bites you, can make you allergic to meat. By utilizing human engineering, we might be able to tackle significant global issues.

The speaker discusses a three-dimensionally printed steak made by Redefine Meat, describing it as meaty and fibrous, with appearance and texture similar to real meat. They note that it looks meaty, smells meaty, and has layers of protein and fat comparable to genuine meat, and that it is pretty juicy. They acknowledge that it smells disgusting, but frame this as something they are willing to be open-minded about. After loading the product into their tacos, the speaker confirms that the visual and olfactory cues align with meat. They proceed to taste the presentation, asking whether it tastes like meat. The response is affirmative: it is very meaty, with an umami flavor reminiscent of meat, capturing the characteristic savory profile. The speaker gives a positive verdict on the overall experience, using the phrasing “Banging.” to convey enthusiasm. They reference the tacos from Club Mexicana, noting that, as always, the Club Mexicana tacos are a 10 out of 10. They finish by stating a clear recommendation to try the dish, expressing that others should definitely give it a try.

People eating too much meat is a problem for the planet, but many are unwilling to give it up due to weakness of will. One solution could be using human engineering to make people intolerant to certain types of meat, similar to how some are intolerant to milk or crayfish. An example of this is the long star tick, which can make people allergic to meat if it bites them. Through human engineering, we have the potential to address significant global issues.

Speaker 0 argues that Elon’s estimate of 20% of federal spending being part of a fraud camp could be higher, and when including state and local spending, the accounting suggests a sizable percentage of overall GDP is effectively theft through government agencies or checks. He predicts a “great uncovering” in 2026, with trillions of dollars of this behavior across the economy, and notes that on the other side, nothing will happen because the cost will be so significant it will feel like staring into the abyss. Speaker 1 asks how to differentiate between legal theft and illegal theft, noting that Somali daycares’ actions were outright fraud and illegal, while Stacey Abrams’s NGO receiving $2,000,000,000 late in the Biden administration is technically legal but clearly a different kind of theft and fraud. Speaker 0 responds with a test: “Would you throw up in your mouth when you heard the news? That’s the test. If you don’t pass the common sense vomit in the mouth test, it doesn’t matter whether it’s legal or illegal. It’s up. And you’ll realize that pretty quickly.”

I used to be human, but I still am. Being human means that certain things will bother you.

A breakthrough in lab-grown meat is showcased by an Israeli tech company, where a piece of meat has been printed in three dimensions. The process begins with stem cells taken from a cow, which are then cultured in a laboratory setting. These cells are fed a specialized nutrient solution that supports rapid multiplication. Once there are enough cells, they are ready to be three-dimensionally printed. A computer oversees the entire operation, determining not only the shape of the meat but also the distribution of fat and muscle. The engineers have already produced a steak through this method. Although not yet ready to eat, the meat is described as alive in a sense: under a microscope, tiny muscle fibers can be observed moving. The timeline suggests that in about a month, this lab-grown steak could be prepared, cooked, and served on a dinner table. In comparison to traditional methods, Wagyu beef, which can require years to produce, is implied to be vastly slower and more expensive. The three-dimensional printing technology could reduce the production time dramatically, stating that the process now takes only a few minutes. When fully prepared and served, the expectation is that the synthetic product could be indistinguishable from real meat, with no noticeable difference in taste or texture mentioned beyond the assertion that it would appear the same as conventional meat. However, the current reality is that this technology remains extremely expensive, so it is not something that consumers will encounter in stores in the immediate future. The message ends with a direct question to the audience: what about you—would you try it?

Speaker 0 presents two examples. First, he notes that people eat too much meat, and if they reduced meat consumption, it would help the planet. He observes that people are not willing to give up meat; some will be willing, but others lack willpower. He admits personal weakness, saying, “Wow, this steak is just too juicy. I can't do it. I'm one of those, by the way.” He then suggests a thought: we know about intolerances, such as his milk intolerance and others being intolerant to crayfish. He proposes that human engineering could make it the case that people become intolerant to certain kinds of meat, specifically bovine proteins. He points to an analogue in life—the long star tick—where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. He mentions that he can describe the mechanism. He then asserts that this is something that could be done through human engineering. In summary, he suggests that human engineering might address large global problems by altering human tolerances to certain foods, including meat, as a potential solution. The second example is implied but not elaborated in the transcript beyond the assertion that human engineering could address big world problems by enabling intolerances to particular foods, thereby influencing behavior and environmental impact. The overall argument centers on leveraging biological or engineered intolerances to reduce meat consumption as a means of benefiting the planet, supported by the reference to naturally occurring meat allergy mechanisms such as the long star tick.

Speaker 0 announces they are about to put something in their mouth, says “it tastes like meat,” notes that it may be disgusting to you, but then states “Actually, it tastes good,” and finishes with “I’m not gonna lie.”

I bought a T-bone steak from Walmart and found it to be mostly fat and not real meat. It was so disgusting that I couldn't even pick it up. This experience has made me never want to buy meat from Walmart again.

You're consuming things that are harmful, like sewage water and bugs. There's a notion that these are being promoted as beneficial. The idea is that people will be encouraged to eat unconventional and unappetizing items, including human remains.

On David Chang's Netflix show, the speaker mentioned that if given permission, they would eat human meat at a fancy restaurant. However, they quickly retracted the statement and said they wouldn't actually try it. The speaker joked about making David Chang speechless and mentioned that they feel like everything has been eaten in fine dining except for human meat. When asked which body part they would eat, the speaker jokingly suggested giving their arm, but quickly dismissed the idea. The conversation ended with the speaker saying that human meat would probably taste like chicken.

Some people are unwilling to give up meat, even though reducing meat consumption would greatly benefit the planet. This is due to a weakness of will and the enjoyment they derive from eating meat. However, human engineering could potentially help address this issue. For instance, by making people intolerant to certain types of meat proteins, similar to how some individuals are intolerant to milk or crayfish. An example of this is the long star tick, which can cause individuals to develop an allergy to meat. Through human engineering, we may be able to tackle significant global problems.

I have a 24-year-old hamburger in a box in my closet, originally from a NASCAR race in 1996. The fries look like they might have fallen under a seat a month ago, but they haven't decayed. Surprisingly, the hamburger itself is completely intact; the bread hasn't molded, and the meat hasn't rotted or broken down at all. I'm curious about what would happen if I actually ate it.

People should eat less meat to help the planet, but many struggle to give it up due to a weakness of will. One solution could be using human engineering to make people intolerant to certain types of meat proteins, similar to how some are intolerant to milk or crayfish. For example, the lone star tick bite can make people allergic to meat. By utilizing human engineering, we may be able to address significant global issues. Translation: Eating less meat can benefit the planet, but many find it hard to give up due to a lack of willpower. One idea is to use human engineering to make people intolerant to certain types of meat proteins, like how some are intolerant to milk or crayfish. For instance, the lone star tick bite can cause meat allergies. Through human engineering, we could potentially tackle major world problems.