reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Stalin oversaw the expulsion of millions of Germans from their homes in Eastern Europe after World War II, resulting in the deaths of around 2 million women and children. Many more Germans died during similar expulsions in other countries. The atrocities committed during these expulsions, including beatings, looting, and starvation, were immense. Western leaders like Winston Churchill turned a blind eye to the suffering of the German population, leading to more deaths in the aftermath of the war than during the conflict itself.

During World War II, the Soviet Union was a military ally whose anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted and later integrated into historical accounts. One speaker states their belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. They then ask another speaker, the president of Iran and a scholar, if he believes that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or if he thinks that is not true. The other speaker says he doesn't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed, and cautions that this statement is against the law in Germany, and could result in imprisonment.

Grab your guns, fight against the Russian acid, the Germans, the Jewish pigs, and other vermin. Fight for our Ukrainian homeland. Against those in Kiev, the allies of the Western world.

The Red Army invaded Germany in 1944, committing brutal atrocities like rape, torture, and murder. Women and girls of all ages were targeted, even in public places like churches. The Soviet soldiers showed no mercy, assaulting victims repeatedly. The horrors extended to children and the elderly, with no one spared from the violence. The German civilians suffered immensely, with millions falling victim to the cruelty of both Soviet and Western invaders. Germany faced a nightmare of unimaginable proportions during this dark period of history.

Zuby posed a question about what people in Germany were like after 1945. The response: after the occupation of Germany, the Soviets engaged in the biggest mass rape in recorded human history, with the majority of assaults committed in the Soviet occupation zone. Estimates of the numbers of German women raped by Soviet soldiers have ranged up to 2,000,000. According to historian William Hitchcock, in many cases, women were the victims of repeated rapes, some as many as 60 to 70 times. At least a 100,000 women were believed to have been raped in Berlin based on surging abortion rates in the following months and contemporary hospital reports, with an estimated ten thousand women dying in the aftermath. Female deaths in connection with the rapes in Germany overall are estimated at two hundred and forty thousand. Antony Beaver describes it as the greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history. Soviet soldiers raped German females from eight to 80 years old. The speaker then questions why this isn’t learned about in countless World War II lessons in high school, and notes that if you’re in high school watching, you should ask your history teacher why you don’t know about any of this, anticipating the teacher’s likely response of, oops. Sorry, lol.

We're not here to kill Russians, but to defeat them. If persuasion fails, we will eliminate as many as necessary, even millions if needed. Those who resist will face consequences. We need to eradicate local dissent. They indoctrinate our soldiers to hate Ukrainians. They claim that Ukrainians would live like the French if it weren't for the Muscovites. We need massacres. We must drown these children where the duck swims. This is our honey, not yours. If someone says the Muscovites have occupied them, throw them in the river. Drive these people into the old wooden house.

Ukraine is described as seeking revenge for 400 years of killing Jews, with a reference to the mass killing by Khmelnytsky in 1648. The speaker claims Ukrainians were more brutal towards Jews than Nazis during World War II. The speaker suggests that Ukraine's history of killing Jews will lead to their destruction before the end of time.

Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used. Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened. 6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on. There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies. Speaker 0: So what you’re saying is that— Speaker 1: So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.

The speaker claims that the majority of revolutionaries in Russia were Jews and blames them for mass terror, concentration camps, and the creation of the Cheka (the Soviet secret police). He states that while studying execution cases from 1937-1939, he found that many investigators and executioners had Jewish surnames. He accuses Jews of being responsible for the deaths of millions of people and the negative impact on the population of the territory. The speaker concludes by saying that Jews invented the Cheka and exterminated people.

In 1943, a directive was allegedly issued from party headquarters to communists in the U.S. It instructed them to label obstructionists as fascist, Nazi, or anti-Semitic after building them up, and to use anti-fascist organizations to discredit them. The directive stated that associating opponents with names that "already have a bad smell" would, after repetition, become fact in the public mind. The speaker claims this 1943 directive predicted what "the left does today." They add that in 1971, Saul Olensky wrote in "Rules for Radicals" that "he who controls the language controls the masses." The speaker concludes that this tactic is not new for the radical left, and it is "crazy" how much the 1943 directive resembles what is seen today in 2025.

"Hitler claims in his book that the Jews are communists." "They made the Russian revolution." "They killed their 30,000,000 Russians, all the intelligent ones, in a cruel and horrific way." "And that's their plan for the entire world. The next country in line is Germany." "If we don't defeat them now, they will eliminate us, and they will slaughter another 20,000,000, all the intelligent people." "The Russian revolution was made by the Jews." "The Russian army was built by Trotsky, who was an incredible genius and antisemite like no other." "Who founded the KGB? Jews." "The Jews destroyed religion and faith." "Out of nine large German newspapers, seven were owned by Jews." "Now you understand why they don't teach it in schools?" "Because who writes the curriculum? Those same leftists." "They spread in Germany the heresy in God." "I feel like the messenger of God to exterminate the Jews because they don't believe in him."

We preemptively attacked and killed Jews because they were sympathetic to the Bolsheviks. By eliminating parents, we believed their children would grow up to be enemies as well, so we killed them too. This was seen as logical. Translation: We attacked and killed Jews because they supported the Bolsheviks. We thought that by killing the parents, their children would become enemies too, so we killed them as well. This was considered logical.

Speaker 0 urges historical perspective, noting the wartime Soviet alliance and that their anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted by the Allies; as victors, the Soviets "got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact." He says current knowledge of Stalin's despotism and the KGB's deception, and the camps Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, have required relying on Soviet sources. "I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis." He asks Speaker 2 if he believes that figure. Speaker 2 replies, "But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany."

Speaker 0 describes a stance to attack only on the front lines, not against women or children, noting that “that was a data loss,” and that they “did it to all fronts” and “we did not fly a night attack.” He argues that since bombs would be dropped anyway, before the German people he cannot permit his own Volksgenossen to perish while sparing foreigners, so the war must be fought and the sacrifices available must be used. Speaker 1, after acknowledging that he cannot deny this any longer, refers to himself as “the greatest strategist born so far” and declares that the Luftkrieg (air war) is his doing. He calls it a brilliant idea by Mister Georgill against the civilian population, noting England apparently rejected this in anticipation of future developments. He asserts that in this war he did not conduct night attacks on civilian populations in Poland, arguing that at night the objective cannot be hit as accurately, so he primarily targeted roofs and aimed at military targets. He says he did the same in Norway, Holland, and France. He contrasts this with a belief that the British Air Force would be unable to escape German scrutiny if night raids targeted civilians, implying that the German campaign aimed at military targets. As the war in the West ended, he extended his efforts toward “Henglad,” and faced pressure from many to act sooner: “how long, Führer, do you wait? They do not stop.” He waited over three months and then gave the order to commence the fight with the same resolve with which he had started every battle, continuing “up to now.” Speaker 2 portrays the enemy as incredibly cruel and determined to destroy Germany, stating that the enemy has proclaimed this thousands of times, and asserting that there is no reason to doubt it. He intensifies the claim by equating the enemies’ motives with biblical purge concepts, describing a wish for Germany’s extermination with “Mann und Maus und Jung und Alt.” He emphasizes that what would be done to German women and children cannot be imagined, urging that it will be a total war that affects every German, their lives, existence, family, wife, and child—the war threatens life itself. He concludes that wherever now flourishing cities and villages exist, a future of desolation would result, turning into a desert; the war, he says, is total and affects everyone.

Checklist: - Identify the core sequence: Putin’s draft treaty, rejection, and invasion. - Distill the recurring claim that the issue is not NATO expansion, despite strong emphasis on NATO. - Capture the claimed democracy-related actions in Ukraine cited by speakers. - Note the discussion of Putin’s aims (sphere of influence) and the the rhetorical comparisons (evil, Hitler). - Include the brief, non-substantive program switch at the end (Lindsey Graham appearance). - Preserve key phrases and the overall stance without adding new judgments. President Putin sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement, a precondition for not invading Ukraine; we didn’t sign that, so he went to war to prevent NATO across his borders. Flashback framing is used to emphasize that this is not fundamentally about NATO enlargement. Several speakers insist, repeatedly, that this is not about NATO expansion. “This is not about NATO expansion,” and similar lines are stressed, arguing that NATO is not the reason for the conflict. They acknowledge, however, that Russia’s aim is to expand its sphere of influence, with one speaker noting that the two goals are not mutually exclusive and that a Western challenge to Russian interests may have opened a path to war. Amid this, a contrasting claim is asserted: the war is about democracy in Ukraine. Ukraine is depicted as banning religious organizations, restricting books and music, and not holding elections, framed as evidence that the conflict concerns Ukraine’s democratic trajectory rather than NATO. The refrain remains that the issue is not about NATO expansion, and that NATO is a fictitious adversary used by Putin. Rhetorical intensity shifts to moral judgments about Putin. Claims of evil and sickness are voiced, with references to Putin allegedly wanting to rebuild a Soviet empire and be like Hitler. Some speakers compare him to Hitler, noting historic aggression such as the invasion of Poland and referencing him as the new Hitler, a metaphor used to describe his alleged brutality and aims. A brief exchange acknowledges complexity: “the two are not mutually exclusive”—Russia’s desire for a sphere of influence and Western challenges to Russian interests are seen as connected. The segment closes with a transition cue: Senator Lindsey Graham is thanked, followed by “Straight ahead.”

According to State Department documents, a group of Jews planned the overthrow of the Russian Tsar in 1916 to implement a communist regime. Communism was a Jewish totalitarian ideology invented and funded by Jewish figures like Jacob Schiff and manifested by Bolsheviks like Lenin and Trotsky. Tsar Nicholas II, a devout Christian, had witnessed Jewish terrorism and failed to execute communists after a 1905 revolution. Schiff financed Alexander Kerensky to release political prisoners, and Trotsky led Jewish communists to Russia with $20 million to lead a revolution. Jacob Schwarlov ordered Jacob Jirovsky to eliminate the Tsar and his family, which he did in 1918. Some Jews allegedly saw the slaughter as a ritual murder. US Ambassador David R. Francis stated that most Bolshevik leaders were Jews aiming for a worldwide revolution. Jewish publications boasted about the Jewish role in the revolution; seventeen of the first Soviet government's 22 ministers were Jews. The first legislation approved was the Anti-Semitism Act in 1917, and "racist" became a term to silence dissent. Leading Bolsheviks hated Russians and Christians, and Bolshevism caused mass slaughter. Collectivization, confiscation of goods, and deliberate famines led to millions of deaths in Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia, known as the Holodomor. Lenin sought to destroy the peasant economy and regarded Europeans as animals. Trotsky aimed to turn Russia into a desert populated by white Negroes. Gendry Shagoda, a Jewish sacred police official, was responsible for millions of deaths. The Jewish Cheka, led by Felix Jarsynski, tortured and murdered Christians. Lazar Kaganovich ordered deaths and destruction of Christian monuments. Lenin said hatred is the basis of communism. Zionism, driven by Jewish brains, aimed to create a new world order. Stalin ordered killings by quotas. Jewish butchers committed atrocities. Trotsky executed people and ordered children murdered. The Gulag, a system of forced labor camps, was founded by Jews and run by Jewish commissars. Communism was created by bankers to enslave the masses.

After World War II, Germany faced a dark period with the Soviet occupation resulting in mass rapes of German women. Historians estimate up to 2 million women were assaulted, with some enduring repeated rapes. In Berlin alone, around 100,000 women were raped, leading to an estimated 10,000 deaths. Overall, approximately 240,000 women died due to these atrocities. This mass rape is considered the greatest in history. It is shocking that this aspect of history is not widely taught in schools, so students should question why this information is often overlooked.

"In 1943, the communists will use the word Nazis, fascist, and antisemitic in order to push the public mind to make them believe something by using repetition." "Germany was arresting all the bankers because they were charging so much interest that they were destroying the country." "60,000,000 Germans died." "after World War two, all these generals in America actually realized they fought the wrong enemy. The enemy is within." "Even general Patton said we should have fought with the fascist against the communist, otherwise, our country will degrade." "There's also another part that was left out of the story." "Yes."

The Red Army invaded Germany in 1944, committing horrific atrocities like rape, torture, and murder. Women, children, and the elderly were brutally assaulted, with no one spared. The Jewish commissars orchestrated the violence, defiling churches and public spaces. German civilians suffered unimaginable horrors at the hands of both Soviet and Western invaders. Millions were killed, raped, and enslaved, marking the beginning of Germany's nightmare.

Wir haben gegen den Bolschewismus gekämpft, um unser Land und Europa zu schützen. Wir standen gegen Amerikaner, Russen und zwölffache Übermacht, um unsere Bevölkerung zu verteidigen. Der Feind hat Kriegsregeln missachtet, Frauen misshandelt und aufgehetzt. Wir haben versucht, dies zu verhindern, Vergewaltigung war streng verboten und wurde nicht von deutschen Soldaten begangen. English Translation: We fought against Bolshevism to protect our country and Europe. We faced Americans, Russians, and overwhelming odds to defend our population. The enemy disregarded rules of war, mistreated women, and incited violence. We tried to prevent this, rape was strictly prohibited and not committed by German soldiers.

The transcript presents an extensive compilation of claims from a group of speakers arguing that the established Holocaust narrative is false or exaggerated and that many historical incidents have been misrepresented or fabricated by Allied propaganda, Soviet influence, and Jewish-led organizations. The speakers frame Holocaust revisionism as a legitimate scholarly effort rather than denial, asserting that revisionists do not dispute that Jews and others suffered and died in the war, but dispute the scale, methods, and specifics of extermination. Key asserted points and claims - Holocaust definition and revisionism - The Holocaust is described as a belief that 6,000,000 Jews were murdered primarily by gassing in “shower rooms,” a narrative the speakers say is amplified by Hollywood, media, and schools. A growing movement of scientists, historians, engineers, journalists, and free-speech activists is portrayed as revisionist, though often branded as “Holocaust deniers” to discourage discourse. Revisionists are said not to deny persecution, deprivation of civil rights, deportation, internment, forced labor, or deaths in camps and ghettos, including deaths from disease; they also say that many victims died in ways other than genocide and that many victims’ dignity is not denied. - Internment and civilian camps in the United States - After Pearl Harbor, over 100,000 people of Japanese descent on the Pacific Coast were interned by Executive Order 9066; the text claims this restricted freedoms, required identity cards, and denied compensation or war reparations. The narrative includes accounts of interned individuals describing camp life, guard presence, and harsh conditions. - General wartime devastation and context - The war is described as a conflict that would not have occurred if “international jury” had not declared war on Germany in 1933, with emphasis on typhus, subversion, and crowded camps as drivers of disease and death. The speakers stress that millions died across battlefields, ships, and cities, and that propaganda surrounding German crimes obscures Allied or Soviet misdeeds. - Claims about typhus, gas chambers, and cremation - Typhus epidemics are said to explain many deaths in camps; Cyclone B (hydrogen cyanide) is claimed to have been used for delousing and pest control rather than execution, with several speakers arguing that gas chambers as homicidal devices did not exist or were technically infeasible. They assert there is no scientific proof of gassing, no German documents proving extermination plans, and that cremation and delousing procedures served health purposes rather than execution purposes. - Expert testimonies and forensics are cited (e.g., Leuchter, Rudolf, Lift, Lindsay) to support the claim that the gas chambers could not have functioned as execution facilities, noting technical impossibilities such as lack of explosion-proof features, gasketed doors, or proper gas delivery systems. - Specific camp narratives and testimonies - The camps are described as having been centers of labor, medical care, and even cultural activity, with accounts of weddings, births, nurseries, orchestras, libraries, theater performances, and recreational activities. Some testimonies describe attempts to maintain humanity and morale under harsh conditions, including a piano in Block 1, children’s art, and soccer games. - Several testimonies challenge the image of mass exterminations, claiming instead that most deaths resulted from disease, starvation, and Allied bombing, and that Red Cross and Vatican inquiries found no evidence of homicidal gas chambers. - A number of survivor testimonials are presented as quotations or paraphrases challenging the notion of mass murder in gas chambers, with some individuals denying personal knowledge of gas chambers or mass killings. - Documentary, legal, and scholarly disputes - The Institute for Historical Review (IHR) and other revisionist scholars are described as measuring and challenging the established narrative, sometimes facing legal or financial pressure. The transcript cites various researchers and forensics teams (e.g., Leuchter, Krakov, Farison, Groff, Farison, Larsson) as having concluded that homicidal gassings were not technically feasible in the cited facilities. - It is claimed that many postwar figures and witnesses provided testimonies or stories later recognized as unreliable or fabricated, including famous Holocaust survivors whose accounts are presented as inconsistent or false. Names and cases (e.g., Herman Rosenblatt, Anne Frank, Elie Wiesel) are invoked to illustrate alleged fraud or manipulation, though these claims contradict well-established historical records. - Propaganda, media, and the so-called “Holocaust industry” - The text asserts that the Holocaust narrative is used as a tool to enforce globalist policy, promote multiculturalism, and suppress nationalist sentiments among white Europeans. It claims that ongoing denazification efforts, legal penalties for questioning the Holocaust, and control over media and online platforms are designed to suppress dissent and promote a one-sided portrayal. - There is a claim that “atrocity propaganda” and black propaganda have been used to shape public perception, with references to Sefton Delmer and Allied psychological warfare, and accusations that postwar trials and media representations were heavily biased or manipulated. - Population counts, mortality figures, and documentary evidence - Several sections contest the veracity of the commonly cited death tolls, the reliability of Red Cross and other international communications, and the authenticity of diaries and eyewitness testimonies. The transcript asserts that the Nuremberg trials did not use physical or technical evidence to establish gas chamber existence and that some documents used as proof were mistranslated or contextualized wrongly. - The piece repeatedly emphasizes that millions of Jews did not die in the camps, that the “6,000,000” figure is a symbolic or religious number, and that high-profile Holocaust narratives are part of a constructed orthodoxy. - Final framing - The speakers position Holocaust revisionism as a defense of free speech and historical inquiry, arguing that questioning the official narrative is essential to truth. They claim laws against denial suppress inquiry and that truth should stand on its own merits without legal protection. They also suggest that conflicting accounts, forged documents, and political agendas have shaped the popular memory of World War II. Note on structure and tone - The transcript interweaves personal testimonials, expert opinions, documentary references, and polemical assertions. It repeatedly contrasts “revisionists” with conventional accounts, often asserting that mainstream portrayals are driven by propaganda, financial interests, or political goals. The overall thrust is to challenge the conventional understanding of the Holocaust, question the evidentiary basis for extermination claims, and highlight alleged inconsistencies in survivor narratives and official records.

The German army and nation suffered immensely during and after WWI due to crippling sanctions and widespread chaos. The election of the National Socialists brought economic revival and renewed hope, but external forces, driven by envy and fear, sought to dismantle Germany, leading to WWII. The war resulted in unprecedented destruction and mass atrocities against Germans, a truth suppressed for over 70 years. Allied terror bombing decimated German cities, exemplified by the firestorm in Hamburg and the obliteration of Dresden, resulting in mass civilian casualties. In the East, the Red Army committed horrific acts of rape, torture, and murder against German civilians. Even after Germany's defeat, the Allies subjected the German people to further suffering, including mass imprisonment, starvation, and expulsion from their homes.

Two days after the end of the second World War, 42 defenseless men, women, and children are lined up to be shot. Their moment of execution is captured in this rare home movie. Their only crime is that they happen to speak German. Their murder is part of a little known story about the fate of millions of ethnic Germans after the war. They are the casualties of a peace that will prove anarchic, vengeful, and bloody. Victory celebrations and dancing in the streets, the traditional images we associate with the end of the second World War. In reality, peace was a violent and chaotic process. For the defeated Germans, peace meant dislocation. It meant revenge You got to spread and rape. To the maximum. Bring gloom down to the minimum. Have faith. It meant the ethnic cleansing of over 12,000,000 Germans living in Eastern Europe.

The speaker identifies as an avid anti-communist who understands the enemy and loves America. They believe Jewish communism is the internal enemy of the United States. According to the speaker, in Ukraine, Jews starved 9 to 10 million Ukrainians to death, despite a record harvest. Ukrainians were killed if they tried to eat. Stalin and other leaders sold the food on the world market. Christians were killed for their faith, and white Christian Russians were forced to speak Yiddish. The speaker claims Germans knew about this secret holocaust. They state that white Russians were partially Prussian German, and this was the greatest holocaust, second only to the holocaust of 50 million aborted babies in the United States. The speaker believes the same overthrow and genocide planned in 1917 is being planned for the United States.

The transcript asserts that Stalin’s plan to dominate Eastern Europe was aided by Eisenhower and Marshall due to their focus on invading Europe from England rather than advancing from the European “soft underbelly.” It claims that by July 1944, communists had advanced into Poland and Germany. It attributes the instigation of Soviet Red Army violence against German civilians to Ilya Ehrenberg, described as Stalin’s Jewish chief propagandist and a prominent member of the Soviet-sponsored Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee. According to the speaker, Ehrenberg urged mass rape and murder of German civilians as the Red Army approached German territory. The transcript cites Ehrenberg’s involvement with propaganda against Germans, including gloating statements about German women and references to Jews “around Roosevelt,” asserting that Ehrenberg sought extermination and genocide of the entire German people. It notes that Ehrenberg encouraged mass rape and killing, with leaflets declaring Germans “are not human beings” and containing messages such as “Nothing gives us so much joy as German corpses.” It mentions leaflets air dropped on troops near Danzig, allegedly composed by Ehrenberg and signed by Stalin, with the directive: “Kill them all.” The text quotes orders and exhortations to Soviet troops: “Men, old men, children and women, after you have amused yourself with them. Kill,” “Nothing in Germany is guiltless, neither the living nor the yet unborn,” and “Break the racial pride of the German woman. Take her as your legitimate booty.” It further claims that a massive violence followed, described as “an unimaginable orgy of violence and rape” that would become one of the ghastliest episodes in human history. Finally, the transcript asserts a quantitative outcome: “At least 2,000,000 German women young and old were gang raped, sodomized and beaten often in view of their children or family members.”