reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Denise, a former SIDS technician from the 1980s, describes conducting 2-channel sleep studies on infants to determine the need for apnea home monitors. These monitors were intended to alarm if a child stopped breathing. Studies were done on infants from the NICU, those with apparent life-threatening events, and subsequent children of SIDS victims. Denise believes the SIDS diagnosis is a "cover up." She recounts how her supervisor, the head SIDS technician, was fired and sued by the hospital for advocating for a mother who believed her child's condition in the pediatric ICU was due to a vaccine injury. The mother claimed this was the second child she lost due to vaccines. Denise states that parents "know" and "saw" their child before and after vaccination, and their concerns are being ignored. She would not vaccinate a newborn, not even with vitamin K, and advises people to research vaccine package inserts and ingredients.

My son loved hockey and got vaccinated despite his fear of needles. He experienced severe symptoms after the shot and passed away shortly after. The doctor failed to properly diagnose him. I want the truth about vaccine deaths and closure for my son. Another doctor confirmed that the vaccine caused his death. Many others have similar stories, and we need to address the issue of vaccine injuries.

Speaker 1 shares a heartbreaking story about their 2-month-old baby who fell unconscious and passed away after receiving vaccinations. The baby had been healthy and didn't require any medical assistance prior to this appointment. The autopsy revealed an anaphylactic adverse reaction to the vaccines. Today marks the 4th anniversary of the baby's passing. The speaker expresses gratitude for the support and aims to raise awareness about the issue. They mention having two more children who are not vaccinated and are healthy. The speaker believes that health doesn't come from vaccines and hopes that more people will realize this for the well-being of children.

The speaker asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The claim is that for the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, and that hundreds of infants and toddlers died after these shots, often from SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker emphasizes that these shots are killing some of these children, with most deaths occurring within about two weeks after the shot, and forty percent dying within one week. The speaker notes that the temporality checks out and that most of these deaths occurred at ages one to one and a half, right when they receive the MMR shots. The speaker reports that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The speaker describes babies dying in their sleep as a result of these shots and calls the situation absolutely disturbing and particular in terms of the causes of death. In summary, the speaker states that all of this combined in the study shows unequivocally that these shots are deadly, and concludes that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore. The suggestion is to split them up if parents still want them, rather than administering the full combination.

The transcript discusses the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean, claiming that vaccination goes against the constitution to take this “garbage.” It asserts that most people don’t know that doctors do not take the shots themselves or give them to their own children, yet they administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. It notes that certain physicians have observed patterns such as paralysis within twenty-four hours after the injection, up to six months after, cancer near the injection area, and diseases such as TB within twenty years. The speaker claims that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern in 1796, describing it as poisoning the people. The question is posed: why do they do this? The answer given is that vaccination is a big business, and that it is protected by the government. The speaker asserts that vaccination was protected by the government in 1986 so that people cannot sue. It is stated as part of the argument that vaccination is the leading cause of why children die under the age of 15.

The speaker, a former pharmaceutical sales rep, shares their disillusionment with the industry after discovering corruption and falsified safety data. They recount their experience with vaccines and their concerns about the lack of rigorous safety studies and the toxic additives, such as aluminum, in childhood vaccines. The speaker highlights the high rates of illness in American children compared to other developed countries and attributes it to the profit-driven nature of the pharmaceutical industry. They discuss the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the media and the lack of liability for vaccine manufacturers. The speaker emphasizes the need for more research and information before mandating vaccines, citing the potential risks involved.

The speaker discusses the timing of vaccinations and crib deaths, noting most crib deaths occur in children under one year old due to underdeveloped immune systems and CYP450 enzymes. They mention a hypothesis suggesting some children receive too many shots in their first year, without full analysis of ingredients. The speaker claims that in Japan, moving the first vaccination age to two years old led to a virtual disappearance of crib deaths and related claims. They also state that non-vaccine-associated SIDS cases cluster in the winter and fall. They recount a story about a podcaster with eight children whose unvaccinated child died of SIDS, leading to intense police scrutiny. They clarify that SIDS can occur in unvaccinated children, though it is rarer and has a different timing pattern.

I've always questioned everything, starting in my teenage years. I learned that the tetanus vaccine was said to prevent death from tetanus bacteria entering through wounds, but I discovered no one has actually died that way. During my training in Detroit, I noticed a disparity in who received the vaccine: those on welfare often did not, while private pay patients did. I found a significant difference in fertility rates between the two groups. Research revealed that since 1972, the WHO and NIH have been developing the tetanus vaccine with a pregnancy hormone, potentially causing early pregnancy loss. This has reportedly been used in various countries, and I suspect similar practices may occur in the U.S. These organizations are now behind the COVID vaccine.

After my daughter's death, I delved into vaccine research. Shockingly, since the smallpox vaccine, vaccines have been linked to brain inflammation and chronic autoimmune issues. Placebos in trials can be harmful substances like aluminum or mercury. The science is available, but many choose to ignore it.

Christine Colbeck, a mother of six, shares her heartbreaking experiences with vaccine adverse reactions. Her first child, Laura, died shortly after receiving a vaccine, while her fifth child, Carter, suffered severe neurological impairment. Christine emphasizes that serious vaccine reactions are not as rare as believed, and many families in Ontario have similar devastating stories. Despite being pro-vaccine and a former nurse, Christine is now labeled as an "anti-vaxxer" for choosing not to vaccinate her youngest child, who is healthy and excelling in life. She pleads for the preservation of conscientious and religious exemptions, as removing them would force parents to choose between their children's education and the potential risks of vaccination. Christine vows to fight against mandatory vaccines for school attendance.

The discussion questions whether SIDS is “vaccine death,” asserting that 75% of all SIDS deaths occurred within seven days of a vaccination. It references a “Polio, forty eight hour safety review trial,” described as “forty eight hours, two days,” and connects this to President Roosevelt, described as famous for having polio in a wheelchair. The speaker claims Roosevelt “had transverse myelitis” and then answers a challenge: “No way. Didn’t have polio,” adding “How can you sit here and say doctors don’t know anything about vaccines?” The response continues by arguing that doctors do not have adequate education about vaccines, stating that “a doctor is lucky if they have a half a day education on vaccines.” The speaker further says, “I have yet to find a pediatrician that can list the ingredients of any vaccines.” The argument then escalates into the claim that “They don’t know anything at all,” emphasizing certainty about doctors’ knowledge of vaccines. The speaker claims “99.5 of our children are getting a product that was tested for five days,” and states that this product is tested “for a disease they will not come in contact with until they’re an adult.” The speaker adds that, “hopefully never,” children will face situations the speaker associates with infection risk, describing those situations as “sharing heroin needles or sleeping with prostitutes.” The overall message frames the topic as revealing wrongdoing, saying, “I do believe when people see the truth on this, it will reveal everything that’s corrupt about the world that you live in.”

World governments have harmed millions without apology. The speaker believes vaccines cause autism, but mainstream media won't discuss it. They gathered data from 10,000 parents showing a link between vaccines and autism, ADHD, and other health issues. More shots lead to poorer health in children.

I hired an expert to analyze data on 2,700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in my practice. Vaccinated kids had more health issues like asthma, allergies, infections, and behavioral problems compared to unvaccinated kids. Vaccines may shift the immune system, leading to more infections. Despite this evidence, my medical license was revoked. The common argument that association does not equal causation dismisses vaccine injury stories. Multiple studies support these findings, indicating a need for further investigation into vaccine safety.

After getting the shot at Shoppers, she texted me, then died 7 minutes later. I insisted the shot killed her healthy mom, but the coroner claimed it was natural causes without examining her. I knew they were lying.

I've always questioned things, starting in my teens when I wondered about the necessity of the tetanus vaccine every ten years. After discussions with medical professionals, I discovered that the narrative surrounding tetanus deaths was exaggerated. During my training in Detroit, I noticed a disparity in vaccine administration based on socio-economic status, with welfare recipients receiving fewer vaccines. I found alarming information suggesting that since 1972, the World Health Organization and NIH have been developing the tetanus vaccine with components that could lead to infertility in women. This vaccine allegedly contains a pregnancy hormone that can cause the body to attack early pregnancies, particularly in certain regions. I suspect similar practices may be occurring with the COVID vaccine, despite official denials.

A child allegedly received dangerous vaccinations at age one while sick with a cold and constipation. Medical professionals reportedly did not disclose potential side effects. Shortly after the vaccinations, the child's eyes rolled back, she foamed at the mouth, and had multiple seizures at St. Vincent's Hospital in Pennsylvania. She went into cardiac arrest, and after 40 minutes of CPR, medical staff declared the baby dead. The parents claim they expected to be fully informed of any potential risks and given the choice to proceed with vaccination. They advise others to ask questions and do their own research before vaccinating their children, as medical professionals may not provide complete or accurate information.

Following the rollout of vaccination programs in the 1960s, crib death began to appear, becoming the number one cause of infant death by 1969. Doctors may have a psychology that prevents them from seeing the harms of treatments they give, believing what they are told about safety. A mother reported that her fraternal twins, Dallas and Tyson Shaw, born premature, received DPT, flu, and Hep A vaccines at 18 months old. The mother had concerns about the flu vaccine due to family history but was reassured of its safety. The next morning, the twins were limp and without energy. They were taken to the ER, where a doctor suspected a reaction to the vaccination, but they were sent home. One week later, the twins were found dead in their sleep. The mother stated that the day before their death was their best day since the vaccination. Their health status changed leading up to their death.

The speaker states they searched for years for a pre-licensing safety trial of the 72 vaccine doses effectively mandated for American children. They claim that every other medication requires a safety trial comparing health outcomes in a placebo group versus a vaccine group before FDA licensing. The speaker assumed this was also done for vaccines. They state they found out that vaccines were exempt from this requirement.

A doctor named William Thompson contacts someone and expresses shame about a fraudulent MMR study conducted by the CDC. The study allegedly covered up the link between vaccines and autism. A parent shares their experience of their child's adverse reaction to vaccines, resulting in loss of motor skills and behavioral changes. Thompson plotted data that showed a separation between MMR and autism diagnoses at 15 months, indicating a potential risk. The CDC is accused of knowing about this risk but continuing vaccinations unchanged. The consequences of this cover-up are described as grievous harm to children and a predicted increase in autism cases.

The discussion centers on the claim that SIDS is a “vaccine death.” It states that seventy five percent of all deaths from SIDS happened within seven days of a vaccination. The conversation then shifts to polio. It references “Polio, forty eight hour safety review trial” and says the safety review lasted “forty eight hours, two days.” It also brings up President Roosevelt, described as “famous for having polio in the wheelchair,” and adds that he “had transverse myelitis.” A response rejects the polio framing: “No way. Didn’t have polio.” The speaker disputes trust in doctors’ knowledge of vaccines, saying, “How can you sit here and say doctors don’t know anything about vaccines?” Another claim follows that “a doctor is lucky if they have a half a day education on vaccines,” and that “I have yet to find a pediatrician that can list the ingredients of any vaccines.” The speaker further asserts, “They don’t know anything at all.” A broader argument is made about vaccine testing and timing for children. The speaker claims that “99.5 of our children are getting a product that was tested for five days” and says this product was tested “for a disease they will not come in contact with until they’re an adult.” The speaker adds “and hopefully never,” linking this to a belief about later behavior: “if they were raised correctly, will find themselves sharing heroin needles or sleeping with prostitutes.” The conclusion of the argument is presented as a belief that uncovering these “truth” points will expose broader wrongdoing: “I do believe when people see the truth on this, it will reveal everything that’s corrupt about the world that you live in.”

Alisa did not vaccinate her child because she is scared of both vaccinating and not vaccinating. She read warnings about introducing alien microorganisms into children's blood, citing potential long-term effects ranging from allergies and asthma to cancer, leukemia, multiple sclerosis, and sudden infant death syndrome. She felt it was wrong to vaccinate and believes people should think twice. One speaker questions the biochemical legacy of vaccinations and how long the effects last. Another speaker states that putting something into a baby's bloodstream requires careful consideration. They claim information about vaccines isn't really known or researched, and cite the original birth control pill as an example of something once considered safe that later proved detrimental to health.

The speaker claims a century of evidence links vaccines to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), drawing parallels to sudden adult death syndrome (SADS) observed after COVID-19 vaccine rollouts. They allege the pharmaceutical industry targets vulnerable groups for profit, citing early DPT vaccine testing on Irish orphans. They state that physicians have observed waves of infant deaths following vaccinations, and data correlates increased vaccination rates with increased infant deaths, contributing to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The speaker notes a predicted and actual drop in infant deaths during COVID-19 lockdowns when vaccinations decreased, and a similar drop in Florida when parents stopped vaccinating. They claim healthcare authorities conceal the link between vaccines and SIDS, and society has normalized these deaths. The speaker aims to provide evidence of the link between vaccination and SIDS, and discusses this with US government researchers. They state that a high percentage of SIDS cases occurred within 7 days of vaccination. The speaker then promotes a weight loss product called Lean, claiming it helps users lose weight quickly by regulating blood sugar and appetite.

The child we brought home from the doctor's office is not the same that we brought to the doctor's office. Well, it means that my son was changed by the vaccine shot. The first day that we took our son Joshua to the doctor for his well baby visit, we had a healthy baby. Twenty one days after that doctor's visit, he had his first grand mal seizure. What happened is that my son developed an uncontrolled seizure disorder following that vaccination shot, and it's a seizure disorder he had for his entire life. I didn't make a conscious decision to take my son to the doctor that day for his vaccine shot. I just did what was expected of me. I put in zero research into what they were getting injected into my son that day.

Speaker 0 asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The speaker claims that, over the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, identifying hundreds of infants and toddlers who died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker states that most of these deaths occurred within about two weeks after the shot, with forty percent dying within one week. The deaths are described as temporally linked to the vaccination, with the majority of fatalities occurring at ages one to one and a half, which the speaker notes as the time they receive the MMR shots. The speaker claims that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The overall claim is that these shots are killing the babies in their sleep, described as absolutely disturbing and as part of a broader study. The speaker concludes that the shots are deadly and that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore; if parents still want them, they should be split up rather than administered as a combined dose, labeling the current approach as “the full load of garbage.”

We analyzed all patients in my practice, regardless of vaccines. Unvaccinated kids showed fewer health issues compared to vaccinated ones over 10 years. The data led to my license suspension, but I fight for informed consent and patient rights.