TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain's love for tea led them to trade opium with China as a substitute for silver. This allowed them to obtain the tea they desired. While this caused addiction problems in China, it didn't concern the British. The resulting Opium Wars ended with Britain gaining control of Hong Kong. This unique triangular trade played a crucial role in shaping the Hong Kong we know today.

Tariffs were once a significant source of revenue for the U.S., but in the early 1900s, the country shifted to an income tax due to pressure from other nations. A commission was formed in 1887 to address the surplus wealth generated from tariffs on foreign goods. The U.S. thrived by taxing imports, which protected American jobs. China, for example, allows foreign companies to build factories there, leading to a different economic dynamic. Elon Musk is mentioned as a notable figure who has successfully navigated these challenges, particularly with his ventures in the automotive and space industries.

Universities are perceived as educational institutions, but the Harvard Endowment made a large portion of its $50 billion through foreign regime change operations with the US State Department. In the 1990s, Jeffrey Sachs, head of the Harvard Endowment for International Development, requested around $500 million from USAID to manage the economic privatization of Russia during shock therapy. The Harvard Endowment and George Soros' Quantum Fund received a closed auction bid on the sale of former Soviet government assets. Harvard receives billions in grants from the US government while doing favors for them. Columbia and Stanford Universities operate similarly. Universities are not solely educational institutions.

During World War 2, the head of British intelligence sought friendship with the Americans. He approached the Rockefellers, offering access to UK espionage in exchange for financial support. The Rockefellers agreed and provided an entire floor at Rockefeller Center rent-free for the operation of the OSS, the precursor to the CIA. Alan Dulles and others were involved in this Rockefeller-backed organization. The CIA's roots can be traced back to the Rockefellers, who also held a strong disdain for organized labor. This information can be easily found online.

China nearly met this fate during the 1980s as George Soros enjoyed vast control over China's economy and found a loyal Chinese devotee in Zhao Jiang, who became premier from 1980 to 1987 and, from 1987 to 1989, chairman of the Communist Party of China. In 1986, Zhao sponsored the first of two Soros-run think tanks with the fund for the reform and opening up of China, using a million dollar grant by Soros, followed by the Institute for Economic and Structural Reform co-run by Zhao’s close advisor Chen Yizhi. Zhao also ensured thousands of young Chinese were given scholarships to receive indoctrination into Milton Friedman’s ideology within western universities, where they were expected to return to oversee China’s inevitable perestroika as a new technocratic managerial class. All that was needed was a revolutionary shock to break the hold of China’s nationalists and force Zhao Jiang into a Pinochet-like position of dictator and privatizer who would force his nation into the IMF clutches. It was here that the CIA’s James Lilly, Ambassador to China, the National Endowment for Democracy, and George Soros deployed all of their resources to activate a full-blown color revolution on 06/04/1989, with student demonstrations in Tiananmen Square bursting into violence. What began as peaceful protests were soon infused with violent provocateurs, and efforts at peaceful dialogue were sabotaged by thousands of Molotov cocktails and dozens of unarmed Chinese soldiers who were hanged and lit on fire. Needless to say, unlike the cases of Hungary, the Philippines, or Russia, this coup d’etat failed to achieve its goals. In the wake of this attempt at a color revolution, China’s leadership immediately removed Zhao Jiang from power, placed him under house arrest for life, and arrested his leading cohorts. China also lost no time shutting down Soros’ Open Society Foundations and banned the financial terrorist for life. With the vast assistance of Hong Kong triads, the CIA and MI6 arranged Operation Yellowbird, which funneled these Western provocateurs and Soros assets out of China, where many received luxurious rewards and scholarships at Ivy League universities in the USA, forming what the Washington Post’s Gavin Hewitt described as the nucleus of a democracy movement in exile.

Speaker 0 raises the question of CIA involvement in drug trafficking, referencing a past discussion with former Tel Aviv CIA chief of station Susan Miller and noting a reminder about Iran-Contra. They ask why the CIA would be intimately involved with drug trafficking, and mention Candace Owens discussing it in relation to the Charlie Kirk assassination. Speaker 1 answers that trafficking in drugs allows the CIA to get closer to the targets they want to reach. They point to a popular Netflix series, Narcos, which follows the hunt for Pablo Escobar, the Cali cartel, and other major cartels. They claim that, in the show, and in real life, every time the Drug Enforcement Administration gets close to its primary target, the CIA station chief steps in and ruins the investigation. They state that this happens because the CIA doesn’t care about drugs. Speaker 1 continues that the CIA cares about terrorism and communism, implying there are always some other bigger ideological concerns. Therefore, the CIA is “perfectly happy” to allow cocaine to flood into the United States in the 1980s during the Iran-Contra period, just as it was “perfectly happy” to allow Afghanistan to provide 93% of the world’s heroin once the United States began its occupation of Afghanistan.

The CIA used dummy foundations to channel money to other foundations, which then passed it on to private organizations. These legitimate foundations were part of the thousands of charitable funds in America, created by wealthy individuals and influenced by the American establishment. One such foundation was located at 73 Tremont Street in Boston.

Americans are coming through Vancouver, with precursors from Guangdong province. The Chinese Communist Party is turning a blind eye to the RCMP's request for help during the Meng Wan Wangzhou incident. This allows the CCP to facilitate the reverse opium war, destabilizing and undermining democracies. The Chinese Communist Party could control and stop the 100,000 deaths from Fentanyl overdoses, but they choose not to. Vancouver is a major distribution point for these drugs, which are then sent back to Asia. The CCP's relationship with organized crime allows them to easily stop this flow, but they have no willingness to do so. This is part of their hybrid warfare strategy to destabilize democracies worldwide.

The East Coast universities in America, like Columbia, Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, were funded by opium money from China during the American Industrial Revolution. The Forbes family, including John Forbes Carry, who was the president's secretary of state, had ties to opium dealing. Opium money played a significant role in building Lowell, Massachusetts, the first industrial city in the United States, as well as the first five railroads. However, this connection was often hidden under the guise of the China trade. In the pursuit of opium money, Britain and other imperial powers invaded and colonized China, with the American army even present in Tiananmen Square.

In the early 1900s, the U.S. shifted from tariffs to an income tax due to pressure from other countries. Politicians were influenced by these nations, which affected economic decisions. A commission was formed in 1887 to address the surplus wealth from tariffs on foreign goods. The U.S. thrived by taxing imports, which protected American jobs. This situation mirrors China's approach, where foreign companies can operate if they build factories there, unlike the restrictions on U.S. cars. Elon Musk exemplifies this dynamic, successfully establishing operations in China, showcasing the complexities of international trade and investment.

Colombia exports 97% of cocaine worldwide, worth $1 trillion annually. The US Institute For Peace receives $50 million yearly from taxpayers and influences Afghanistan's opium production. USAID aids in heroin cultivation in Afghanistan. The drug trade connects to political power in Latin America and China, involving Bush, Biden, and Clinton. Trump's lack of involvement in this scheme is a reason for opposition. The control of narco gangs is crucial for political influence in the region. Bukele's crackdown on drug gangs in El Salvador disrupts this system, leading to backlash from Soros and the media.

Speaker 0 notes that owned groups have been buying up schools across the United States, including Spring Education Group which owns 240 schools in 19 states, funded by a Chinese investment firm whose CEO has been described as an ardent Chinese nationalist. Xi Van Fleet, who was born in China and lived through the Cultural Revolution, joins the discussion. Speaker 1 explains that the CCP has long viewed America as its arch enemy and has continually aimed to weaken and undermine the United States in order to replace it as the world’s superpower. Education is identified as a key battleground. Since the early 2000s, CCP efforts began with higher education through Confucius Institutes, then expanded to public schools via donation and exchange programs such as sister school programs, and are now moving into private schools by purchasing many of them. She asserts that in 2015 the CCP bought the high school New York Military Academy, a school that President Donald Trump attended, arguing that the intent is not to make money but to take over American education and turn classrooms into the “little red classroom” and education into “American education with CCP characteristics.” The overarching goal, she claims, is generations of people who align with CCP messaging, referencing influencer Hassan Piker who allegedly visited China and told followers that China offered a solution for America, asserting that communism is the solution to problems created by capitalism in America. This, she says, is very dangerous. Speaker 0 adds that the NY Military Academy purchase connects to efforts to influence elites by targeting private schools where wealthy families send their children, who then go on to hold high positions in society. She notes that there has been chatter about Chinese ownership of farmlands as well, but argues that the influence through these private schools is even more effective.

The CIA used dummy foundations to channel money to other foundations, which then passed it on to private organizations. These legitimate foundations were part of the 15,000 charitable funds in America, established by wealthy individuals and influenced by the American establishment. CBS newsman Norman Glubach reports on some of these foundations, including one located at 73 Tremont Street in Boston.

The speaker discusses the temptation for American elites, particularly Wall Street, to engage with China. They highlight how Chinese individuals, like Gal Yinyuan, offer unique benefits to Americans. The speaker suggests that when Chinese individuals befriend Westerners, they often imply that China is at their disposal. This leads to the desire for power and control rather than just money. The speaker mentions instances of exploitation, such as sex with minors and child abuse, which some American elites believe are permissible in China. Additionally, the speaker discusses how Wall Street seeks opportunities in China, including visiting restricted areas like Tibet. The CCP promises resources, power, and access to the Chinese people. Money is seen as a means to achieve their desires in China, rather than the ultimate goal. The CCP's control over resources and their ability to fulfill desires that cannot be obtained in America are what entice American elites.

A Jewish Marxist named Lev Davinovich Rammstein was funded by the Rockefellers to incite a revolution in Russia with the help of Western banking interests. Trotsky, a German official, and Lenin were supported by US and British intelligence to overthrow the Russian government. The American International Corporation, backed by powerful families like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, provided millions in funding for the Russian Revolution. This led to the creation of the communist threat of the 20th century, resulting in countless deaths from purges and wars.

The issue with medical education in America can be traced back to the late 1800s and early 1900s when the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations aimed to establish a medical monopoly. They achieved this by funding universities and appointing their staff to the boards of directors, ensuring their influence. As a result, the curriculum shifted towards pharmaceutical drugs, and this influence remains today. The medical profession is seen as subservient to the pharmaceutical industry, as money from vested interests dictates the outcome.

I discovered the United Front's connection to the Chinese mafia, known as the Triads, who are influential in New York. They engage in human trafficking, drug trafficking, and collaborate with government officials. They even control some police advisory boards. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has infiltrated US law enforcement agencies, particularly in Chinese communities. When the NYPD investigates cases in Chinatown or Flushing, they often consult these advisory boards, which have Chinese agents who provide false information to protect their own operations. The CCP's influence is deeply concerning.

Morgan's estate had only a few million dollars upon his death, as most of the securities people believed he owned were actually owned by others. By 1880, the Rothschilds secretly owned a large part of the United States through representatives like August Belmont, JPMorgan, and Coon Loeb Company. These two Rothschild firms owned 96% of all railroad mileage in the US by 1896. Secret money, operations, and armies have been involved, leading to the deaths of individuals like Forrestal, McCarthy, Kennedy, and the victims of 9/11. The drug narcotics trafficking issue has also been part of this continuous story since 1913, when the Federal Reserve was created and the use of fiat currency globally became possible.

Speaker 0: Take this in and understand what we’re actually dealing with. Many views exist—from Trump being a pedophile protecting pedophile buddies, to Israel infiltration and cover-ups, to it being a Democrat hoax. The reality, as described here, is that there is a supranational global cabal that has operated for nearly a hundred years, using money laundering, blackmail, drug trafficking, human trafficking, and other nefarious operations to fund and overthrow countries, serving as the shadow power of the world. We can see who these people are, their intentions, and the outcomes of their policies, and they are still being shoehorned into the most important positions in the world specifically because they’re part of this cabal. Main players mentioned include Larry Summers, who, per Epstein documents, was named executor of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate after his death. The money Epstein received from Les Wexner and others to create a starting fund and build a reputation as a financier is said to be returning to the coffers of Larry Summers, seen as part of this operation. The analogy is that this operation is like a corporation with Epstein as a brand under an umbrella, where if one asset (like Irish Spring) fails, its resources are absorbed back into the wider corporate structure. Summers, formerly Treasury Secretary, who helped destroy Glass-Steagall and contributed to the 2008 market crash dynamics, is said to have his bailout-money influence guided by Larry Fink at BlackRock. Summers, who was head of Harvard and later appointed to OpenAI’s board, is linked to the governance of the AI company behind ChatGPT. Larry Ellison is described as corresponding with Epstein and Ehud Barak (former Israeli prime minister) about which politicians serve their interests, including arranging a meeting between Marco Rubio and Tony Blair due to shared interests in this cabal. Epstein is depicted as a central, manipulative figure involved in selling weapons from Israel, meddling in elections, and influencing universities in Russia, raising questions about his influence and reach. The speaker emphasizes Epstein’s reach across political and corporate spheres and the question of his power, asking how such influence is possible. Speaker 1: The question is, how do you go about that? Speaker 0: He didn’t even go to school for trading; it’s all fabricated. He is a spymaster and a kingpin in a mafia. This group, including Les Wexner, Jeffrey Epstein, Larry Summers, Larry Ellison, Donald Trump (at this point), is part or perhaps the managing structure of the same organization discussed in the Eagle two documents from the 1960s, where the CIA sought autonomy from Congress by creating its own income streams, including drug trafficking in Vietnam. The opioid and drug-running links are tied to Iran-Contra, with George H. W. Bush involved in opium trade and the drug-running networks. Bill Gates and other figures are alleged to have involved in cover-ups during CIA-driven operations in South America, with Gary Webb’s Dark Alliance cited as exposing such networks. Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, when Bill was governor of Arkansas, allegedly helped run headquarters in Mina for flights to and from Colombia, spreading drugs across the United States. The assertion is that the same group runs drugs, rigs elections, and is involved in various crises, including alleged connections to COVID-19, Russiagate, 9/11, and the assassination of Charlie Kirk, forming a pattern of the last decades of upheaval in America. The discussion moves toward Epstein’s network and the sources of his money, with emails revealing connections, against a backdrop of broad search for Trump and the prevalence of unconfirmed, baseless anonymous claims. The core claim is that the true representation is the “new world order” and a banking-based intelligence network where intelligence agencies originated from banks. The CIA’s founding from the OSS is tied to MI6, which allegedly drew on the Rothschild banking intelligence, tying the CIA, MI6, and banking elites together. The speaker concludes that the same names—running drugs, stealing elections, burning down skyscrapers, and flying airplanes—appear repeatedly, linking DEI, ESG, white discrimination claims, and Epstein to the same global web.

Universities are not just places where professors teach students. The Harvard Endowment, for example, has made a large amount of its $50 billion by working with the US State Department in foreign regime change operations. In the 1990s, Jeffrey Sachs, head of the Harvard Endowment for International Development, petitioned USAID for around $500 million to administer the economic privatization of Russia during its shock therapy period. The Harvard Endowment and George Soros' Quantum Fund were given a closed auction bid on the sale of formerly Soviet government-held assets. Harvard receives billions in grants from the US government while doing favors for them. The same applies to Columbia and Stanford Universities.

Banks, including the ones we use today, were built on the back of slavery. The forced labor of 11 million enslaved people helped Britain become a global superpower. Even after slavery was abolished, the British government compensated slave owners with £20 million, which was not given to the slaves themselves. The debt was only paid off in 2015, meaning taxpayers' money went towards compensating slave owners. The UK's largest banks, including Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, and the Bank of England, have all been linked to the slave trade through these compensation payments. British banks also profited indirectly from slavery by providing finance to slave traders and offering plantation mortgages secured against the value of slaves. The city of London, a global financial hub, was built with the labor of enslaved people.

During slavery, cotton was like oil today. The rich controlled it, linking North and South. Jewish people dominated the cotton trade, sending it to England for cloth. Rothschilds and Lehman Brothers got rich from cotton. The truth must be told.

The speaker presents a message of alarm and action, arguing that anarchy in Washington DC stems from the federal government seizing powers and passing unconstitutional laws, with men acting as though they are above the Constitution. He claims a supranational, clandestine power structure governs world events. Key claim: a Committee of Three Hundred (also known in intelligence circles as the Olympians) consists of 300 men who run the world and who are sworn to secrecy. The speaker says he discovered this while in Africa, finding documents labeled above top-secret that revealed the committee’s influence. He asserts that the descendants of the British East India Company control The United States today, and that the 300 men govern global affairs with equal voting rights and no outvoting. The speaker traces the committee’s roots and influence to the British East India Company, opium profits, and a global elite. He asserts that in India House in London he found manifests showing opium trade profits that dwarned major carmakers’ profits for certain years, and that the 300 govern from Venice’s black nobility families (the Lucatis, the Rekanates, the Volpe Dumiserratis), boasting wealth that would make figures like David Rockefeller seem modest. He claims those families still run the world and name every member in his book The Committee of 300 and, later, in socialism, the road to slavery. The scope of control is described as worldwide and multi-branch: the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA, aka Chatham House) is the executive arm; the Club of Rome, the Seni Foundation, the Mont Pelerin Society, the Order of Saint John are tapped as executive arms; the RIIA allegedly instructs U.S. policy through the Morgan Guarantee & Trust Bank, with Dennis Weatherstone as a conduit to the Secretary of State and then the President. The speaker alleges the Gulf War was orchestrated by Margaret Thatcher (in Aspen Institute) to instruct George Bush, framing it as unconstitutional and driven by an international agenda. He asserts that the Club of Rome (through Aurelio Peccei) sought to destroy U.S. industry and agriculture, citing Bertrand Russell’s influence and writings on overpopulation. He claims the Club of Rome’s “Zero Growth” post-industrial plan aimed to destroy the American middle class, destroy U.S. industries, and push a socialist transformation. Global 2000 is described as a Club of Rome genocide blueprint targeting mass population reduction by 2050, aimed particularly at decimating the U.S. middle class and other populations. The speaker links AIDS, HIV-era and other outbreaks to this plan, alleging deliberate creation and dissemination of pathogens via Fort Detrick, the World Health Organization, and other bodies, with assertions of experiments (CAB, Lassa fever, etc.) and a later shift to other viruses like HIV/AIDS, cholera, malaria, and black plague, all framed as part of population control under the global plan. He claims vaccines and viral campaigns in Africa and Brazil were weaponized to decimate populations, while the “black nobility” finances these operations through London and Venice. The speaker asserts that a vast network of bankers, insurance companies, mining conglomerates, and political organizations—including the Democrat Party in the U.S.—are controlled by the 300 and their secret society apparatus ( Illuminati, Society of the Cincinnati, etc.). He contends the strongest arm is the Club of Rome, and that the RIA/Club of Rome manipulated U.S. presidents through PMs, MI6, and other foreign controllers. He gives examples: Lincoln’s assassination, Wilson’s presidency, Kennedy’s murder, and later U.S. policy under Bush, Clinton, and others, as outcomes of control by London and the RIIA. The speaker contends that intelligence and political leadership are predetermined by the 300, not elected by the people. He argues the President and Secretary of State are chosen by the Royal Institute for International Affairs, not directly by the American electorate. He cites MacArthur, Dean Rusk, and Truman as exemplars of subversion by an international power structure that guides U.S. foreign policy. In closing, the speaker asserts the Constitution is immutable, condemns what he sees as creeping socialism, and calls for the dissolution of the Federal Reserve and a severing of the concord between the 50 states and the federal government. He frames the situation as a war to the death for the United States, urging Americans to reclaim state sovereignty and reject what he characterizes as unconstitutional measures, arguing that the United States consists of 50 nations with rights to dissolve the federal government if necessary.

The CIA's troubles stem from its use of tax-free foundations. The CIA created dummy foundations to channel money to legitimate philanthropic foundations. These legitimate foundations then mixed CIA money with their own and passed it on to private organizations on the CIA payroll during the 40s, 50s, and 60s. These foundations are part of the American establishment, the power structure of wealthy families, law firms, and universities that have influenced American life since World War II. CBS reported on some of the foundations which channeled money for the CIA, such as one located at 73 Tremont Street, Boston.