reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 presents a continuation of a theory about a hidden connection between a 1848 statue and the Statue of Liberty in New York City. The core claims are as follows: - The 1848 statue is described as a statue of Lucifer called the “genius of evil,” and the speaker argues there are unmistakable similarities between it and the NYC statue. - A chain attached to the ankle of the figure in the 1848 statue is interpreted as a symbol of imprisonment in the bottomless pit for a thousand years, and the speaker notes a “very similar chain” on the Statue of Liberty. - The faces of the two statues are described as bearing a “very similar resemblance.” - In Lucifer’s hand in the 1848 statue, the speaker notes a “one, two, three, four, five, six, seven point crown,” and then compares this to the Statue of Liberty’s crown, which is described by the speaker as having seven points. - The speaker points out a “fruit” hanging at the bottom of the 1848 statue and claims a similar association with an apple for the Statue of Liberty. - A torch is described as being at the bottom of the statue, and the speaker notes that this torch bears a “very similar resemblance” to Lucifer, the light bearer, who is often depicted with a torch. - The speaker asserts that these similarities—crown points, torch, apple association, chain, and overall imagery—aren’t coincidences and suggests they imply a worship or tribute to fallen angels through familiar symbols. - The video mentions a Vatican telescope being called Lucifer in the context of this claim, framing it as something that “the Vatican would never actually call their telescope Lucifer,” and characterizes the discussion as jokes or entertainment. - The speaker emphasizes that all of this is presented as satire and entertainment for viewers, and explicitly states that the content is “for shits and gigs” and “entertainment purposes only.” Key framing points include: the alleged deliberate parallels between the 1848 Lucifer statue and the Statue of Liberty, the interpretation of shared symbols (chain, crown with seven points, torch, apple), and the concluding note that the material is satire and not a factual accusation.

Speaker 0 asks if a higher form of non-human intelligence has visited Earth. Speaker 1 responds that non-human intelligence exists and has been interacting with humanity for a long time. Furthermore, this interaction is not new, it's ongoing, and there are unelected people in the government who are aware of it. Speaker 0 notes this is a bold statement and asks how confident Speaker 1 is that it is true. Speaker 1 states there is zero doubt.

On 03/26/2026, the Pentagon's Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) quietly announced BIOW, basic information awareness operations, a cognitive warfare program that changes the rules of the battlefield through belief rather than bullets or bombs. The SCO sits inside the Office of the Secretary of Defense, with a mandate to deliver breakthrough capabilities to war fighters typically within three to five years. Sam Gray, SCO's chief technology officer and lead for autonomy and artificial intelligence, leads BIOW. Speaking at the National Defense Industrial Association's Pacific Operational Science and Technology Conference in Honolulu, Gray stated: the goal of cognitive warfare is to disrupt the cognition and the thinking ability of an adversary or person and influence how they perceive, sense make, and act. This is not propaganda in the old sense. This is something fundamentally different. For most of military history, influence operations required a physical observable. In World War Two, the Allies inflated fake tanks to fool German reconnaissance. You needed something the enemy could see. Gray said that era is over. Quote, I don't actually need the physical observable because I can generate both the physical observable and the associated narrative that comes along with it, and I can promulgate it across the digital environment that allows it to go everywhere. BIOW. BIOW is built on three technological pillars. Pillar one, detection: systems designed to identify adversary generated materials to see what the enemy is pushing into the information space before it takes hold. Pillar two, multimodal effects: AI models capable of generating text, video, and audio, synthetic content designed to shape how target populations perceive events in real time. Pillar three, population modeling: a large scale simulation environment that can model entire populations and produce quantitative metrics. Answering the question Sam Gray himself asked, how good am I doing with this narrative? Did it resonate like we thought it was going to? The technology architecture Gray described is deliberately lean and distributed. Quote, give me 100 Mac minis with 100 different agents on them that are out running and operating, that are lightweight, small, do not require gigawatts of power. This is not a massive fragile supercomputer. This is a swarm. But there's a problem Gray openly acknowledged: the off the shelf AI systems we all use, ChatGPT, Gemini, do not think like Russia. They do not think like China. They were trained on American data shaped by American assumptions. Gray said directly, we have to get to a point where we can understand what it is that they think about and what we can create from a model perspective to emulate and behave like our adversary does. BIOW's goal is to build bespoke AI models specifically tuned to adversary cognitive frameworks. Why is this urgent? Gray pointed to two ongoing adversary campaigns as evidence: The United States is already behind. First, Iran's information operations during Operation Epic Fury. Second, China's large scale efforts to, in Gray's words, change the way that certain populations are thinking. And then Gray stated plainly, The United States is not currently positioned to counter these operations at machine speed. Quote, we need to start to get into that space. Congress didn't wait. The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act directed the Secretary of Defense to formally define cognitive warfare for the department, assign organizational responsibility, and assess the value of narrative intelligence with a deadline of 03/31/2026. BIOW does not operate in isolation. In 2025, the US Army created Detachment 201, the Executive Innovation Corps, commissioning four Senior Silicon Valley technology executives directly into the Army Reserve at the rank of Lieutenant Colonel: Andrew Bosworth, Kevin Weil, Shyam Sankar, and Bob McGrew. They wear the uniform and serve within the chain of command. Together, BIOW's technology stack and Detachment 201's Silicon Valley expertise represent a deliberate convergence of artificial intelligence, influence operations, and military command structure. NATO's chief scientist framed the stakes: cognitive warfare targets trust networks, identity narratives, and institutional legitimacy. The battle space is continuous, operates below the threshold of armed conflict, and the measure of success is not a message received, but a durable change in how a population thinks, decides, and acts. The human mind is now a contested domain. As of April 2026, BIOW is active: performers are being on-ramped, models are being built, simulations are running. And Gray made one thing clear about the vendors chosen to build this system: those who don't keep up will be cut. Quote, I will offramp you. The battle for cognition has begun. Whether you believe this program is an essential shield against adversary manipulation or a capability that raises profound questions about who defines the adversary and where those tools can be aimed, one fact is not in dispute. This is real. It is funded. It is operational. And you are now aware.

Speaker 0 questions why someone would change their signature after 30 years. They mention that the person has now changed their signature on a website, and wonders if it is strange.

The speaker asks if the person is willing to provide an affidavit to confirm the accuracy of their evidence, specifically a photo taken on a certain day. The person agrees and is willing to vouch for the authenticity of the files.

These are multiyear payouts, each secured by several mortgages. Oh! We've got it. We've got an Earth. We did it. All in favor, say aye. No. He's right there. He's right here.

Speaker 0 points out a spaceship and asks if the viewer can see it. They confirm that it is indeed there. Speaker 0 insists that Veronica should look at it, but the conversation abruptly ends.

The speaker points to an old chart to show something significant that occurred recently.

Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1 to swear on the Bible that he walked on the moon. Speaker 1 dismisses the request and says it's not worth answering.

I see the spaceship. Do you see it? Yes, it's there. No, it's not. I promise, Veronica. Take a look. No, let me see. Wow.

Speaker: Noted claims about the Amish and COVID. - The speaker traveled to Lancaster County, Amish country, visiting the house of a relative of Gideon King, described as the one person, the only known person in the Amish community who supposedly died from COVID. They say there may be up to five people, but the names of five people were not provided. A $2,500 reward on Twitter was offered for names of more than five people in Lancaster County who died from COVID; no one could name more than one person, and they all named Gideon King. - The speaker visited the house of Sam King, a relative of Gideon King. Sam said he doesn’t know if Gideon actually died from COVID. They think Gideon died in the hospital. - If there were five Amish people who died, this would mean the Amish death rate was 90 times lower than the infection fatality rate of the United States. - The explanation offered: this is possible because the Amish aren’t vaccinated and didn’t follow a single guideline of the CDC. They did not lockdown, did not mask, did not social distance, did not vaccinate, and there were no mandates to get vaccinated in the Amish community. - The speaker asserts there are no autistic kids in the Amish community, claiming it is very rare to find kids with ADD, autoimmune disease, PANDA, PANS, epilepsy, or other chronic diseases. - The speaker states the US government has studied the Amish for decades, but there has never been a report released to the public. The stated reason is that such a report would show that not following guidelines leads to better health. - The speaker concludes there is no public report after decades of study because it would be devastating to the narrative and would show that the CDC has been harming the public for decades.

How would you prove that you're in zero gravity? We don't have time for conspiracy theories.

These are multiyear payouts, and each one has multiple mortgages. Oh. Oh, so moved. All in favor, say aye. No. He's right there. He's right here. We've got an Earth. We did.

The discussion centers on sunspots as evidence supporting a broader “Moon Map” theory, with a focus on how sun, moon, and star rays interact. The sequence reviews parts seven through ten, explaining that cosmic rays from the Sun, Moon, and Stars refract off a firmament to transform atmospheric molecules into plasma states. The overlap of the conical sun ray with the moon ray is tied to the moon’s phases, as the sun ray overpowers the moon ray’s weaker light. Lunar eclipses are attributed to an overlap of the Venus or Mercury rays. The group then shifts to sunspots and their causes, presenting a photo comparison of sunspots from space weather data against astronomical positions relative to the sun. A key claim is that sunspots correspond to star cluster formations, described as an overlap of the star rays with the sun’s ray. The speakers display examples of different star clusters occurring at the same time and question the odds that these clusters would be present and located correctly with respect to the sun. They extend this examination to a year-long view, asking whether sunspot clusters consistently match star ray patterns rotating across the sun, and noting that inside the sun disk there is a neutralization of sunlight, which accounts for the darkness inside. Speaker 1 adds several provocative interpretations. They state that sunspots are holes that allow observation inside the sun, which is described as hollow and dark inside. They challenge conventional physics by asserting that the sun does not operate by fusion and that fusion is not the primary operation of the sun; rather, the arcs and current density produce hydrogen diffusion, implying the sun itself is not a fusion device. Fusion is described as an effect or converter, transforming from another dimensionality into our dimensionality. The conversion is said to be incomplete until it enters Earth’s atmosphere or other physical matter, at which point electromagnetic light is produced. The outer solar envelope is described as undefined, with references to Wilhelm Reich and the idea that scars cannot be seen inside. The sun’s energy is described as photovoltaic energy, an electrophysical conversion from a primary force to a secondary force, with the conversion becoming complete once it interacts with the outer atmosphere; after interaction with matter, emission reverts to a reduced form of heat, light, and mechanical activity. The origin is labeled as undefined, allegedly coming from a "counter space" or another dimension with holes inside the hollow sun. The photosphere is described as generating light and being contiguously arranged through little glowing spots with dark gaps in between, forming a veil. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 intoning, “The truth will set us free.”

Speaker 0: Nearly two weeks into this conflict, the official story is cracking, and the number of Americans wounded is slowly coming out. Yesterday, we reported based on our sources that the number of American wounded was at least one hundred and thirty seven. After our report ran, the Pentagon has now publicly acknowledged about one hundred and forty wounded. That confirms our sources on this. So why did it take a little news show like ours to report this information? Why wasn't Fox News reporting this information? The Pentagon I know it's really weird. Why is the mainstream media silent on this? The Pentagon finally comes out and actually admits to this. Speaker 1: Reuters comes out and reports this. Exclusive. As many as one hundred and fifty US troops wounded so far in Iran war. They just published this today, this morning. March 10. That's remarkable. Exclusive. Just curious how that's an exclusive when we reported it yesterday. Yesterday. Whatever. Hey, Reuters. Bite me. Anyway, this war is clearly not winding down no matter what the messaging says. President Trump is saying the war could end very soon. But Iran says talks with The United States are off the table for now. Tehran is prepared to keep striking as long as it takes. And they're vowing an eye for an eye. So what is an eye for an eye actually mean? Does it mean you hey, you killed our leader. We kill yours? Does it mean, hey, you killed all these girls who were the daughters of members of the the Iranian Navy at a girls school, do we also do that to you? Like, what is actually does that look like? Speaker 0: Does it mean we took out your water infrastructures or you took out ours? So we do that. Right. Your gas infrastructure, civilian infrastructure, that's that's a war crime. But we did it. Your oil infrastructure, we do that. Like, what exactly does that look like? Meanwhile, the Strait Of Hormuz is getting worse by the minute. US intelligence tracking Iranian mine laying threats now as Gulf energy infrastructure there is taking a major hit with about 1,900,000 barrels per day of refining capacity across Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and The UAE. All down. CBS now says shipping through the Strait Of Hormuz has ground to a virtual halt. Nothing getting through. That's of just a few minutes ago. And Israel's hammering Beirut's southern suburbs and Lebanon. So they've essentially invaded Lebanon. Speaker 2: And then there's the neocon political class in Washington saying the quiet part out loud. Senator Lindsey Graham is now openly talking about, you know, going back to South Carolina to tell the sons and daughters in South Carolina, you know, you gotta send your loved ones to the Middle East. That's what I'm doing here in South Carolina. I gotta tell them to go fight in the Middle East, and he's calling on other Middle East countries that have been sitting on the fence that we've supported over the years as allies. Get off the fence. Go bomb Iran. Help out with Iran. And, oh, by the way, Spain, we're pissed off at you because you don't want us using your air bases or airspace to bomb Iran. Listen. Speaker 0: To our allies step up, get our air bases out of Spain. They're not reliable. Move all those airplanes to a country that would let us use them when we're threatened by a regime like Iran. To our friends in Spain, man, you have lost your way. I don't wanna do business with you anymore. I want our air bases our air bases out of Spain into a country that will let us use them. To our Arab friends, I've tried to help you construct a new Mideast. You need to up your game here. I can't go to South Carolina and say we're fighting and you won't publicly fight. What you're doing behind the scenes, that has to stop. The double dealing of the Arab world when it comes to this stuff needs to end. I go back to South Carolina. I'm asking them to send their sons and daughters over to the Mideast. What I want you to do in The Mideast to our friends in Saudi Arabia and other places, step forward and say this is my fight too. I join America. I'm publicly involved in bringing this regime down. If you don't, you're making a great mistake, and you're gonna cut off the ability to have a better relationship with The United States. I say this as a friend. Speaker 1: Ugh. He's an odious friend. Speaker 0: Say this as a friend. Speaker 3: With friends pick up a gun and go fight yourself, you coward. Yeah. I freaking hate that. But you're calling so, like, bluntly for somebody else to go die for his stupid cause. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: I am so curious about this. I mean, he's a liar. But how many people in South Carolina are really walking up to him and saying, who are we gonna get to fight with us? Who are we gonna get to fight Iran? Worried about this. My son can go, but who's going with him? Let's make some war playdates. Who does that? Speaker 0: Larry Johnson is a former CIA analyst, NRA gun trainer, and, he's been looking at all of this and doing some incredible writing over at his website, Sonar twenty one. Larry, thank you for joining us. Great to see you back on the show. Speaker 4: Hi, guys. Good to see you. Speaker 0: So I wanna talk about the American war wounded first because Mhmm. I know that this is, near and dear to your heart and, of course, something that you've been watching, closely. And the lies, of course, that are coming out about this. Again, I spoke to sources over the past forty eight hours that were telling us here at Redacted about 137 Americans wounded. Then the Pentagon comes out and then confirms about a hundred and forty. So right pretty much right on the nose. And does that number sound low to you? Or does that sound about right? Speaker 4: That sounds a little low. So on March 4, let's go to Germany. Stuttgart, just North West of Germany, there is a hospital called Landstuhl Regional Medical Center. Landstuhl's primary mission is to handle American war wounded. On March 4, they issued a memo telling all the pregnant women that were about to give birth that, sorry, don't come here. We're not birthing any more babies. We gotta focus on our main mission. So that was the first clue that there was there were a lot of casualties inbound. I know, without mentioning his name, somebody who was involved dealing with the combat casualties during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and he dealt with the personnel at Lunstul. And he called someone up and said, can't say anything, but there's a lot of casualties. Then 13 miles to the east of Landstuhl is an army base called Kaiserslautern. Kaiserslautern and the Stars and Stripes issued for that base had an appeal, a blood drive appeal. Hey. We need lots of people to show up and donate blood. So those that was on March 5. So I wrote about this March 6. So I wrote about this four days ago, that, yeah, we had a lot more casualties, and there are more coming, because Iran's not gonna stop. You know, right now, we're getting signals that the Trump administration is reaching out, trying, oh, hey, let's talk, let's talk cease fire. Iran's having none of it. They've been betrayed twice by Donald Trump and his group of clowns. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 4: You know? And and so they're not ready to say no. No. They've got the world, by the testicles is the polite way of saying it, withholding the Strait Of Hormuz. They've shut down the movement of not only oil, liquid natural gas. They're the supplier of about 25%, 25 to 30% of the world's liquid natural gas, and, about 30%, 30 to 35% of the world's urea, which is used for fertilizer. Now, that may not I just learned that that may not be as important as I once thought it was because most of it comes out of Oman. Oman, you don't have to worry about things going through the Strait Of Hormuz. But on oil and liquid natural gas, huge. 94% of The Philippines depended upon the flow of gas, both liquid and the petroleum oil, out of the Persian Gulf. India, 80%. Japan, South Korea. So this is gonna have a major impact on certain economies in the world. Now there there I I I've said this ironically. I I think Vladimir Putin's sitting there going, maybe Donald Trump really does like me, because what he's done is he's making Russia rich again in a way I mean, they're getting, you know, they were selling they were forced to sell their oil previously under sanctions at, like, $55 a barrel. Now they're getting $88.90 dollars a barrel. Well, and they just opened it up to India. I mean, that story over the past forty eight hours, like, so they The United States has eased its restriction on Russian oil flowing to India. I mean, talk about an absolute disaster. Speaker 4: Well, yeah. And remember what had happened there is India was playing a double game too. You know, bricks India is the I in bricks, and Iran is the new I in bricks. And so what was India doing? Well, India was pretending to play along with The United States, but then going to Russia and saying, hey, Russia. Yeah. We'll buy we'll buy your oil, but we needed a discount because we're going against the sanctions, and we need to cover ourselves. So Russia said, okay. As a BRICS partner, we'll let you have for $55 barrel. So they got a discount. So now when all of a sudden the the the oil tap is turned off, including the liquid natural gas, India goes running back to Russia. Now remember, on, February 25-26, India was in Israel buttering up the rear end of BB, Net, and Yahoo, kissing rear end all they could. Oh, man. It was a love fest. We're partners with Israel. And then Israel attacks their BRICS partner. And what does India say? Nothing. Zero. They don't say a thing about the murdered girls. So now all of a sudden, the oil's turned off. It's nine days now with no oil coming out of there for India. They go running back to Russia. Hey, buddy. Let's let's get back together. And Russia says, sure. That's great. But it's gonna cost you $89 now a barrel. No more friends and family program. Gonna get market conditions. Speaker 0: We've had many journalist friends that have had their bank accounts shut down. We were literally in the middle of an interview with a great journalist from the gray zone who found out that his banking was just shut down. Literally, in the middle of an interview, he got a message that his banking was shut down. Well, Rumble Wallet prevents that, because Rumble can't even touch it. No one can touch it. Rumble Wallet lets you control your money, not a bank, not a government, not a tech company, not even Rumble can touch it. It's yours, only yours, yours to protect your future and your family. You can buy and save digital assets like Bitcoin, Tether Gold, and now the new USA USA app USAT, which is Tether's US regulated stablecoin all in one place. Tether Gold is real gold on the blockchain with ownership of physical gold bars, and USAT keeps your money steady against inflation. No banks needed. It's not only a wallet to buy and save, but it also allows you to support your favorite creators by easily tipping them if you want with the click of a button. There'll be no fees when you tip our channel or others, and we actually receive the tip instantly unlike other platforms where we have to wait for payouts. So support our show today and other creators by clicking the tip button on our Rumble channel. Speaker 1: Now I wanna ask you about president Trump responding to CBS News reports that there may be mines in the Strait Of Hormuz. That doesn't make a ton of sense. He says we have no indication that they did, but they better not. But they are picking and choosing who gets to go through, and their allies can go through. So why would they mine their allies? What do we make of this? Do we need to respond to this at all? Speaker 4: Yeah. I don't think they've done it yet. But let's recall the last time Iran mined the Persian Gulf. They didn't mine the Strait Of Hormuz. They mined farther up. It was 1987, 1988. Why did they do that? Well, in September 1980, when Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski were still in office, The United States encouraged a guy named Saddam Hussein, don't know if you've ever heard of him, but they encouraged Saddam Hussein to launch a war against Iran. And then Ronald Reagan comes in with Donald Rumsfeld and Cap Weinberger, and by 1983 had provided chemical weapons, or the precursors that Iraq needed to build chemical weapons, and Iraq started using chemical weapons against Iran in 1983 and continued to do it in '84, 85, 86. During that entire time, Iran never retaliated with chemical weapons. They were not going because they saw it as an act against God. They were serious about the religion. So 'eighty seven, 'eighty eight, they start dropping mines there in the Persian Gulf. Well, at that time, they didn't have all these missiles, so the United States Navy, a Navy SEAL, a good friend of mine, set up what was called the Hercules barge, and he had a Navy SEAL unit with him, and they fought off attacks by Iranian gunboats. He had some Little Bird helicopters from the one sixtieth, the special operations wing of the Air Force. And but we ended up disrupting the Iranian plan to mine The Gulf back then. Well, we couldn't do that today. We do not have that capability because Iran would blow us out of the water with drones and with missiles. You as we've seen, it's been happening over the last ten days. So United States would be in a real pickle. Speaker 1: And especially given the rhetoric of US war hawks in power for three decades. Like Yeah. Yes. They kind of had to prepare all of this time. Did we think that they weren't paying attention when we said it to the world? Speaker 4: Well, when we're writing our own press clippings and then reading them, there is a tendency to say, god, I am great. Can you see this? How good we are? And so they really believed that our air def the Patriot air defense systems and the THAAD systems would be they they could shut down the Iranian missiles and drones. And what they discovered was, nope. They didn't work. And they worked at an even lower level than the you know, Pentagon kept foul. We're shooting down 90%.

Speaker 0: Take this in and understand what we’re actually dealing with. Many views exist—from Trump being a pedophile protecting pedophile buddies, to Israel infiltration and cover-ups, to it being a Democrat hoax. The reality, as described here, is that there is a supranational global cabal that has operated for nearly a hundred years, using money laundering, blackmail, drug trafficking, human trafficking, and other nefarious operations to fund and overthrow countries, serving as the shadow power of the world. We can see who these people are, their intentions, and the outcomes of their policies, and they are still being shoehorned into the most important positions in the world specifically because they’re part of this cabal. Main players mentioned include Larry Summers, who, per Epstein documents, was named executor of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate after his death. The money Epstein received from Les Wexner and others to create a starting fund and build a reputation as a financier is said to be returning to the coffers of Larry Summers, seen as part of this operation. The analogy is that this operation is like a corporation with Epstein as a brand under an umbrella, where if one asset (like Irish Spring) fails, its resources are absorbed back into the wider corporate structure. Summers, formerly Treasury Secretary, who helped destroy Glass-Steagall and contributed to the 2008 market crash dynamics, is said to have his bailout-money influence guided by Larry Fink at BlackRock. Summers, who was head of Harvard and later appointed to OpenAI’s board, is linked to the governance of the AI company behind ChatGPT. Larry Ellison is described as corresponding with Epstein and Ehud Barak (former Israeli prime minister) about which politicians serve their interests, including arranging a meeting between Marco Rubio and Tony Blair due to shared interests in this cabal. Epstein is depicted as a central, manipulative figure involved in selling weapons from Israel, meddling in elections, and influencing universities in Russia, raising questions about his influence and reach. The speaker emphasizes Epstein’s reach across political and corporate spheres and the question of his power, asking how such influence is possible. Speaker 1: The question is, how do you go about that? Speaker 0: He didn’t even go to school for trading; it’s all fabricated. He is a spymaster and a kingpin in a mafia. This group, including Les Wexner, Jeffrey Epstein, Larry Summers, Larry Ellison, Donald Trump (at this point), is part or perhaps the managing structure of the same organization discussed in the Eagle two documents from the 1960s, where the CIA sought autonomy from Congress by creating its own income streams, including drug trafficking in Vietnam. The opioid and drug-running links are tied to Iran-Contra, with George H. W. Bush involved in opium trade and the drug-running networks. Bill Gates and other figures are alleged to have involved in cover-ups during CIA-driven operations in South America, with Gary Webb’s Dark Alliance cited as exposing such networks. Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, when Bill was governor of Arkansas, allegedly helped run headquarters in Mina for flights to and from Colombia, spreading drugs across the United States. The assertion is that the same group runs drugs, rigs elections, and is involved in various crises, including alleged connections to COVID-19, Russiagate, 9/11, and the assassination of Charlie Kirk, forming a pattern of the last decades of upheaval in America. The discussion moves toward Epstein’s network and the sources of his money, with emails revealing connections, against a backdrop of broad search for Trump and the prevalence of unconfirmed, baseless anonymous claims. The core claim is that the true representation is the “new world order” and a banking-based intelligence network where intelligence agencies originated from banks. The CIA’s founding from the OSS is tied to MI6, which allegedly drew on the Rothschild banking intelligence, tying the CIA, MI6, and banking elites together. The speaker concludes that the same names—running drugs, stealing elections, burning down skyscrapers, and flying airplanes—appear repeatedly, linking DEI, ESG, white discrimination claims, and Epstein to the same global web.

The speaker mentions holding onto an old chart and suggests looking at what happened recently for a clearer picture.

Speaker 0 admits being on the wrong side of history multiple times.

If Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will be terminated, according to Speaker 0. Speaker 1 questions how this will be accomplished since Germany controls the project. Speaker 0 assures that they will find a way to make it happen.

We are discussing reaching the wall. Watch this.

The video launches with a provocative premise: the history we’ve been taught may hide the truth about who we are and what was here before us, using Sardinia, Italy, and the Giants of Monte Prama as a case study. After four excavations from 1975 to 1979, roughly 5,000 underground items were found at the site, including 15 heads and 22 torsos, among others. The claim is that many pieces were moved and stored for thirty years in the National Archaeological Museum of Cagliari, with the number of items and their condition allegedly undisclosed or unverifiable, and that only a subset has been exhibited while the rest remain hidden from the public view along with the statues. The speaker argues that archaeologists’ work would be illegal to perform today, yet the authorities publish numbers that are easily questioned. The video asserts that what is taught in schools is based on select pieces shown to the public, while the majority of finds were kept in basements or backrooms for decades. It is claimed that the restoration and subsequent display have been selective, with many pieces not accessible to the public and a broader narrative being pushed about the site’s significance, timeline, and origins. A central accusation is that Monte Prama’s timelines are manipulated. There’s criticism of dating, such as a late fourth-century BC abandonment versus other proposed centuries, asserting that the dates are “made up,” and that local or regional authorities have altered timelines to fit a narrative. The video references the use of local leaf tests to assert ages between the eleventh and eighth centuries BC, and claims these are debatable and not definitive proof of the site’s history. It contends that limestone preservation would require destructive testing or ancient processes, and argues that the heads have been damaged or removed, obscuring what the past looked like and what people held or wore. The narrator speculates about six fingers, watches, and other artifacts possibly hidden in the stonework, joking about Apple Watches, then insists that hands, feet, and other parts have been removed to conceal information. The Giants are described as over eight feet tall, with elongated heads and horns, and the video maintains that the depictions reveal a different history than the conventional narrative. It claims more than 25 statues existed, with the total later estimated to be 44, and asserts that more are stored in back rooms. The restoration project, the video asserts, should be transparent and livestreamed so the public can see the process. It accuses the group behind the official exhibition of manipulating information, destroying or hiding evidence, and restricting access to the site for decades. Beyond Sardinia, the discussion expands to the broader region, linking Sardinia to Syria (episode references Palmyra and the Temple of Baal) and touching on Georgia (the Lord’s Fortress), Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Tartaria. The narrator asserts that these regions contain melted rock-town structures and extensive tunnel networks, sometimes described as multi-level, ancient urban settlements connected by underground passages. Carbon dating is criticized as being unreliable for proving human presence at these sites, and there is a persistent assertion that mainstream archaeology fabricates or withholds the truth. In Georgia and adjacent regions, tunnels, staircases, and hidden halls are described as evidence of advanced subterranean civilizations, with claims that earthquakes or other disasters are misrepresented by mainstream accounts. The speaker references political figures and questionable provenance for dates, and ends by urging continued exploration and public scrutiny, implying a global pattern of hidden or manipulated premodern advanced knowledge. The closing note teases more content next Saturday, inviting viewers to weigh in on what is truly below the sand and what ancient civilizations might have built beneath the surface of the world.

Speaker 1 mentions ridiculous theories about Melania's statement, joking about a time traveler. They suggest a conspiracy involving the Democratic party using TEMO for a hit. Speaker 0 interrupts, ending the conversation.

The excerpt opens with a reference to a conference from many years ago, suggesting that the listener might have been in attendance. The exchange then shifts to a brief, awkward moment where someone apologizes and asks for permission to proceed, followed by a request for help. A responder states "No," and a separate remark introduces "the subpoena, for example," indicating a mention of a subpoena within the discussion. The conversation continues with an affirmative interjection—"Oh, good"—and a request: "Can you take off the stage?" The reactions include a startled "Wow" and a meta-comment noting the situation is starting in a dramatic way: "Getting off to a dramatic start already." The exchange ends with a clipped closing, simply "Well," signaling an unresolved or continuing moment in the dialogue. Overall, the passage captures a tense, performative moment at a conference, blending retrospective reference, administrative tension (subpoena), and a stage-direction style query, all underscored by a sense of escalating drama at the outset.

Elon Musk's cooperation and/or technical relationships with other countries is worthy of being looked at. The speaker is not suggesting Musk is doing anything inappropriate, but that these relationships warrant examination. There are many ways this could be investigated.

Speaker 0 questions if the claim of the bunkers being a major command center is true, as no conclusive proof has been shown. Speaker 1 interrupts and says "Christian" before the transcript ends.