reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 2009, the US government discussed the pros and cons of chemtrails, also known as solar radiation management and aerosol injections. They acknowledged that spraying chemicals into the sky would result in blank white skies but also create beautiful sunsets. In 2022, Luke Iseman founded a company called Make Sunsets, which received significant funding. A year later, NOAA signed a 200-year contract with Make Sunsets to spray chemicals worldwide to block the sun and reduce global temperatures. Interestingly, the contract does not mention creating sunsets but focuses on temperature reduction.

The U.S. is developing an early warning system to detect potential geoengineering efforts, particularly those that could manipulate weather, such as solar geoengineering. This initiative, taking place in a secure location in the Rockies, aims to alert scientists about attempts by foreign nations or wealthy individuals to alter sunlight. Concerns are rising about the unintended consequences of such actions, which could disrupt weather patterns and harm agriculture and economies. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) will monitor aerosol concentrations to identify anomalies. Meanwhile, Florida is moving to legislate against climate engineering practices, reflecting growing awareness and pushback against these technologies.

Utah is the first state to ban fluoride in drinking water, despite opposition from dentists and health organizations who believe this could cause medical problems. Republican Governor Spencer Cox signed the legislation, preventing cities and communities from adding fluoride to their water systems. Florida, Ohio, and South Carolina are reportedly considering similar measures.

The speaker introduces a bill to protect Tennessee's atmosphere from intentional manipulation through chemical injections. Doctors testify about the health and environmental risks associated with such actions, emphasizing the importance of sunlight for human health and crop production. They urge legislators to pass the bill to prevent harmful consequences.

Following a viral post by Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, a bill banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate, making it a third-degree felony to release chemicals or use devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicious activity. Proponents fear the weaponization of weather modification, citing insufficient scientific understanding. While cloud seeding is used to induce rain, supporters of the ban prefer to wait for more research. Meanwhile, a more moderate version in the Florida House codifies geoengineering and weather modification, which the governor opposes. Opponents of the ban worry that lawmakers are legislating based on "tinfoil theories" and moving too fast without proper methodology, potentially penalizing people without fully understanding the issue.

Following a viral post by GOP Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather to influence the 2024 election, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate. If signed into law, the bill bans releasing chemicals or using devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, punishable as a third-degree felony. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicions. Supporters of the ban cite insufficient scientific research and worry about the weaponization of weather modification. Cloud seeding, using silver iodide to induce rain, is a real practice, but some want to pause such activities. While the governor supports the ban, he opposes a House version that codifies geoengineering and weather modification. Opponents of the bill fear legislating based on "tinfoil theories" and argue for a more measured approach with proper methodology before imposing penalties.

A Politico expose revealed a secretive, multimillion-dollar ocean experiment, backed by crypto tycoons and elite philanthropists, to dim the sun and cool the planet. Researchers associated with the University of Washington's marine cloud brightening program planned a test larger than Puerto Rico but failed to notify California officials about an earlier, smaller trial. Emails show researchers considered massive tests off North America, Chile, or Africa, risking unpredictable weather shifts. Critics warn of potential consequences like wrecked farms, wildlife harm, and deadly termination shock, with some studies suggesting increased malaria or droughts. Politicians like Marjorie Taylor Greene are speaking out, and countries across Africa, Latin America, The Pacific, and Europe are signaling their support for the solar geoengineering nonuse agreement initiative. The Center for International Environmental Law highlights growing commitment to nonuse of solar geoengineering, citing the geopolitical, environmental, and social risks. The speaker suggests geoengineering has been happening for years and calls for a federal ban, considering foreign weather modification an act of war.

The speaker claims that airplanes are injecting aerosols containing chemicals like silver iodide, silver dioxide, aluminum barium, strontium, cadmium, polymers, microplastics, and black coal into the sky as nanoparticles. The speaker acknowledges that the full health ramifications are not understood, but believes the activity "cannot be good" and is an attempt to alter the environment by dimming the sun, as Bill Gates allegedly suggested. The speaker urges the committee to approve the bill and recommends increasing the criminal penalty to a felony, so pilots will reconsider dispersing these chemicals. The speaker also states that Representative Steele has observed extensive images of this activity from his farmland.

The speaker announces the filing of the Clear Skies Act, legislation to ban all weather modification and geoengineering. The goal is to protect the skies, water, atmospheres, and families. The speaker requests support for the Clear Skies Act.

The speakers discuss the concept of chemtrails, geoengineering, and solar radiation management. They highlight the irregular appearance of trails in the sky, the involvement of global governance in geoengineering, and the potential harm to human health. The speakers emphasize the need for public awareness and action to address the issue.

Legislation is being voted on in New Hampshire to ban climate engineering operations. The draft of this legislation is well-drafted and uses scientific terms and descriptions. It is important to circulate this draft to other states to raise awareness about the issue. The activities in our skies, which involve the release of various elements like aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, polymer fibers, surfactants, and graphene, have significant implications. Some of these elements, such as polymer fibers and graphene, are used militarily as carriers of pathogens. Therefore, there are multiple levels of concern regarding what is happening in our skies.

Louisiana has become the first state in the US to reject the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations (UN), and World Economic Forum (WEF) within its boundaries. The state senate passed a bill stating that these international bodies have no jurisdiction or power in Louisiana. The bill aims to protect state sovereignty and personal freedoms from overreach by globalist organizations. It is a response to concerns about vaccine safety and the influence of international organizations on domestic policy. The bill still needs to pass in the Louisiana House, but it sets the stage for a legal barrier against the power grab of these globalist entities.

Following a viral post by GOP Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather to influence the 2024 election, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate. If signed into law, the bill bans releasing chemicals or using devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, punishable as a third-degree felony. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicious activity. Senator Garcia stated the bill aims to prevent weather modification from being weaponized, while proponents cite insufficient scientific understanding and prefer a cautious approach. Cloud seeding, using silver iodide to induce rain, is a real practice, but some worry about its potential misuse. Meanwhile, a more moderate version in the Florida House codifies geoengineering and weather modification, which the governor opposes. Opponents of the ban, like State Senator Tina Polsky, express concern that the legislation is based on "tinfoil theories" and that lawmakers are moving too fast without proper methodology.

Weather modification, or cloud seeding, has been ongoing since the 1940s. Government documents and reports from NASA, the National Science Foundation, and the CIA confirm this, detailing substantial funding and research into techniques like seeding clouds with silver iodide or dry ice. Recent state legislation banning cloud seeding and stratospheric aerosol injections further validates its continued practice. While presented as beneficial, this involves spraying harmful chemicals, like sulfur dioxide, into the atmosphere. This raises concerns, especially considering the potential health effects and environmental damage caused by sulfur dioxide, a colorless toxic gas that contributes to acid rain. The practice is linked to efforts to combat global warming, raising questions about motivations and long-term consequences.

A bill is moving through the Panchatula legislature to end so-called chemtrails, which some lawmakers believe are chemicals dumped from aircraft to manipulate the weather. Representative Kimberly Landry Coates claims the bill addresses the growing problem of white lines in the sky, which she alleges are "chemtrails" made of nanochemicals that change the weather, including nanoparticles of aluminum and barium. Coates claims the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration sends chemicals into clouds to reflect sunlight and cool the Earth, but NOAA denies conducting weather modification experiments. Coates believes multiple groups and contractors are involved, with contracts from at least nine federal agencies. She says she sees these lines in the sky at least once a week. The bill passed the house with a mixed vote and will now go to the state senate.

Following a viral post by GOP Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claiming the federal government was controlling the weather to influence the 2024 election, Florida State Senator Eliana Garcia filed SB 56, banning weather modification in Florida. The bill passed the full senate. If signed into law, the bill bans releasing chemicals or using devices to affect temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, punishable as a third-degree felony. The Department of Environmental Protection will enforce the ban and operate a public hotline for reporting suspicions. Supporters of the ban cite insufficient scientific understanding and worry about the weaponization of weather modification. While cloud seeding is a real practice used to induce rain, some Florida lawmakers are concerned about geoengineering and weather modification. Opponents of the bill, like State Senator Tina Polsky, believe lawmakers are moving too fast and legislating based on "tinfoil theories" without proper methodology. The governor supports the ban but has concerns about a more moderate version in the Florida House.

Legislation is being proposed in the New Hampshire House of Representatives to make it illegal to intentionally release polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation. This news story highlights the efforts of lawmakers in New Hampshire to prohibit attempts to change the weather through scientific means. The speaker urges viewers to follow them for real news that is not covered by mainstream media.

A New Hampshire news story reports that legislation has been proposed in the state's House of Representatives to prohibit the intentional release of polluting emissions. This includes cloud seeding, weather modification, and excessive electromagnetic radio frequency and microwave radiation. The legislation would impose penalties for violations. According to the speaker, this is real news that people are not seeing on mainstream media.

Geoengineering, specifically the use of chemtrails to control weather and combat global warming, is being discussed and admitted by the establishment. The idea is to spray sulfuric acid or other particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. However, there are concerns about the health and environmental impacts of these chemicals. Some believe that the media is suppressing information about geoengineering, and there are claims that it is already being used. The presence of aluminum and other nanoparticles in the air is causing health problems and may be linked to the increase in diseases like dementia. The fight against geoengineering and the need for awareness and action are emphasized.

In Tennessee, chemtrails have been banned by Congress for over 30 days now. Previously, the sky was filled with stripes every day, but since the ban, not a single chemtrail has been seen. It's interesting how they disappeared once the ban was in place.

32 states are attempting to ban geoengineering in America. In Oklahoma, Senate Bill 430 was slashed by the energy subcommittee. A reporter from Veterans on Patrol News asked Governor Stitt if he would declare an emergency session to push the legislation through, but Stitt said no. His staff then questioned the reporter's credentials, asking if he was an activist or a journalist. The speaker encourages viewers to check on their state's progress and call their governors to demand a ban on geoengineering. The states listed are: Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming. The speaker urges Oklahoma residents to call Governor Stitt.

Speaker 0: Gates argues that our future thriving depends on science and technology. He mentions Beauverre, a feed additive for cows that is supposed to reduce methane but reportedly makes cows sick. Gates is also involved in stratospheric geoengineering via Scope X to dim the sun. A headline notes: “Bill Gates venture aims to spray dust in the atmosphere to block the sun. What could go wrong?” This was reported by Harvard and environmentalists protested, leading to its shutdown. Scientific American reported on this: “High profile engineering experiment shuts down.” Harvard shut it down, but the effort migrated to the UK, where it is described as a “secretive government unit planning to dim the sun.” The UK project is ARIA, the Advanced Research and Invention Agency, modeled after DARPA in the US. The difference is DARPA is military; ARIA is a public-private venture pursuing things “impossible to prove that are safe and effective,” like spraying things into the sky. There is concern about harms and potential climate catastrophe, as they actually implement. ARIA’s funding is reported as £800,000,000 over five years, with £184,000,000 allocated for 2025-2026. In comparison, DARPA in the US was given £4,000,000,000 in the same period. The bottom line is that ARIA is described as “running fast and loose, operating like a speculative venture capital firm with public money” and there is a lack of accountability. The UK government website states ARIA will be “a small body with minimal administrative capacity” and that it will “remove the burden of processing Freedom of Information requests,” i.e., no FOIA access. ARIA is pursuing climate interventions because climate models show warming, but climate models are said to “run hot,” potentially exaggerating impacts of global warming. The idea of stratospheric geoengineering from ARIA rests on a contested premise. Speaker 1: During a conference at Cambridge’s Center for Climate Repair, Robert Chris, an independent researcher, discusses five UK geoengineering trials funded to combat global warming and has written a book on geoengineering policy. He discusses stratospheric geoengineering but notes concerns about failures to control carbon emissions and argues some consider it necessary to avert ecosystem and societal collapse, perhaps solar geoengineering as the price for inadequate climate response. Speaker 2: Others push back, saying climate interventions interfere with nature, and that humanity already interferes with nature. They argue the Anthropocene implies a permanent responsibility to manage the climate system. Another speaker notes that “we now have a permanent responsibility to play God,” criticizing the move to influence Earth and the atmosphere. There is critique of academic authorship and power, and a call to reduce human population to 1800 levels to solve the problem. Speaker 0: A UK petition gathered over 160,000 signatures urging the government to “make all forms of geoengineering affecting the environment illegal,” prompting a government response that “the government is not in favor of using solar radiation modification and has no plans for deployment.” Nevertheless, ARIA reportedly aims to advance such work. ICANN (an organization) has monitored this since it has challenged both UK and US representations on geoengineering. ICANN highlights that unlike other programs that limit to computer modeling, ARIA’s plan “will conduct outdoor experiments to test and validate sun blocking methods.” ICANN has pushed petitions in California as well. Speaker 0: ICANN has pressed the EPA to probe a geoengineering startup, Making Sunsets, which purportedly releases sulfur dioxide. EPA demands answers from the company following legal letters from ICANN. Lee Zeldin labeled the venture as deploying criteria air pollutants to earn cooling credits, underscoring regulatory concerns. ICANN emphasizes vigilance over governments—public or private—attempting to dim the sun and its potential impact on life.

Chemtrails are discussed as a natural occurrence linked to jet fuel burning. Various entities like NOAA and NASA are mentioned as utilizing aerosol spraying for research purposes in the stratosphere. The conversation also touches on a congressionally mandated research plan related to solar radiation modification released by the White House in June 2023.

New Hampshire lawmakers have proposed legislation that would make it illegal to intentionally release polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation. This news story highlights the growing concern about changing the weather through scientific means. The speaker urges viewers to follow them for more real news that is not covered by mainstream media.

I'm here to discuss House File 191, a bill to prohibit geoengineering, while also urging you to consider Senate File 142 as a superior alternative. Inspired by Tennessee's recent law and similar considerations in other states, as well as discussions in the EU and White House policy documents, this legislation addresses the potential for polluting atmospheric activities like cloud seeding and weather engineering. Past congressional hearings and Council on Foreign Relations discussions highlight the urgent need for regulation. Iowa is behind on this issue, and failure to act puts our health, well-being, and economic prosperity at risk. This bill is a necessary fact-finding exercise because the absence of information justifies a prohibition to gather data. I urge swift action in delivering Senate File 142 to the governor. It is the very least the people of Iowa can expect.