reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Kristen McGinkelly, a senior industrial hygienist cross-credentialed in public health, states she and Tammy Clark are the only two subject matter experts in the room. She asserts: “Masks do not stop aerosols.” She condemns Adams’ statement as disgusting and says, “I apologize that you all had to hear to an official speaking from his rear.” She adds, “Speaking of the rear, you spread aerosols through your rear. Are we gonna put masks under children's rears?”
McGinkelly argues that if this were about public health professionals, they would have implemented measures such as “toilet seat covers over the toilets,” and would have removed air dryers because aerosols can stay suspended in the air for up to thirty days. Referring to industrial hygiene expertise, she says, “If you were an industrial hygienist, you would calculate through Stokes’ law, and you would have figured that out.”
She mentions a commissioner in a dark colored mask who allegedly called Steven Petty, one of the highest credentialed industrial hygienists, professional engineers, and certified safety professionals, a “quack.” She identifies Petty as “the top exposure scientist in this country, the lead exposure scientist on the Monsanto cases,” who has “put videos on Rumble telling you that masks do not stop a virus because industrial hygienists, we conducted baseline surveys.”
McGinkelly asks, “Where's your baseline surveys? Where's Adam's baseline surveys?” She defines a baseline survey as “when you say something's wrong, you put in a control, you go back, you verify the confidence in those controls, and if they don't work, you remove them.” She alleges the measures “didn't work” and caused self and cross contamination.
She asks: “Children are dying? Is it because of the treatment that was withheld? Are children dying because of suicide?” She notes that some states do not mask their children and claims that Tammy Clark and she traveled to those states “on our own dime.” McGinkelly identifies herself as a United States Air Force disabled veteran and states she is “in my own litigation because of discrimination,” affirming support for the bus drivers and referencing OSHA rule five and discrimination.
She concludes with claims of violations: “OSHA rule five, file OSHA discrimination,” and asserts “There are violations under the general duty clause. OSHA recordable.”