TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We've learned that the Intelligence Community's Inspector General can't provide any information about contacts between the majority and the whistleblower before his involvement. The only way to obtain that information is from the majority themselves. They are fact witnesses in the same investigation they are running. Nowhere else in America can you be both a fact witness and the prosecutor in an investigation, especially one to remove a president. It's entirely inappropriate. Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation where his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the process.

Please take your seat. Because some members are still disrupting decorum, I am directing the sergeant at arms to restore order, and remove this gentleman from the chamber.

I have the floor and expect to be heard. I changed the topic to cause conflict, which is not appropriate. As a member of parliament, this committee used to be peaceful until you arrived. You need to speak respectfully to your colleagues and not try to intimidate us. Canadians want to hear from the witnesses, and we demand that. Dr. Lewis and Miss O'Connell should be allowed to speak. Let's all show respect for each other, as is the standard practice in this committee. We should not bring the issues from other committees into this room.

Stop! This has gone too far. I have a duty to be in this room, representing 200,000 people from Northwest Georgia who elected me to be here today.

The speaker accuses others of lying to the American people and challenges Hunter Biden's attorney to make claims on national television. He highlights his Navy background before being interrupted by a member questioning decorum rules for witnesses. The chair allows the speaker to continue his statement, emphasizing the importance of the facts for the American people.

I don't understand why the committee skipped over 30 years of my career and focused on a past incident from graduate school. We should be looking at the last three and a half years because people were killed in a terrorist act. The special agent found that I was involved and I apologize for lying to the committee. I was fired for it.

I don't want to be seen as a hostile witness. My presence here is not meant to be hostile. I want to clarify that Miss Willis is the adverse witness, not me. Her interests go against Miss Merchant's and are contrary to democracy, but not to mine.

Points of order attacking the president are not allowed during today's impeachment inquiry hearing. Members are encouraged to speak openly.

The speaker accuses others of lying and challenges Hunter Biden's attorney to make claims on national TV. He highlights his Navy background before being interrupted by a member questioning decorum rules for witnesses. The chairman allows the speaker to continue his statement, emphasizing the importance of the facts for the American people.

We've learned that the Intelligence Community's Inspector General can't provide information about contact between the majority and the whistleblower before the whistleblower's involvement. The only source for this information is the majority themselves. They are fact witnesses in the very investigation they're leading. In the United States, it is unheard of for someone to be both a fact witness and a prosecutor, especially in an investigation to potentially remove a president. It's inappropriate, and Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from leading an investigation where his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the process.

Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation because his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process. The speaker has not spoken directly with the whistleblower but would like to. Acclaimed Republican Intelligence Committee members question this.

The committee will come to order. Individuals disrupting the hearing will be removed by Capitol Police. Disruptions from the audience will not be tolerated while the committee conducts its business. The secretary will resume.

I would like to reclaim my time and address the chairman. It seems that Hunter is afraid of what I have to say. It's unfortunate that I burst their bubble.

Given continued disruptions, I'm directing the sergeant at arms to restore order and remove this individual from the chamber. Members, please maintain decorum in the House.

Thank you, Madam Chair, and Ranking Member Keating. Mr. Chairman, please repeat your introduction. What is the standard you are setting here? Please repeat what you just said when you introduced a duly elected representative from the United States of America. "The representative from Delaware, Mr. McBride." Mr. Chairman, you are out of order! Have you no decency? I've gotten to know you a little bit, and this is not decent. I will not continue this hearing unless you introduce a duly elected representative the right way. This hearing is adjourned.

I thank you for being here, Mr. Mayorkas. Your actions have been watched closely, and it is believed that you have lied. The American public sees this too. You are seen as a threat to freedom and rights, but thankfully the first amendment exists to stop you. Your accusations are untrue.

The speaker accuses others of lying and challenges Hunter Biden's attorney to make claims on national television. He highlights his Navy background before being interrupted by a member questioning decorum rules for witnesses. The chairman allows the speaker to continue his statement, emphasizing the importance of sharing facts with the American people.

I will not call on you if you yell, and you're wasting time because Dr. Fauci has to leave soon. I'm not engaging in a back-and-forth. It's not your turn. Don't look at me; it's your first question. You should call on people across the room. She has a valid question about the origin of COVID. I hear the question, but we're not proceeding as you wish. This is disrespectful. I'm done with this. Simon, I'm finished with you right now. Go ahead.

Order must be restored. I've observed persistent and intentional disruptions of decorum. Therefore, I instruct the sergeant at arms to restore order and remove the members who are not following the rules.

Speaker 0: I’m a little pissed at the New York Times, honestly. But since you’re listening, I believe in your mission. When you write a technically completely illiterate article, you lose a lot of credibility if people are technical. That article about us being a surveillance thing is like where it’s all implied, what we do. The problem is you lose credibility with anyone who goes on the thing. That’s damaging for our democracy. Speaker 1: ask you this. And I’ll Speaker 0: look left and right. One thing I would say to people in the audience: you know you’re a lot of you think I’m right. And you know your spouse, your relative, your child, the person at work would be horrified if they knew it. You better speak up, because everyone who thinks I’m a ridiculous fascist, they’re speaking up. They write about it every day. If you do not speak up, the people who are disagreeing with me or think I’m stupid a lot, I disagree with myself. So, you have to speak up. And you cannot blame the far left, far right idiots. When they speak up for their views, do you speak up for your views? Where? Do you tell your colleague, I bet you at The New York Times a lot of people read that article about us and were ashamed. Did you go to your editor and say, how can you write something that’s technically illiterate? The guy might be a fascist, but this is technically illiterate. Okay. Speaker 1: Let me ask you different question. Speaker 0: Did you or didn’t you? Because I’m the only one speaking up. You’re gonna get a world of technical illiteracy on the right, on the left, and in the middle. Speaker 1: Alex, help me with this. A lot of Speaker 0: people

I'm here to address any valid questions from Chairman Comer and the House Oversight Committee at a public hearing. My purpose is to prevent the committee's unjust investigations into my family from moving forward based on false information, manipulated evidence, and falsehoods.

I am here to testify and confirm that I will speak the truth. The witness has acknowledged this. I appreciate the opportunity to address the committee. I have spent the last 30 years in public service, striving to fulfill the needs of the people. The committee accuses me of pay-to-play, but I accuse them of the same. They only play politics when it benefits them. I believe they are all serving their own interests. I will continue my statement, as I am not finished. I am accused of breaking the rules, but I am playing by the rules we all agreed upon. The system is corrupt, and you wanted someone like me to guard it. You don't care about my values, just my actions. I don't care if you love or hate me, as long as I win. The rules are rigged, and reason is dead. There is no right or wrong, only being in or out.

I made a mistake in calling Mr. Parnas a Republican witness, he is actually your witness. I was a Republican for Trump. The committee is in recess due to votes, we will reconvene in 10 minutes.

The speaker accuses others of lying and challenges Hunter Biden's defense attorney to make claims on national television. He highlights his Navy background and technology officer role. There is a disruption, with a member questioning the witness's behavior. The chairman clarifies that decorum applies to members, not witnesses. The witness is asked to continue his opening statement, emphasizing the importance of the facts for the American people.

Mister Parnas questions the committee about text messages from Mister Bob. Mister Chairman interrupts, saying there's no time for Democratic games. Parnas insists on discussing important investigative matters. The chairman grants Parnas 7 minutes, equal to Bobolinski's time.